1 Samuel 18:25-27
"Then Saul said,“Thus shall you say to David,‘The king desires no bride-price except a hundred foreskins of the Philistines, that he may be avenged of the king’s enemies.’” Now Saul thought to make David fall by the hand of the Philistines. And when his servants told David these words, it pleased David well to be the king’s son-in-law. Before the time had expired, David arose and went, along with his men, and killed two hundred of the Philistines. And David brought their foreskins, which were given in full number to the king, that he might become the king’s son-in-law. And Saul gave him his daughter Michal for a wife.


Ezekiel 23:20
"There she lusted after her lovers, whose pe.nises were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.


Exodus 4:24-25
"At a lodging place on the way, the LORD met Moses and was about to kill him. 25 But Zipporah took a flint knife, cut off". her son’s foreskin and touched Moses’ feet with it.“Surely you are a bridegroom of blood to me,” she said.


Deuteronomy 23:1
He that is wounded in the stones, or hath his privy member cut off, shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD.

Deuteronomy 25:11-12
If two men are fighting and the wife of one of them comes to rescue her husband from his assailant, and she reaches out and seizes him by his private parts, you shall cut off her hand. Show her no pity.


Matthew 19:12
For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs (i.e. castration) for the kingdom of heaven's sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it.

is everything ok with this chap?

toba:

is everything ok with this chap?

i didn't write them and placed them there!

what exactly are u talking about?

toba:

what exactly are u talking about?

nothing!

LagosShia:

nothing!

then save ur self the stress course it doesn't worth it

toba:

then save your self the stress course it doesn't worth it

okay

toba is ashamed. so he just comes up with trying to pretend as mr. nice guy.

Sweetnecta:

toba is ashamed. so he just comes up with trying to pretend as mr. nice guy.

Ashamed of what?

Im still a nice guy but this Lagosshia/shiamuslim needs to be shown how things are done here

toba:

Ashamed of what?

Im still a nice guy but this Lagosshia/shiamuslim needs to be shown how things are done here

please try it!

you will feel humiliation in calling yourself "christian" ever again or someone who follows that things called bible;that is if you have any shame in you!

LagosShia:

please try it!

you will feel humiliation in calling yourself "christian" ever again or someone who follows that things called bible;that is if you have any shame in you!

I see. u are still making mouth abi?

Over to the other thread

Again. Quotes taken out of context.

toba:

I see. u are still making mouth abi?

Over to the other thread

LOL

Mobinga:

Again. Quotes taken out of context.

hmmm, that is a big statement.i dont think that word should have any context in the "word of God".i stand to be corrected,if you can do that.

LagosShia:

hmmm, that is a big statement.i dont think that word should have any context in the "word of God".i stand to be corrected,if you can do that.

Let's digress :

And forbidden to you are wedded wives of other people except those who have fallen in your hands [as prisoners of war] - Sura 4:24

In essence your Quran is approving sex with slaves of wars, i.e refugees, e.t.c?

O Prophet, when you [and the believers] divorce women, divorce them for their prescribed waiting—period and count the waiting—period accurately . . . 4 And if you are in doubt about those of your women who have despaired of menstruation, (you should know that) their waiting period is three months, and the same applies to those who have not menstruated as yet. As for pregnant women, their period ends when they have delivered their burden. - Sura 65:1

Is your Quran blatantly approving of paedophilia? So Mohammed was a randy paedophile?.

If you fear highhandedness from your wives, remind them [of the teaching of God], then ignore them when you go to bed, then hit them. If they obey you, you have no right to act against them. God is most high and great - Sura 4:34

Is this blatant misogyny? So Mohammed was a wife-beater?

^^^^^ Modinga does not realize that the human natural instinct remains intact for free and captives the same, all the time. Imagine the master of the house having relationship with his house maid. Why? Because the master's manhood acts independently of his status if we go by the fact that he is the husband of the mommy in charge of the female house maid.

The house maid is a woman still. She needs what every normal woman needs; love and affection from a man. So if the master of the house has morals, she pounces on the next available male; the younger brother or the children of the master who are old enough to work out. If she is pretty, some of the males will find a way to get to her, one way or the other.

If she is desperate, then abuses the immature, inexperience is her care at the slightest of window to do so, without raising any obvious sign of her actions and desire.

