Will Smith is not dark in completion but light brown in completion, it's funny and ridiculous enough that what being discussed is reddish brown and your bringing up a set of pictures that present different types of Moreno Mestizos as reddish brown, seriously this is the highest height of ridiculousness indeed.
I am pleased to see you're posting reddish brown skinned Adam and Eve, lmao. You slowly but surely subconsciously are admitting to this truth. Keep the good work up, lmao
I am pleased to see you're posting reddish brown skinned Adam and Eve, lmao. You slowly but surely subconsciously are admitting to this truth. Keep the good work up, lmao
I am pleased to see you're posting reddish brown skinned Adam and Eve, lmao. You slowly but surely subconsciously are admitting to this truth. Keep the good work up, lmao
I am pleased to see you're posting reddish brown skinned Adam and Eve, lmao. You slowly but surely subconsciously are admitting to this truth. Keep the good work up, lmao
Wakeupchristian: In His sermon on the Mount Christ said, "Think not that I have come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I have not come to destroy, but to fulfill the law" (Matthew 5:17). This statement has generated some controversies among believers in recent times. While some people believe that the old Covenant and its practices still apply to the Church today, others are of the opinion that they have completely been made obsolete.
To get this matter straightened, we will take this message in two parts. Part one will first endeavor to separate between the laws that operated in the old Covenant. Then it will reveal which law Christ came to fulfill and how He fulfilled it. Finally it will disclose whether or not, the law still applies to the Church. Part two will throw some light on the misunderstandings made from certain expressions of Paul which have helped to make this subject more complex.
There are basically three laws that operated in the old Covenant. These are the moral laws or the ten commandments, usually referred to as the law of God, and the ceremonial and the civil laws known as the laws of Moses.
The law of God, the ten commandments, is the fundamental framework of how mankind is to relate with God and with each other. These laws were written and engraved on stones by the finger of God (Exodus 24:12, 31:18, 32:16). God instructed Moses to place them inside the ark of the Covenant (Exodus 25:16, 21). Being engraved on stones symbolizes that they are permanent for all Ages. This means that they apply to all people and at all times.
On the other hand the laws of Moses, the ceremonial and civil laws are the instructions God reeled out to Moses to enable him direct the Israelites. In other words they were the system of administration of God's law at the time. The ceremonial laws encompassed directions on atonement, cleansing, worship, etc, while the civil laws stipulated regulations on justice and punishment for offenders of the ten commandments. These laws were written by the hand of Moses and placed in the side of the ark, not into the ark (Deuteronomy 31:24-26). The fact that the laws of Moses were not engraved on stones and were not put into the ark of the Covenant signifies that they were subject to change. This means that the system of administration given to Moses, that is the ceremonial and civil laws, were specifically meant for the Jews of that dispensation.
Every new Covenant comes with a change in the system of administration of the former. The death of Jesus Christ brought the dawn of a new Covenant with a change in the system of administration. For example the ceremonial laws of atonement and worship, whose primary purpose was to foreshadow Christ, became unnecessary after Jesus made Himself the last sacrifice. The burning of incense which produced the sweet aroma to attract God's presence in the old order also became unnecessary. The sacrifice for worship in the grace Covenant is a living sacrifice, not that of animals and incense. It is the sacrifice of a righteous and holy living through the message of Jesus Christ. This is what attracts God's presence to us.
The civil laws which stipulated an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth were overtaken by the forgiveness Christ taught. The love and grace of Christ in the new Covenant is the reason why disobedient children, adulterers, idolaters, witches, sodomites and the likes are no longer killed as stipulated in the law of Moses. Every offender of God's law is given a chance to repent in the grace Covenant. Christ showed us an example when He gave the adulterous woman who was liable to death in the Mosaic law a chance to repent (John 8:11).
If you are one of those who still rely on the laws of Moses to destroy, or pray for the wicked to die, I call to you to repent and follow the examples and teachings of the author and finisher of the Christian faith, Jesus Christ. While in agony on the cross, He prayed for His enemies, not against them (Luke 23:34). In His sermon on the mount He taught men to love their enemies and bless those who curse them(Matthew 5:44).
