Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,196,450 members, 7,961,400 topics. Date: Sunday, 29 September 2024 at 01:03 AM

What Is Your Take On Homosexualism? - Culture (13) - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Culture / What Is Your Take On Homosexualism? (17285 Views)

Homosexualism In Nigeria (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) ... (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (Reply) (Go Down)

Re: What Is Your Take On Homosexualism? by Dawgpound: 7:15pm On Jun 07, 2010
Whatever!! That video is shameful. See Africans acting like the savages the West loves to portray them as. Its dumb to think that every gay or bisexual man eats feaces. EWWWWW Since when did that become fashionable? Look people have different fetishes and eatin poopooo can be one of em. I don't eat any damn poo poo but if you douche ur asss Bawolomo and keep it smellin fresh and clean I might go down on you then stick da booty of urs that if u are cute and got thick asss. grin
Re: What Is Your Take On Homosexualism? by bawomolo(m): 7:53pm On Jun 07, 2010
Dawgpound:

Whatever!! That video is shameful. See Africans acting like the savages the West loves to portray them as. Its dumb to think that every gay or bisexual man eats feaces. EWWWWW Since when did that become fashionable? Look people have different fetishes and eatin poopooo can be one of em. I don't eat any damn poo poo but if you douche your asss Bawolomo and keep it smellin fresh and clean I might go down on you then stick da booty of urs that if u are cute and got thick asss. grin

bros too much info.
a certain guy named sefago might be interested in your offer grin
sagamite might want to watch for research purposes shocked cheesy
Re: What Is Your Take On Homosexualism? by rubaslipa: 9:05pm On Jun 07, 2010
bawomolo:

bros too much info.
a certain guy named sefago might be interested in your offer grin
sagamite might want to watch for research purposes shocked cheesy

Mek u no kill me o! I laugh so tey my jaw dislocate  grin  grin  grin

Not too sure sefago would roll with that, but sagamite might,  then again, he might pass, unless goats are involved!  tongue

'Eat da poo poo' vid is blocked in some countries.  angry

Check it here  (same video, shot from the reverse angle).

Imagine! Someone had to visit some conc coldblooded rockstonegranite hardcore websites with that laptop to get those pics shocked
Then he showed them around! I've never seen such before, and I thought I'd seen it all.

For younger/more bush readers: The reason why it's such a joke is because
a) few gay men do this stuff
b) everything mentioned is done by some heterosexuals too

Deeper!!!  cry

I remember this case where this guy hired a hitman to kill his wife after she packed out of the house and started divorce and custody proceedings. She couldn't take his 'eat da poo poo' habits any more. Na wa o! Dat one too much. The guy was a cop!
Re: What Is Your Take On Homosexualism? by muyiserra: 9:45pm On Jun 07, 2010
I dont see anything wrong wit it as fas as these ''couple'' loves themselves.
@Chinyeye you are old enough to respect the decision of other pple rather condemning then.

I dnt think for me o! dat anything is wrong with it cos itwhat they feel and enjoy best final.
Re: What Is Your Take On Homosexualism? by Sagamite(m): 12:36am On Jun 08, 2010
bawomolo:

booo you eat dee poo pooo  grin

look at sagamite's pastor  cheesy

can the children leave please grin grin

See as you want make holy spirit bust out of my body. grin

bawomolo:

bros too much info.
a certain guy named sefago might be interested in your offer grin
sagamite might want to watch for research purposes shocked cheesy

Shigidi go give you abara (slap on the back) tonight when you are sleeping. angry
Re: What Is Your Take On Homosexualism? by Sagamite(m): 12:38am On Jun 08, 2010
ruba_slipa:

Mek u no kill me o! I laugh so tey my jaw dislocate  grin  grin  grin

Not too sure sefago would roll with that, but sagamite might,  then again, he might pass, unless goats are involved!  tongue

'Eat da poo poo' vid is blocked in some countries.  angry

Check it here  (same video, shot from the reverse angle).

Imagine! Someone had to visit some conc coldblooded rockstonegranite hardcore websites with that laptop to get those pics shocked
Then he showed them around! I've never seen such before, and I thought I'd seen it all.

For younger/more bush readers: The reason why it's such a joke is because
a) few gay men do this stuff
b) everything mentioned is done by some heterosexuals too

Deeper!!!  cry

I remember this case where this guy hired a hitman to kill his wife after she packed out of the house and started divorce and custody proceedings. She couldn't take his 'eat da poo poo' habits any more. Na wa o! Dat one too much. The guy was a cop!

slowpoke, you gay arse is sick.

With your daft Georgetown arguments, you are pissed you got a beating.

