NO MATTER HW HARD U TRY TO PREACH EQUALITY IN A RELATIONSHIP, IT CAN'T WORK CUS WOMEN DNT UNDERSTAND EQUAL RIGHTS. EITHER SHE'S ABOVE U OR UNDER U..

TheDarkGamer:
To understand female psychology better and know the true motives of all women, read this book by Esther Vilar called The Manipulated Man. It's only 64 pages long and someone here sent it to me. Please every word of that book is pure wisdom, you can request it and I'll send it to your email. Please read this book, I urge you to and you won't regret it. Also when you're done, share the book with others or you can share the ideas of the book with your other friends. Let the veil of ignorance be lifted from all men and let the manipulative hypocrisy of the female race be exposed.

clintonohanaka99@gmail.com

nwaezeemmanuel:
Not enough backstory to understand this. What was your standing relationship with her?

Stranger? Neighbor? spill!

By the way, I do not approve of fornication but I'd try to give the likely state of what went down. She probably shit tested you and you failed. In her mind, you're all about the sex and she pulled the friend card ASAP.

Or maybe you weren't interesting enough. If you just went straight and expected her to comply, then that could be the reason things went the way it did. If you're in your 20s or early 30s, I'd advice you keep improving your sexual market value and get the essentials checked - try to make you getting attention the norm, not the other way round.

Don't chase her without leveling up. That way, she'd know you didn't waste your time thinking of how to enter her panties but moved on.

Thank you sir!
We use to be friends from the onset

You call someone your wife, yet you don't want her involved at all in the decision making in your home. So, you make sure she spends nothing so that she would have absolutely no say in the house.

Just get yourself a housegirl and save yourself the stress.

Enough of this talk.

Junnior:
You call someone your wife, yet you don't want her involved at all in the decision making in your home. So, you make sure she spends nothing so that she would have absolutely no say in the house.

Just get yourself a housegirl and save yourself the stress.

Enough of this talk.

Thank you jare. It's really befuddling. I wouldn't want to be with someone so bland as I'd get bored very quickly neither would I want to have someone so subjugated to me in that manner. She'd definitely have her own thing going. Plenty of times, your wife might come up with ideas that are much better than yours. That is why two correct heads are better than one. It is left to you to use your discretion in choosing the best of all available options without letting your so-called manly pride and ego blind you completely.


Reminds me of Neyo's Miss Independent. Dòpe lyrics. That's how my dream woman should be. I'm just looking for clay so I can mould her myself.

DEMZEE:


Sighs

As a man u need money to exert dominance and not because of women. Money is the score guys use to rank themselves in the social hierarchy.

Asides having money, also u need to have frame, know game and b redpill aware.

My point is that any man that allows his wife to share financial responsibility with him is a low valued beta male simp. No high value man wud condole such.
She's entering ur world and not the other way around. U are the prize and u have ur rules and standards.

Western men tot by sharing financial responsibility with their wives, she wud value their marriage not knowing once she earns more than u in the marriage the chances of divorce increases to 80% especially in the western societies and yet some dumb weak ass western men still want their wives to be sharing financial responsibility with them..... SMH!

From the few incidents I have seen, It is always a problem when a woman has money. You have to be high value man to be able to control woman when she has money. Like she has to be madly in love with you.

I know a woman here in the north that her husband is university registrar and she is a chief judge of a state, so she is richer than he is.
The husband decided that he wants take another wife since their religion allowed that, but the wife said she would not allow that. And if he insist she said she has to walk away from the marriage.
And that's exactly what happened. she walked away from marriage.
And I know two women that are richer than their husband and they are all treating them like trash. One of them even sleeps in the BQ.
You see ehn, the only thing that tame women when she is rich is religion. if she fears God and hell fire, thats what would make her not to treat you like trash

DEMZEE:


I just believe women don't build, they just move in especially in this 21st century

Bro, we are all here to learn a thing or two. Be open minded so you can improve yourself. Nobody knows it all.

Don't allow yourself to be a tool in the hands of women. Trust me bro, they will use and dump you like you never existed.

Nobody is saying you should collect your woman's money to build yourself. You have to build yourself up and your home must be up to standard before a woman will agree to roll with you. Women don't follow unproductive men.

