Workch:
Theres no evidence right? You just want to argue

Nothingserious:


If I were you, I would pretend small, check and come back. These questions are beginning to make me think we are on different pages.

Do you understand what argument from teleology or cosmology or morality or beauty meant?

Every sound atheist or skeptic should understand what I meant and should have sound objections and defeaters. Not the way you go about it pls.

Workch:
skeptics don't believe magic. Your religion is magic

Workch:
skeptics don't believe magic. Your religion is magic

Workch:
you are yet to take me through microevolution

Workch:
What would it take for Christians to believe that Zeus and Flying Spaghetti Monster exist?

-I contend we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.- Stephen Roberts

Nothingserious:


Atheism is a religion.

Nothingserious:


Lol!

I give up.
You are just reasoning and responding like secondary school children. I am sorry for all the troubles abeg.
Go brush up and maybe come back after a while

hupernikao:


In intelligent argument as this, pushing on burden of proof is a sign of lack of knowledge. When you know something proof it. If you say a god doesn't exist, that is a claim, so you proof it. If someone say he does exist that is a claim, he should also prove it. But hiding behind a burden of proof is a strawman approach and found among people who only talk of things they can even understand or defend.

I have asked you over 15 times since yesterday to prove your claim but you were only repeating the memory verse (Spiderman, spaghetti. Lol) you were taught by your senior counterpart.

Such mindset can't sit on the table of intelligent argument. It only strive online.

hupernikao:


In intelligent argument as this, pushing on burden of proof is a sign of lack of knowledge. When you know something proof it. If you say a god doesn't exist, that is a claim, so you proof it. If someone say he does exist that is a claim, he should also prove it. But hiding behind a burden of proof is a strawman approach and found among people who only talk of things they can even understand or defend.

I have asked you over 15 times since yesterday to prove your claim but you were only repeating the memory verse (Spiderman, spaghetti. Lol) you were taught by your senior counterpart.

Such mindset can't sit on the table of intelligent argument. It only strive online.

FatherOfJesus:
You are a fool if you think the burden of proof lies on the person refuting the God claim.
Religious people always think foolishly.

The Bible made thousands of claims that hasn't been proven and you want someone that is refuting it to bear the burden of proof. If that's how burden of proof works in your useless church then I wil reset your brain here.

That's what religion does, it turned everhting upside-down to cover its dishonesty. It's amuses me that people who preach truth can be this dishonest.

How can you tell someone who's refute the biblical claims to prove a negative? Are you Christians everlasting morons?

Religion is a total scam and practiced by idiots who are liars and you are evidence for that.

You make amateur philosophy mistakes of Russell's teapot and then think you have any brain in thay your skull?
Who provides Evidence for a god claim?
The person making the claim or the person refuting it?

If I slap you EH?

FatherOfJesus:
You are a fool if you think the burden of proof lies on the person refuting the God claim.
Religious people always think foolishly.

The Bible made thousands of claims that hasn't been proven and you want someone that is refuting it to bear the burden of proof. If that's how burden of proof works in your useless church then I wil reset your brain here.

That's what religion does, it turned everhting upside-down to cover its dishonesty. It amuses me how people who preach truth can be this dishonest.

How can you tell someone who's refute the biblical claims to prove a negative? Are you Christians everlasting morons?

Religion is a total scam and practiced by idiots who are liars and you are evidence for that.

You make amateur philosophy mistakes of Russell's teapot and then think you have any brain in thay your skull?
Who provides Evidence for a god claim?
The person making the claim or the person refuting it?

If I slap you EH?

Nothingserious:


If I were you, I would pretend small, check and come back. These questions are beginning to make me think we are on different pages.

Do you understand what argument from teleology or cosmology or morality or beauty meant?

Every sound atheist or skeptic should understand what I meant and should have sound objections and defeaters. Not the way you go about it pls.

Workch:
Hupernikao is a typical Christian, he refuses to take responsibility for the claims of the Bible and tries to shift the responsibility to the opposition.

It’s has religious people reason like they don’t have anything upstairs.

Just like telling me to disprove Flying Spaghetti Monster, does that make any sense?

FatherOfJesus:
[s][/s] you have no moral right to talk about sound objections when your claims are not sound.

