HellRaiXer:
[s] you quoted the post of another moniker and ascribed it to me.

I thought you're a busy gynecologist and you have created 3 handles just this morning [/s]

I'm not going down that road with you!

-Lord

HellRaiXer:
@lordadam11, Why are you ascribing me to another person?

Are you same as Lordadam7 lordadam8 , lordadam9 , lordadam10 and now lordadam11? Damn!!!

Anyways, I don't get what the squabble is if one states his preference, you should state yours without projecting your fears by resorting to personal invectives.

I'm not going down that road with you.

I answered your question and that's it. Never ascribed you to another person, read well and comprehend.

-Lord

Who banned my LordAdam7, LordAdam8, and LordAdam10 monikers?

This was my first post with LordAdam7 moniker. It shows that my LordAdam main account ban was an oversight by an overzealous mod:

LordAdam7:
Because the Yoruba people are AFONJAS.

Abi r u not reading the history with open eyes? Can't u see the many flagrant instances of treachery by fellow Yoruba people on their comrades after being coerced by their former slaves turned masters?

Is it any surprise that Tinubu after repackaging Buhari is receiving the same treachery from his fellow Yoruba comrades coerced by the same people that came begging caps in hands? Or even that Tinubu revolted against Southern interests for his purely selfish agenda of becoming the sole power in the region, only to be hackneyed by the same monster he created?

It is the same thing that happened between Akintola and Awolowo.

Yorubas are AFONJAS. They're back-stabbers, treacherous, and treasonous. Of course, it is immodest to generalize, but the trait is undeniably strong especially amongst the elites, and even more so amongst the hoi polloi.

How I wish the Obas in Benin during this period were not so vile, wicked, and lacking sufficient ambition. Bini would have successfully routed many Yoruba towns, especially Eko and Ikoyi, because the Yorubas would not have been able to put up a united front, seeing as they alternated between fighting themselves and becoming fodder to the rampaging Fulani cavalry.

These were interesting times indeed, and it is indeed entertaining to ponder on the number of death proportional to the population that occurred weekly during the raids, battles, massacres, and carnage. Many innocents falling due to the ego or stupidity of their lords.

Makes you value the fact you weren't born in those times, but now that we have Geneva conventions, and war crime parlance pervading the polity of the modern world.

-Lord

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Who is the very STUPI.D and UNINTELLIGENT moderator who banned my account (https://www.nairaland.com/lordadam) because of the reply above the line on a history thread.

Let the BAST.ARD come here and maintain an intelligent discussion let NLs settle the scores.

I dare you FOO.L.

I'm talking about a trait that was well elucidated by Samuel Jackson and even revealed in modern times and the cry baby who cannot stomach criticism dare to ban my account for 5 months. What temerity?

Outside of NL can you police opinions because they are not favorable to you. In fact, who are you?

I was about to reply naijalander's civil reply with an explanation, and I discovered what the ethnic coward had done.

Yorubas are educated, brilliant, and proud people, but they are also treacherous. Every tribe has that one bad trait. The Igbos may be intelligent, formidable, and astute businessmen, but they are cunny. The Fulanis may be efficient organizers and very patient, but they are utterly vindictive.

If I cannot critique an historical piece about one of the big 3 tribes in Nigeria on the largest NIGERIAN forum, where can I do so without boundaries?

What has NairaLand turned into?

Seun, Lalasticlala, I need answers. How dare you guys hand over the baton of policing intellectual topics to a bunch of unintelligent, quack neophytes with irresponsible ethnic bias.

I'm livid is an understatement. This is not the politics section, it is the culture section for crying out loud!

I need my main account to be unbanned, I could care less what happened in 18th century Yorubaland, I use that account to conduct trades on this platform.

-Lord

And even after I posted my complaint on the complaint thread, no mod or Admin responded; but clearly they recognized the fault line and didn't axe my account.

LordAdam7:


Thank you for the mention.

Personally, if I knew a mod would view my submissions as an ethnic insult I wouldn't have bothered replying in the thread.

Anyone can read that thread to see the intellectual discussions that have been made that wouldn't have occurred if someone with valuable input had just skipped the thread.

For the record, I know I've skipped many threads for the simple reason that I didn't want a mod to take my reply out of context and deliver a harsh ban.

