WildPrimate:
My woman must venerate me, she must kneel before me and worship me. She must fear me and tremble at the sound of my voice. And if I so wish, she must arrogate slavery to herself whilst under my roof just to please me. My descendants and my wife will bear unequal authority. She is a servant to them as she is to me.








®WildPrimate

waywardpikin:


Don't feed the troll.

20-24, student, and most likely never had a living, breathing girlfriend in his entire life. That's all I need to know.

Dapc.ity = JESH.AL = DEMZ.EE

DEM.ZEE is the account he uses to be at his uncouth best, where he doesn't have to pretend to be civil or a gentleman. JES.HAL is the voice of "reason".

All in all, you are just a silly little child living in a fantasy world. Reality will teach you.

Thought I was the only one who figured this out. There's one more account he uses. Anyway, for the sanity of this thread, just leave him alone.

Martinez39s:
Wrong! He is not displeased with us that we are doing nothing to combat gynocentrism. His life begins and end with being a high-value patriarchal male building a family in which his women worship him like deity, and he fathom why others do not reason like him and value what he values. While this is not really bad, he had to take it further to be use vulgar languages and make up silly tales about those who disagree with him. These are people whom he hasn't even met in person.

IGNORE THIS GUY SO THIS THREAD DOESN'T GET MESSED UP.

DEMZEE:


Wat is wrong if a woman worships her husband and adores him like her god

So are u telling me wen u worship God, God is a tyrant ni? koyemi ooo

"God" is not human. He is the creator of all beings. As such, he is worthy of worship. No human is. And if your belief is that there is no God, then know that no being is worthy of worship. Only a creator should be worshipped by his/its creation.

Told you to stop quoting me.

U can't negotiate genuine desire. Once a woman desires u she will submit to ur lordship and authority automatically

I don't have time for a back-and-forth with an uncouth guy who holds a nonsensical patriarchal idealism in these modern times.
It's futile engaging in a debate with you.

By the way, this is your ghost/troll account. I know your main account here.
I won't reply to any other posts from you. Thanks.

I have an issue with the use of the word "worship". Only God should be worshipped.

If a person is worshipping another, it means one is a master and the other is a slave.

Kings are not even worshipped by their subordinates. They're served just as they serve the people as well. Only a tyrant makes his subordinates worship him. People would normally worship their God or other deities.

This is to the best of my understanding.

TheUndercover:

Shit Test - The moment when someone does or say something just to make you react in some way. If you react in a way they expected, you have passed their shit test, if you react in an unexpected way or the opposite way instead, you've failed their shit test.

Oh. I thought it was vice versa? As in, if you react in a way they didn't expect, eg., calling out their bullshit, then you passed the shit test.

Sometimes your girl might do something intentional or unintentional to see how you're gonna react, if you react in way that signifies being weak, being too needy, being too emotional, being scared etcetera, then you've passed her shit test. But if you react in the opposite or unexpected way, then you've failed her shit test.

Sometimes a girl shit tests you to test your strength and your ability to protect her. Sometimes, in order to determine how much you love her.

For example, If a girl asks you to do something for her or else she leaves you, that's a shit test to show if you're really gonna buy it because you can't do without her. If you should get her the phone, it shows you're afraid of losing her and can't do without her. If you don't and didn't show any form of remorse, it shows she doesn't have any authority over you and you are indirectly telling her "to hell with her".

I get you now. You used "fail" in the positive light and "pass" in the negative. Thanks

obembet:
I still expecting guys to take this bold steps.

I believe it will work for them too



Lalasticlala

It will be harder for guys. She easily got help after the publicity because she is a lady. Guys have been carrying placards and CV all over the place for years getting little to no attention.

TheUndercover:

Monk Mode in a summarized sentence simply means dedicating all your time to your goals and self development, staying fit and healthy, ending any sort of romantic or sexual relationships with women for that period etcetera.

Okay. Sure. Thought you were gonna say fasting and meditation that leads to levitation.

luminouz:

Chad will never be a true Alpha unless he accepts the fuqin pill. He is handsome and so attracts the girls but he has no FRAME. HE caves in to pressure from women and that comes from being raised by as you call it "a domineering biitch of a single mom'. The gf,after marriage will alienate his ass from everyone and the house will be a warzone between his wife and his mom. Lastly, the gf respect will continue to dwindle any time he caves in to her pressure and soon enough, there won't be anything manly in him to make her obedient.

Chad is getting fuqed...like our Lake Chad, sooner or later

Who is Chad?

TheUndercover:
You must fail her shit tests while she must pass yours.

Wait, what? Please throw more light on this.

