LordReed:


I have stated how it shows only a 1 day interval, waiting for you to show how it was a 2 day interval.

Yes so?

Jesus actually spent three days. If you study the bible very well with understanding, the jews count day and night. Esther as well said she's going to fast for three days before meeting the king but she went on the third day "esther 4&5:1" why? Because they count day and night in israel. And there is no where in the bible that says jesus would resurrect AFTER the third day but ON the third day.
Jesus was buried in the day of friday, day and night is what we call a complete day but it differs from how israelites count theirs, friday "day" was the first day. Saturday "day" was the second day and sunday morning makes it the third day.
If you still don't get it i refer you to "romans 1:28-32"

AntiChristian:


1. Buy brighter grammar and learn simple English! I said the Jews call Jesus a bastard. This is to prove that what Israelites claim may not be the truth!

2. Where was Jesus when there was God approved terror in the old testament? He was asleep nowhere!

3. Osama bin laden had a long history with your people.
4. You need to research on this. Bandits are not religious based. And what about IPOB, ESN, Ema powerful and co? They must also be Muslims or unserious Christians without the holy spirit like you right?

1. Lies. There's no where israelites call jesus bastard instead dey refer him as son of david meaning: descendant of david. So who is d biological father of ur isa?
2. Don't forget israel never terrolize like you in d name of blasphemy.
3. Always in support of your blood sucking people.
4. Lies. Bandits are religion base, they're ur blood sucking people. IPOB, ESN aren't religion base they're fighting for d freedom of biafra stop lying.

AntiChristian:
1. where re the Israelites claiming anything? Israel claim Jesus is a bastard having no father. Is this true? No! So Israelites need not claim anything! Our Qu'ran is true.
Same Jesus said he never came to abolish the law of Moses nd d Prophets but to fulfill them.
2. And claim that "no Islam no terrorism", how is Islam involved in NATO? Russia/Ukraine war, Israel occupying Palestinian lands and killing them?
Anyways, Bush of USA is a Christian and many like him from the CIA are terrorists not associated with Islam. Infact, most are either Jews or Christians.

1. The Jesus you call a bastard is the same isa you honoured, atleast Jesus existed. But your quran that gave u details abt isrealites nd it can't be found in d hebrew bible or can never be claimed by the israelites. Jesus combined d laws together in matthew 22:36-40 if u love ur neighbour u won't terrorize in d name of blasphemy.
2. Osama biladeen, boko haram, bandits nd so on re christians right?

@knownunknown
So isreal as a captive in egypt is what you support?

Isreal as a captive in babylons as slavery without reason is what you support?

Crusaders should have kept quiet and allow christianity to be wiped out.

I see terrorism like and "romans 1:28-32 in you supporting true genocide and killings hypocrite.

KnownUnknown:


1. I see! Permission from God justifies all.
Yes, they go permission from god to solve the Jewish problem.

2. I don’t know what this means.

3.Both believe in massacre. Christianity now appears benign because its murdering and looting have abated. Christians were terrorizing people at least 200 years before the birth of Muhammad and haven’t stopped since. The violence abated but it’s still an intrinsic part of Christianity.

1. Once again isrealites warred to defend, repossess and avenge any proof against this claims?
2. Abrahamic religion are based on wars, but Jesus have been sent to remit those laws. And christians have been seperated from old ways for we have become new.
3. Imagine if the crusaders didn't war i wonder what would have become christianity today, cos i doubt if you truly know about the history.

@knownunknown
Our biblical God never told moses to wage war at egypt it was their quran who said it reread what i posted.
Isrealites warred to defend, repossess and avenge.
Crusaders warred because of turkey threat against them, that war can't be judged because they both (christians and muslims) waged war against each other.
But christians now preach peace and love but they continue in killing in the name of blasphemy and religion propagation. Once again there are difference. I refer you to romans 1:28-32.
@knownunknown

KnownUnknown:

1. Just like the Nazis never terrorized, they repossessed living space, avenged the humiliation of WW1, and defended their people.
2. Just like the Israelites killed to steal and the counterparts of the Muslims called christians raped, pillaged, and destroyed to spread their religion.
3. There are no differences and you have no point. I’m not defending Muslims but pointing out your hypocrisy and the fact that all Abrahamic religions are prone to violence based on the delusion that their god permits it. So you cannot criticize the Muslims while your faith is littered with the same depravity.