I find it heard that Modinga will ignore the human nature and thinks that a 30 year old beautiful woman who suddenly becomes a spoil of war in the household of a young military general about her age, will leave her alone for too long. After a year, if that long in his care, she herself will see the man as the ideal man for her by his position of power and privilege, forgetting he had personally masterminded the death of her future husband, father and any other males in her clan. Her womanhood will be instinctively pushing her to him. This is human nature. If the best woman in your society is suddenly willed to you, before long you will be inviting her to your bed or coming to her bed, with a single knock at the door to simply announce that you are just about to open the door. Hypocritical Modinga, I say.

Apart from all the signs and the age indicated for a man and woman to marry, even though these benchmarks apply to both genders, what Islam stresses more is the mental capability of the spouse to handle the role of husband or wife; there is a marital contract which both must participate, contribute by giving their individual wish and desire. a little child can't participate in this very important technical document, wherein without it, the marriage is not effective, along with the presence of guardian, witnesses and the man who officiates.

I will hit my wife with a handkerchief. I guess that hurts, instead of a show of sign of unhappiness. Job [as] did hit his wife with 100 blades of grass by touching her with this single bundle, in fulfillment of his pledge as a prophet. Some prophets in the Bible did not fulfill their pledges making them false prophets if you apply the Biblical yardstick to them of true prophet or false prophets.

Your case, Modinga, reminds me of the false prophets Elisha killed in the Bible.

No where in the Islamic verses you quoted did you see male Instruments mentioned.

Sweetnecta:

^^^^^ Modinga does not realize that the human natural instinct remains intact for free and captives the same, all the time. Imagine the master of the house having relationship with his house maid. Why? Because the master's manhood acts independently of his status if we go by the fact that he is the husband of the mommy in charge of the female house maid.

The house maid is a woman still. She needs what every normal woman needs; love and affection from a man. So if the master of the house has morals, she pounces on the next available male; the younger brother or the children of the master who are old enough to work out. If she is pretty, some of the males will find a way to get to her, one way or the other.

If she is desperate, then abuses the immature, inexperience is her care at the slightest of window to do so, without raising any obvious sign of her actions and desire.

I find it heard that Modinga will ignore the human nature and thinks that a 30 year old beautiful woman who suddenly becomes a spoil of war in the household of a young military general about her age, will leave her alone for too long. After a year, if that long in his care, she herself will see the man as the ideal man for her by his position of power and privilege, forgetting he had personally masterminded the death of her future husband, father and any other males in her clan. Her womanhood will be instinctively pushing her to him. This is human nature. If the best woman in your society is suddenly willed to you, before long you will be inviting her to your bed or coming to her bed, with a single knock at the door to simply announce that you are just about to open the door. Hypocritical Modinga, I say.
Apart from all the signs and the age indicated for a man and woman to marry, even though these benchmarks apply to both genders, what Islam stresses more is the mental capability of the spouse to handle the role of husband or wife; there is a marital contract which both must participate, contribute by giving their individual wish and desire. a little child can't participate in this very important technical document, wherein without it, the marriage is not effective, along with the presence of guardian, witnesses and the man who officiates.

I will hit my wife with a handkerchief. I guess that hurts, instead of a show of sign of unhappiness. Job [as] did hit his wife with 100 blades of grass by touching her with this single bundle, in fulfillment of his pledge as a prophet. Some prophets in the Bible did not fulfill their pledges making them false prophets if you apply the Biblical yardstick to them of true prophet or false prophets.

Your case, Modinga, reminds me of the false prophets Elisha killed in the Bible.

No where in the Islamic verses you quoted did you see male Cores mentioned.

are you trying to defend assault? and the fact that you will sleep with any unmarried/unbetrothed/unrelated woman in your household provided she approaches you sends shivers down my spine. What kind of people are you? . and that you are INCAPABLE of restraint doesn't mean mobinga/other decent men.

Now to the mention of male 'CORES'
Who created your parts? you? or is reference to a man's organ sinful again? maybe men should not be doctors again. mscheeeeeeeeew

@lagosshia
BIG SHAME ON YOU. THERE IS NOT ONE TRANSLATION OF THE BIBLE THAT MENTIONS THE MALE ORGAN IN THE WORD THAT YOU USED. THAT GOES TO SHOW HOW DESPERATELY FRAUDULENT YOU ARE. _{but we all know that don't we}
i challenge you to paste the translation that uses the P word to describe it.
some use 'Cores' and other words that convey the meaning.
it simply shows that you are a LIAR!

