BlueRayDick:
.

Walahi that might be the bar of the year and it's only April

Leyqute:
Mourinho is an absolute bottler !

What of OLE bottler Solkjear?

timbros:


The only contact made was Silva's left leg which was trailing. He had no control over that because his stretch left him sliding...

From the referee's angle, he wouldn't have seen it. I expected VAR to call for a review. If you watch the replays from the camera in the corner kick/throw in angle, you will see that Silva's right leg never made contact. It was his trailing left leg... And it never determined the outcome of the shot.

Check Burnleys first goal vs Southampton today

Contact from KwP came after the ball has been released

Expert17:


What of OLE bottler Solkjear?

Bottling is not a monopoly. The same way Pepsi and Coca-Cola can co-exist you can also have 2 or more bottlers.

raumdeuter:


Check Burnleys first goal vs Southampton today

Contact from KwP came after the ball has been released

I don't even understand timbros' argument. Contact after the ball has been released makes the foul even more egregious. It is the very definition of a late tackle.

raumdeuter:


Check Burnleys first goal vs Southampton today

Contact from KwP came after the ball has been released

Wrong example.

The ball was later knocked back towards the Burnley attacker that crossed but couldn't continue because he had already been hacked down by KWP. That's a clear penalty.

Thiago Silva's was even a minimal contact that the West brom attacker must have shouted like someone shot at, to force the hands of the mumu referee.

Football is a contact sport, there are many instances in which referee will not even blow or blow without a card after a contact with a ball kicker. I will bring many gifs later when i am free.

afrodoc:


It was a yellow card offence. He crashed into the guy after the ball had left his feet. It was a late and dangerous tackle which while not really reckless was at least unsporting and deserving of a yellow card. The fact that the ball was no where near the player when he hit him actually makes the tackle worse.

VAR calls for reviews only for OBVIOUS errors made by the referee. That was not an obvious error, and in fact was no error at all.

I wanted to ask you of the Werner incident earlier but I see BlueMann and you have done that already.

My point is, that foul shouldn't be a card. Silva clearly went for the ball which he missed and didn't make contact with that tackle. The only contact was his trailing left leg. It was clearly unintentional. Why branding a yellow card?

Good thing you admitted the inconsistency of VAR.

raumdeuter:


Check Burnleys first goal vs Southampton today

Contact from KwP came after the ball has been released

I didn't watch the match. I'll watch the highlight and revert.

Meanwhile why was the Werner incident overlooked? Was it a penalty or not?

timbros:


I wanted to ask you of the Werner incident earlier but I see BlueMann and you have done that already.

My point is, that foul shouldn't be a card. Silva clearly went for the ball which he missed and didn't make contact with that tackle. The only contact was his trailing left leg. It was clearly unintentional. Why branding a yellow card?

Good thing you admitted the inconsistency of VAR.

All i can say is that intent is not required for a yellow card to be brandished. The IFAB laws of the game are quite clear on this. The way Silva made the tackle was dangerous, and some might say reckless.
There will not be an uproar outside Chelsea circles about the decision. If the roles were reversed you would have been wondering why the referee didn't card the offender.

The more important issue is why should an experienced defender like Silva be making such rash decisions when he is already on a yellow card. Silva is a Jekyll and Hyde kind of a defender. Appears classy most times and then has these occasional brain farts that crop up at inopportune times. Reminds me a little of Joseph Yobo for the Super Eagles.

Corporate Shoe kicking off again...

nihilistjnr:
Corporate Shoe kicking off again...

"Enemies creates rumours, fools spread it, idiots accept it" .

Rudiger is a big bro to everybody in the locker room, Abraham confirmed it.
Stop peddling fake rumours .

ShadowCracker:

"Enemies creates rumours, fools spread it, idiots accept it" .

Rudiger is a big bro to everybody in the locker room, Abraham confirmed it.
Stop peddling fake rumours .

You are an embecile

nihilistjnr:

You are an embecile

What is embecile ?. Fake news peddler .

Bissouma is criminally underrated...

How VAR did not give that penalty on Welbeck, I will never know

Ibeme:
How VAR did not give that penalty on Welbeck, I will never know

Scummies will say it wasn't a dangerous tackle on him.

Ibeme:
How VAR did not give that penalty on Welbeck, I will never know

Only God knows what VAR checked in that incident. That was an obvious penalty even without VAR check.

Lol see them wailing

Summary of Chelsea vs West Brom

Ibeme:
How VAR did not give that penalty on Welbeck, I will never know

5-2 FC

BlueRayDick:


Only God knows what VAR checked in that incident. That was an obvious penalty even without VAR check.

Mechionu there! 5-2 FC.

2-5

Leyqute:
Summary of Chelsea vs West Brom

Porto will complete the work

Crystal palace will beat them no champions league football next season

handelex:
Lol see them wailing

Leyqute:


Mechionu there! 5-2 FC.

Even Blueray?

You don dey Kolo be that.

Leyqute:
Summary of Chelsea vs West Brom

Lol.. Troll football with the energy

https://twitter.com/TrollFootball/status/1378993127537569792?s=20

dammywapes:
Crystal palace will beat them no champions league football next season

We pray oo.

Skimpledawg:

Even Blueray?

You don dey Kolo be that.

AY is the highway

handelex:
We pray oo.

The surest thing na say Chelsea no go make top 4. Their woes just began. Have you seen their run in fixtures?

Ooooo jigbijigbi!

[img]https://media1./images/4b6ea473526b7480bb30864dde7e892c/tenor.gif?itemid=15159433[/img]

Leyqute:


The surest thing na say Chelsea no go make top 4. Their woes just began. Have you seen their run in fixtures?

Ooooo jigbijigbi!

[img]https://media1./images/4b6ea473526b7480bb30864dde7e892c/tenor.gif?itemid=15159433[/img]

Lmao

handelex:
Lol.. Troll football with the energy

https://twitter.com/TrollFootball/status/1378993127537569792?s=20

This guys laugh gets me everytime. Looks like he gets paid to laugh on tv.

The matter reach to laugh true true sha

BlueMann:



I just weak when I saw people complaining about TT starting Silva against West Brom. WEST BROM OH! Like, this was our easiest fixture left on paper. What better opposition could we hope for to ease a player who's coming from an injury layoff back into the team? Abi make Silva no kuku play again?!

Funny thing is, if Chris had started and made those same errors, we would have been asking, "why didn't Silva start?".

We have a huge UCL quarterfinal game coming up, and most of the regulars that played majority of the games for their national teams were rested, which is perfectly logical. The team that started yesterday is more than good enough to beat West Brom, even with 10 men. It was just one of those days.

We meuve.

That is how you know that most of us are very confused.