cloaked: ...Hmmmm!.....Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent....It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction ( i.e make things simpler)....I'm glad u thought it through dis tym!....JSUK, apology accepted!

Yhemit: Hell is far beta dan Oau hostel....must go home back tomorrow morning. >no light,everytn dull

Olastep1: Clap 4 yaself now, if u want me to concur with u. Answer me this question....

>



>
DO YOUR PAST STILL MATTERS TO THE WORLD ? ? ?

gloatkenf: Oga, first of all, thanks for the gloat and 2nd of all, the positive aspects of my past matters to me as your birthday should, if at all you have one. Plus, I am not alive or living for THIS or THE WORLD, I am alive for and by THE WORD and via Him only, to make my now worth remembering for betterment in the future or tomorrow... That's comprehensive enough, I think...

GodzBELOVED:

To be honest, you and Olastep are really derailing this thread. I've been followin ur convo and i've not see much sense in it. I don't know if it's just me. Well,no offence intended. Just saying my own.

miss law: wow U MEAN U DINT GRAB A THIN....
am suprisd cos i was realy enjoyin dos quote is lyk dey re debatin ...nd i luv d reply dey re both givn

jayjam: WHICH COURSE ARE YOU IN FOR, BRO?I LIKE UR MATURITY

slybrolin: hey bro, it's to my chagrin dt u would have d slightest hope dt any other party would deem it apt to interfere in u guys little competition; more of a bragging right event. It dis-heartens me greatly when u feel no Law aspirant joined. D nub, quintessence and of course point of a discussion is to educate cos afta d whole drama a concession would be agreed on; hence, a new lesson will be learnt. Bt urs gave no room 4 such, cos d verbosity, grandiloquence and complexity of ur words were a tad too much than what is needed here. Do u think its every tom, dick, and harry dt can operate in dt level or knows d meaning of dis words. In as much as d topic u guys were discussing is a very important 1 bt I must be frank u guyz made a pig's ear out of d whole issue. If u need participation next time try words dt can be understood by all and sundry. Am nt against vocabularies cos its evident in my writing dt am a big fan of it jst dt too many cooks spoil d broth, everything should be in moderation. Seeing u made mention of law students, good command of d language is 1 of d paraphernalia dt are need 4 a successful practice, dnt knw if u 1 of ours bt on behalf of d whole Law crew in d building/house I give our sincere apology 4 nt joining in it and on a personal level nw I love ur styles both of u should keep it up, blending dem in with easily comprehensible words mke dem a delight to read

cloaked: ....fenks!....Engineering physics!...u?

Olastep1: yea....Bro... U'v spoken the 99% truth.
C'mon, here is ur cake.
Now back 2 d discussion; its true the foundation matters alot.... But i hereby disagree to agree. I dont live in the past! I even hate my past. What a bullsh1t?!. The only thing i can do is to redeem it with the present. Bro, real GREAT men i've read abt dont even have a bit of greatness before their GREATNESS is shown to the world. I dont think they have any foundation....lol. C'mon lets talk abt Bill Gates, Albert Einstein, Michael Jackson, Barrack Obama, Wallace D. Wattles, Ophray Winfrey...! They only took upon the possibilities at the present moment. Life consists not in holding good cards but in playing those you hold well.
Hey, let us take Pres. Obama as an example. He had a troubled beginning. His Kenyan father divourced his mum at a tender age of 10. He went to different schools due to migrations. Yet, he made his goals....
Though no one can go back and make a brand New Start; my friend, anyone can start from now and make a brand New End.

Olastep1: [b]yea...bro... U've gat me pulling out my biggest fart...
Now, back 2 d discussion. I still have not gotten the meaning of d defination of ur past. Nay, maybe u've given me a double blow at my jaws. I believe we're speaking as young guys. Hey man, ur responses seems absurd to me!
Are we now at d mercy of our past Are we fools cos we accepts to break off odd habits
C'mon, lets erase this mentality!! Thats why we unarguable follow these western nations. They dont have any parmanent rules. They make changes as much as they bathe. U cant see them fighting over poo claiming that the old customs must continue. But here in Africa, we're so blindfolded we believe that the witches we've offended in our childhood are responsible for our failures!
I count all your examples as poo. They dont move the smallest star. Even if my girl is buzzling with two kids. Does that change who i am? Does it affects my future? Or u think if Obama died, he wont get to his present position? Then my bro, expect every American to die before the next election just because the past is following them.
Even though i'm a christian, i'm also an ardent pragmatist. I believe in ACTIONS. I hate those beliefs that hold me back to my past! Infact, i had a sweet and lovely past but yet i cast it off as f*cking sh1ts. It adds no meaning again in my life. C'mon, how can my past hunt me when i have alot of privileges to even hunt it back. Nothing whatsover gonna change me. I have the utmost belief the pasts are just jobless morons who have no teeth but always bark. Dont let it hurt u my friend. Fight the war from now till your future gets brighter and u wont regret your past!!![/b]

Yhemit: Hell is far beta dan Oau hostel....must go home back tomorrow morning. >no light,everytn dull

