Since the advent of the trend of "fact checking" I can count the entire times a single individual has been "fact checked" in one hand, well except Peter Obi.

It seems this "fact check" of a thing was invented and engineered for Peter Obi, the Labour Party and the OBIdients almost exclusively. You can "fact check" this assertion, Peter Obi and everything OBIdients and Labour Party have been the most checked and scrutinized group, taking more than a wooping eighty percent of the "fact checked" total ratio. Prove me wrong!

Yet the biggest, most notorious, most daring and popular, even dangerous conglomerates of criminals in Nigeria have almost never been "checked", some not even once.

Is the "fact checking" rave really meant for proper scrutiny and national accountability or is it really just some form of quasi-propaganda meant to CHECK MATE a single group and individual?

Or does accountability, responsibility and the push and desire for incorruptibility and proper expected individual and group performance only comes to play when it concerns said entity?

Or is excellence only expected of a single person and it's group, while the rest should continue in the status quo, UNCHECKED?

But if so, should not the most scrutinized, investigated, tested and "fact checked" be the most admired, dependable and trustworthy of the bunch? Or is excellence and hard work even hunger for honest service to nation and patriotism to country be thrown out the window?

Are we allergic and repulsed by openness and other good expected qualities required of a public servant? And/or do we not value such "goody-two-shoe" servants and consider them as such, servants to the public?

Are the rest just too rotten we don't care about anything they say, or are they too righteous and perfect we don't even want to know?

But if so what are we actually saying as a nation without literally saying?


I am asking for a friend!

Once again, Congratulations to the Great Asiwaju!!!

No one fact-checks the devil because he is the father of lies

Why waste your time?

This election begines and end in Peter obi as no journalist cares to probe Tinubu on how he will govern Nigeria.

40Bullets:
No one fact-checks the devil because he is the father of lies

Why waste your time?

Is that what and who we really want, the devil?

hisgrace090:
This election begines and end in Peter obi as no journalist cares to probe Tinubu on how he will govern Nigeria.

I know Tinubu and his group will never take half the pressure and propaganda on Peter Obi and his group. He sues people and news outlets to submission.

But is that what we really want and glamour for?

Because Tinubu never tried to show anyone that he knows it all...simple

When you go about, throwing up numbers and statistics and figures at everyone and at every little opportunity you get and you keep telling them to go and verify... then you alone have prepared for yourself a recipe for disaster... because people will do that one thing you have told them to do...That's to VERIFY

So you can not come back to blame people for verifying your figures and coming back to throw them right back at you because they found out that the figures were false...

LocalStandard1:
Since the advent of the trend of "fact checking" I can count the entire times a single individual has been "fact checked" in one hand, well except Peter Obi.

It seems this "fact check" of a thing was invented and engineered for Peter Obi, the Labour Party and the OBIdients almost exclusively. You can "fact check" this assertion, Peter Obi and everything OBIdients and Labour Party have been the most checked and scrutinized group, taking more than a wooping eighty percent of the "fact checked" total ratio. Prove me wrong!

Yet the biggest, most notorious, most daring and popular, even dangerous conglomerates of criminals in Nigeria have almost never been "checked", some not even once.

Is the "fact checking" rave really meant for proper scrutiny and national accountability or is it really just some form of quasi-propaganda meant to CHECK MATE a single group and individual?

Or does accountability, responsibility and the push and desire for incorruptibility and proper expected individual and group performance only comes to play when it concerns said entity?

Or is excellence only expected of a single person and it's group, while the rest should continue in the status quo, UNCHECKED?

But if so, should not the most scrutinized, investigated, tested and "fact checked" be the most admired, dependable and trustworthy of the bunch? Or is excellence and hard work even hunger for honest service to nation and patriotism to country be thrown out the window?

Are we allergic and repulsed by openness and other good expected qualities required of a public servants? And/or do we not value such "goody-two-shoe" servants and consider them as such, servants to the public?

Are the rest just too rotten we don't care about anything they say, or are they too righteous and perfect we don't even want to know?

But if so what are we actually saying as a nation without literally saying?


I am asking for a friend!

How can someone who has never visited a television or radio station to speak to Nigerians about his plans for the country as a president be ‘fact checked’ ?

Cos they know obi lies a lot and gives misleading stats

Conner44:
How can someone who has never visited a television or radio station to speak to Nigerians about his plans for the country as a president be ‘fact checked’ ?