TheUndercover:

There's more to it than just that Sir.

Okay. Do you mind explaining? I'm very interested in learning.

TheUndercover:
Questions For You:

If you catch your wife cheating on you, what will you do?

I will forgive her and beg her not to do it again.



































I will send her packing. That's all.

What have you learned so far starting from phase one to phase two? What do you want me to talk or post about more? Has your views about life changed?

Some of my views about life have definitely changed since I started my redpill journey which includes reading this thread as well.

Post more on wealth and power.

Nonsense.

Highbeepeeh:
Og abeg which one is monk mode

No sex

DEMZEE:


AWALT

The only woman who can love u unconditionally is ur mother

Please stop quoting me. Thanks.

COOL10:


SMH "Sighs*

Why do men love excluding their mothers from female nature?

What I've come to realize here is that many guys are not interested in the whole TRUTH. They just want only the part that suits them or the part they feel they can cope with. Some truths are too uncomfortable to accept. So they emotionally modify some of the truths into what they're comfortable with.

tope777:


Bravo!
The above is not applicable to women alone, this is same principle that has been helping me for:

Business.
Health related issue.
Relationship.
School exams.
Family.

Etc.

Can you give an instance of how it helped you with school exams? Thanks

nwaezeemmanuel:
Is this conclusion of yours subjective?

Anyway, to be frank I would say the answer is not black and white. You can't generalize this because families are just too diverse. From what I have observed, hardly anyone will love you in entirety for who you are - not even parents.

People in polygamous homes understand that. The most successful sibling often gets the love and affection more than others. I think life is just fashioned that way. If everyone loved us for who we were we will not even be in this community, we would not improve.

That should be our mentality, debating and complaining about it does no good.

You are in line with me.

Snowflakess:

t
your opinion

Sure. It's why I said it's debatable.

To the best of my understanding, nobody really loves anyone just for who they are. Your parents
Show you love as you're growing up so that you can probably double the favour in the nearest future. If you forsake them, they will curse you.

Snowflakess:

he's right

No woman, not even your mother, loves you just for who you are. If at all anyone is capable of that kind of love (unconditional), it is your father.

However, generally, the highest amount of love (still conditional) you can get comes from the following people in descending order:
Father
Mother
Brother
Sister.

BLOODYSPERM:
Your mother is the only woman who loves you for who you are, rather than what you can do or how you make her feel.

Honour your mother as well as your father
They both truely love you unconditionally

This is debatable.

KingGeorgey:
The rage I feel inside of me is unexplainable....
I’ve read page 1 of this thread through to page 200 and still reading and all I feel is rage for being in the dark for so long

scofield114:
I WILL START READING THIS THREAD TODAY FROM PAGE ONE BUT I STUMBLED ON A POST HERE EXPLAINING HOW THE OWNER OF THE THREAD HAS TURNED INTO SIMP AGAIN if thats true lemme know i dont wanna waste my time readng it

Dpsychologist:
From prostate cancer research we know that a man with a vasectomy might be
four times more likely to have prostate cancer than a man without a
vasectomy.

So, it is better not to have a vasectomy, right?

Skepticus:


Thank you. I understand the cons of going my own way. I've assessed it properly and confirmed that I can bear its consequences. I have an aversion to the issues that constitute the transactional institution called modern marriages and cohabitation (from the nature of the modern woman to the influence of the state at the detriment of men). However, I'm not against men getting married. Men should do, if they want to. The red pill at least makes them know what they are getting into, and lessen the risks.

For your question, I intend to have a kid at some point in time and I have a lady who we have some form of agreement towards this. The terms are perfect for both us.

Wow, this is awesome.

Quite busy now. In a few months, I will be assessing my options as per how exactly my relationship with women will be. I will definitely be seeking your views on particular questions I might have as regards to Mgtow.

DEMZEE:


Yes u are a low value beta male simp if u are sharing financial responsibilities with ur wife or wives.

Major financial responsibilities should b done by the man.

Alright

Saviolamemphix:
U have a valid point though but it seems u don't understand what we are saying. to me my wife must contribute but not more than me, that's my point though.. nobody lyks a liability but never allow ur wife contribute more than u in ur marriage, if its relationship its understandable but not marriage.

You are in line with me. But Demzee and co believe if your wife contributes any money, you're a low value beta simp. According to them, you are a Low Value Beta Simp

waywardpikin:


Thank you jare. It's really befuddling. I wouldn't want to be with someone so bland as I'd get bored very quickly neither would I want to have someone so subjugated to me in that manner. She'd definitely have her own thing going. Plenty of times, your wife might come up with ideas that are much better than yours. That is why two correct heads are better than one. It is left to you to use your discretion in choosing the best of all available options without letting your so-called manly pride and ego blind you completely.


