Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,197,446 members, 7,964,818 topics. Date: Wednesday, 02 October 2024 at 09:31 PM |
Nairaland Forum / Alfaman2's Profile / Alfaman2's Posts
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (of 12 pages)
Religion / Re: Questions? Comments? Complaints? Talk To The Moderators Here by alfaman2: 7:43am On Apr 27, 2013 |
@ JeSoul, I saw your new rules and regulations and it made me laugh harder than when I saw the first one. The last line made reality hit me in the face and I stopped laughing and started crying for Africa and the black race. Anyway, good luck to you. |
Religion / Re: Big-Bang Theory Doesn't Make Enough Sense by alfaman2: 3:19pm On Apr 26, 2013 |
wiegraf: There you go again. It is not what I believe but what the big bangers are actually saying. Did you read the result of their findings? That star is 14.5 billion years old. The universe is 13.77 billion years old. How do you fit a square peg in a round hole? Mathematically simple: approximated percentage errors. Except percentage errors as every statistician knows, is a double edged sword. Here they put in a percentage error of 800 million years, which if the error has to be the most extreme they can make (note that the most extreme errors in mathematics are the least probable), puts that star at almost the same age as the universe. However, and here is the double edge, it is equally conceivable, if you were to believe their calculations, that that star is 15.3 billion years old. But for the time being, let us accept that the least probable answer is the correct one and that star is 13.7 billion years old. It means we had 700 million years between the big bang and the birth of that star. This creates another headache for big bangers. According to recent top university researches, 750 million years after the big bang, stars have not started forming. http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2012/12/the-first-stars-of-the-universe-new-discoveries-announced-by-mit.html To compound this, it is well known that a first generation of stars formed and died out (exploding or collasping into black holes) and their gases had to cool before the birth of the second generation stars that we see today. Some big bangers would say that HD 140283 was part of the first generation. This is highly unlikely because the first generation stars had ridiculously short life spans ranging from 10 million - 400 million years. But even if the star was first generation, there is still the problem stated previously about the time of formation. If you read the article on NASA website that I linked, you will see the magic they did in order to reduce the age to 14.5 million. Infact here it is: With a better handle on the star's brightness Bond's team refined the star's age by applying contemporary theories about the star's burn rate, chemical abundances, and internal structure. New ideas are that leftover helium diffuses deeper into the core and so the star has less hydrogen to burn via nuclear fusion. This means it uses fuel faster and that correspondingly lowers the age. You know what that means, it means they got data from their observation which they didn't like, then they started applying theories, and "Bond's thinking" and lowering the age arbitrarily. After all these lowerings, they still arrived at 14.5 billion years. Laughable. wiegraf: Waow! You did good. Refreshing ones knowledge before responding on some topics is a very advisable entreprise. (wink @ logicboy) But this in itself, while sounding good when scientist proclaim it from their pulpits actually puts them in difficulty when questionned with relation to big bang. The bolded is true to the extent that we are talking of stars in the milky way. All other stars in other galaxies are moving away from us due to expansion of space. Do you agree? |
Religion / Re: I Always Have Weird Dreams by alfaman2: 10:39am On Apr 26, 2013 |
code_0: It is not fun. Satan is not who you think He is. Forget all those lies told about Him from the pulpits of deception. Give your life to Satan today and see all your worries become a thing of the past. Also go see a doctor and tell him to check your thyroid hormones. |
Politics / Re: Student To Die For Robbing Colleagueof N2,000 by alfaman2: 6:40pm On Apr 25, 2013 |
thrugemaster: have you seen anybody robbed by a pen before? |
Politics / Re: Can You Identify This Person In This Picture? by alfaman2: 6:33pm On Apr 25, 2013 |
Shekau's third wife. |
Politics / Re: List. by alfaman2: 6:31pm On Apr 25, 2013 |
Story story, STORY! Once upon a time, TIME TIME! 1 Like |
Religion / Re: I Always Have Weird Dreams by alfaman2: 5:20pm On Apr 25, 2013 |
code_0: You need Satan. |
Religion / Re: Does The Family You Are Born Into Determine Your Religion? by alfaman2: 5:14pm On Apr 25, 2013 |
striktlymi: Exactly. |
Religion / Please Stop Putting Religious Topics On The Front Page. by alfaman2: 11:43am On Apr 25, 2013 |
Front pagers are full of derailers that multiply page numbers but don't add substance to serious discussions. If people want to discuss religion, let them find their way here. Stop going looking for them. |