Knight1 is denying the obvious while he lives in the world capital of immorality, free sex, payment of money for sex. Imagine if you now control the young women of nollywood as your property? No one can come to them but you alone. I wonder what your freaky self will do? Freak!

You can't stand a week staring at them women without calling one of them for interview.

Quran restricts us from immorality, in all normal situation. When a master honors his maid, he may marry her. If he does not marry her, he must not stops her from being a woman. Some woman will ask if master is ready to be a man. I wonder if you will say you are still a boy? There is no better or equal treatment of captives in the Bible.

Mobinga:

Let's digress :

And forbidden to you are wedded wives of other people except those who have fallen in your hands [as prisoners of war] - Sura 4:24

In essence your Quran is approving sex with slaves of wars, i.e refugees, e.t.c?

wrong and blatant case of christian dishonesty!why are you people like this?!

let us continue reading the verse 4:24 and see what it says if men are allowed to follow lust:

"And [also prohibited to you are all] married women except those your right hands possess. [This is] the decree of Allah upon you. And lawful to you are [all others] beyond these, [provided] that you seek them [in marriage] with [gifts from] your property, desiring chastity, not unlawful sexual intercourse. So for whatever you enjoy [of marriage] from them, give them their due compensation as an obligation. And there is no blame upon you for what you mutually agree to beyond the obligation. Indeed, Allah is ever Knowing and Wise".

so are you here to waste our time with your fradulent half-quoting?why did you not post the entire verse you shamless animal?

you want to compare the Holy Quran with your por.no.graphic bible?why the dishonesty?

O Prophet, when you [and the believers] divorce women, divorce them for their prescribed waiting—period and count the waiting—period accurately . . . 4 And if you are in doubt about those of your women who have despaired of menstruation, (you should know that) their waiting period is three months, and the same applies to those who have not menstruated as yet. As for pregnant women, their period ends when they have delivered their burden. - Sura 65:1

Is your Quran blatantly approving of paedophilia? So Mohammed was a randy paedophile?.

here is verse 65:4:

"And those who no longer expect menstruation among your women - if you doubt, then their period is three months, and [also for] those who have not menstruated. And for those who are pregnant, their term is until they give birth. And whoever fears Allah - He will make for him of his matter ease".

my question to this christian pig:if your mother is elderly does she still menstruate?does christian women menstruate into old age?must every non-menstruating female be a child?see your filthy minds that the bible have made of you!!!

If you fear highhandedness from your wives, remind them [of the teaching of God], then ignore them when you go to bed, then hit them. If they obey you, you have no right to act against them. God is most high and great - Sura 4:34

Is this blatant misogyny? So Mohammed was a wife-beater?

this has being discoursed before and there is no hint of wife beating in the verse you are quoting or rather misquoting and distorting as the missionaries like to do.here is a detailed explanation and discussion:

https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria/topic-817561.0.html#msg9693077

Knight1:

are you trying to defend assault? and the fact that you will sleep with any unmarried/unbetrothed/unrelated woman in your household provided she approaches you sends shivers down my spine. What kind of people are you? . and that you are INCAPABLE of restraint doesn't mean mobinga/other decent men.

Now to the mention of male 'CORES'
Who created your parts? you? or is reference to a man's organ sinful again? maybe men should not be doctors again. mscheeeeeeeeew

@lagosshia
BIG SHAME ON YOU. THERE IS NOT ONE TRANSLATION OF THE BIBLE THAT MENTIONS THE MALE ORGAN IN THE WORD THAT YOU USED. THAT GOES TO SHOW HOW DESPERATELY FRAUDULENT YOU ARE. _{but we all know that don't we}
i challenge you to paste the translation that uses the P word to describe it.
some use 'Cores' and other words that convey the meaning.
it simply shows that you are a LIAR!

Oga,keep living in denial!

and just to remind you that we had a similar encounter in another thread on scandalous bible verses and the business there is unfinished:

https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria/topic-739876.0.html#msg9681104

Which denial, LagosShia?
you carefully ignored your fraud, while telling me i am in denial.
SHOW THE THE TRANSLATION THAT USE THAT WORD NA

And for someone accusing someone of half quoting, you probably shoud ALWAYS read at least the whole chapter of any portion you wish to quote.