Fffing deviant. Go and put the shite in your mouth.
Re: What Is Your Take On Homosexualism? by mamagee3(f): 12:42am On Jun 08, 2010
[size=27pt]Enough Already! [/size] angry angry
Re: What Is Your Take On Homosexualism? by bawomolo(m): 3:11am On Jun 08, 2010
lol jokes aside. let me get serious for a minute.

sagamite - do you agree with extremist views such as those of pastor eat da poo poo.  Do you think homosexuals(gays) should be portrayed in such manner.  why are homosexuals ridiculed for acts also performed by heterosexuals?

a little off-topic- shouldn't the congregation be wondering why their pastor is watching fisting videos  grin
Re: What Is Your Take On Homosexualism? by SEFAGO(m): 6:34am On Jun 08, 2010
@ Sagamite

I swore I would never go into this, but you keep causing trouble:

As I have said leave me out of this. I am not ruba_slippa- you prolly assumed because of this, knowing your thought process:

Not too sure sefago  would roll with that, but sagamite  might,  then again, he might pass, unless goats are involved!

I would also assume the goat pictures brought back memories of the chimpanzee picture  grin.

However note, apart from the fact that i dont engage in cowardly tactics, I would not do so in such a sloppy way that would make me identifiable. I feel insulted lol.

Moreover, I cannot even speak pidgin at the level of ruba_slipa and my attempts to do so would be extremely obvious. I also do not enage people that directly in my posts. ruba_slipa's style is too different from mine to even warrant suspecting we are the same. Apart from the fact that his writing is very very emotive, just like how you write- a style that I dislike personally, he also has some peculiarities.

He tends to pick your arguments directly, while spicing it up with insults. Further, he engages you on the bestiality issue which i would never do. I would easily dispel it on consent issues and the fact that this is not parallel logic. He is right though about the fact that bestiality laws can be argued to be to protect animals. This has been done to engage people who want to strike bestiality laws. But I would not even go that long wind route, but stick with my consent logic since I am not interested in bestiality. Also, I would never engage arguments on naturality because of the fact that humans and animals are just not the same. I think ruba_slippa pointed that out to you.

Moreover, he escapes the NL word censor by using symbols such as @ and [pounds]. I dont have a british pounds sign on my laptop undecided. Infact I had to google this up to find out:

http://www.ehow.com/how_5663401_type-british-pound-sign.html

Its likely that ruba_slipa bought his laptop in britain or copy and pasted the pound sign. I would personally (If you follow my style) separate the words like s=e=x or just use homo/gay activity.

Anyhoo, please leave me out of this and use some Midlands arguments to engage ruba_slippa.

My word, and I rarely lie- We are not the same. You don't seem like a nice person but there is nothing I can do to change that. Please leave me out of this. This would be my last post.
Re: What Is Your Take On Homosexualism? by geniogeni: 9:11am On Jun 08, 2010
ruba_slipa:

!!Look at you sef. Na for dat you register for NL? You no read di thread, come post rubbish an runway one-two!! Nonsense! Whish kin medical attention you dey recommend? Wetin you tink prayer go do?

Na you be among di goat wey Sagamite dey ride everyday.

I for yap you up-and-down, only una nickname funny small. As if Cashmadam no dey sin every day.
I go try pray for you o! Mek u no smuggle cocaine or open yansh again because of bizness.

@geniogeni: How you fit dress yourself when morning dey nack sef? o ma se o! (terrible shame). when I see your level of intellect, mi sef, I vomit one kin pavement pizza, i-i-i-bleeeeurrrrghhhh!!!!!  shocked  embarassed
Sorry o! Sorry. I get home training. I no fit yap disable persin.
ruba or whatever your name is ,its very obvious you are such a big fool with very bad upbringing.my comment was not directed to you or but to a topic and i expressed my take on it ,so getting personal with someone u dont even know shows ur level of intellect also.This forum was not made for people like you to insult others,becos dats all u know how to do,but to air their view so please , grow up.idiot
Re: What Is Your Take On Homosexualism? by Sagamite(m): 12:44pm On Jun 08, 2010
bawomolo:

lol jokes aside. let me get serious for a minute.

sagamite - do you agree with extremist views such as those of pastor eat da poo poo.  Do you think homosexuals(gays) should be portrayed in such manner.  why are homosexuals ridiculed for acts also performed by heterosexuals?

a little off-topic- shouldn't the congregation be wondering why their pastor is watching fisting videos  grin

You know me!

I only stand for objectivity, logic and intelligence.

I think his arguments does not carry weight, so you will not see me referring to his views and insight in my arguments.

But what he is doing, I will not object to or condemn as the pro-gay people are doing worse misinformation on BIGGER platforms and IT IS WORKING FOR THEM, as evident in the platitudes you see even Nigerian kids now based abroad or in African cities now use without questioning (and think it makes them look 'cool, modern, enlightened  grin, forward-thinking, progressive etc'). Talkless of locals still based in Africa that idolise anything white people do.

Ediotic platitudes like:

"Two consenting adults"

"Gay sexual interaction is fundamental human rights"

"Not accepting gays is the same as whites not accepting blacks"

"Homophobic" (People accept to be called that without understanding what a phobia means)

"Bigot, conservative, closed-minded for not accepting gays"

" Disapproval of 'Discrimination' against homosexuality"

All these moronic platitudes are not any different for what my dear Rev. Father grin is using. His idiocy is only levelling up the advantage the others have on the principles pitch. He still has a long way to go, because the opposition is already dominating mediums like BBC, CNN, SKY, soaps and other powerful platforms that can influence the thinking of the daft or those with inferiority complex (worshippers of the GREAT WHITE MAN).