1. And do they get permission from God before doing that?
2. Religions are mostly based on wars. But what i'm saying is that Jesus had come to remit those things we don't need war again but peace.
3. There are difference because christian as a religion not as a nation don't believe in massacre but they do.

KnownUnknown:


This is not about Jesus or whatever he renewed. This is about your Moses and God and their affinity for violence which you accuse Islam of. Everything you accuse Muslims of are actions that are recorded in your Bible. Everything you accuse Muslims of has also been done by the Israelites in your biblical stories and by Christians has they spread the so called gospel around the world.

Isrealites never terrorize, they repossess, avenge and defend. But they (islam terrorists) kill to spread their religion, kill in the name of blasphemy, hatred against western education and so on.

There are difference blind atheists. Maybe until one of your relative is being murder for religion propagation before you understand my point.

KnownUnknown:


Firstly, just because they call it theirs doesn’t make it theirs. Hence, their bloodcurdling savagery.

Secondly, murder and genocide aren’t excused just because Moses “was sent to avenge”.

2. Thirdly, what possession of theirs were the Israelite terrorists trying to repossess through genocide as written in Numbers 31?

2. It's not only numbers 31 israelites warred.
Their quran also told them that Allah told musa to go and repossess canaan which is the land of their father "Abraham, Isaac and Jacob" and to wage war at eygpt but they rebell at God and they wonder in the wilderness for forty years.

1. Your hypocrisy judgement won't make you hear from both side before judging. Isrealites war to defend, repossess and avenge they never terrorize. What would you say about the babylonians that took isrealites to captive?
A hypocrite atheist like you doesn't deserve judging religious matter.
What's your business with the matter on ground?

KnownUnknown:


If the Muslims are full of terrorism because they follow Moses and the laws God have him, what does that make Moses and God?

Those old laws never support terrorism.
What i mean by they follow the old law is, the hot judgement they give to sinners then they still practice it in the sharia law but all this has been renewed in "matthew 22:36-40" and the case of the woman who committed adultery and was brought to Jesus, the judgement Jesus did there was just but under their sharia law it has hot consequences you'll face and the terrorist use all those laws as their back up in killing fellow humans but Jesus had thought us to love.
There are differences.

KnownUnknown:


If the Muslims are full of terrorism because they follow Moses and the laws God have him, what does that make Moses and God?

Moses was sent to avenge, but they (islam terrorists) kill in the name of blasphemy, hatred against western education and many more.
That was not the same reason israelites wage war, they do that to revenge or take back their possession. But all these Jesus had come to renew "matthew 22:36:40"

AntiChristian:
Stories of Moses sent to kill people and reserve the virgins. Even virgins was shared for God in Numbers 31:40. Where are these in the Qu'ran?



Our God need no son or heir to function.
He forgives sins Himself and needs no helper in that regards. Our God does not have old and new laws where the new law involves having Him send His son to die!

There are Christians who are terrorists! Infact, there will be no terrorists without Christianity!

But your quran gave you lies that the isrealites never claim.

The old law is the law he gave to moses but was renewed through Jesus "mat 22:36-40", but you people live with those old laws and that's why you are full of terrorism.

No islam, no terrorism anywhere u people are, surely there will be terrorism.

AntiChristian:


But your God can't kill! In fact, he never sent Moses to kill people. Why did Saul lose favor? I think your God that seek vengeance from the first generation to many generations is more violent!

You guys hypocrisy are well known! Must you tell us brazenly that your God has repented from the Old testament killing despite saying He doesn't change his ways?

