Grayoso:


Same here. However it goes down, Southerners should get informed so we can determine when and how we have been betrayed by our leaders so that we can punish them accordingly.

Clearly we now see that Governors have the power to enforce the ban they agreed on against open grazing.

It will be interesting to note, from this point on, the Governors who show they respect the wellbeing of their people more than any commitment to pleasing Buhari and his ruling cabal. In my head I can only think of Ortom and Akeredolu because of what both have done bravely so far.

Grayoso:


https://www.premiumtimesng.com/news/headlines/462857-court-affirms-right-of-states-police-to-enforce-anti-open-grazing-law.html

Elliotwaveforec:
.

akeentech:
Who’s gonna enforce it?

SmartProf:
There will be weeping and gnashing of teeth at the fulani headquarters on hearing this news...all their stakeholders including the president will release statements soon... I wonder if cow business is not an individual one, and why those in it can't play by the rules owners of other businesses adhere to.

kunkelhanspeter:

It’s very simple Southerners are slave to the Northerners because without the support of the Northerners they political career is at risk, that why that are all afraid to enforce the ban on open grazing.

Amodi470:
So you people are rejoicing

Krucifax:


To be brutally honest this judgement is neither a victory for the long suffering victims of herders nor the governors. It is basically back to square one. Let me explain why.

The judge in her closing statement said a few keys things.:

A: That the plaintiff/claimant's suit was wrongly construed and aimed at the wrong person i.e Buhari
B: Reaffirms the constitutional stance that the president can not be sued as was being attempted
C: That the court lacks the power to do anything about what they are asking.
D: That it was not the job of the president to enforce open-grazing ban

The court decision seems at first to be in favour of anti grazing but look closely. The court effectively is saying your approach is wrong and there is nothing we can do for you.

The decision also implies that the State Governors should be the ones enforcing anti-grazing laws THIS is the key point made. Considering that the State governors do not officially have any control over any security agencies(besides Amotekun,Ebebu Agu that don't have legal backing yet) how will they then enforce the law?

This is what the judge failed to mention or give guidance on. In this failure she has inadvertently exposed herself as being a Buhari stooge whose judgement was either bribed or coerced or done out of fear for her career. Pay attention to the details my people.

ELKHALIFAISIS:
Judge Ijeoma Ojukwu only an igbo Judge will have such courage

WATCHMANX:
Silly bigot with poor knowledge of history!

byinks:


It will only hasten the coming genocide of the southern states.

Grayoso:


Malami is awful. He is directly comparable to only Aondoakaa , another charge and bail lawyer promoted far above his station, as one of the worst AGF ever.

ELKHALIFAISIS:
e pain am yellowbar Muslim and their narrow minds

WATCHMANX:
Are you going to lead the genocide army?

Sonoyom:
It's been confirmed that our AGF is a quota system SAN who knows nothing but cowtocurrency.

Benbellamor:


The States are not waiting for the federal police to enforce its own valid laws of course a Fulani President and AGF would not
But rather, having passed the anti grazing laws in their respective states any action taking against defauters by state securities will be valid and it will be a burden on the supreme court to order the federal apparatus to comply even vwithout the president

Grayoso:


https://www.premiumtimesng.com/news/headlines/462857-court-affirms-right-of-states-police-to-enforce-anti-open-grazing-law.html

byinks:


Watchmanx you should know better than I do...

Elliotwaveforec:
Nice! One idiotic Malami wants to twist the law.

Krucifax:


To be brutally honest this judgement is neither a victory for the long suffering victims of herders nor the governors. It is basically back to square one. Let me explain why.

The judge in her closing statement said a few keys things.:

A: That the plaintiff/claimant's suit was wrongly construed and aimed at the wrong person i.e Buhari
B: Reaffirms the constitutional stance that the president can not be sued as was being attempted
C: That the court lacks the power to do anything about what they are asking.
D: That it was not the job of the president to enforce open-grazing ban

The court decision seems at first to be in favour of anti grazing but look closely. The court effectively is saying your approach is wrong and there is nothing we can do for you.

The decision also implies that the State Governors should be the ones enforcing anti-grazing laws THIS is the key point made. Considering that the State governors do not officially have any control over any security agencies(besides Amotekun,Ebebu Agu that don't have legal backing yet) how will they then enforce the law?

This is what the judge failed to mention or give guidance on. In this failure she has inadvertently exposed herself as being a Buhari stooge whose judgement was either bribed or coerced or done out of fear for her career. Pay attention to the details my people.

rummmy:
they are free to graze in core northern states....
South is a complete no go area for now..
We are already planning to go into ranching here and compete with them .
We will push them out from the bussiness and teach them what is modernity and improved ways of rearing cow....their local disease infected cow will be consumed by El rufai and AGF...