I question everything because of my confidence in myself and thinking.
Re: What Is Your Take On Homosexualism? by rubaslipa: 1:27pm On Jun 08, 2010
geniogeni:

ruba or whatever your name is ,its very obvious you are such a big fool with very bad upbringing.my comment was not directed to you or but to a topic and i expressed my take on it ,so getting personal with someone u dont even know shows your level of intellect also.This forum was not made for people like you to insult others,becos dats all u know how to do,but to air their view so please , grow up.idiot

Mek me talk one Kiswahili for una: Mpanda ovyo - hula ovyo
'You sow anyhow - you go chop anyhow'
You are just reaping the uselessness you sowed, in other words.

You guys like to play rough, so I too play rough with you. I will be polite and gentle with people who show politeness and gentility.

Look at what you posted as your only 'view':

geniogeni posted on: Yesterday at 03:38:21 PM
HOMOSEXUALITY, sooooooooooooo ssssssssiiiiiiiicccckkkkkkkkk, gagging, gagging, here it goes, buahhhhh!!!!!!!(just lost my lunch

You posted that with a silly amount of smilies as your 'point', and when you get yapped you're now crying. It pained you, abi?

Igbo man tell me sey:
Agwo emeghi nke o jiri buru agwo, umuaka achiri ya hie nku.
If snake never bite person, small pikin go use am tie firewood

Not to leave out Yoruba-Yoruba people:
Ko ju ma ri bi, ese lo gun e.
If u no fit see badness, betta talk to ya leg only

Sorry pipple, na Azania proverb dey shak my head todey.

geniogeni, I've tried not to yap you here. I'm assuming that you are maybe quite young. Oya, make your point, my brother, we are listening.
Re: What Is Your Take On Homosexualism? by rubaslipa: 3:06pm On Jun 08, 2010
Note to Sagamite

Pastor Poo-Poo is not the only person you should shy away from.
In your foaming-at-the-mouth homophobia, you have been mentioning NARTH as 'scientific' proof that a LGBT (gay) orientation is a mental illness that needs curing. Why link to an organisation whose idea is anti-gay first, with science and logic coming very, very far behind?

Eh, no be ya NARTH board member (and Baptist minister) dis? shocked
Anti-gay 'scientific' campaigner packing male love-peddler on holiday, and receiving daily 'servicing'!! Na wa o!
E no fit cure himself, sha! No worry yasef. Mr BigMan don resign one-two!. Maybe he don find boyfriend, so he no go patronise ashewo boy again. You nko? Ewu no good o!

In fact, you should shy away from your own past posts. You like to avoid answering points, and instead attack people on the grounds that their education is not up to yours. Your posts are remarkably fact-free, you simply repeat your own personal feelings and opinion, and pretend they are 'facts'. You feel that constantly calling people morons, retarded fools etc is making a point. Don't deny it, anyone can click on your name and see your past posts. That's why I keep hammering you for your long list of Wrong-like-Gowon nonsense. I have at least 10 more of your shamefully weak 'points' to mess up in this thread. I left them out before because my posts are always too long.

That's what I like about about Nairaland. What you have said, is there for everyone to see.

Please stick around. We still have to discuss the issues of:[list]

[li]your spelling[/li]
[li]your insistence that I am in fact SEFAGO. I am not. Why u no hear word?[/li]
[li]your supposed treatments to cure homosexuality[/li]
[li]your bizarre, frightening attachment to goat-sex. dat one dey too much for anyone.[/li]
[li]your weak, weak 'proof' that homosexuality is not 'natural'[/li]
[li]your view that homosexuality is equivalent to bestiality[/li]
[li]your insistence that despite your bitterness, hatred and attempts to prevent[/li][/li]progress, yet you are not homophobic[/li]
[li]your interesting freudian slips ('you keep trying to ram it down our throats') shocked [/li]
[li]your similarity to other arch-homophobes worldwide, who eventually turn out to be gay themselves[/li]
[li]your laughable insistence that homosexuality is some kind of new thing brought to Africa by the useless Oyinbos[/li]
[li]your unfortunate idea that you can use constant insulting terms (gay, pansy), yet can still deny that you are a bigot[/li]
[li]your habit of being yapped up, down and sideways in one thread discussing homosexuality, and then carrying the same yeye, egbe (dry nonsense) words to the next thread, expecting to get away with it. How far now?[/li]
[/list]

You have never made any point on this thread successfully aside from
[list]
[li]'it's unnatural' (Wrong as usual, as has been burnt into your yansh several times)[/li]
[li]'it's disgusting' (Wrong, not in itself, but because you state it as a fact, when actually it's your personal opinion only).[/li]
[/list]


You insist that Naija cannot change and will never change. People who believe that about society are always wrong. The problem is that you don't realise you are setting yourself as an enemy, and people are ready for you and other homophobes. Against you are gay people, progressive people, people who believe in justice, people who believe in civil rights, and open-minded people. We are too many, and we are too strong in our arguments. You go lose. Guaranteed.