But while she's with you, she has to be doing something for herself so she can be spending on you or the household, either directly or indirectly.

I personally don't roll with jobless ladies. I hate them with passion. You must be doing something for yourself. I help you, you help me too. I need help as much as she does.

I believe that doesn't make me less of a man.

TheDarkGamer:

send me pm

finished the book late last night..
it's cool..

I came across this red pill. (Everything copied from online)

Briffault's law: "The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place."

The upshot of this is threefold:

1. A woman may very well have received past benefits from her relationship with a man, but this does not guarantee her continuing the relationship with him.

2. Even when a woman promises to continue the relationship with a man in the future in exchange for some benefit derived from him today, her promise is worth nothing the moment she has received the benefit.

3. The man’s promise to a woman of any future benefit has limited value of securing an ongoing relationship with any woman, as his promise is useful only to the extent that the woman’s wait for the benefit is short and the extent that she trusts him to keep his promise.

Jessepaid:
finished the book late last night..

it's cool..

That's great. I hope you learnt some valuable lessons, especially about the concept of dating?

waywardpikin:


Thank you jare. It's really befuddling. I wouldn't want to be with someone so bland as I'd get bored very quickly neither would I want to have someone so subjugated to me in that manner. She'd definitely have her own thing going. Plenty of times, your wife might come up with ideas that are much better than yours. That is why two correct heads are better than one. It is left to you to use your discretion in choosing the best of all available options without letting your so-called manly pride and ego blind you completely.


Reminds me of Neyo's Miss Independent. Dòpe lyrics. That's how my dream woman should be. I'm just looking for clay so I can mould her myself.

Thank you.
It seems to me that these guys do not want a woman that has a mind of her own. They want a zombie, more or less.

Calling men LOW VALUE BETA SIMPS because they allow their wives contribute financially is ignorant.
The fact is if you're being alpha, your woman will spend her money for you and still be submissive.
Everyone is claiming alpha these days, but only a few can truly be alpha. It's not by spending your money and refusing your woman's money. There are so many high-value men who are betas. All it takes to be high-value these days is having a lot of money. You get a lotta women as a result. That is often mistaken as alpha.
But that's not what it takes to be alpha. Status, money and looks, together, will make you high-value, but they won't stop you from ignorantly simping. If at all any man is being beta here, it is the man who refuses his woman's money.
The p1mp constantly collects money from women. He is alpha as fvck.

You think allowing her spend money is beta. You think you're being dominant and alpha by funding her whole lifestyle and refusing her money, but the truth is she manipulating the fvck out of you. She knows you too proud and egotistical as hell, so she leverages and acts all dumb like she ain't got an opinion, while sucking you of your resources and keeping hers, until it's time for her to move on. That's female nature.

Junnior:
Thank you.
It seems to me that these guys do not want a woman that has a mind of her own. They want a zombie, more or less.

Calling men LOW VALUE BETA SIMPS because they allow their wives contribute financially is ignorant.
The fact is if you're being alpha, your woman will spend her money for you and still be submissive.
Everyone is claiming alpha these days, but only a few can truly be alpha. It's not by spending your money and refusing your woman's money. There are so many high-value men who are betas. All it takes to be high-value these days is having a lot of money. You get a lotta women as a result. That is often mistaken as alpha.
But that's not what it takes to be alpha. Status, money and looks, together, will make you high-value, but they won't stop you from ignorantly simping. If at all any man is being beta here, it is the man who refuses his woman's money.
The p1mp constantly collects money from women. He is alpha as fvck.

You think allowing her spend money is beta. You think you're being dominant and alpha by funding her whole lifestyle and refusing her money, but the truth is she manipulating the fvck out of you. She knows you too proud and egotistical as hell, so she leverages and acts all dumb like she ain't got an opinion, while sucking you of your resources and keeping hers, until it's time for her to move on. That's female nature.

U have a valid point though but it seems u don't understand what we are saying. to me my wife must contribute but not more than me, that's my point though.. nobody lyks a liability but never allow ur wife contribute more than u in ur marriage, if its relationship its understandable but not marriage.