It's killing the quality of discussions that happen on NL, and I'm not sure Seun cares as much about the quality of discussions on NL as he wants us to believe. Else he'll reign in on the bots he employed as Moderators, who no offense, have displayed as much intelligence as three-month old toddlers.

The majority of NLs may be content viewing memes and epic clap backs and populating populist threads. And if I'm in Seun's shoes, I'd obviously focus more on this demography. But there is a significant percentage of NLs that are here to learn a lot more than whether Adaeze Yobo is exercising or if Davido's sister is pregnant.

These people need an insulated environment where their intellectual views are protected from the rancor of mindless moderation.

And if Seun can't cater to this small segment of people who enrich NL in their little way and improve the diversity of an 11 yr old NIGERIAN (not pan-Yoruba or pan-Progressives or pan-whatever) forum, then Seun should be bold enough to say so. And let people like me know I'm only coming here to check out the currency thread. And if I want to join communities where intellect is protected and promoted, I head elsewhere.

cc frathermathy obaliala tippytop 998990 (I hope I got this correctly) and the other brethren them.

-Lord

Look at the stats attached to this post, I'm not the average marauding NL. My posts give value and it shows. If my account hadn't been axed since day one, I'll like to know why now of all times is the best time to axe it.

This time I'm done.

HellRaiXer:
yeah yeah yeah. To each is own. So why the squabble?

Here is the reason:

[quote author=LordAdam7 post=53862789]Oh dear @Timelezz

Are you getting screwed over by the bots?

You never learn. What a dumb brute!

Stay down! The punches are too heavy, you couldn't possibly get back from this. Your credibility is shattered.

Here, I reposted the post you clearly missed.



When you say this:



Preceded by



You are simply saying that what all (not some) male gynecologists do is wrong... In fact according to your statement, the mere fact that a male gyn examines a female patient amounts to sexual assault. It is a heavy accusation.

You just dropped a gavel on the job description of an entire sub-profession that's attending to the health needs of more than 2 billion women around the world.

That you concluded with a statement that you wouldn't let any male ob-gyn touch your female relative does not excuse the fact that you implicitly implied that those who allow their female relatives to meet male ob-gyns are "SICK."

It is the height of intolerance and goes against everything that a rational, educated mind should be saying on a public forum.

It is okay to say, that you wouldn't trust a male gyn to be alone with your female relative. That is justified. And that's what multiple people have said on this thread. You didn't see me quoting them. They have a right to an opinion.

Most of these people are open to the idea of a female chaperon when a female ob-gyn is not present.

But for you, anything other than a female ob-gyn is unacceptable, simply because you think male ob-gyns are immoral and those who use male ob-gyns are condoning immorality.

When you come on a public forum to say that, it is akin to taking a mega phone to your central hospital and say that what the male ob-gyns are doing is morally reprehensible. When you do that, you can count on some uninformed listeners to re-echo it, and soonest we'll have a mob.

On the Internet, this just spreads misinformation, that can be very dangerous. We're talking about health. I shouldn't have to give statistics about how early detection saves lives, and here you are saying on a public forum that it is acceptable to not meet a male ob-gyn (even when a female chaperon is provided) until a female is in a life-threatening situation.

That you do not understand the gravity of the words you used is a clear indication that you should be hospitalized. You have ZERO value for human life. Not even the lives of your female relatives. And it's why I said you are a danger to those around you.

You are taking a medically unsafe decision and you are influencing others to take same decision. And you are using the moral and culture blackmail to implicitly coerce others to accept your viewpoint. And when you are called out, you are saying it is harmless because you used a personal pronoun.

And you even had the guts to type that. You sociopath.

-Lord

It's one thing to say you aren't comfortable with a male ob-gyn and female patient setup.

It is another thing to say it is immoral and that those who don't see it your way are SICK...

Now if we talking about wearing trousers or applying makeup, I wouldn't care.

But this is centering on health. And someone is one a public forum opining that it is moral to endanger the lives of women. In an ultra-religious country like ours where some sects say it is moral to bleed to death and we have hundreds of new believers of that. I wouldn't have someone come here and give extremist quasi-religious views that can potential ruin the health of an innocent reader.

And that's the origin of the squabble.

-Lord