Religion / Re: Was The Sacrifice Of Jesus On The Cross That Big A Deal? by alfaman2: 11:40am On Apr 25, 2013 |
musKeeto: LOTFLOL Dear muskeeto. Please allow me to use this quote freely. |
Religion / Re: I Always Have Weird Dreams by alfaman2: 11:33am On Apr 25, 2013 |
code_0: I can tell you something useful but only you can help yourself. You need to stop being afraid. You are full of fear. Fear of the unknown and of a wonderful part of our life called death. You are afraid of the struggles of this life. You are afraid to face challenges. You are simply made of fear matter. Stop being afraid and see what a wonderful life you will have. |
Religion / Re: Does The Family You Are Born Into Determine Your Religion? by alfaman2: 11:25am On Apr 25, 2013 |
musKeeto: Does the family you are born to determine your religion? But one did come out with a quran. |
Religion / Re: I Always Have Weird Dreams by alfaman2: 9:34am On Apr 25, 2013 |
code_0: Of course you can. Stop sleeping. Or die. |
Politics / Re: We Will Punish Those Behind Baga Massacre - Jonathan by alfaman2: 8:24am On Apr 25, 2013 |
He lost me when he started calling on allah. |
Politics / Re: Student To Die For Robbing Colleagueof N2,000 by alfaman2: 8:22am On Apr 25, 2013 |
Wrong headline. He was condemned to death because he is an armed robber. |
Religion / Re: “Paganism Is Man-made”....Do You Agree? by alfaman2: 7:33pm On Apr 24, 2013 |
Logicboy03: A christian made this statement to me when we were talking about a burial some days ago; Maybe you should stop trying to have intelligent discussions with christians. |
Religion / Re: Jesus, Help Me!!! by alfaman2: 4:49pm On Apr 24, 2013 |
You will still die one day afterall. |
Nairaland / General / Re: An Open Letter To Seun by alfaman2: 4:21pm On Apr 24, 2013 |
WTF is delect? 1 Like 1 Share |
Politics / Re: Protest Over Death Of Nigerian In UK Prison Custody by alfaman2: 4:19pm On Apr 24, 2013 |
Haha! Adekunle's country. One Nigeria. So your papa fought for this? Mumus. 1 Like |
Religion / Re: Big-Bang Theory Doesn't Make Enough Sense by alfaman2: 1:54pm On Apr 24, 2013 |
wiegraf: Well, I guess we will never agree with each other, (until your scientists tell you otherwise, that is) so let us let these arguments go for now. Even though you manifest a certain incapacity to understand a few scientific facts, at least you accept the possibility that I might be right, and that is good. You are not yet completely brainwashed. I would urge anyone following to go through all the previous arguments and make up their mind which one makes more sense. wiegraf: Where you saving this as your trump card? Some sort of secret last move you'd use only when your back is against the wall and there's seemingly no hope LOL @ the image of anime last stand hero. No. I wasn't saving anything. I have a lot of points against the Big Bang. I started this thread so as to argue those points one after the other sort of but as you witnessed, enemies of progress hijacked the thread with their derailings. It is just another point, like the questions I asked Area Boy which he couldn't answer but rather ran away. You at least, despite your limited critical awareness are making a commendable effort to argue. I don't know if you had already watched the video I posted. Or if you had figured out if the Big Bang concerns only the observable universe as claimed by Area Boy. I would urge you to read up on that HD 140283 star. It really shaked the BB community. My next question is actually scientifically easy to answer but I want to see if you are analytical enough and if I should continue with my other points that make wholesome mockery of the BBT. Here: How come we can see stars that are 47 billion light years away? While explaining, please bear in mind the method of calculation that gave the Big Bangers the age of the universe at 13.7 billion. |
Religion / France To Teach Children Secular Morality In Schools by alfaman2: 10:16am On Apr 24, 2013 |
In primary and secondary schools, one hour a week will be devoted to the teaching of "secular morality". But the subject will not be taught as a separate subject with dedicated teachers as was first envisaged by Peillon. Instead, the hour a week dedicated to the values will take the form of debates rather than formal teaching.More http://www.thelocal.fr/page/view/minister-to-present-plan-for-moral-secular-classes#.UXeiY0qjv6k Another nail in the coffin of religion. They just only yesterday legalised gay marriage. Up France! |
Religion / Re: Barack Obama Gay Sex Scandal New Evidence by alfaman2: 7:58am On Apr 24, 2013 |
OLAADEGBU: You should know that I don't believe James 2:19. How you want to use such lies to convince me is a bit surprising. Quoting your nonsensical book to me is a waste of time. |
Religion / Re: Big-Bang Theory Doesn't Make Enough Sense by alfaman2: 2:11pm On Apr 23, 2013 |