O te aka o di njo, emesie o ga-adi mma.
Things will eventually improve despite the present difficulties

Ukpala gbabara n'ikpo okuko na-ala ala mmuo.
The grasshopper that runs into the mist of fowls ends up in the land of spirits

Bring it! wink
Re: What Is Your Take On Homosexualism? by Sagamite(m): 3:25pm On Jun 08, 2010
bawomolo:

lol jokes aside. let me get serious for a minute.

sagamite - do you agree with extremist views such as those of pastor eat da poo poo.  Do you think homosexuals(gays) should be portrayed in such manner.  why are homosexuals ridiculed for acts also performed by heterosexuals?

a little off-topic- shouldn't the congregation be wondering why their pastor is watching fisting videos  grin

Another moronic thing that annoys me, is the reference to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, as an abiding law that prevents the condemnation of gays and the need to legalise their activities to abide by the declaration.

This is a document with ambigious texts, written by a group of white men from the West (but I guess to the Western media that is representative of "Universal"  grin). Men of unknown and unconfirmed sexual leanings (they may be closet gays), hence we can not understand the influences and biases of their motives. Although, to be fair to them, the declaration  is ambigious and does not explicitly approve of homosexuality although some fooools would refer to it like if it does.

Furthermore, there is a pathetic deceit that countries (including Nigeria) are a signatory to this document, hence are legally binded to respect it.

No, Nigeria is not a signatory. The Declaration is not legally binding, it is a mere view of some few white men, so no slowpoke should use it as defence of gays and mislead some impressionable people.

The Declaration was ratified (basically not legally binding but liked) by appointed representatives of 48 countries (not including Nigeria) in 1948 when the UN would have had less than 60 members.

Now, you see this being exploited by some daft, moronic gay promoters (thinking they are smart) like it is some generally agreed and approved guide that all UN members have to abide by.

IT IS NOT LEGALLY BINDING.

THERE ARE NO SIGNATORIES.

IT IS A MERE, AMBIGIOUS PHILOSOPHY OF SOME FEW WHITE MEN.

The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights AND the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights are what is legally binding by the signatories and which are signed by Nigeria and most countries.
Re: What Is Your Take On Homosexualism? by Sagamite(m): 3:28pm On Jun 08, 2010
ruba_slipa:

Note to Sagamite

Pastor Poo-Poo is not the only person you should shy away from.
In your foaming-at-the-mouth homophobia, you have been mentioning NARTH as 'scientific' proof that a LGBT (gay) orientation is a mental illness that needs curing. Why link to an organisation whose idea is anti-gay first, with science and logic coming very, very far behind?

Eh, no be ya NARTH board member (and Baptist minister) dis? shocked
Anti-gay 'scientific' campaigner packing male love-peddler on holiday, and receiving daily 'servicing'!! Na wa o!
E no fit cure himself, sha! No worry yasef. Mr BigMan don resign one-two!. Maybe he don find boyfriend, so he no go patronise ashewo boy again. You nko? Ewu no good o!

In fact, you should shy away from your own past posts. You like to avoid answering points, and instead attack people on the grounds that their education is not up to yours. Your posts are remarkably fact-free, you simply repeat your own personal feelings and opinion, and pretend they are 'facts'. You feel that constantly calling people morons, retarded fools etc is making a point. Don't deny it, anyone can click on your name and see your past posts. That's why I keep hammering you for your long list of Wrong-like-Gowon nonsense. I have at least 10 more of your shamefully weak 'points' to mess up in this thread. I left them out before because my posts are always too long.

That's what I like about about Nairaland. What you have said, is there for everyone to see.

Please stick around. We still have to discuss the issues of:[list]

[li]your spelling[/li]
[li]your insistence that I am in fact SEFAGO. I am not. Why u no hear word?[/li]
[li]your supposed treatments to cure homosexuality[/li]
[li]your bizarre, frightening attachment to goat-sex. dat one dey too much for anyone.[/li]
[li]your weak, weak 'proof' that homosexuality is not 'natural'[/li]
[li]your view that homosexuality is equivalent to bestiality[/li]
[li]your insistence that despite your bitterness, hatred and attempts to prevent[/li][/li]progress, yet you are not homophobic[/li]
[li]your interesting freudian slips ('you keep trying to ram it down our throats') shocked [/li]
[li]your similarity to other arch-homophobes worldwide, who eventually turn out to be gay themselves[/li]
[li]your laughable insistence that homosexuality is some kind of new thing brought to Africa by the useless Oyinbos[/li]
[li]your unfortunate idea that you can use constant insulting terms (gay, pansy), yet can still deny that you are a bigot[/li]
[li]your habit of being yapped up, down and sideways in one thread discussing homosexuality, and then carrying the same yeye, egbe (dry nonsense) words to the next thread, expecting to get away with it. How far now?[/li]
[/list]

You have never made any point on this thread successfully aside from
[list]
[li]'it's unnatural' (Wrong as usual, as has been burnt into your yansh several times)[/li]
[li]'it's disgusting' (Wrong, not in itself, but because you state it as a fact, when actually it's your personal opinion only).[/li]
[/list]


You insist that Naija cannot change and will never change. People who believe that about society are always wrong. The problem is that you don't realise you are setting yourself as an enemy, and people are ready for you and other homophobes. Against you are gay people, progressive people, people who believe in justice, people who believe in civil rights, and open-minded people. We are too many, and we are too strong in our arguments. You go lose. Guaranteed.

