FxMasterz:


Not so. I'm just really offended that you guys have dragged many souls to hell, and you here are still supporting the obvious evils even after you have read about it in black and white. You've even watched videos as well, yet you remain adamant. Your reluctance to even verify the information as a honest seeker of truth is the most worrisome. Each time you read about the honest findings of people here about the satanic organization to which you belong, your only robotic response is Better Performing Organization. You've been messed up. You look absolutely irredeemable but Jesus Christ can still deliver you if you humble yourself before Him.

The bolded is the reason why Almighty God and Jesus are totally against twisting, adding and subtracting from the word of God. Doing that diverts Christians direction from the road to Life in Heaven. This is why their Bible is dangerous. If God is this disgusted at this despicable act as shown in the verses below, just imagine the looks on his face and that of Jesus when they see JWs go out to preach with those manipulated verses to Deceive people. Why do you think they are rejected all the time when they go out to preach? If their Bible wasn't manipulated, they won't have this high rejection rate. It doesn't ever register in their Brains as to why they keep getting rejected.

Courz:


The bolded is the reason why Almighty God and Jesus are totally against twisting, adding and subtracting from the word of God. Doing that diverts Christians direction from the road to Life in Heaven. This is why their Bible is dangerous. If God is this disgusted at this despicable act as shown in the verses below, just imagine the looks on his face and that of Jesus when they see JWs go out to preach with those manipulated verses to Deceive people. Why do you think they are rejected all the time when they go out to preach? If their Bible wasn't manipulated, they won't have this high rejection rate. It doesn't ever register in their Brains as to why they keep getting rejected.

Maxindhouse, Aemmyjah, Janosky and Michael547, attached below is the reason why your Bible is very dangerous as indicated at the bolded.

Repent before it's too late.

FxMasterz:


Maxindhouse, Aemmyjah Janosky and Michael547, have you seen how your organization also manipulated someone's book to support their deceptive ideologies? Those who can manipulate the Bible would manipulate anything anyway. I just want to show you that the author of the book they manipulated has disowned them in the letter attached.

Thanks Emusan for this.

Let me give you an example of misquoting of Scholars that Watchtower does. Watchtower was trying to explain to JWs in their publication proof that Jesus wasn't crucified on the Cross. They went to quote an Imperial Bible dictionary meaning of cross. In the quote, they selected the part where the dictionary mentioned that the Romans originally killed criminals by hanging them on a stake. Watchtower stopped there and said, See? Even the dictionary agrees that Jesus wasn't crucified on a cross but on a stake. What JWS didn't know is that, that wasn't all that the dictionary said. The quote didn't end there. The dictionary also said that the Romans then changed their mode of killing by introducing a cross beam across the stake and this eventually became the common way to kill even during the time of Jesus. Watchtower ignored this part but quoted the part that favoured their doctrine. Can you see the Fraud? The good thing is the words of Jesus to Thomas already proved that he was crucified on the Cross by saying mentioning the mark of nails, not One Nail but nails on his hands.

There are many other examples of Watchtower selecting quotes of sources that favour them and then ignoring the ones that don't. This shows that anything Watchtower quotes and adds ellipsis at the end, you must go and find that source and read it for yourself to make sure they mentioned everything. Or else, you will be deceived.

Courz:


Let me give you an example of misquoting of Scholars that Watchtower does. Watchtower was trying to explain to JWs in their publication proof that Jesus wasn't crucified on the Cross. They went to quote an Imperial Bible dictionary meaning of cross. In the quote, they selected the part where the dictionary mentioned that the Romans originally killed criminals by hanging them on a stake. Watchtower stopped there and said, See? Even the dictionary agrees that Jesus wasn't crucified on a cross but on a stake. What JWS didn't know is that, that wasn't all that the dictionary said. The quote didn't end there. The dictionary also said that the Romans then changed their mode of killing by introducing a cross beam across the stake and this eventually became the common way to kill even during the time of Jesus. Watchtower ignored this part but quoted the part that favoured their doctrine. Can you see the Fraud? The good thing is the words of Jesus to Thomas already proved that he was crucified on the Cross by saying mentioning the mark of nails, not One Nail but nails on his hands.