wiegraf: I didn't think it possible for an atheist to be as close minded as you. wiegraf: I'm not sure why you have a problem understanding this. It's real simple, at high temperatures it may behave differently or even be something else entirely. Just like the strong/weak forces are the same force at higher temperatures. Now, at even higher temperatures, would it be unreasonable to assume all the forces would behave differently? Actually, you're almost guaranteed they'd work differently, as they probably wouldn't even exist then! Their grand-daddy would, ie before cooling down, and, at the very least, it would behave differently to some of its offspring, likely most (if not all). Until you show me a snake that barks, I still maintain that all natural forces behave according to their nature. Until then, all you are doing is assuming. wiegraf: [img]http://mu2e.fnal.gov/images_v2/OT0082M.jpg[/img] You should have explained this image because it makes no sense to me. wiegraf: This is a valid possibility however you look at it. Quoting what I posted earlier, somewhat related Brian green is a big banger. And I don't see how quoting a big banger to support big bang is different from using the bible to validate the bible. I mean come on. And you attributed a quote I didn't make to me which I hope was not done out of malice. Journalists sensationalist reports are not scientific confirmations. The BBC article you referenced said that: Dark matter accounts for most of the mass in the Universe. It cannot be seen directly with telescopes, but astronomers know it to be out there because of the gravitational effects it has on the matter we can see. Galaxies, for example, could not rotate the way they do and hold their shape without the presence of dark matter. What a falacious statement to make. If you bring that paper to scientists (including big bangers), they will laugh you out of the room. Like I said before, let's stay with facts or at least factual hypothesis. wiegraf: Again, same thing here. Maybe you missed my previous quote from a link before. Here is is again. the big bang theory can boast of no quantitative predictions that have subsequently been validated by observation. The successes claimed by the theory's supporters consist of its ability to retrospectively fit observations with a steadily increasing array of adjustable parameters, just as the old Earth-centered cosmology of Ptolemy needed layer upon layer of epicycles. I will repeat it just in case: [size=14pt]the big bang theory has made absolutely no single quantitative predictions that have subsequently been validated by observation.[/size] wiegraf: In this discussion it matters little, and you well know what I'm trying to say, my good pedant. There you go again misreading my post. I know it matters little here,but for clarity purposes especially for others following the discussion, I believe highlighting the distinction is appropriate. But I do understand what you mean. wiegraf: Well.. You know this, how?Because that's what happens to big bangers everytime a mystery is expalined and they realise they were wrong. wiegraf: You have a problem with making predictions based on good reason? 'Backed up by objective evidence' sort of reason? See above for what I mean by it might not even have existed yet (ie, they could be unified at higher temps). No, I have problems with people accepting a flawed theory be it reasonable or not and unwilling to question this theory even as new evidence of its flaws are discovered almost daily. wiegraf: Interesting. How in the world did you come to these conclusions? Does the merging of the forces at higher energy levels make "the laws of motion in space becomes useless, all laws of thermodynamics thrown out of the window"? What in the universe are you on about. This is akin to you telling me accept christ else I'll burn in hell for eternity. Completely baseless... This is one of the reasons why I wanted us to differentiate between dark energy and dark matter. The universe is apparently made up of 68% dark energy. If we add the 27% dark matter, we are now talking of 95% DARK force that in the early start of big bang did not influence the universe. Or did the reverse and subsequently changed its nature. It is all suppositions that don't make sense. Let's leave it at that. OK? wiegraf: Also, why don't you have a problem with this possible scenario, yet think the one above unlikely? The one above is just as likely as this one (actually, probably more so). You misunderstand again. I do have a problem with that scenario. I was only praising the manner in which you structured your argument, not the substance of the argument. wiegraf: Here we are. The nice, great, world conquering conspiracy/agenda by our scientific overlords. You may be spending too much time around theists. Not me. These are scientist and university professors complainning of lack of funding for any project that might further reveal the flaws of the big bang. wiegraf: Again, criticizing BB is very fine. Criticizing mainstream science and the scientific method (over this issue in particular) as unreasonable, irresponsible, etc, is really rather unreasonable, irresponsible, etc. Let me tell you a story. In 2000, some scientists