O te aka o di njo, emesie o ga-adi mma.
Things will eventually improve despite the present difficulties

Ukpala gbabara n'ikpo okuko na-ala ala mmuo.
The grasshopper that runs into the mist of fowls ends up in the land of spirits

Bring it! wink

WTF is this moronic gay ranting about?

Is he dying of AIDS?
Re: What Is Your Take On Homosexualism? by rubaslipa: 4:23pm On Jun 08, 2010
SAGAMITE

You can't win because you are a Professional Fumbler. How many times can you be wrong, yet still continue making noise? Dis one no be football thread o! You for tok sense here!

Sagamite:

WTF is this moronic gay ranting about?
Is he dying of AIDS?
Wrong [/b]on all points. As usual.

slowpoke? [b]Wrong.
You're just confirming what I said in my last post:
ruba_slipa:

You like to avoid answering points.
You feel that constantly calling people morons, retarded fools etc is making a point.
You have never made any point on this thread successfully.
Let the crowd decide.

Gay? No, I'm not.
Wrong. [/b]As usual.

dying of AIDS
[b]Wrong. [/b]As usual.

Why don't you try addressing the points? We all know why, [b]Mr NARTH
. You no get any point to make, at-all, at-all.

Na u go catch AIDS first - from goat, inside ya big closet there.

*<Sigh>* Honestly, you have to try harder. Three wrong statements in only two lines!  embarassed embarassed embarassed

If na me, I go sharrap. lipsrsealed

Re: What Is Your Take On Homosexualism? by Sagamite(m): 4:36pm On Jun 08, 2010
ruba_slipa:

SAGAMITE

You can't win because you are a Professional Fumbler. How many times can you be wrong, yet still continue making noise? Dis one no be football thread o! You for tok sense here!
Wrong [/b]on all points. As usual.

slowpoke? [b]Wrong.
You're just confirming what I said in my last post:Let the crowd decide.

Gay? No, I'm not.
Wrong. [/b]As usual.

dying of AIDS
[b]Wrong. [/b]As usual.

Why don't you try addressing the points? We all know why, [b]Mr NARTH
. You no get any point to make, at-all, at-all.

Na u go catch AIDS first - from goat, inside ya big closet there.

*<Sigh>* Honestly, you have to try harder. Three wrong statements in only two lines!  embarassed embarassed embarassed

If na me, I go sharrap. lipsrsealed

gay, you think saying cooking is natural is the "right" I should be? grin
Re: What Is Your Take On Homosexualism? by rubaslipa: 5:05pm On Jun 08, 2010
SAGAMITE AKA MR. NARTH

No tek insult cover di matter. You dey see 'gay' even under ya bed, when na u di only 'gay' who dey dere.

Pipple dey tek you laff, so tey, dem teef wan comot. Sorry sah. cheesy

^^^^^
Can't you explain yourself? See all di full points wey don make on ya head. Try, now,

See your mates, how dem dey. Hyypocriiiiiite.

Re: What Is Your Take On Homosexualism? by bawomolo(m): 6:03pm On Jun 08, 2010
lmao@that pic
u guys are not serious
Re: What Is Your Take On Homosexualism? by Sagamite(m): 6:24pm On Jun 08, 2010
ruba_slipa:

SAGAMITE AKA MR. NARTH

No tek insult cover di matter. You dey see 'gay' even under ya bed, when na u di only 'gay' who dey dere.

Pipple dey tek you laff, so tey, dem teef wan comot. Sorry sah. cheesy

^^^^^
Can't you explain yourself? See all di full points wey don make on ya head. Try, now,

See your mates, how dem dey. Hyypocriiiiiite.

gay, explain myself to a slowpoke that when his argument was killed resorted to insults?

Explain myself to a fooool that says homosexuality is the same as people being left handed?

Explain myself to the dimwit that thinks animals only have inter'curse' when in heat?

Beetch, are you retarded?
Re: What Is Your Take On Homosexualism? by rubaslipa: 11:52pm On Jun 08, 2010
bawomolo:

lmao@that pic
u guys are not serious
embarassed  cheesy Sorry bros, una don catch me. I no dey serious at-all at-all. Abeg, mek u no vex wink

But I serious pass SAGAMITE/Mr NARTH o!

Ok, mek we lef goat issue - but na him first bring goat matta inside di thread.

SAGAMITE, Young man, Wrong man, we go continue efry-day bizness.

Sagamite:

gay, explain myself to a slowpoke that when his argument was killed resorted to insults?

You nefer kill single argment for this thread, not for me, not for bawomolo, not for SEFAGO not for enybody sef. Mek una mention one.  Yu sef be double hypocrite. No be u first bring insult inside di thread? No be your sig sey u like insult? Please, go check early pages of di thread, make una hide face like all una conservative friend wey don disgrace demsef finish.

Sagamite:

Explain myself to a fooool that says homosexuality is the same as people being left handed?
Dat one na my opinion. I no be like u who tink sey opinion [/i]and [i]fact [/i]na di same ting.