@sweetnecta,
please don't speculate as to what other people will do when faced in your position. that you would do wrong in a situation doesn't mean others would.
Now to your question,
If knight1 controlled all the women in nollywood, i would, if i am interested in her, approach One (1) (UNo) (un) that i like and ask her hand, not force her or compel her, if she is willing i will marry her properly, as for the remaining, anybody that is interested in wedding them can come and do so.
ONE MAN, ONE WIFE; EQUAL IN LOVE AND FELLOWSHIP.


NOW WE ALL KNOW WHAT SWEETNECTA HAS IN HIS MIND

Knight1:

Which denial, LagosShia?
you carefully ignored your fraud, while telling me i am in denial.
SHOW THE THE TRANSLATION THAT USE THAT WORD NA

dont worry.its the word "apple" that is written there.hope you are happy!

so because someone uses "cores" instead of "peni$" in translating you dont know what is written there?

And for someone accusing someone of half quoting, you probably shoud ALWAYS read at least the whole chapter of any portion you wish to quote.

simply quoting the entire verse was enough.i didnt even have to present more than the one verse.

LagosShia:

dont worry.its the word "apple" that is written there.hope you are happy!

so because someone uses "cores" instead of "peni$" in translating you dont know what is written there?

simply quoting the entire verse was enough.i didnt even have to present more than the one verse.

WE ALL KNOW WHAT IS BEING REFERRED TO _{and i addressed that in my first post}, THAT'S NOT WHAT IS IN QUESTION, THE FACT IS THAT IT WAS DESCRIBED IN A WAY THAT IS "SOCIALLY CORRECT/ DOESN'T OFFEND"
IF YOU AN "UPRIGHT" MOSLEM THEN QUOTES A VERSE, I WOULD EXPECT THAT YOU'D DO SO OBJECTIVELY INSTEAD OF CHANGING A WORD THERE AND PRETENDING THAT ALL'S CORRECT. THAT IS DISHONESTY

Knight1:

WE ALL KNOW WHAT IS BEING REFERRED TO _{and i addressed that in my first post}, THAT'S NOT WHAT IS IN QUESTION, THE FACT IS THAT IT WAS DESCRIBED IN A WAY THAT IS "SOCIALLY CORRECT/ DOESN'T OFFEND"
IF YOU AN "UPRIGHT" MOSLEM THEN QUOTES A VERSE, I WOULD EXPECT THAT YOU'D DO SO OBJECTIVELY INSTEAD OF CHANGING A WORD THERE AND PRETENDING THAT ALL'S CORRECT. THAT IS DISHONESTY

you can call it as you like.you understand what is there,and that is all the thread is about.search the many versions online.simply because other versions conceal the "peni$" word does not mean that the male private part is not the intended description.you like threading on off-topic discussions.stick to the topic!

LagosShia:

you can call it as you like.you understand what is there,and that is all the thread is about.search the many versions online.simply because other versions conceal _{you need to check the meaning of that word} the "peni$" word does not mean that the male private part is not the intended description.you like threading on off-topic discussions.stick to the topic!

i addressed the "topic" in my first post, you can scroll up and check it;
after i addressed it, i showed that you deliberately inserted a word that isn't there to incite. that is wrong and you should admit that, not saying 'it's apple that was mentioned' or 'you can call it as you like'.

A man's privates are not sinful, God created it and has intended purposes for it, and if he refers to it, i don't see how that corrupts anyone. _{except of course people that think like you. God knows the kind of graphic stuff you have fed to your mind to cause a red alert anytime you see/hear it being refered to}

Knight1:

i addressed the "topic" in my first post, you can scroll up and check it;
after i addressed it, i showed that you deliberately inserted a word that isn't there to incite. that is wrong and you should admit that, not saying 'it's apple that was mentioned' or 'you can call it as you like'.

A man's privates are not sinful, God created it and has intended purposes for it, and if he refers to it, i don't see how that corrupts anyone. _{except of course people that think like you. God knows the kind of graphic stuff you have fed to your mind to cause a red alert anytime you see/hear it being refered to}

if nothing is wrong and everything is fine and well,then why complain?

have you read the bible manuscripts and all the versions in english?

some pple need to have their heads checked

Britta:

some pple need to have their heads checked

exactly!

these christians like to deny the obvious and live in perennial denial!!!

i really shouldn't be replying but i got the time so, why not

Who is complaining? has anyone except you and sweetnecta complain? don't you know your position of arguement
well, so far, in case you didn't notice , YOU are the one complaining
clearly we know those who need their heads checkedi haven't read all the versions but you haven't read anyone that uses the P word either

inserting it deviously is wrong. accept it!

