.

This is nice. At least you aren't shifting the burden of proof...Please prove that that the Gods of human religions are false.

Ranchhoddas:
This is nice. At least you aren't shifting the burden of proof...Please prove that that the Gods of human religions are false.

Pick a god, any God. I'll prove he/she/it is false.

SeunLanLege:


Pick a god, any God. I'll prove he/she/it is false.

Yahweh. As presented by David Oyedepo of Winners Chapel.

Gnostic is on the position of knowledge
Atheism is a Stand on A Lack of belief

SeunLanLege:


Pick a god, any God. I'll prove he/she/it is false.

Wtf is wrong wif u?

EyeHateGod:

Wtf is wrong wif u?

seunlanlege you said this thread ain't for theist why try to engage them here

stephenmorris:
seunlanlege you said this thread ain't for theist why try to engage them here

Ranchhoddas is an atheist as far as I know

EyeHateGod:

Wtf is wrong wif u?

Whats the problem?

SeunLanLege:


Whats the problem?

Don't derail ur Thread

Problem with Gnostic Atheism is that it's more like saying



" I KNOW there is no God".


But then; who/what is God


There is no "real" definiton of a god yet; we have descripitions from a real and personoid being to an impersonal force.

Gnostic Atheism is saying that ALL these definitions/forms which God can come is false. That no such higher being or force exists. That you KNOW it doesn't.



That position, to me a position of faith; the kind of weak faith we often accuse theists of. It's no less different than a Gnostic theism even if diametrically opposite. It can even; conceivably; be classifed as a sort of religion in itself.


So I dunno. Laying it out that you KNOW there is no god only opens a box of even more catchy arguments and really crappy analogies.



















But hey, What do I know

SirWere:
Problem with Gnostic Atheism is that it's more like saying



" I KNOW there is no God".


But then; who/what is God


There is no "real" definiton of a god yet; we have descripitions from a real and personoid being to an impersonal force.

Gnostic Atheism is saying that ALL these definitions/forms which God can come is false. That no such higher being or force exists. That you KNOW it doesn't.



That position, to me a position of faith; the kind of weak faith we often accuse theists of. It's no less different than a Gnostic theism even if diametrically opposite. It can even; conceivably; be classifed as a sort of religion in itself.


So I dunno. Laying it out that you KNOW there is no god only opens a box of even more catchy arguments and really crappy analogies.



















But hey, What do I know

The label "Atheism" was Born as a result of theism.
There are no diverse definitions of god. There is only one as described by human religions which I know without a doubt is false.

The term "god" doesn't equal "creator of the universe". It is a placeholder for human ignorance.

And as such if there was a creator, we wouldn't call him /her/it "god" we would call him /her/it "creator".

SeunLanLege:


The label "Atheism" was Born as a result of theism.
There are no diverse definitions of god. There is only one as described by human religions which I know without a doubt is false.

The term "god" doesn't equal "creator of the universe". It is a placeholder for human ignorance.

And as such if there was a creator, we wouldn't call him /her/it "god" we would call him /her/it "creator".

it seems you read my posts on thinkers lodge,,,,,,,,,,,,,,i asked a question why can't we have a creator who is not a GOD