The order has changed! The order has changed from worshiping God in designated places like Jerusalem or the mountain, to worshiping Him in spirit and in truth(John 4:21-24). The order has changed from sacrificing animals and burning incense for atonement and worship, to presenting our bodies a living sacrifice holy and acceptable to God (Romans 12:1). Yes the order has changed from the instant killing of law offenders, an eye for an eye, to forgiveness and salvation through Christ. The order has changed from loving your neighbor and hating your enemy, to loving your enemy and blessing those who curse you ( Matthew 5:43-44). The grace Covenant is an order where salvation through Christ has replaced vengeance and the killing of law offenders.
Which of the laws did Christ come to fulfill and how did he fulfill it? Christ came to fulfill the moral laws, the ten commandments of God, not the laws of Moses. Isaiah described Jesus the Messiah as the faithful servant of God whose example would contrast that of the blind religious leaders of Israel, and who would magnify the law and make it honorable (Isaiah 42:1-21). What does it mean to magnify the law and make it honorable?
When you view an object under a magnifier, it becomes bigger and clearer. To magnify the law means that Jesus came to amplify and make God's commandments clearer. In other words He came to show us a better way of obeying them. Jesus confirmed this in His sermon on the mount. On the issue of adultery for example He said, " you have heard that it was said, you shall not commit adultery, but I say to you, that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart ( Matthew 5:27-28). This law was not unfolded in this manner in the old testament. Notice that instead of amplifying the laws of Moses, Christ made them obsolete. Where Moses advocated vengeance, or a tit for tat, Christ encouraged peace, forgiveness and love (Matthew 5:38-44).
If Christ amplified the law of God to aid its fulfillment, what then does Paul imply in his statement, " the ministration of death has been done away with?" (2Corinthians 3:7). To be continued.
Ceremonial laws ceremonial law's, you make it look like this ceremonial law's was done personally by Moses but the truth is all this law's both the Ten commandments and the others you called ceremonial law's can be traced to the Lord Almighty, non was done by the power of Moses.
[img]https://s7/images/mosaic-panel-2-abe-angels.jpg[/img] The Hospitality of Abraham, c. 432–440, mosaic, at sanctuary, Church of Santa Maria Maggiore, Rome (Italy) - based on Genesis 18 where Abraham & Sarah are visited by 3 messengers (i.e. God)[img]https://s7/images/Christ_with_beard.jpg[/img] Mural painting from the catacomb of Commodilla. One of the first bearded images of Jesus, late 4th century.[img]https://s7/images/58810-004-7FC30CE1.jpg[/img] An early 5th-century mosaic in a semicircular portion of a church in Rome shows Christ, the Apostles, and the four evangelists (i.e. the Tetramorph represented by the beasts)
Dude your doing a very good work in defending your WHITE'S, in everything you will stand for them, by defending them, always saying the truth or the version of the truth that only support Eurocentric view in everything, it has always been clear that you are not fighting anything rather you're promoting a singular version of truth that only serve one purpose, it doesn't matter how much you try to masquerade it by speaking about Authochthonous Native Black Americans , other Native Blacks of other continent and Black Israelis eg Ethiopian jews, it still won't be enough to hide the fact of what you're actually promoting eg like they say and ask can a Leopard change its colour, it will always be a big fat NO.
MuttleyLaff: Why don't you use some efficient and good working brain cells to understand the question asked. Why is it proving difficult for you to repeat correctly the question I asked Baba about the US involvement in the transatlantic slave trade?
Okay, at lest I've tried answering your question now here is one for you, (1) there are importers that buy slave's directly from Africa and (2) those who are not into importation of slave's inwhich they based only in buying directly from those that import, I'm really interested in those that falls in my number 2 explanation, because many of this buyers were leaving in America so who are these people, where the Aliens or Humans, what did they address themselves as is it Whites, greens, blue's , Blacks? .
Baba, again the poor history student/teacher, with more big fat lies. Mister d, that picture you misleadingly posted as black Chinese are actually Black Filipino girls, who are from among the indigenous peoples making up Philippines.