Olastep1: Yea....guys. Its still my humble self, Olastep. I knw we're derailing this thread but i wanna tender an apology. I am for the motion which says our present is far more important than out past. My fellow contestant, gloatkenf, says our past is more important than our present.
Its been a quite and educative insight. I must confess.
It pains me most that no law aspirant/student could join. Maybe u're looking for money here too....lol.
OAU all the way.
Later folks

miss law: Bt u hv goten urs...i rememba u postin dat
SO WAT DETAILS DO U NID

slybrolin: hey bro, it's to my chagrin dt u would have d slightest hope dt any other party would deem it apt to interfere in u guys little competition; more of a bragging right event. It dis-heartens me greatly when u feel no Law aspirant joined. D nub, quintessence and of course point of a discussion is to educate cos afta d whole drama a concession would be agreed on; hence, a new lesson will be learnt. Bt urs gave no room 4 such, cos d verbosity, grandiloquence and complexity of ur words were a tad too much than what is needed here. Do u think its every tom, dick, and harry dt can operate in dt level or knows d meaning of dis words. In as much as d topic u guys were discussing is a very important 1 bt I must be frank u guyz made a pig's ear out of d whole issue. If u need participation next time try words dt can be understood by all and sundry. Am nt against vocabularies cos its evident in my writing dt am a big fan of it jst dt too many cooks spoil d broth, everything should be in moderation. Seeing u made mention of law students, good command of d language is 1 of d paraphernalia dt are need 4 a successful practice, dnt knw if u 1 of ours bt on behalf of d whole Law crew in d building/house I give our sincere apology 4 nt joining in it and on a personal level nw I love ur styles both of u should keep it up, blending dem in with easily comprehensible words mke dem a delight to read

Olastep1: Clap 4 yaself now, if u want me to concur with u. Answer me this question....

>



>
DO YOUR PAST STILL MATTERS TO THE WORLD ? ? ?

Olastep1: yea.... U're now 100% right...lolzz. Lets be more formal pls. But i wish to ask u a question in this anology.
Assuming there is this SS1 boy who is not serious atall with his studies most especially Maths. Yet, during the promotion exam he managed to pass and got promoted maybe thru expo. Do we now say he's laying a bad foundation? Or do we say he's laying a good one? Remember, he passed though he didnt even know he managed to write it. I must say the foundation is both good and bad... Good foundation in the sense that he passed. Bad foundation in the sense that he didnt read well.
Now there's this other boy who studies hard yet failed. Please how do we qualify his foundation. Good or Bad?

Olastep1: yea.... U're now 100% right...lolzz. Lets be more formal pls. But i wish to ask u a question in this anology.
Assuming there is this SS1 boy who is not serious atall with his studies most especially Maths. Yet, during the promotion exam he managed to pass and got promoted maybe thru expo. Do we now say he's laying a bad foundation? Or do we say he's laying a good one? Remember, he passed though he didnt even know he managed to write it. I must say the foundation is both good and bad... Good foundation in the sense that he passed. Bad foundation in the sense that he didnt read well.
Now there's this other boy who studies hard yet failed. Please how do we qualify his foundation. Good or Bad?

slybrolin: hey bro, it's to my chagrin dt u would have d slightest hope dt any other party would deem it apt to interfere in u guys little competition; more of a bragging right event. It dis-heartens me greatly when u feel no Law aspirant joined. D nub, quintessence and of course point of a discussion is to educate cos afta d whole drama a concession would be agreed on; hence, a new lesson will be learnt. Bt urs gave no room 4 such, cos d verbosity, grandiloquence and complexity of ur words were a tad too much than what is needed here. Do u think its every tom, dick, and harry dt can operate in dt level or knows d meaning of dis words. In as much as d topic u guys were discussing is a very important 1 bt I must be frank u guyz made a pig's ear out of d whole issue. If u need participation next time try words dt can be understood by all and sundry. Am nt against vocabularies cos its evident in my writing dt am a big fan of it jst dt too many cooks spoil d broth, everything should be in moderation. Seeing u made mention of law students, good command of d language is 1 of d paraphernalia dt are need 4 a successful practice, dnt knw if u 1 of ours bt on behalf of d whole Law crew in d building/house I give our sincere apology 4 nt joining in it and on a personal level nw I love ur styles both of u should keep it up, blending dem in with easily comprehensible words mke dem a delight to read

Hermienart: Na waoooo, is it because u want to post on the thread that u went to buy d new oxford advanced learners dictionary. People can just go any length to gain attention. Ogaooo....

Hermienart: Na waoooo, is it because u want to post on the thread that u went to buy d new oxford advanced learners dictionary. People can just go any length to gain attention. Ogaooo....

GodzBELOVED: See ehn, you people, I understand that you people can speak and blow big grammar but please, for the sake of others(like me) who don't know 'big english', please speak simple english. Blowing grammar won't get us anywhere,it will only cause headache for others...so please,be considerate,eh. It is better to speak a few simple words and get the good attention of others than to speak a thousand big words and not carry anybody along... Peace!

TOSIN ACCA: GOOD ADVHCE. HOWEVER, LET'S TAKE PEOPLE FOR WHO and WHAT THEY ARE.
C'mon, IF YOU ARE IN ROME ...