Reminds me of Neyo's Miss Independent. Dòpe lyrics. That's how my dream woman should be. I'm just looking for clay so I can mould her myself.

Thank you.
It seems to me that these guys do not want a woman that has a mind of her own. They want a zombie, more or less.

Calling men LOW VALUE BETA SIMPS because they allow their wives contribute financially is ignorant.
The fact is if you're being alpha, your woman will spend her money for you and still be submissive.
Everyone is claiming alpha these days, but only a few can truly be alpha. It's not by spending your money and refusing your woman's money. There are so many high-value men who are betas. All it takes to be high-value these days is having a lot of money. You get a lotta women as a result. That is often mistaken as alpha.
But that's not what it takes to be alpha. Status, money and looks, together, will make you high-value, but they won't stop you from ignorantly simping. If at all any man is being beta here, it is the man who refuses his woman's money.
The p1mp constantly collects money from women. He is alpha as fvck.

You think allowing her spend money is beta. You think you're being dominant and alpha by funding her whole lifestyle and refusing her money, but the truth is she manipulating the fvck out of you. She knows you too proud and egotistical as hell, so she leverages and acts all dumb like she ain't got an opinion, while sucking you of your resources and keeping hers, until it's time for her to move on. That's female nature.

You call someone your wife, yet you don't want her involved at all in the decision making in your home. So, you make sure she spends nothing so that she would have absolutely no say in the house.

Just get yourself a housegirl and save yourself the stress.

Enough of this talk.

DEMZEE:


I'm looking at it from an entrepreneur's angle. My wife will b my employee and b useful to me in my business.

Except she won't be your employee but your wife.

I just feel men especially high value men don't share financial responsibility with their wives. Because most women don't want to work after and during pregnancy so why wud u now want ur wife to share financial responsibility with you. U are hinting to her in her hindbrain that u are a low valued beta male simp wen u share financial responsibility with her.

You are not hinting anything of such to her. Actually, it is when you make her not invest in the marriage that you're hinting at being a huge SIMP. She will leverage and suck your funds until she's fed up, bored and ready to move to the next nigga.
It is your kind of thinking that makes pregnant women make ridiculous demands of their husbands. Many men may not really be simps, but once their wives conceive, they become the greatest simps of all time.

I get it: pregnancy is tough. But we aren't contributing equal amounts. I will bring the bulk of the whole amount, but she must contribute to the best of her capacity before, during and after pregnancy. This is to keep things balanced.
Any time she thinks of misbehaving, she will think of all she has put in the marriage.

This is uncomfortable, especially if you're egotistical, I know, but it is the best way to secure your conjugal bliss.

Men need money to address dominance in life and not because of women.
The person with the most financial power, asides understanding frame, game and being redpill aware etc, is the one who's in control andajes the critical decisions in the home

Men lead
Women follow

A wife is meant to bask in ur world and beautify it with her femininity and skills.

PS : All my sayings are for men who want to b high valued Men

I agree with the bolded. Still, it doesn't mean women contributing financially in their marriages makes men simps.

1) Things will be the way you said if the man shoulders the whole financial responsibility. 2) Things will still be that way if the man shoulders most, but leaves some for the wife to shoulder too. The different likely implication?
In the first case, there is a very high chance of the wife getting bored and moving on to another man with more money. In the second case, there is a low chance of the woman getting bored and just moving on like that, because she's invested.

Your idea is patriarchal, while mine is Machiavellian. In today's world, some patriarchal practices like this one will most likely land you in a ditch, because women now are free to do whatever they want. That's the truth.

DEMZEE:


I'm not saying women shouldn't contribute in marriage, Wat I m against is men Sharing financial responsibility with their wives.

Women are hypergamous for bleeps sake so why wud she share financial responsibilities with u and most men who say this believe in equality. They want their burden of performance to b edged by their wives. That's why anytime I talk, I don't only consider people who plan to b wealthy in life and not people who want to be poor or average in life or people who life have dosed off their reality and they had to settle for Wat life gave them

It is not about burden of performance. It is about commitment. Things are no longer the way they used to be in the olden. Your ideology is that of the old where the man provides everything and the woman just does house work and bring no money to the table. It worked in the past because women didn't have the leeway to divorce their husbands anyhow they liked. Try that with modern women and watch her ditch you for the next richer nigga, because she has nothing to lose and modern society has made it easy for her to get divorced. This is the point.