I am sure you can see the equator from the above picture passing through the Philippines and so realise the cause why they have black skin
Yes he made a mistake, besides nobody is above mistake inwhich it doesn't change the fact the people in the picture are Black Asians.
MuttleyLaff: Look at the question again here and tell me if you truly answered it : "How did America get involved in the Transatlantic slave trade then because America wasn't originally part of the players in the "game" before 1619, huh?""
The Portuguese did not steal, that there, is one misinformation for you, but rather they paid for those African they carted away as slaves, and of which you are the descendants of.
Another misinformation, is that, you aren't a true born and real McCoy American because you aren't aboriginal to the US, you are aboriginal to Africa, lmao. Only the Native Americans/American Indians are aboriginal to America. Every other person on that soil are either descendants of immigrants or slaves lmao.
According you Americans where not part of the players but in truth beyond all ramifications, Americans or Whites in America where part of the buyers.
MuttleyLaff: The only true born and real Americans are the Native Americans/American Indians (e.g. Apache Indians, Sioux Indians, Comanche, Cherokee et cetera) Every other person on that soil are either immigrant or slaves, lmao.
As for you my dear missus, Madam confused dot com, getting her knickers in knot , you're the product of an ex-African slave, which is why you address yourself as African American.
You and Baba, are nothing other than poor history students/teachers. What has the benefit of a benefit education got you other than ignorance and having to resort to lying through your teeth.
Don't you see how you completely made a right mess of the simple, easy, direct and straightforward question I asked Baba about how did America get involved in the Transatlantic slave trade then because America wasn't originally part of the players in the "game" before 1619, huh?
PS: Be editing, changing and adding more to your original comment there. There is no rest for twisted and wicked people of your sort, lmao
Yes for once in your life you've said the truth, to those not so sure about his or her so called Native America which also has to do with what many people here, have been talking about it here in Nairaland and also those who are of African continent eg @ Donnie's write-up on blacks of this planet Earth, which I will help with this pictures of Native America.
MuttleyLaff: The only true born and real Americans are the Native Americans/American Indians (e.g. Apache Indians, Sioux Indians, Comanche, Cherokee et cetera) Every other person on that soil are either immigrant or slaves, lmao.
As for you my dear missus, Madam confused dot com, getting her knickers in knot , you're the product of an ex-African slave, which is why you address yourself as African American.
You and Baba, are nothing other than poor history students/teachers. What has the benefit of a benefit education got you other than ignorance and having to resort to lying through your teeth.
Don't you see how you completely made a right mess of the simple, easy, direct and straightforward question I asked Baba about how did America get involved in the Transatlantic slave trade then because America wasn't originally part of the players in the "game" before 1619, huh?
PS: Be editing, changing and adding more to your original comment there. There is no rest for twisted and wicked people of your sort, lmao
It has to do with the White folks leaving in American continent and their White relatives in Europe.
MuttleyLaff: Baba, why are you, a respected and elderly man, barefacedly fond of lying now. Why, why, why?
That Sphinx of Giza's nose was already broken off before Napoleon, in the 19th century, set his foot in its vicinity. Baba please fear YAH now. Please fear God ooo.
An archaeological study, even concluded that it was broken with instruments at an unknown time between the 3rd and 10th centuries CE, but you say that it was Napoleon, born 15 August 1769 and died 5 May 1821 who broken off the nose. Poor history student/teacher. Smh.
Slave's will always be defending his or her masters through Stockholm syndrome attitude.
