elampiro:


This is from Euro 2016.

It makes no sense if it’s not enforced.

You lied earlier that enforcing the law started around 2007.

This was 2018. Where was Collina at the World Cup? Was he blind?

Expert17:


Yh, the same way Henderson bottled AC Milan and Real Sociedad games.(3 clean sheet in 4 games)

Useless Pau Lopez benching the error-prone blind boy at Spain national team

How many saves did Henderson make in those games?

How many did De Gea make at Roma?

Is de Gea responsible for shots conceded? Is it his fault that the idiots in front of him concede shots?

Henderson would have knocked United out at the semis.

Illimitable:


It makes no sense if it’s not enforced.

You lied earlier that enforcing the law started around 2007.

This was 2018. Where was Collina at the World Cup? Was he blind?

I am not sure you understand English. Don't twist anything. Just humbly admit that you were ignorant that the law did not start with VAR.

I told you I saw this law from time immemorial. We also used it in our school games in the 1990s. You will hear, their keeper move o, na replay.

Lastly, I told you that google says it was introduced in 1905. Any laxity in any particular tournament did not represent the law. You are looking for exceptions instead of the general law through ages.

elampiro:


I am not sure you understand English. Don't twist anything. Just humbly admit that you were ignorant that the law did not start with VAR.

I told you I saw this law from time immemorial. We also used it in our school games in the 1990s. You will hear, their keeper move o, na replay.

Lastly, I told you that google says it was introduced in 1905. Any laxity in any particular tournament did not represent the law. You are looking for exceptions instead of the general law through ages.

elampiro:


It's not new. The linesman watches it. Before VAR, keepers were penalised for such. As far back as 2007, it was used. Much before, it was used. Now I see it was introduced in 1905 from google search

You people just lie without shame. Who mentioned 2007 here?

The law started with VAR and it was enforced with VAR. Pre-VAR, referee had no opportunity to get a second look if the keeper had cheated unless the keeper made it way too obvious.

A law isn’t a law until it’s enforced. Abortion is illegal in Nigeria but an estimated 60,000 abortions are committed every month in Lagos. What you read on paper has no relevance if people are getting away with it.

Go and rest.

Why is the debate about the failure of DDG to save a penalty?

Lindelof was stupid to have lost his marker, nothing De Gea would have done for that goal...

Rashford was guilty of missing a very good chance and was shit throughout but guess what? He finished the game. Maybe some of you didn't watch the game so I should let you guys in on what happened...

As soon as it got to extra time, shame catch me because Villarreal were that bad yet took us all the way to a shootout...At that point, they were more deserving of the win as underdogs...

We lost because for the second season in a row, Ole showed lack of faith in his bench even after it was strengthened...If I was the owner of Manchester United, I'd have asked him to give me one reason why he thinks I should spend a penny signing more players when it's obvious he wouldn't play them...Ole is a fraud, if he had any shame he'd have resigned by now...

Aurelio De Laurentiis would have sacked Ole via a Tweet at the end of 90mins...

Illimitable:




You people just lie without shame. Who mentioned 2007 here?

The law started with VAR and it was enforced with VAR. Pre-VAR, referee had no opportunity to get a second look if the keeper had cheated unless the keeper made it way too obvious.

A law isn’t a law until it’s enforced. Abortion is illegal in Nigeria but an estimated 60,000 abortions are committed every month in Lagos. What you read on paper has no relevance if people are getting away with it.

Go and rest.

The law has been used since 1905. Everyone knew about this law. You are not qualified to analyse football. It is FIFA rule 14. All FIFA rules are in use. Sometimes, for whatever reason, one tournament can see ref ignoring an issue

Moderator bundle this guy to ogogoro section

handelex:

I table your request, but it was thrown out by the board. No vex

airmark:
Eph12, don't come out yet o.


[img]https://media1./images/d5d864bceb00d5ee7940147419760b76/tenor.gif?itemid=6119299[/img]

Madumanu

Even now I just saw that the decision is is left in the hands of the referee in the EPL after VAR made a costly mistake in women's world cup.
.........
Video assistant referees in the Premier League this season will not rule on a goalkeeper’s position on penalties.

VAR will be used in the league for the first time from August, but referees chiefs have made the call that the technology will be not be used in decisions on a goalkeeper’s position for penalties, and will instead be left to the on-field officials to decide.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.chroniclelive.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/premier-league-var-goalkeeping-ruling-16457780.amp

elampiro:


The law has been used since 1905. Everyone knew about this law. You are not qualified to analyse football. It is FIFA rule 14. All FIFA rules are in use. Sometimes, for whatever reason, one tournament can see ref ignoring an issue

Moderator bundle this guy to ogogoro section

The law was in use and plenty of goalkeepers benefitted from cheating in 2018 World Cup?

The new laws started in 2019.

You are a fraud!

Illimitable:


The law was in use and plenty of goalkeepers benefitted from cheating in 2018 World Cup?

The new laws started in 2019.

You are a fraud!

This 'case study' was written by a student with little knowledge like you.

I am giving you link from FIFA, sports paper from 2014, 2016, etc. You are giving me a case study written from mamaput

elampiro:


This 'case study' was written by a student with little knowledge like you.

I am giving you link from FIFA, sports paper from 2014, 2016, etc. You are giving me a case study written from mamaput

You are a mega fraud.

What did the second to the last bullet point say? What date did IFAB say they would start enforcing these new rules?

Have some shame, boy.

Illimitable:


You are a mega fraud.

What did the second to the last bullet point say? What date did IFAB say they would start enforcing this new rules?

