Stats: 3,189,237 members, 7,936,802 topics. Date: Sunday, 01 September 2024 at 12:05 AM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Religion / Criminal Will Enter Paradise Without The Belief In Trinity And Blood Atonement (107 Views)
Christians Get In:the Belief In The Holy Trinity Is Fake !! / The Trinity And Identity Of God / My Take On The Doctrine Of Trinity And Those Saying Jesus Is God Almighty! (2) (3) (4)
(1) (Reply)
Criminal Will Enter Paradise Without The Belief In Trinity And Blood Atonement by AbuTwins: 12:27pm On Jun 08 |
We read from Luke 23:39-43 (NIV) the following: One of the criminals who hung there hurled insults at him: “Aren’t you the Messiah? Save yourself and us!” But the other criminal rebuked him. “Don’t you fear God,” he said, “since you are under the same sentence? We are punished justly, for we are getting what our deeds deserve. But this man has done nothing wrong.” Then he said, “Jesus, remember me when you come into your kingdom.” Jesus answered him, “Truly I tell you, today you will be with me in paradise.” Clearly this criminal did not believe in trinity! Nor does he believe in Jesus dying for his sins! Nor does he believe Jesus is God! Nor does he believe Jesus is man and God! Nor does he believe in the New Testament as the word of God! Nor does he even know who the Holy spirit is or the other members of the Godhead! Nor does he believe that each member of the Godhead (Father, Son and Spirit) are coequal and co-substantial to each other! If we were to ask a confessional Christian today (one that knows of and adheres to the doctrinal confessions of the faith) what one needed to believe in for salvation, we would perhaps have a very long list. It would likely include belief that Jesus died for the sins of all, that Jesus was God, that Jesus was both man and God (belief in the hypostatic union), belief that the New Testament is the word of God, belief in the Godhead, in the Personhood of each member of the Godhead who were all co-equal and co-substantial to each other. When we examine the verses we can identify only two things: That Jesus was an innocent man. That Jesus was a King (or would become one at some point). All the thief had to do to be granted salvation was to accept that Jesus was innocent and thus did not deserve to be crucified, and that Jesus would survive in some form such that he would become a king or have a kingdom. By this standard, all Muslims will be granted entry into the kingdom of God. The thief did not have to believe in the New Testament, did not have to accept the Old Testament, did not have to express belief in the Trinity, did not have to believe in the Godhead, did not have to believe in the two natures of Christ, did not have to even accept Jesus as the Messiah! He did not have to believe Jesus was the incarnate word of God, he did not have to believe that Jesus was the 2nd person in the Godhead…in other words, the thief did not have to believe in anything that Christians today hold to be true. There is perhaps an even greater issue here. The thief claims that Jesus was innocent and thus did not deserve to be punished. See, Christians necessarily believe that while Jesus was innocent, he deserved to suffer and be punished, because he came to suffer for our sins as an act of grace: “For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.” – John 3:16 (NIV). “And he said, “The Son of Man must suffer many things and be rejected by the elders, the chief priests and the teachers of the law, and he must be killed and on the third day be raised to life.” – Luke 9:22 (NIV). According to the above passages, Christ must suffer and must be killed. However, the thief on the cross, seemingly disagrees with these teachings. The thief explicitly says that not only is Jesus innocent, but that he did not deserve to die. In other words, the thief is expressing an Islamic position that Muslims would agree with. Jesus did not deserve to die, he did not deserve to suffer and he was an innocent man. In other words, Jesus rewards a thief and claims the thief would be in the Kingdom of God with him because he denied the core tenets of Christianity while affirming core beliefs of Islam. The thief in no uncertain words explains that his crucifixion on the cross is justified, but Jesus’s isn’t, however, confessional Christians would argue that in order for sin to be paid, it had to be justified through the death of Jesus the Christ. This presents a problem for Christianity. Jesus rewards a man and accepts him into the Kingdom of God for expressively, clearly and absolutely, rejecting core Christian beliefs about salvation! |
Re: Criminal Will Enter Paradise Without The Belief In Trinity And Blood Atonement by LordIsaac(m): 12:58pm On Jun 08 |
How then shall we escape if after knowing all the above we still do not believe? May God deliver us from godlessness (Amen). |
Re: Criminal Will Enter Paradise Without The Belief In Trinity And Blood Atonement by AbuTwins: 3:24pm On Jun 08 |
LordIsaac: You dey OYO! |
(1) (Reply)
My Second Vision Of The Lord Jesus And How He Led Me Out Of Indebtedness / Life Changing Miracles Performed by God / If The Bible Says God Created Evil, Why Is There Satan?
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 19 |