They are studying Igbo culture and language which is good, it doesn't mean that they should start practicing Igbo culture since they have their own culture neither are they supposed to be practicing Igbo culture/behaving/dressing and dancing like ndi Igbo because they have their own unique way of life/ culture unlike those Igbo's in that picture who were clearly imitating/behaving like Chinese. If they (Chinese) wants to bring there stuff down here, I will be expecting it to be something like Chinese institute of technology, Chinese institute of Agricultural science etc, and not this stuff they are doing here or in the picture that was posted by OP, besides who even tell the Chinese that we Ndi Igbo don't have any Culture inwhich the Chinese choose this stuff in place of all other stuff that Chinese are know for eg Chinese Technological Advancement instead what they (Chinese) choose to bring down here is this stuff I'm seeing in the OP picture, something that will further damage what ever will be left of our culture after the damages been done to our culture by westernization. I don't have any problem with Chinese infact I'm a fan of Chinese martial art/Confusius/ movies, more of what I'm saying is if we are going to be welcoming other people's culture in Igbo land let be in a right direction by using it to compliment/boost our way of life to a right direction eg a look at Ethiopian Culture and Christianity how the two compliment each other which gives us the Ethiopian Christian Orthodox. By welcoming other people's culture through the wrong direction inwhich left uncheck in future it will start unleashing havock and damages to our Igbo culture.
Anambralstson: Chinese are everywhere in Anambra, our people gradual embracing their culture.
China Confucius institution Nnamdi Azikiwe University Awka Lalasticlala
Ogini kwanu ka agakpor ihinka, what kind of nonsense is this inasmuch as we are still suffering from the effect and damages of westernization in our life's and culture/tradition now imagine what I'm seeing here, they are now adding Chinese culture to it not forgetting the Igbo's who are into this Indian culture/Maharaja Temple stuff.
Scholars are not totally certain as to when the gnostics appeared on the scene, but by the second century they already existed and wrote many early christian books such as the book of Thomas, gospel of Peter, etc. So probably gnostic Hebrews/Messianics already existed. But John emphasized over and over again that jesus came in the flesh, this is a more likely interpretation of that verse, as a verse against probably messianics who bought into some of the emerging gnostic doctrines.
Daejoyoung: [. You are quoting this scripture out of context donnie, john was writing against gnostics, the gnostics claim that jesus did not die because he was not human, he was a ghost, hence without flesh and blood, thus could not die. The epistle of john was written to tackle these heresies and to promote unity and love.
As in gnostics Hebrews or gnostics Messianic Hebrews this is crazy because the last time I checked John has always been a Hebrew so let me ask, fellow members of Nairaland forum have any of you heard of such know as gnostics Hebrews/gnostics Messianic Hebrews?.
This is history, man. Nobody owns absolute truth thereof, only versions upon versions of it. And the OP has chosen the version that tickles his fancy as has you. So wetin be the big deal here?
OP's sources categorically stated Jesus was black, and he's sticking with them, for he's obviously distrustful of mainstream historical accounts by the whites, for which I don't blame him. If oyinbo could successfully lay claim to the genealogy of Jesus, going as far as displacing and killing people to achieve this, and which, shockingly enough, Christians seem to be cool with, then i reiterate: I do not see why OP and his people can't do likewise.
I will call out the OP only when the world denounces the fake-arse Jews in the middle east as charlatans. White people can claim Jesus as their ancestor but black people can't abi. Who no like beta thing.
That's it your on point, this is exactly what I'm talking about/believes in.
Matthew 19:3-8 3 The Pharisees also came unto him, tempting him, and saying unto him, Is it lawful for a man to put away his wife for every cause? 4 And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female, 5 And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh? 6 Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder. 7 They say unto him, Why did Moses then command to give a writing of divorcement, and to put her away? 8 He saith unto them, Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so.
We don't own ourselves! Someone owns us! We can't live outside the way our owner told us to..
Questioning Him is irrelevant.. we are nothing but mere creatures..
For some obvious reasons you choose to ignore Mtt 19v1-2 instead you jump 1and2, then started it with v 3. The chapter your quoting is speaking about divorce and it's not speaking about marrying more than one wife, from v1-2 that you choose to ignore clearly shows that Mtt 19 wasn't all about Jesus and the Pharisees inwhich there where already a large crowd that was with Jesus before the Pharisees decide to show themselves. So back to the large crowd who where Hebrews in Origin, this Hebrews are strong followers of their Hebrew tradition/faith in the ways of their ancestors which means that many of them all have more than one wife, then such idea that says the chapter is speaking against marrying more than one wife won't add up because the Hebrews there with Jesus are strong practitioner of their tradition/faith, Omelaala/Odinala of their ancestors inwhich Jesus is also strong believer of his ancestors faith/Omelaala Odinala and also Christ practiced the tradition of his ancestors, I'm not saying that Christ married and have more than one wife but Christ was a traditional Hebrew man filled with the spirit of God, well kindly please stop twisting the Bible.