Knight1:

i really shouldn't be replying but i got the time so, why not

Who is complaining? has anyone except you and sweetnecta complain? don't you know your position of arguement
well, so far, in case you didn't notice , YOU are the one complaining
clearly we know those who need their heads checkedi haven't read all the versions but you haven't read anyone that uses the P word either

inserting it deviously is wrong. accept it!

please let us call a spade a spade and stop drifting into the direction you want to take the thread.

let me ask you for a small favor.assume i am your 7 years old son or your old mother in the village who is semi-literate.and either of these two ask you to explain the below verse and what it says.how do you explain to them based on your own version/translation of the bible using the word "cores" and not the "p" word as you referred?:


Ezekiel 23:20
"There she lusted after her lovers, whose cores were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

LagosShia:

please let us call a spade a spade and stop drifting into the direction you want to take the thread.

let me ask you for a small favor.assume i am your 7 years old son or your old mother in the village who is semi-literate.and either of these two ask you to explain the below verse and what it says.how do you explain to them based on your own version/translation of the bible using the word "cores" and not the "p" word as you referred?:

Ezekiel 23:20
"There she lusted after her lovers, whose cores were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

once again, due to availabilty of plenty time, i will answer.
YOUR QUESTION HAS PROVEN YOU WRONG. THAT IT NEEDS EXPLANATION MEANS IT IS NOT WRITTEN THERE IN PLAIN OFFENSIVE/SOCIALLY UNACCEPTABLE TERMS.
i will explain what it is to them, the same way parents teach their children sex education; a core is a private part; an 'emission' is semen/spermatozoa.
it's the same thing if your child asks you what a virgin is or what sex is. i'm sure you are the type that'll probably beat up the child for asking such a question and unconsciously send him looking for the meaning in all the wrong places.

I AM NOT TAKING THE THREAD IN ANY DIRECTION.
THE TOPIC SAYS "P word in the Word?"
and i showed that it isn't there.
it is referred to as same as you refer to a woman's virginity.


YOU TOLD A LIE!!!! SIMPLE!!!!! AND THE FACT THAT YOU HAVE REFUSED TO ADMIT IT/ CHANGE THE NAME OF THE TOPIC SHOWS THE EXTENT OF YOUR MORAL CHARACTER, REligious LagosShia!

What is Knight1 refuting here ?

Knight1:

once again, due to availabilty of plenty time, i will answer.
YOUR QUESTION HAS PROVEN YOU WRONG. THAT IT NEEDS EXPLANATION MEANS IT IS NOT WRITTEN THERE IN PLAIN OFFENSIVE/SOCIALLY UNACCEPTABLE TERMS.
i will explain what it is to them, the same way parents teach their children sex education; a core is a private part; an 'emission' is Fluid/spermatozoa.
it's the same thing if your child asks you what a virgin is or what sex is. i'm sure you are the type that'll probably beat up the child for asking such a question and unconsciously send him looking for the meaning in all the wrong places.

but daddy "private part" is not what is written there.what is private part?

and what is spermatozoa? is it engine oil? 

N.B:How can a 7 years old know what spermatozoa is?

I AM NOT TAKING THE THREAD IN ANY DIRECTION.
THE TOPIC SAYS "P word in the Word?"
and i showed that it isn't there.
it is referred to as same as you refer to a woman's virginity.


YOU TOLD A LIE!!!! SIMPLE!!!!! AND THE FACT THAT YOU HAVE REFUSED TO ADMIT IT/ CHANGE THE NAME OF THE TOPIC SHOWS THE EXTENT OF YOUR MORAL CHARACTER, REligious LagosShia!

the topic of the thread has a "question" mark.translating what a verse is saying does not account for dishonesty at all.the fact is in those verses there is mentioned of the male organ all along.so if you dont want to see that and you want to hide behind your fingers that why should "pe.nis" instead of "cores" be used in this thread,you can hit your head on the wall.that is how it would remain.if you think it is wrong,search all versions of the bible in spanish,french,english,arabic,and other languages and then come tell us that the word "pe.nis" is not found there and what "cores" means.you want to run away from the topic.when you further drift away and ignore the idea the thread presents,you'd be ignored.