Sagamite:

Explain myself to the dimwit that thinks animals only have inter'curse' when in heat?
Beetch, are you retarded?

This is why people never give a sucker an even break. Why do you want to go back to that old stuff, when you're [i]still wrong?
. Most mammals have sex when the female comes into heat.
I know sey na b!tch u dey look. U no go find am here, sha! Check rentboy.com, please. No be di place where u NARTH people dey go 'shopping'?

You nefer mention past points for correct time, now you wan to use them dodge current points I already don ask u for dis page. When u fit answer them? No be only me de wait o!

Imagine, bringing out your same old favourite insults when you don't know basic law, you don't know even basic biology, you don't understand the concepts of logic, reasoned argument, even fact is too much for you. No worry, I go list all una yeye statements for u, see if u still get mouth to tok.

And for the last time, leave those goats alone. Your efforts to continually drag bestiality into this thread are tedious - and very, very suspicious. Not sure where you are, but in some jurisdictions, too much interest in animals s£x is actually illegal. Mi no wan mek police pack u o! Police fit carry u go judge, judge fit put una inside prison, where 'touch your toes' go sweet you too much,   shocked
Re: What Is Your Take On Homosexualism? by Sagamite(m): 1:38am On Jun 09, 2010
ruba_slipa:

embarassed  cheesy Sorry bros, una don catch me. I no dey serious at-all at-all. Abeg, mek u no vex wink

But I serious pass SAGAMITE/Mr NARTH o!

Ok, mek we lef goat issue - but na him first bring goat matta inside di thread.

SAGAMITE, Young man, Wrong man, we go continue efry-day bizness.

You nefer kill single argment for this thread, not for me, not for bawomolo, not for SEFAGO not for enybody sef. Mek una mention one.  Yu sef be double hypocrite. No be u first bring insult inside di thread? No be your sig sey u like insult? Please, go check early pages of di thread, make una hide face like all una conservative friend wey don disgrace demsef finish.
Dat one na my opinion. I no be like u who tink sey opinion [/i]and [i]fact [/i]na di same ting.

This is why people never give a sucker an even break. Why do you want to go back to that old stuff, when you're [i]still wrong?
. Most mammals have intimacy when the female comes into heat.
I know sey na b!tch u dey look. U no go find am here, sha! Check rentboy.com, please. No be di place where u NARTH people dey go 'shopping'?

You nefer mention past points for correct time, now you wan to use them dodge current points I already don ask u for dis page. When u fit answer them? No be only me de wait o!

Imagine, bringing out your same old favourite insults when you don't know basic law, you don't know even basic biology, you don't understand the concepts of logic, reasoned argument, even fact is too much for you. No worry, I go list all una yeye statements for u, see if u still get mouth to tok.

And for the last time, leave those goats alone. Your efforts to continually drag bestiality into this thread are tedious - and very, very suspicious. Not sure where you are, but in some jurisdictions, too much interest in animals s£x is actually illegal. Mi no wan mek police pack u o! Police fit carry u go judge, judge fit put una inside prison, where 'touch your toes' go sweet you too much,   shocked

This slowpoke is still ranting his gay poos?
Re: What Is Your Take On Homosexualism? by geniogeni: 8:53am On Jun 09, 2010
ruba_slipa:

Mek me talk one Kiswahili for una: Mpanda ovyo - hula ovyo
'You sow anyhow - you go chop anyhow'
You are just reaping the uselessness you sowed, in other words.

You guys like to play rough, so I too play rough with you. I will be polite and gentle with people who show politeness and gentility.

Look at what you posted as your only 'view':

geniogeni posted on: Yesterday at 03:38:21 PM
You posted that with a silly amount of smilies as your 'point', and when you get yapped you're now crying. It pained you, abi?

Igbo man tell me sey:
Agwo emeghi nke o jiri buru agwo, umuaka achiri ya hie nku.
If snake never bite person, small pikin go use am tie firewood

Not to leave out Yoruba-Yoruba people:
Ko ju ma ri bi, ese lo gun e.
If u no fit see badness, betta talk to ya leg only

Sorry pipple, na Azania proverb dey shak my head todey.

geniogeni, I've tried not to yap you here. I'm assuming that you are maybe quite young. Oya, make your point, my brother, we are listening.
ruba_whatever:
1.i am not your brother.

2.i'm very sure i am older than you.

3.i have no point to make to people like you because you have already killed the enthusiasm with your childish insults.