decided to measure the age of an intriguing star called HD 140283. This star is very near our galaxy, mind you. So they measured and remeasured and remeasured, and the data kept coming up. After everthing, they had no other option than to publish their finding: The star is 16 billion years old. What?! Panic amongst the big bangers. That cannot be true, they said. So the big bangers decided to measure it themselves. They measured and measured but refused to publish their results, talking about anomalies. Last year, NASA sponsored team of astronomers decided to measure it again but we have to await till last month before they could release the results. You know what else happenned last month? They told us they made a calculation in the age of the universe by 80 million years. Now you start putting two and two together. Well the result of the latest measurement came out and guess what, our dear star is 14.5 billion years old. I guess those astronomers didn't want to put their reputation in line by saying it is younger than the big bang but they have a cop-out. Listen to this: "Put all of those ingredients together and you get an age of 14.5 billion years, with a residual uncertainty that makes the star's age compatible with the age of the universe," said Bond. "This is the best star in the sky to do precision age calculations by virtue of its closeness and brightness." Chei! See deer in a headlamp grammer. http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/science/hd140283.html There are quantrillions of visible stars in space and the only one that can give them the precise calculations of age is telling them that it born before their big bang happenned. They refused to believe him and kept spending trillions to somehow arrive at such a stupid conclusion that it is indeed older than but could also be the same age as the universe with a residual uncertainty. And that, after increasing their supposed age of the universe. This is what you have faith in? It's laughable. |
Religion / Re: The Tower Of Babel, Which Heaven Were Dey Building It To? by alfaman2: 12:50pm On Apr 23, 2013 |
obadiah777: MAN INVENTED SWAHILI ok. which languages did he cause people to speak then in genesis, when he came with his friends to confuse the one single language everybody spoke then? 1 Like |
Religion / Re: The Tower Of Babel, Which Heaven Were Dey Building It To? by alfaman2: 12:45pm On Apr 23, 2013 |
obadiah777: HE DIDNT ASK TO BE WORSHIPPED AT THAT POINT HE HAD GIVEN THE WORLD TO THE GENTILES TO RULE EACH OTHER IN WICKEDNESS. ANCIENT BABYLONIA, THE KINGDOM OF NIMROD WAS THE FIRST GENTILE EMPIRE OUT OF THE GATE so why the Bleep did he go inventing swahili? |
Religion / Re: 98% Of Members Of This Section Would Go To Hell Fire by alfaman2: 12:44pm On Apr 23, 2013 |
I'm already in Hell, and it's soooo good. I wish you could all join me for eternal barbecueing. |
Religion / Re: The Tower Of Babel, Which Heaven Were Dey Building It To? by alfaman2: 12:40pm On Apr 23, 2013 |
obadiah777: YOU ERR. THE TOWER OF BABEL IS NIMROD. TRYING TO BUILD TO HEAVEN MEANS A ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT WHERE THE WHOLE WORLD WORSHIPS NIMROD. THIS IS WHAT HE WAS TRYING TO DO.HE WAS TRYING TO PLAY GOD MEANING HE WAS TRYING TO GET THE PEOPLE TO BUILD HIM UP TO HEAVEN. WHO IS IN HEAVEN ? GOD. SO HE WAS TRYING TO HAVE THE WHOLE WORLD WORSHIP HIM LIKE GOD So inventing headache inducing languages is supposed to force us to worship him only? Jealousy too bad. Your god needs to pray to his son to cure him of the spirit of envy and jealousy. |
Religion / Re: Did Adam And Eve Have Belly-Buttons? by alfaman2: 11:25am On Apr 23, 2013 |
Hehehe. Genesis na wa o. Infant stories believed by grown ups. |
Religion / Re: Barack Obama Gay Sex Scandal New Evidence by alfaman2: 11:22am On Apr 23, 2013 |
OLAADEGBU: When has lack of belief prevented agents of Satan from quoting scriptures? Even our Master quoted such to your master in Luke 4: 10-11, (and Mathew 4:6) to remind him of his uselessness. |
Religion / Re: How Helpful Has Nairaland Religion Section Been To You by alfaman2: 8:28am On Apr 23, 2013 |
Ihedinobi: I think he wants a simple answer to his question. If you can't answer it, say so. Stop being a dickhead. |
Religion / Re: The Tower Of Babel, Which Heaven Were Dey Building It To? by alfaman2: 3:27pm On Apr 22, 2013 |
ninja4life: U people like trouble dont u know dat God is omnipotent and omniscience so he only let u mere mortal know wat he wish cos u cant interprete d bible with ur fish brain u beta ask for d holy ghost so dat he cant teach u d things in d bible and u can ask him ur question.u must also know dat u cant interprete d bible literarily okay goodluck. You should be sued for impersonation. 1 Like |
Politics / Re: MASSOB: Try Uwazuruike For Treason, Face Hell by alfaman2: 3:25pm On Apr 22, 2013 |
History ought to have taught nigerians that igbos no dey do half measure. Anyway, let's wait and see. 8 Likes |
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (of 12 pages)
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 95 |