Are those stories not in your quran?
But our difference is he sent his son to redeem us from the curse and judgement and also remit our sins. But you're still living in the old law and that's why we have more terrorists among you, your hypocrisy won't make you think this. You better repent and turn from your evil ways
"john 14:6-7"

talk2hb1:

Then why all the preaching that accept Jesus as your personal saviour. He died on the Calvary to attorne our sin

Don't get confused, Jesus said he came to call sinners "matthew 9:13"

The reason for that preaching is in "matthew 28:19-20 mark 16:16-18" and to tell you the purpose of Jesus blood which is the remission of men sins, renewal and establishment of God's new law and commandment through Jesus christ.

talk2hb1:

1. A Man Went to Drink and Drank To Stupor, it was his son at that got intoxicated. Does this sound reasonable to you?
Adam and Eve ate the fruit only for their descendant to bear the consequences of their action
Why can't he just punish the two for their misdeed, instead of transferring the punishment on the children
2. and later requesting for one of his holy son to wipe the sin of those who has nothing to the sin of some other people.

1. Adam and eve was punished for their sin and we keep getting punishment from God when we keep sinning "romans 6".

2. If he had not sent his son, probably he would have wipe out this world. But to show his infinite and eternal love to us
"john 3:16-17" Jesus is the only option for us. If we didn't sin evil won't befall us, that is why you see evangelist around keeping the commandment and fufilling the promise in "mark 16:15-18" my brother you have no excuse. Repent.

talk2hb1:

I am not asking questions, I am affirming how your god in his supremacy can't just forgive all humanity and still requesting for blood of his son to forgive humans.
Those that sound reasonable to you?
Don't you consider that as scam?

Christianity should have an icon for the remission of sin which is the blood of Jesus.


God does things for a purpose, we are all humans we give excuses. We can give excuse to God that atleast no die for the remission of our sin to prove his love to us. Less you forget Jesus didn't die forever he rose on the third day and ascended to heaven.

There won't be excuse for you if you refuse to believe in him and you end up in damnation, read this scripture "mark 16:16" peace be unto you.

malvisguy212:
they are being lead by the Spirit of deceptions. they love to attack Christians. I'm sure, the Atheists may even want to vote for a Muslim-muslim ticket. just watch and see. they hate anything related to Christianity.

They hate the truth in "john 14:6" because "romans 1:28-32" is reflecting in them.

@kobojunkie.
We love Jesus because he first loved us "1 john 4:19"
You keep quoting that scripture "john 15:1-15" but you fail to understand, what he said was we should abide in him and he in us, not we should love him first before loving us.
Ok those who don't love God would you say God hate them?
Or if we are the one to love him first, would you say it was our love toward him that made him die for our sin?
He has an unconditional love to us, which means no matter the sin his love is there, only salvation is conditional which he explain in "john 15:1-15" abide in him then he abide in you, that is salvation for individual you can say that is conditional but love is for everybody "unconditional". I can't explain than this, if you don't get it then forget it.
@kobojunkie.

Kobojunkie:
God's Love to mankind through Jesus Christ is conditional. Jesus Christ explained this thoroughly in John 15 vs 1 - 15 where He told His followers that it if they obey His commandments .I.e. love Him that He will love them back. If they abide in Him, then He will abide in them..

His Death only saves you from Death if you do as He commands. Salvation which He offers isn't free but comes at a cost - you have to abandon all you own and live your life in continuous submission to and obedience of His teachings(and commandments) until the end - Matthew 24 vs 13 - in order to be saved. There is nothing unconditional about Jesus Christ.

Stop lying to the world using the name of Jesus Christ.

Lies Jesus never love us because we first love him "1 john 4:19".
If what you claim that we first love Jesus and he loved us back was true, will you say it was our love to him that made him die for our sins?

Kobojunkie:
How can it be between you and God when God says you sin against Him with your tithe and offering rituals?