4.if you have a problem with my first post then read the topic again ''what is YOUR take on homosexuality''

5.if you are comfortable being a homosexual then why being so defensive?

p.s:i dont like you atall and dont care for your ill manners.
Re: What Is Your Take On Homosexualism? by rubaslipa: 1:09pm On Jun 09, 2010
geniogeni:

ruba_whatever:
1.i am not your brother.
You're still stinging? No problem, you are just a next man posting without knowing what he is talking about.
geniogeni:

2.i'm very sure i am older than you.
Very sure? [/i]A ridiculous thing to say on zero evidence. OK, na u know. If you are senior, then why did you post like a small boy, and then start wailing like a small boy wey dem don cane  cry, when I replied to you in your own style? You fit give yappis, but you no fit take am.

geniogeni:

3.i have no point to make to people like you because you have already killed the enthusiasm with your childish insults.
Wrong. You have no point to make, [i]because you had no point to make from the very beginning
. You made the first childish comment, and you don't even realise how childish it was. To show people:
geniogeni:

HOMOSEXUALITY, sooooooooooooo ssssssssiiiiiiiicccckkkkkkkkk, gagging, gagging, here it goes, buahhhhh!!!!!!!(just lost my lunch embarassed sad sad sad sad sad sad sad sad)
You make yourself look worse by pretending the above was reasonable discussion.

geniogeni:

4.if you have a problem with my first post then read the topic again ''what is YOUR take on homosexuality''
Mek I explain. This is an internet forum. When people have a problem with your post, they tell you so. The reasonable ones even tell you why.

geniogeni:

5.if you are comfortable being a homosexual then why being so defensive?
Wrong. Indicate my defensive comment. Wrong. I'm not actually gay. Anyway, many good people are not comfortable being gay because of rude people like you. I'm following this thread because it's a conc civil rights issue, and I want our country to progress, without no-information people like you blocking it.

geniogeni:

p.s:i dont like you atall and dont care for your ill manners.
How upsetting.wink When I replied to you, I didn't make fun of you any more, I just pointed out where you were wrong. That's why you don't like me. Sorry o! cheesy
Na you teach me bad manner first. Una tok bad, u go hear bad reply.

I'm fed up with the big number of you people who just land on the thread and immediately start with your insults, then bleat like goat wey see knife when you get the right reply.

My point is that homosexuality is common, only hidden because it is seen as 'unacceptable'. As that causes a lot of suffering, yet it is not an illness or crime, we might as well be real and stop hiding it.

Pleeeease, make a point on topic. Just one even. Na beg I dey beg you o!
Re: What Is Your Take On Homosexualism? by geniogeni: 1:37pm On Jun 09, 2010
ruba_slipa:

You're still stinging? No problem, you are just a next man posting without knowing what he is talking about.

next man? still zero evidence


Very sure? [/i]A ridiculous thing to say on zero evidence. OK, na u know. If you are senior, then why did you post like a small boy, and then start wailing like a small boy wey dem don cane  cry, when I replied to you in your own style? You fit give yappis, but you no fit take am.

where is the ''yappies'' i gave?


Wrong. You have no point to make, [i]because you had no point to make from the very beginning
. You made the first childish comment, and you don't even realise how childish it was. To show people:You make yourself look worse by pretending the above was reasonable discussion.
Mek I explain. This is an internet forum. When people have a problem with your post, they tell you so. The reasonable ones even tell you why.

i didnt get any reasonable feedback from you


Wrong. Indicate my defensive comment. Wrong. I'm not actually gay. Anyway, many good people are not comfortable being gay because of rude people like you. I'm following this thread because it's a conc civil rights issue, and I want our country to progress, without no-information people like you blocking it.

''not actually gay'', ok


How upsetting.wink When I replied to you, I didn't make fun of you any more, I just pointed out where you were wrong. That's why you don't like me. Sorry o! cheesy
Na you teach me bad manner first. Una tok bad, u go hear bad reply.

I'm fed up with the big number of you people who just land on the thread and immediately start with your insults, then bleat like goat wey see knife when you get the right reply.

My point is that homosexuality is common, only hidden because it is seen as 'unacceptable'. As that causes a lot of suffering, yet it is not an illness or crime, we might as well be real and stop hiding it.

Pleeeease, make a point on topic. Just one even. Na beg I dey beg you o!

like i said earlier ,i have nothing to justify to the likes of u because you didnt start on a matured note,v had my piece on the topic and on you ,so u could keep fooling around and dishing out your insults afterall it all goes back to upbringing.im happy im not the only one that feels this way about you.
Re: What Is Your Take On Homosexualism? by rubaslipa: 2:20pm On Jun 09, 2010
geniogeni:

like i said earlier ,i have nothing to justify to the likes of u because you didnt start on a matured note

You first posted, on this 'matured note':
geniogeni:

HOMOSEXUALITY, sooooooooooooo ssssssssiiiiiiiicccckkkkkkkkk, gagging, gagging, here it goes, buahhhhh!!!!!!!(just lost my lunch embarassed sad sad sad sad sad sad sad sad)

geniogeni:

v had my piece on the topic and on you ,so u could keep fooling around and dishing out your insults afterall it all goes back to upbringing.

You dare talk about my upbringing because I return bad tok for ya own bad tok? See what you posted, I could say the same about your upbringing. You mention my family, mek I mention your mother small. Na she know well well sey I no gay. But mek una ask am for morning time. wink

Ehn, I weigh 75 kilos. How I reach dat size? Every time I £ukc ya mama, she give me one puff-puff. cheesy

Come again, I will tell you what you don't want to hear.  tongue
Re: What Is Your Take On Homosexualism? by Sagamite(m): 2:55pm On Jun 09, 2010
bawomolo:

lol jokes aside. let me get serious for a minute.

sagamite - do you agree with extremist views such as those of pastor eat da poo poo.  Do you think homosexuals(gays) should be portrayed in such manner.  why are homosexuals ridiculed for acts also performed by heterosexuals?

a little off-topic- shouldn't the congregation be wondering why their pastor is watching fisting videos  grin

Read this article and see what I am talking about:

1) See the way the BBC only put gay supporting views (personified by the obnoxious Peter Tatchell), what happened to reporting views of REASONABLE individuals that support the Malawi system?