There are many other examples of Watchtower selecting quotes of sources that favour them and then ignoring the ones that don't. This shows that anything Watchtower quotes and adds ellipsis at the end, you must go and find that source and read it for yourself to make sure they mentioned everything. Or else, you will be deceived.

This is really serious o! Jesus Christ!

Maxindhouse, Aemmyjah, Janosky and Michael547, please read the above post very well with full understanding. Read the attached screenshots too.

FxMasterz:


Have you ever seen a honest, true seeking Christian who depends on King James alone like you do your new world translation?

Or has King James ever claimed to be the only true Bible like your organization claims for your book?

Which Bible is the only true Bible

Aemmyjah:




Which Bible is the only true Bible

Is your New World Translation heavily manipulated or not?

Aemmyjah:
Which Bible is the only true Bible

This is one of the reasons why it's you people who don't reason and think outside what you brainwashed with.

THE ONLY TRUE CHURCH
THE ONLY TRUE BIBLE
bla bla bla

We have the manuscripts and people have tried for centuries to TRANSLATE it to various languages by getting closer to the original languages. This has made people to enroll in Hebrew, Latin, Greek so that they can well grounded and equipped for their translations but only NWT version was done in other to support DOCTRINES without adequate knowledge of the written languages of the scriptures.

Even the manuscripts in possession today aren't the actual written of the Apostles.

So why will any reasonable person ask, which Bible is the ONLY TRUE Bible?

Emusan:


This is one of the reasons why it's you people who don't reason and think outside what you brainwashed with.

THE ONLY TRUE CHURCH
THE ONLY TRUE BIBLE
bla bla bla

We have the manuscripts and people have tried for centuries to TRANSLATE it to various languages by getting closer to the original languages. This has made people to enroll in Hebrew, Latin, Greek so that they can well grounded and equipped for their translations but only NWT version was done in other to support DOCTRINES without adequate knowledge of the written languages of the scriptures.

Even the manuscripts in possession today aren't the actual written of the Apostles.

So why will any reasonable person ask, which Bible is the ONLY TRUE Bible?

If you cannot answer that simple question
Then you have no authority to question or say anything about the NWT which is easy t to understand and free
Continue to peddle other Bibles to make profit

FxMasterz:


Is your New World Translation heavily manipulated or not?

The simple answer is NO

My question, is the authoritative Bibles such as KJV free from errors, additions, distortions of what is found in many reliable manuscripts or not? Yes or No?

Aemmyjah:




The simple answer is NO

My question, is the authoritative Bibles such as KJV free from errors, additions, distortions of what is found in many reliable manuscripts or not? Yes or No?

Is the KJV your standard?

What's your concern about the KJV? Do you want to use the KJV to measure your book?

You yourself know that you're a liar for answering 'No' regarding the manipulation of your book.

Now, defend this answer by proving to us that the book is not manipulated!

FxMasterz:


Is the KJV your standard?

What's your concern about the KJV? Do you want to use the KJV to measure your book?

You yourself know that you're a liar for answering 'No' regarding the manipulation of your book.

Now, defend this answer by proving to us that the book is not manipulated!

What then is standard
Is the Bible written in English?

Aemmyjah:
If you cannot answer that simple question
Then you have no authority to question or say anything about the NWT which is easy t to understand and free
Continue to peddle other Bibles to make profit

I should answer a question that didn't make any sense in the first place.

FxMasterz:


Is the KJV your standard?

What's your concern about the KJV? Do you want to use the KJV to measure your book?

You yourself know that you're a liar for answering 'No' regarding the manipulation of your book.

Now, defend this answer by proving to us that the book is not manipulated!