God didn't say that. LIES!!!

temi1290:


What's the rubbish in bold?

LOL.... Don't quote me cos i see Romans 1:28-32 in you, i don't have business with a fool who doesn't believe in the existence of God.

zimdante:


He is not even a Christian.

He has never sound like a christian before but like a hypocrite..... I would rather call him satan's tool.

zimdante:


Beloved your questions already gave you away, a canal mind cannot understand the things of the spirit.
You are not here to learn, you have come to argue.
The mystery of the word of God is not something you can figure out with your intelligence.

Where science and technology stops is where God start.

He didn't come here to argue aswell he came here to judge, condemn and criticize.
He's coming back for you

Kobojunkie:
Is English suddenly a problem for you or what?.

I should ask you either cos i'm certain you didn't understand what you posted.

Kobojunkie:
Would you like for me to explain it to you?

Explain what exactly? What you wrote that you don't understand so you can feed me with lies you fed yourself gettat!!!!

Kobojunkie:
You don't even understand any of what is stated, do you??

I should ask you either, cos none of your claim discredit payment of tithe.

Kobojunkie:
1. Where?
2. If you knew, you wouldn't have made the assertions to begin with.
3. You have yet to answer any of my questions regarding what is written in Matthew 17 and Matthew 22..
4. Well, duh!
If Jesus Christ had been farming the lands, he would have had to tithe a 10th of the produce from His farm this since Jesus Christ lived His life in complete submission to God's Old Covenant standard and Constitution for the Nation of Israel which He came to fulfill.
5. I cannot condemn payment of taxes since God's Tithing law isn't same as any and every tax law out there.

1. Isrealites started paying tax from exodus 30:11-16.
2. Assert what?
3. Answer what question again? When you've already ask "when" in number 1.
4. Still saying same thing.
5. So you condemn God's commandment in malachi 3:8-12

Kobojunkie:
Again.....
▪︎It is a sin because Jesus Christ warned that you cannot serve two Masters in the Kingdom of God.

▪︎It is a sin because Jesus Christ warned against attempting to put new wine in Old wine Skin.

▪︎It is sin because God warned against attempts to usw His Name in practicing that which He never decreed in His Law to begin with. It is akin to adding laws to God's Eternal Law.
....

Tithing is a sin against God for all those who claim to belong to Jesus Christ.

Every of your claim doesn't discredit payment of tithe.

zimdante:

Mattew 13 you quoted was talking about those that hear the word of God and do not understand because they do not have the holy spirit.
Only the holy spirit can reveal to you the mystery of the word of God.

The guy reply as if he's the real word of God, and na lie only pretending, he's a satan tool to confuse christian.

Kobojunkie:
1. My question again is did God command the payment of a Temple Tax in the His Constitution to the Nation of Israel?

2. You are still not making any sense to me.

Again, did God command the people of Israel not to pay taxes to any other governments other that set up by Him over them?

I am trying to understand your claim that following my #2 Jesus Christ must have sinned in the context of Matthew 17 vs 24-27 and Matthew 22 vs 18-21

God do command them to pay temple tax.
I know where you're driving at. God aswell command them to pay tithe, so what you claim in that your number two is rubbish because if Jesus were earning income he would pay tithe.
Since you condemn payment of tithe you should condemn payment of tax aswell or else your judgement is not just.

Kobojunkie:


▪︎ Did God command the payment of a Temple Tax in the His Constitution to the Nation of Israel?

▪︎ Did God command the people of Israel not to pay taxes to any other governments other except that set up by Him over them?

1. God commands tithes in malachi 3:8-12.

2. God do not tell us not to pay taxes as Jesus do not aswell condemn payment of tithe instead he condemned the scribes and pharisees that collect tithe but do not fufill all the laws.

Kobojunkie:
How exactly is paying taxes considered sin against God based on my number 2?

Since your number 2 assert Jesus warning against putting new wine in old wine skin. Tax paying is also included if tithing is included.