E. choke

once again I quote
sometimes d only difference between alpha and beta male is the intent, not the behavior. for example: both can be seen paying 4 date or holding door open, but beta do these things to impress & please women, while the alpha does them because they mk him feel good or they help achieve his goals

If y'all gonna continue talking of this my wife should contribute or not, today...I wont kill myself but will commit suicide.


I don taya to dey talk. Dem use argument swear for una?

TheDarkGamer:


That's great. I hope you learnt some valuable lessons, especially about the concept of dating?

sure

Kevincal144444:


Bro, we are all here to learn a thing or two. Be open minded so you can improve yourself. Nobody knows it all.

Don't allow yourself to be a tool in the hands of women. Trust me bro, they will use and dump you like you never existed.

Nobody is saying you should collect your woman's money to build yourself. You have to build yourself up and your home must be up to standard before a woman will agree to roll with you. Women don't follow unproductive men.

But while she's with you, she has to be doing something for herself so she can be spending on you or the household, either directly or indirectly.

I personally don't roll with jobless ladies. I hate them with passion. You must be doing something for yourself. I help you, you help me too. I need help as much as she does.

I believe that doesn't make me less of a man.

I understand you brother

My own is that her contribution to the home financially will be 0.00001% as compared to my own contribution financially.

I want my woman to b feminine and retain her feminine essence.

I don't date career ladies for long term relationships, I prefer a lady who's not career minded

papiforreal:


From the few incidents I have seen, It is always a problem when a woman has money. You have to be high value man to be able to control woman when she has money. Like she has to be madly in love with you.

I know a woman here in the north that her husband is university registrar and she is a chief judge of a state, so she is richer than he is.
The husband decided that he wants take another wife since their religion allowed that, but the wife said she would not allow that. And if he insist she said she has to walk away from the marriage.
And that's exactly what happened. she walked away from marriage.
And I know two women that are richer than their husband and they are all treating them like trash. One of them even sleeps in the BQ.
You see ehn, the only thing that tame women when she is rich is religion. if she fears God and hell fire, thats what would make her not to treat you like trash

Exactly but I wud rather she fears and respect me willingly than hope religion wud make her fear and respect me

Emotionss:
[color=#006600][/color]

Yes money is very important BUT money is not the most important especially in this age and time women are making their own money....

As a man you need to have another set of qualities that DIFFRENCIATE you from other Men....

That's why I won't consider a masculine woman for a long term relationship

I'm the prize remember

Women are making money is none of my business, infact those ladies are invisible to me wen it comes to long term relationships but for fucking if they are hot why not...... Just touch and go lol

SOZINN:
E. choke

Women don't build, they just move in especially in this 21st century

Junnior:
Thank you.
It seems to me that these guys do not want a woman that has a mind of her own. They want a zombie, more or less.

Calling men LOW VALUE BETA SIMPS because they allow their wives contribute financially is ignorant.
The fact is if you're being alpha, your woman will spend her money for you and still be submissive.
Everyone is claiming alpha these days, but only a few can truly be alpha. It's not by spending your money and refusing your woman's money. There are so many high-value men who are betas. All it takes to be high-value these days is having a lot of money. You get a lotta women as a result. That is often mistaken as alpha.
But that's not what it takes to be alpha. Status, money and looks, together, will make you high-value, but they won't stop you from ignorantly simping. If at all any man is being beta here, it is the man who refuses his woman's money.
The p1mp constantly collects money from women. He is alpha as fvck.

You think allowing her spend money is beta. You think you're being dominant and alpha by funding her whole lifestyle and refusing her money, but the truth is she manipulating the fvck out of you. She knows you too proud and egotistical as hell, so she leverages and acts all dumb like she ain't got an opinion, while sucking you of your resources and keeping hers, until it's time for her to move on. That's female nature.

That's why u need to have money and status, understand frame, game and b redpill aware.

But by trying to think that a woman Sharing responsibility in ur home will make u wise as a man, u must b very delusional. Goan check divorce stats in the USA and see the reasons why women file for divorce from their husbands 80% of the time.

Junnior:
Thank you.
It seems to me that these guys do not want a woman that has a mind of her own. They want a zombie, more or less.