Then how dare such person ever even bother to come out and seek election? Why don't we also elect trees and stones in that case?

harmonyglobal:
Cos they know obi lies a lot and gives misleading stats

I have the perfect answer and reply to you, one that will put you and your type to sleep immediately. But I won't indulge you on this thread, it's for intelligent people.

What does know it all have to do with what the guy said? You can't be a Tinubu supporter and have sense.

PlayerMeji:
Because Tinubu never tried to show anyone that he knows it all...simple

Pandorabots cannot comprehend again...

Person mentioned why Tinubu had not been fact-checked and I told him the truth... hin self understand pass you..

But because you are a Pandorabot, you must show your mumuness by asking mumu question.. and Me, I don answer you

TheFreshVanilla:
What does know it all have to do with what the guy said? You can't be a Tinubu supporter and have sense.

LocalStandard1:


Then how dare such person ever even bother to come out and seek election? Why don't we also elect trees and stones in that case?

Back In 2015 APC made buhari their presidential candidate and hid him from online and live media stations, channels and debates thereby hoodwinking the country’s populace to erroneously vote for him . . . Today we all see how buhari has handled his regime

TODAY AGAIN

The same APC (in conjunction with INEC) wants to foist another ‘ live media shy’ candidate on us Nigerians as our president. . .

God help us

because they don't lie like the bastard foolish cursed Peter Obi liar

LocalStandard1:
Since the advent of the trend of "fact checking" I can count the entire times a single individual has been "fact checked" in one hand, well except Peter Obi.

It seems this "fact check" of a thing was invented and engineered for Peter Obi, the Labour Party and the OBIdients almost exclusively. You can "fact check" this assertion, Peter Obi and everything OBIdients and Labour Party have been the most checked and scrutinized group, taking more than a wooping eighty percent of the "fact checked" total ratio. Prove me wrong!

Yet the biggest, most notorious, most daring and popular, even dangerous conglomerates of criminals in Nigeria have almost never been "checked", some not even once.

Is the "fact checking" rave really meant for proper scrutiny and national accountability or is it really just some form of quasi-propaganda meant to CHECK MATE a single group and individual?

Or does accountability, responsibility and the push and desire for incorruptibility and proper expected individual and group performance only comes to play when it concerns said entity?

Or is excellence only expected of a single person and it's group, while the rest should continue in the status quo, UNCHECKED?

But if so, should not the most scrutinized, investigated, tested and "fact checked" be the most admired, dependable and trustworthy of the bunch? Or is excellence and hard work even hunger for honest service to nation and patriotism to country be thrown out the window?

Are we allergic and repulsed by openness and other good expected qualities required of a public servant? And/or do we not value such "goody-two-shoe" servants and consider them as such, servants to the public?

Are the rest just too rotten we don't care about anything they say, or are they too righteous and perfect we don't even want to know?

But if so what are we actually saying as a nation without literally saying?


I am asking for a friend!

Ballmer:
because they don't lie like the bastard foolish cursed Peter Obi liar

This guy below has answered you....

Conner44:


Back In 2015 APC made buhari their presidential candidate and hid him from online and live media stations, channels and debates thereby hoodwinking the country’s populace to erroneously vote for him . . . Today we all see how buhari has handled his regime

TODAY AGAIN

The same APC (in conjunction with INEC) wants to foist another ‘ live media shy’ candidate on us Nigerians as our president. . .

God help us

There's nothing to factcheck. You don't fact check liars and thieves and drug barons.

Dude, look at your crappy response. Zero sense.

PlayerMeji:
Pandorabots cannot comprehend again...

Person mentioned why Tinubu had not been fact-checked and I told him the truth... hin self understand pass you..

But because you are a Pandorabot, you must show your mumuness by asking mumu question.. and Me, I don answer you

You see the difference between master of the game and an errand boy..

Tinubu's speeches are well prepared which most of the information must have been fast checked before releasing to the public and also, Tinubu is not that idle to be jumping from one media house to another

TheFreshVanilla:
Dude, look at your crappy response. Zero sense.

Don't bother about that number, he is one of the most newer recruits, driven by greed, crumbs and tribal glaucoma.

helinues:
You see the difference between master of the game and an errand boy..

Tinubu's speeches are well prepared which most of the information must have been fast checked before releasing to the public and also, Tinubu is not that idle to be jumping from one media house to another

Yes, Bala Blu bulaba, the gaga raga master and most gaffe infested politician of Nigeria's history. Coming from your type I am not surprised.

How can you fact check a mad man? He is senile and demented therefore, anything he says is a word of a mad man.

No one actuality-cheques the devil because he is the father of liesWhy waste your time