2) See this statement:

"There was condemnation from around the world for Malawi's anti-homosexuality laws after the pair were jailed for "gross indecency and unnatural acts""

So Western condemnations is representative of "world"?  grin

Are the BBC telling me that there wasn't , at least, equal or even more support around the world for Malawi to enforce its laws and for a nice punitive punishment for the foolhardy deviants? You want to tell me at least 70% of Africans/Arabs/Asians did not support Malawi? Why was that not reported? Part of the brianwashing that the world is accepting gays so give up or "you are odd for not following the movement"?  grin

So, my good pastor, ride on! I will not condemn.
Re: What Is Your Take On Homosexualism? by geniogeni: 3:42pm On Jun 09, 2010
ruba_slipa:

You first posted, on this 'matured note':
You dare talk about my upbringing because I return bad tok for ya own bad tok? See what you posted, I could say the same about your upbringing. You mention my family, mek I mention your mother small. Na she know well well sey I no gay. But mek una ask am for morning time. wink

Ehn, I weigh 75 kilos. How I reach dat size? Every time I £ukc ya mama, she give me one puff-puff. cheesy

Come again, I will tell you what you don't want to hear.  tongue
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, RTFLMAO, HAHAHAHAHA, God i cant believe people like this still exist, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, (cant stop laughing),you just told the whole world the kind of mama you got bitch(ur not a man definately) wink grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.this babe is impossible!!!!!
Re: What Is Your Take On Homosexualism? by tpiah: 3:53pm On Jun 09, 2010
One half of Malawi gay couple 'moves in with a woman'

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/africa/10273459.stm

A gay couple who were jailed in Malawi have split after one of them moved in with a woman, according to reports.

now he's dl
Re: What Is Your Take On Homosexualism? by ChinenyeN(m): 4:27pm On Jun 09, 2010
muyiserra:

@Chinyeye you are old enough to respect the decision of other pple rather condemning then.
Where did I say anything about condemning people?
Re: What Is Your Take On Homosexualism? by Sagamite(m): 5:49pm On Jun 09, 2010
bawomolo:

lol jokes aside. let me get serious for a minute.

sagamite - do you agree with extremist views such as those of pastor eat da poo poo.  Do you think homosexuals(gays) should be portrayed in such manner.  why are homosexuals ridiculed for acts also performed by heterosexuals?

a little off-topic- shouldn't the congregation be wondering why their pastor is watching fisting videos  grin

Part of the Gayrorism (Gay Terrorism) have been telling you about is:

Take for example, in the UK (I don't know about US), you are a politician competing for a seat in Parliament. You need media coverage to cover your campaign and policies to bolster your chances and your party's.

If you are interviewed and gay issues are raised, if you say you are all for gay freedom, acceptance, integration, rights blah blah blah, the media will report it. Probably one paragraph. End of story. Then you can continue going on, discussing your policies and let everyone know you are intelligent and know you can solve the issues affecting the community and nation at large.

If you indicate a reservation about homosexuals rights, acceptance, adoption etc. You are guaranteed to be plastard as a CONTROVERSIAL figure on the front pages the very next morning. You will get a bunch of TV studio interviews that are stealthly aggressive from journalists questioning your position and then they will bring in a gay rights campaigner (e.g. from Stonewall) to question you aggressively. You will spend at least all your campaigning hours defending/explaining your position for the next 4-6 weeks, whilst your rivals are discussing policies/issues, smiling and sharing jokes with journalist to show they are likeable. Your party would have to come out and defend the arbitrarily used label of being "out of touch". Gay rights activists will be outside your doors and the media will take delight in reporting it and say you are "under pressure". Tabloids will dig out pix of you at instances were you do not look composed and apply a defeatist caption (e.g. "Controversial MP cadidate is under severe attack for his views . . . "wink, hence eroding your image as a leader. You will spend so much time defending just that statement that the media will not be interested in discussing other policies on issues with you for 4-6 WHOLE weeks or so. All you will be doing in this period is to PR manage your image to say your opinion is on certain principles, not because you are evil or backward as the media will directly or implicitly insinuate.

Now, you tell me, as a politician, which approach do you see as making more sense to at least get your primary target?

Once you have this bloody gay rights rubbish (even decriminilisation), you open doors for their gayrorisms. Overtime, you will only be allowed to be on the anti-gay side in public (as evident in UK).

That is why I say: DO NOT GIVE THEM AN INCH!

(1) (2) (3) ... (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (Reply)

Keagborekuzi I, The Youngest Crowned King In The World / The Genesis Of Oba-ile Town, Osun State (HISTORY) / Nigeria Is Among The Top Marijuana Consuming Countries In The World - UN Report

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 169
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.