What are you using to judge our books then?
Ur malicious envy


The image below is the preface of the Revised standard version
It acknowledges that the KJV is marred with errors and mistakes yet it follows the KJV tradition, like many other translations to remove God's name and replace with Lord even where the manuscripts had the DIVINE NAME there. Did the translators not also have a knowledge of Greek, Hebrew n Latin?
Who gave them the authority that the use of God's name is no longer appropriate? They'd have lost millions of it was some other books yet we restored it to where they belong and you call it manipulative

You're not serious
Blind, pitiable envious person
Enter a nursery 2 classroom and beg them to say shame on you

Emusan:


I should answer a question that didn't make any sense in the first place.

You're free to decide what makes sense to you or what doesn't make sense
Old man
There's thousands of Bible translations
Is the KJV which is the most authoritative and popular Bible the true translation? You cannot answer
Which one is true and on what basis? You cannot answer

There's thousands of religion
Mention your own if it is true and I'll consider joining, you cannot mention

Bunch of envious people

Aemmyjah:
What are you using to judge our books then?
Ur malicious envy

The image below is the preface of the Revised standard version
It acknowledges that the KJV is marred with errors and mistakes yet it follows the KJV tradition, like many other translations to remove God's name and replace with Lord even where the manuscripts had the DIVINE NAME there.

Now you agree with RSV about their stand on KJV, will you agree with them on NWT?

KJV even though used the name Jehovah in some places, still shows they KNOW about the name and the name can't be lost. Which means Watchtower isn't the one who RESTORED THE NAME.

Did the translators not also have a knowledge of Greek, Hebrew n Latin?

They did and the reason why many translators didn't include the name are:

1. They follow the tradition of the Jews of not pronouncing the name and used Lord in place wherever the name is used.
2. The pronunciation of the name has lost even though an attempt has been made to restore its pronunciation which can't still be term original.
3. Base on the NT manuscripts in possession today, no single place where the name was used by any New Testament writers.

Who gave them the authority that the use of God's name is no longer appropriate?

This has happened even before Jesus was born and during the time of Jesus.

Yet Jesus didn't do anything about it.

So why do you want to blame English translators for what even Jesus didn't correct Himself?

They'd have lost millions of it was some other books yet we restored it to where they belong and you call it manipulative

Your selective restore.

Why did Watchtower not used the name in some places where the NT writers quoted the OT where the name appears?

Why did NWT include the name in the New Testament when it was never used by NT writers?

Meanwhile, are you not the one who said KJV used it in some places?

Aemmyjah:
You're free to decide what makes sense to you or what doesn't make sense

If your point or question make any sense, it will be addressed.

Old man
There's thousands of Bible translations

Now, you just used the right WORD "Bible TRANSLATION"

You see the reason I said your question doesn't make sense then?

Is the KJV which is the most authoritative and popular Bible the true translation?

KJV is not the True Translation of the Bible even though some consider the work okay.

You cannot answer

I've answered

Which one is true and on what basis? You cannot answer

You're still being deceived by which one is TRUE

For goodness sake, it's a translation. How can you ask if TRANSLATION IS TRUE.

YOU CAN ONLY ASK IF THEY ARE ACCURATE.

O MA ṢE OOOO

There's thousands of religion
Mention your own if it is true and I'll consider joining, you cannot mention

Bunch of envious people

From Translation to THOUSANDS OF RELIGION

So, KJV is a religion to you.

Aemmyjah:


What are you using to judge our books then?
Ur malicious envy


The image below is the preface of the Revised standard version
It acknowledges that the KJV is marred with errors and mistakes yet it follows the KJV tradition, like many other translations to remove God's name and replace with Lord even where the manuscripts had the DIVINE NAME there. Did the translators not also have a knowledge of Greek, Hebrew n Latin?
Who gave them the authority that the use of God's name is no longer appropriate? They'd have lost millions of it was some other books yet we restored it to where they belong and you call it manipulative

You're not serious
Blind, pitiable envious person
Enter a nursery 2 classroom and beg them to say shame on you

Stop asking foolish questions please. I want intelligent questions.