"That which is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence"
You are useless person who believes in biblical myths without evidence.
Go find evidence for all the fables in the Bible before any sane human can take you seriously.

FatherOfJesus:
Religion is a disease. It eats the most valuable parts of the brain and leaves wasted remnant.

The religious moo wants you to disprove lies that hasn't been proven. This can only happen in religion
I usually do not have patience for such kind of ignoramus.

Nothingserious:


How is your rant logical and reasonable and empirical?

Nothingserious:


This fool just parroting what he copied from the net. You just shot yourself in the foot. If you were smart enough and had thought your response through, you would have noticed your quote is self-refuting as it crashes all your and his claims of empirical proof for all your lines of defense. That is a concession of never speaking from empirical point of view.

Get out of here attention seeking foolish Child.

FatherOfJesus:
You are a fool if you think the burden of proof lies on the person refuting the God claim.
Religious people always think foolishly.

The Bible made thousands of claims that hasn't been proven and you want someone that is refuting it to bear the burden of proof. If that's how burden of proof works in your useless church then I wil reset your brain here.

That's what religion does, it turned everhting upside-down to cover its dishonesty. It amuses me that people who preach truth can be this dishonest.

How can you tell someone who's refute the biblical claims to prove a negative? Are you Christians everlasting morons?

Religion is a total scam and practiced by idiots who are liars and you are evidence for that.

You make amateur philosophy mistakes of Russell's teapot and then think you have any brain in thay your skull?
Who provides Evidence for a god claim?
The person making the claim or the person refuting it?

If I slap you EH?

FatherOfJesus:
[s][/s] you can't question me, I am thy lord your God.
Look at my moniker, I joined nairaland to work in mysterious ways

FatherOfJesus:
where did this church mumu come from?

Nothingserious:


Religious beliefs are as valid, basic and warranted as any other beliefs you have and doesn’t need any proof to make it valid.

Whatever anyone tries to do is at best an academic venture. Inspite of that, you can show him why you think their claims are wrong. Or maybe you don’t even know .

Sound atheists will tell you it is difficult to disprove God. Stephen Hawkings conceded to that. Richard Dawkins alluded to that too.

We don’t know you pls.

hupernikao:


In intelligent argument as this, pushing on burden of proof is a sign of lack of knowledge. When you know something proof it. If you say a god doesn't exist, that is a claim, so you proof it. If someone say he does exist that is a claim, he should also prove it. But hiding behind a burden of proof is a strawman approach and found among people who only talk of things they can even understand or defend.

I have asked you over 15 times since yesterday to prove your claim but you were only repeating the memory verse (Spiderman, spaghetti. Lol) you were taught by your senior counterpart.

Such mindset can't sit on the table of intelligent argument. It only strive online.

Nothingserious:


Foolish child. How is that rant an empirical truth? Can you show us?

FatherOfJesus:
You dare call the lord a child?
You will burn in a special VIP lounge in hell

FatherOfJesus:
[s][/s] your wisdom is like a filthy rat in my sight.

Can anyone know better than the lord? No

I'm the lord who created Dawkins and Hawkings, I made donkeys and monkeys, the birds of air, fish of thr seas and reefs.
I'm here working in mysterious ways

Nothingserious:


Matthew 7:6

Workch:
lol, this is the evidence I have been asking for.
Nothingserious, your god finally showed himself on nairaland.

Thank you lord

FatherOfJesus:
That's my son Jesus talking there.
He made me proud while he was on earth.

Glory be to me

Nothingserious:


You see your folly? You should be grounded in the Bible if you want to be a sound atheist.
You are a just wannabe atheist.

The Christian Bible said not to have any other god beside God Yahweh. It didn’t say there are no smaller gods.
So if you think you and your friend are gods and fiends, the Bible already got it covered.
But in your state of ignorance, you didn’t even know and thought you could turn it for mockery.
Alas you did yourself in.
Hahaha!

Nothingserious:


End of the game for you

Workch:
God just showed up on nairaland and you don’t believe it?

That’s how rapture will occur and you will miss it.
Remember Revelation 16 vs 15 “Behold I come like a thief”
God is here, you go to believe it