Have some shame, boy.

This is saying that before two feet required to be on goalline. But now one.

This makes it even easier.

elampiro:


This is saying that before two feet required to be on goalline. But now one.

This makes it even easier.

It makes it easier when keepers aren’t allowed to move side to side, touch the goalpost or crossbar or rattle the net?

Are you drunk?

macjireh:
SO DS SPACE WILL BE SWEET TILL NEXT SEASON

Insha Allah.

Illimitable:


It makes it easier when keepers aren’t allowed to move side to side, touch the goalpost or crossbar or rattle the net?

Are you drunk?

The keeper is allowed to move along the goal line and even distract the shooter, but must not touch the goalpost

elampiro:


The keeper is allowed to move along the goal line and even distract the shooter, but must not touch the goalpost

Were the keepers not touching the goalpost or rattling the post pre-2019 to distract the kicker?

So how is the law easier and how does it align with the ones you used in your secondary school?

So you have finally come full circle to admit the laws were changed recently plus there’s now VAR to enforce it?

You’re a fraud!

Illimitable:


Were the keepers not touching the goalpost or rattling the post pre-2019 to distract the kicker?

So how is the law easier and how does it align with the ones you used in your secondary school?

So you have finally come full circle to admit the laws were changed recently plus there’s now VAR to enforce it?

You’re a fraud!

Watch this video of 2004 and be enlightened. The keeper kept diving out to save and the referee ordered a replay. Sometimes, the player scored but his team mates encroached into the box


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJwAE5Mtrxc&t=23s

elampiro:


Watch this video of 2004 and be enlightened. The keeper kept diving out to save and the referee ordered a replay. Sometimes, the player scored but his team mates encroached into the box


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJwAE5Mtrxc&t=23s

You don’t even know how to lie.

The referee had the penalty to be retaken because the other players were encroaching the box before the ball was kicked.

In order news

Solskjær will open talks over a three-year contract extension with #mufc and will be supported with up to four signings this summer #mulive [
@mcgrathmike
]

KingAlabi:
In order news

[b][/b]

E be things!

patrickmuf:
Subbed off Greenwood and keeping Rashford for the entirety of the game is criminal...I couldn't believe my eyes when I saw Rashford on the pitch after the introduction of James...

Omo ehn

Expert17:


We suppose sack am after that game, just like Van Gaal

Amaka wey dem suppose plank

elampiro:


Watch this video of 2004 and be enlightened. The keeper kept diving out to save and the referee ordered a replay. Sometimes, the player scored but his team mates encroached into the box


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJwAE5Mtrxc&t=23s

The referee wasn’t even looking at the goalie in all the penalties that were taken. He was looking at the kicker and the encroachment.

If the referee thought the keeper was cheating, why was he giving the other players yellow cards instead of the real offender?

You people just lie without any shame.

Illimitable:


The referee wasn’t even looking at the goalie in all the penalties that were taken. He was looking at the kicker and the encroachment.

If the referee thought the keeper was cheating, why was he giving the other players yellow cards instead of the real offender?

You people just lie without any shame.

You never change. At least two of the retakes were as a result of goalkeeper's off his line. And there were no cards in those instances

elampiro:


You never change. At least two of the retakes were as a result of goalkeeper's off his line. And there were no cards in those instances

That’s not true.

If they were, the referee would have carded the goalkeeper. He was busy carding the players outside the box.

Can a team mate get a yellow card on behalf of a goalkeeper?

Why do you lie like this?

Illimitable:


That’s not true.

If they were, the referee would have carded the goalkeeper. He was busy carding the players outside the box.

Can a team mate get a yellow card on behalf of a goalkeeper?

Why do you lie like this?

You are a lair. This is the source of the information I shared and I followed their lead to the video. You just come online to distort fact

All the hulabalo about DDG was to shield OGS. Only a brain dead idiot will believe that useless piece of paper that OGS media PR boys have been posting around since last night to take attention away from the bottler called OGS.

No one is talking about how clueless the idiotic Ole is or how we only have 3 shot on target in 120 mins of football or how our first sub was at the 100min. They have shifted all attention of DDG not keeping out a PK.

Foolishness.

#OleOUT

elampiro:


You are a lair. This is the source of the information I shared and I followed their lead to the video. You just come online to distort fact

You and the author of that piece are both drunk.

In the video I watched, at no point did the referee communicate with the goalkeeper for any wrongdoing.

He didn’t caution him or give him a yellow card. There was no sign language or any form of communication between the referee and the goalkeeper and yet the referee was booking the players outside the box.

Watch the video yourself instead of reading a useless write up that didn’t capture the true event. If you are blind, ask a neighbor to interpret what happened in the video you sent.

The goalie wasn’t at fault as far as the referee was concerned otherwise he would have walked to him or signal to him to stop coming off his line.

Stop lying.

elampiro:
How much we deflated since his injury.

This guy is a leader and worth every of his £80m price tag. We need another defender to partner him. Lindlof goes to the bench as a first choice back up.

Chai even elampiro is now confused, Ole's cluelessness is ready doing some Olesexuals strong tin......

Expert17:


With Villareal's weak attack?

How many clear chance was created through out the game.





Your foolish GK, can't follow simple instructions.

This is the main reason why foolish ole wanted the game to enter penalties. Reason why he brought in Pk specialists towards end of the game. Cos he had confidence in de gea thinking his guy has done his home work well

Well, I don talk am before, if de gea na uni student, even with all the cheat sheet him for don get plenty carry overs
This just proved me right