We have told you several times to check your books against original manuscripts. We've told you several times that your translators don't know either Greek or Hebrew. It has been demonstrated here with good authority that your book has been heavily manipulated.

Has anyone mentioned to you that KJV is used to measure your book before you spewed all these trash?

FxMasterz:


Stop asking foolish questions please. I want intelligent questions.

We have told you several times to check your books against original manuscripts. We've told you several times that your translators don't know either Greek or Hebrew. It has been demonstrated here with good authority that your book has been heavily manipulated.

Has anyone mentioned to you that KJV is used to measure your book before you spewed all these trash?

Oga
Is it right for translations to replace the divine name with LORD cos they think it is inappropriate
That's the biggest manipulation of the scriptures ever
Simpleton like you will not ask them why they deviated from the original manuscripts
Your envy don de choke u

Emusan:


If your point or question make any sense, it will be addressed.



Now, you just used the right WORD "Bible TRANSLATION"

You see the reason I said your question doesn't make sense then?



KJV is not the True Translation of the Bible even though some consider the work okay.



I've answered



You're still being deceived by which one is TRUE

For goodness sake, it's a translation. How can you ask if TRANSLATION IS TRUE.

YOU CAN ONLY ASK IF THEY ARE ACCURATE.

O MA ṢE OOOO



From Translation to THOUSANDS OF RELIGION

So, KJV is a religion to you.

As you old reach with children
You cannot even comprehend simple comments cos I differentiated between different translations and different religions

Old man like you without sense


Emusan my child, mention one true Bible translation

Aemmyjah:



Oga
Is it right for translations to replace the divine name with LORD cos they think it is inappropriate
That's the biggest manipulation of the scriptures ever
Simpleton like you will not ask them why they deviated from the original manuscripts
Your envy don de choke u

Lol. They translated the name, not replace it. 'The Lord', is a translation of the name. Not a replacement.

Even in your books, they translated it to Latin. Jehovah isn't the name in the original language. The name Jehovah is neither Hebrew nor Greek. Don't be ignorant.

It seems your lame excuse is to validate the manipulation in your books by accusing KJV of the same manipulation. If you say your book is not manipulated, provide evidence against the proofs given on this thread.

Why do you guys like doing hide and seek? You don't ever answer any question directly because you know that the right answer is your coffin.

Aemmyjah:
As you old reach with children
You cannot even comprehend simple comments cos I differentiated between different translations and different religions

Old man like you without sense


Emusan my child, mention one true Bible translation

Anyone who lacks proper upbringing is the one behaving like this.

Nothing like TRUE Bible Translation.

We can only have ACCURATE TRANSLATION

O ma ṣe oooo

FxMasterz:


Maxindhouse, Aemmyjah, Janosky and Michael547, if you know this and continue to be deceived, you're compound fools.

If you didn't know this before, and reading it now, you fail to confirm the information and review your standing with the organization, something is definitely wrong with your head. You need to get treated ASAP. That's not ordinary.

😂😂🤣😂🤣😂

FxMasterz:


My dear, don't be stupid. Please I beg you for the sake of your eternity.

There's a reason why some of us don't trust the Pope, but of course not the Bible translation that are translated by trained scholars in the source languages of the Bible. We didn't even trust their scholarship, as right thinking humans we have gone to verify if the translations were done in complete honesty before we can accept them. This can't be said of you, you see how foolish your response is? You hang your life on the translations of people who know neither Greek nor Hebrew. Something is wrong somewhere if you're still defending this nonsense.

When a foundation is built on lies and manipulations, the fruit it yields will be liars and manipulators

FxMasterz:


Keep your mouth shut with the better performing organization nonsense. Better performing organization of fraudsters who mistranslate scriptures to suit their own ideologies. No fear of God whatsoever! So an organization that deliberately manipulated scriptures is a better performance organization? Something must be wrong with you.