Calling men LOW VALUE BETA SIMPS because they allow their wives contribute financially is ignorant.
The fact is if you're being alpha, your woman will spend her money for you and still be submissive.
Everyone is claiming alpha these days, but only a few can truly be alpha. It's not by spending your money and refusing your woman's money. There are so many high-value men who are betas. All it takes to be high-value these days is having a lot of money. You get a lotta women as a result. That is often mistaken as alpha.
But that's not what it takes to be alpha. Status, money and looks, together, will make you high-value, but they won't stop you from ignorantly simping. If at all any man is being beta here, it is the man who refuses his woman's money.
The p1mp constantly collects money from women. He is alpha as fvck.

You think allowing her spend money is beta. You think you're being dominant and alpha by funding her whole lifestyle and refusing her money, but the truth is she manipulating the fvck out of you. She knows you too proud and egotistical as hell, so she leverages and acts all dumb like she ain't got an opinion, while sucking you of your resources and keeping hers, until it's time for her to move on. That's female nature.

Men are simple beings we want fit, friendly, feminine ladies.

Only feminine men care about status, money as qualities they look for in their ladies.

Saviolamemphix:
U have a valid point though but it seems u don't understand what we are saying. to me my wife must contribute but not more than me, that's my point though.. nobody lyks a liability but never allow ur wife contribute more than u in ur marriage, if its relationship its understandable but not marriage.

Saviolamemphix, it's the same thing Junnior and a few others are hinting on. There is no 50/50 equality in marriage. Anyone who believes that is very ignorant. One would exceed each other. In this case, it's my advise for men to take the highest share while the woman takes the a minimal portion to be "invested" except you are super-rich or being born into wealthy royalty where the woman doesn't even have to drop a kobo or do domestic duties (like a trophy wife) and won't also cheat as there are severe social consequences of she doing that.

DEMZEE is talking about total dominance - Hard Patriarchy which is highly impracticable in the 21st century except you are going to pick a wife from some pre-modern society in the amazon or some hyper-rural parts of Africa. Even to the woman, he is still a HIGH VALUE SLAVE trapped in the insecurity of his ego. With the modern woman already exposed to tropes of women liberation and feminism, it's a waste of valuable time and unnecessary accumulation of mental stress for a man to seek total domination of a woman. It's possible though but you have to work yourself flat out to be mega rich which is not entirely within your control.

Money makes a lot of thing easy for a man and men must strive to make it, though in reality, only a minimal percentage of men would make money to last his lifetime and death. There would always be rank and class among men. The basic thing for a man is to have his own space (SHELTER either yours or rented) and a means of earning income. If you are not there yet, strive to achieve this, from there, you can move into building bigger things within which time, chance and effort can afford you.

That said, I'll clear things up here being red pilled means putting your own needs first as an individual whether rich, managing or flat out broke. I see people talk about making money and self improvement (which is very good) but those are not exclusive to the red pill. Miserable blue pilled SIMPs can find the motivation (like every other men) to make money and self improve. There are a lot more of these types, than rich red pilled dudes. I've also seen super-broke young men who don't seem to chase money or even self-improve but put themselves first among their peers and in their relationship with women - the core of the red pill. To the surprise of some men who think they are high value because they are super-educated and wealthy, they see so-called "low lives" run their own space with beautiful submissive women at their beck and call. It's the same thing that happens when some folks see motor park touts getting wealthy and being influential in society and think because they have PhDs, they deserve to be rewarded more. The reality of life doesn't work that way.

Go for what you want and get it. Even though factors beyond your control may sometimes get in your way, at least you know that you tried. However, in what ever state you find yourself, try to be in control of what is within your limits (taking responsibility), try to get some influence among your peers and strive to get better. A man in charge of his life, space and pushing his needs regardless of what society thinks is HIGH VALUE.

DEMZEE:


That's why I won't consider a masculine woman for a long term relationship

I'm the prize remember

Women are making money is none of my business, infact those ladies are invisible to me wen it comes to long term relationships but for fucking if they are hot why not...... Just touch and go lol

It's okay. Just do you.

At least you know what you are getting into.

I'll leave another point for you. For a good number of modern women, if you give them an environment of comfortability so much that they never earned it, contributed for or only got because of their looks, they'll resent you, use your money to cheat on you with a so-called LOW VALUE dude as you like to say.