Go and read The Thirteenth Tribe by Arthur Koestler and stop this foolishness. He explains how "Jewish people" were created. They are Europeans from Russia, Ukraine, Germany etc. they are not the people of the book.
Sorry but your wasting your time on him, the fellow is worse than a lazy Bamboo all his going to do is to screen shot a small aspect of a particular chapter of the book and then he will post it here, inwhich he will start pulping his heart and also start chest beating it up and down.
MuttleyLaff said the smoke from candles changed the color to dark brown or black. But the smoke did not touch the background color and the hollow on their head; It didn't stain Jesus' cloth.
If nor be sickness dey worry d guy, abeg na wetin e be?
OkCornel: Oya @ letu, let us start with the Seljuk empire;
Abeg did the Seljuk Empire which was Turks-Persian (also Semitic) in origin carry out any anti-Semitic cleansing in the Middle East hmmm?
who wrote that stuff, it appears that you don't have the right mind to be able to decipher the truth from the lie and the lie from the truth, how can you be Seljuk Turkic/ Semitic /Persians all at once even here in Nigeria there's nothing like eg I'm Angas Kanuri Yoruba Tive Ogoni Igala Urohbo Idoma Fulani Binin Hausa Igbo all at once no wonder your White Masters do look down on Blacks simply because of people like you. No wonder white people say's
IF YOU WANT TO HIDE SOMETHING FROM A BLACK MAN PUT IT IN A BOOK HE WILL BELIEVE YOU WITHOUT REASONING.
MuttleyLaff: I know, but it is just them being lazy bible illiterate and pretending that they can't see in the same Lamentations 4:7, talking of purer than snow and whiter than milk. Why not use their absurd logic to equate the snow and white milk to the Israelites being white-skinned. Of course donnie, wouldn't like to do that. Why? Its because it doesnt fit his agenda, so he has to pick and choose. Be proof-texting with scripture
As for Lamentations 4:7, the verse didnt even say anything about anyone being black or black skinned. It merely and simply said their skin got darker, which of course, anyone in the times of famine, get darker skins. The Irish famine, the white skinned Irish got dark then darker
And also the Bible didn't say anything about Irish no need for the example, from black to white Snow Milk what where you expecting. The Bible as we have it today was arrange organized rearrange and Crafted by white people , if I was the one doing all this I would have twisted it more by adding my own from Black to the White and Snow Milk stuff, thirdly I will put my own like this AS HANDSOME AND BEAUTIFUL LIKE IGBO PEOPLE .
Please can you show us evidence of massive ethnic cleansing of Semites in Iraq, Iran, Turkey and Syria?
Put it here for everyone to see nau.
Awon Jews were black liars...
Stop this Laziness and read because I'm not going to do your assignment for you so go and do your assignment and stop running your mouth any how, your a human being and your not a Bamboo, make sure you do your assignment .
letu: And More, the last picture is that of German teper history of Europeans defending their Castle from Barbarians or Bush men according to White people.
@MuttleyLaff, go back and check it out because I've removed it now you can relax.
MuttleyLaff: I watched the full interview with its audio from start to end.
You see my friend that yours and donnie picture quotes are made up. President Nasser didn't say anything about the Jews' skin colour and its more the reason you cant find anywhere in the world, of the supposed quote on video or audio.
Religion / Re: The Egypt Hollywood Never Shows You by letu(m): 9:16am On Jun 24, 2020 
, if I was the one doing all this I would have twisted it more by adding my own from Black to the White and Snow Milk stuff, thirdly I will put my own like this AS HANDSOME AND BEAUTIFUL LIKE IGBO PEOPLE 