Best imperfect organization on earth

I don't know what criteria they used in determining that

FxMasterz:


Not so. I'm just really offended that you guys have dragged many souls to hell, and you here are still supporting the obvious evils even after you have read about it in black and white. You've even watched videos as well, yet you remain adamant. Your reluctance to even verify the information as a honest seeker of truth is the most worrisome. Each time you read about the honest findings of people here about the satanic organization to which you belong, your only robotic response is Better Performing Organization. You've been messed up. You look absolutely irredeemable but Jesus Christ can still deliver you if you humble yourself before Him.

They will easily tell others to verify their beliefs, tell them same thing they cry blue murder

Aemmyjah:



King James is completely honest shey?

Back to questions when caught in his stupid apostate peddling

Aemmyjah:


Well
Our publications do not force any reader to accept it's message
We just show you all the details about popular practices and doctrines in a logical manner?
We have used the same question to address other things such as
Should you believe in angels
Should you believe in God
Should you believe in the Bible


Your low level of thinking won't allow you to reason properly

As usual you must display your stupid apostate peddling brains. After your lies and manipulations were exposed. You resort to attacking him by stating....

Your low level of thinking

Since you realise indeed your lies and manipulations are being exposed . Then ended up with....

We just show you all the details about popular practices and doctrines in a logical manner?

Oya advance more madness and insanities peddling from your brains

achorladey:


Best imperfect organization on earth

I don't know what criteria they used in determining that

Because they go from house to house and don't join the army, according to Maxindhouse. That's the criteria. Very hilarious.

FxMasterz:


Maxindhouse, Aemmyjah, Janosky, Michael547. By now, you are supposed to have followed that link and researched more on this subject.

Every right thinking person knows that the GB didn't birth Christianity. They also received it. Christianity has its foundation upon which everyone must build. The original manuscripts for example are the foundations for any other language translation. Except for someone bent on mischief, all translations must remain true to the original manuscripts. Any translation that says something different from what the original writings say is trying to pull people away from the faith and give them another religion - a fake gospel.

Without doubt, your New Worlds Translation have DELIBERATELY changed, mistranslated removed several verses from the original translations. Definitely, what you're holding in your hand differs greatly from the original manuscripts. Some of the words are not the Words of Jesus, and a great deal of the ideas were not held by the apostles. You yourselves have never denied this claim. Which means you already know. Except you're an agent of Satan, you would not continue supporting such deception.

If what you hold defers from what the apostles believed in, then you're really endangering your soul.

Jude 1:3
"Beloved, although I made every effort to write to you about the salvation we share, I felt it necessary to write and urge you to contend earnestly for the faith entrusted once for all to the saints."

By confirming the originality of biblical writings and taking a stand for the honest and undiluted translation of Scripture, you're obeying the Lord by CONTENDING EARNESTLY FOR THE FAITH WHICH WAS ONCE FOR ALL ENTHRUSTED UNTO THE SAINTS.

You should know they have their own REAL GOOD NEWS . Captured in their own religious publications delivered to them in the 20th century different from the one Jude talked about.

achorladey:


You should know they have their own REAL GOOD NEWS . Captured in their own religious publications delivered to them in the 20th century different from the one Jude talked about.

Hmmmmmm.

FxMasterz:


The bolded applies to you 100%.

What we're talking about is the heavy manipulation of someone's book and the heavy manipulation of the Bible. Who's asking you how you arrived at the questions of Should you believe in Angels, etc. Please read well before responding.

Na deflection tactics to draw you into their usual madness and insanities peddling

FxMasterz:


If you can't defend your nation, why should you defend yourself? Why should you call on the same law enforcements you say you discourage people from enlisting in?

Is that not hypocrisy? They want to eat and reap from what and where they did not sow