You are projecting the values that men use in assessing each other, unto women. On a deeper level, women see wealth and status differently than men.

Skepticus:


DEMZEE is talking about total dominance - Hard Patriarchy which is highly impracticable in the 21st century except you are going to pick a wife from some pre-modern society in the amazon or some hyper-rural parts of Africa. Even to the woman, he is still a HIGH VALUE SLAVE trapped in the insecurity of his ego. With the modern woman already exposed to tropes of women liberation and feminism, it's a waste of valuable time and unnecessary accumulation of mental stress for a man to seek total domination of a woman. It's possible though but you have to work yourself flat out to be mega rich which is not entirely within your control.

Money makes a lot of thing easy for a man and men must strive to make it, though in reality, only a minimal percentage of men would make money to last his lifetime and death. There would always be rank and class among men. The basic thing for a man is to have his own space (SHELTER either yours or rented) and a means of earning income. If you are not there yet, strive to achieve this, from there, you can move into building bigger things within which time, chance and effort can afford you.

That said, I'll clear things up here being red pilled means putting your own needs first as an individual whether rich, managing or flat out broke. I see people talk about making money and self improvement (which is very good) but those are not exclusive to the red pill. Miserable blue pilled SIMPs can find the motivation (like every other men) to make money and self improve. There are a lot more of these types, than rich red pilled dudes. I've also seen super-broke young men who don't seem to chase money or even self-improve but put themselves first among their peers and in their relationship with women - the core of the red pill. To the surprise of some men who think they are high value because they are super-educated and wealthy, they see so-called "low lives" run their own space with beautiful submissive women at their beck and call. It's the same thing that happens when some folks see motor park touts getting wealthy and being influential in society and think because they have PhDs, they deserve to be rewarded more. The reality of life doesn't work that way.

Go for what you want and get it. Even though factors beyond your control may sometimes get in your way, at least you know that you tried. However, in what ever state you find yourself, try to be in control of what is within your limits (taking responsibility), try to get some influence among your peers and strive to get better. A man in charge of his space is HIGH VALUE.

I understand u

In Nigeria here u don't need to be mega rich to get a feminine lady.

There's no such thing as hard patriarchy. Patriarchy is patriarchy!

Life isn't fair that's why men must try to have both game,frame and money. None is better alone than the others that's my point of view.

luminouz:
If y'all gonna continue talking of this my wife should contribute or not, today...I wont kill myself but will commit suicide.


I don taya to dey talk. Dem use argument swear for una?

We are not mindless robots. In the end, everyman will do what aligns with his beliefs.

The argument here is related to the red-pill which the thread was created for. Men here should be allowed to bare their mind as it is a contentious issue among those who are purple-pilled. Folks can pick what aligns to their own belief even if they disagree with some. Those who are married and those who aren't are dropping gems based on facts, realities and even unrealistic fantasies. It's open for everyone to learn.

Skepticus:


It's okay. Just do you.

At least you know what you are getting into.

I'll leave another point for you. For a good number of modern women, if you give them an environment of comfortability so much that they never earned it, contributed for or only got because of their looks, they'll resent you, use your money to cheat on you with a so-called LOW VALUE dude as you like to say.

You are projecting the values of men unto women. On a deeper level, women see wealth and status differently than men.

A woman cheats on u wen she has lost respect for u and that always comes wen she's not longer in ur frame.

Most men are taught to condone their cheating girlfriends. Once ur woman cheats on you, u dump the bitch immediately. That's called having STANDARDS.

THATS WHY U NEED TO B HIGH VALUE TO BE ABLE TO HANDLE THE BULLSHIT THAT COMES EVENTUALLY FROM WOMEN.

Most men cannot walk away from their wives or girlfriends because they are not high value that's why they tolerate their wives or girlfriends bullshit

Women see wealth from a security point of view. Men see wealth from a social hierarchy point of view.

Saviolamemphix:
U have a valid point though but it seems u don't understand what we are saying. to me my wife must contribute but not more than me, that's my point though.. nobody lyks a liability but never allow ur wife contribute more than u in ur marriage, if its relationship its understandable but not marriage.

You are in line with me. But Demzee and co believe if your wife contributes any money, you're a low value beta simp. According to them, you are a Low Value Beta Simp