iammo:


Send your act

Have received it.jazakallu kairan

iammo:


Done

You may remove your details now

Have done it.May Allah reward you abundantly.

adam4success:

Have done it.May Allah reward you abundantly.

Amin..

RingRoadMafia:


I appreciate your inputs, bro. I like it when people approach topics with facts and not emotions. That being said, if you think that my point is valid then how exactly am I wrong?

Talking about religion evolving, while the crusaders were doing their thing, your holy prophet Muhammed (pbuh) was doing the exact same thing in the middle east. Christian popes saw the folly of their ways and stopped. Christianity evolved since the late 1800's but up till now, Islam has refused to evolve. Despite human civilization, despite our technological advancements, despite our social maturity, Islam has still refused to stop killing people for not believing in their god. That is all shades of WRONG!

Quote me, and believe me when I say this, Islam will never evolve until the apostate law is abolished.

Validity of point and Unbiased truth is very different.
That is, your point could be valid and logical but your overall submission may be based on your own personal view not universal truth.

History has shown that they were lots of situations that hitherto were apparently not changeable, countries that were apparently indivisible and liberty that were tall orders but end proving that change is constant.

As Christianity try to become liberalised lots of people were killed, lots of women were liked.
People that spoke about the apostasy and heresy laws were killed.
People kept fighting for you to be able to read your Bible in English and they were killed for that.

Who would have thought Christianity would be open for all the way it is today with all the atrocities that was done in the name of the church by Rome 250 years ago.

Lastly Christianity is over 2,000 years old.
Islam is over 1,400 years old

When Christianity was 1.4k years old, what make you think she was better off than Islam now?

What make you think Islam would not be far more far evolved than Christianity of now (which has its own issues) in the next 600 years?

AhmaduBello:


Validity of point and Unbiased truth is very different.
That is, your point could be valid and logical but your overall submission may be based on your own personal view not universal truth.

History has shown that they were lots of situations that hitherto were apparently not changeable, countries that were apparently indivisible and liberty that were tall orders but end proving that change is constant.

As Christianity try to become liberalised lots of people were killed, lots of women were liked.
People that spoke about the apostasy and heresy laws were killed.
People kept fighting for you to be able to read your Bible in English and they were killed for that.

Who would have thought Christianity would be open for all the way it is today with all the atrocities that was done in the name of the church by Rome 250 years ago.

Lastly Christianity is over 2,000 years old.
Islam is over 1,400 years old

When Christianity was 1.4k years old, what make you think she was better off than Islam now?

What make you think Islam would not be far more far evolved than Christianity of now (which has its own issues) in the next 600 years?

Don't you think that it's is somewhat absurd that you're whipping up christianity's past sins as an excuse for Islams current sins? You're comparing the events of thousands of years when there were no constitutions, no treatys, no United Nations, no democracy to the events of today when humanity has not only matured by the way of these things but has also experienced a boom in science and technology? People have been to the moon, bro. That moon that tells you when it's time to fast and when it's time to stop fasting, man has set foot on it! As a matter of fact, man will set foot on Mars in 2 years, and you're still making excuses for slitting people's throats because they don't believe in your god? Dude!

Okay, going by your logic, since Christianity is older and more mature, the world should wait for Islam to mature too before we can move forward? So if I start my own religion today, I can tell my followers to pillage, rape and murder since Christianity did it 2000 years ago, the world should wait for me until RingRoadMafianism is 2000 years old too, then we can all have sense? Are you not supposed to learn from the mistakes of your elder? If you go ahead making the same mistake, then what does that make you?


Mhen.. I'm just tired.

RingRoadMafia:


Don't you think that it's is somewhat absurd that you're whipping up christianity's past sins as an excuse for Islams current sins? You're comparing the events of thousands of years ...

You are becoming emotional, and obviously it's not thousands of years.

Lastly, I am not giving any excuse.
But you fail to see lots of liberal Muslim all over southwest, you fail to see liberal Muslim that are killed in the north for preaching liberalism.

You failed to see that, though there Muslim extremists that "slight throat" there are also very nice, gentle Muslim that are tolerant and welcoming.

The moment you generalized, and tag all Muslims terrorist, you create more problem in the system.

My point is simple. There are more moderate, tolerable and liberal Muslims than radicals but The radicals are more loud.

And the phase we are in right now makes the gentle and nice ones unable to speak primarily because they have been tag terrorist.