Athiest: someone who believes in one less God than you - Ricky Gervais

You picked one story about one “God” out of a pile of 3000 stories about other “Gods” and think they’re right about everything because of something a 2,000 yr old book with texts and figures stolen from other previous religions said. The religion you happened to be born into, just happens to be the right one. How convenient!

Your belief in a magic zombie sky fairy doesn’t translate into reality, and isn’t a base for arguing anything. You keep arguing about faith because you know that you have literally no evidence to back up your claims.

Athiests only believe in one fewer religion, of the thousands, than you.

You're 99% atheist.

SSIPON:
Your belief in a magic zombie sky fairy doesn’t translate into reality, and isn’t a base for arguing anything. You keep arguing about faith because you know that you have literally no evidence to back up your claims.

Athiests only believe in one fewer religion, of the thousands, than you.

You're 99% atheist.

I am afraid Ricky is wrong!
Christians actually believe in the existence of others gods- devils and demons they are called.

SSIPON:
Athiest: someone who believes in one less God than you - Ricky Gervais

O, how the people do not know!

Theist comes from Theo which means God in Latin.

A-Theist is from Anti-Theo which means Anti-God.

It does not mean "I get many gods pass you"!

Dtruthspeaker:


O, how the people do not know!

Theist comes from Theo which means God in Latin.

A-Theist is from Anti-Theo which means Anti-God.

It does not mean "I get many gods pass you"!

Tell me you don't understand the context of the post without telling me you don't understand the context of the post.

Kobojunkie:
I am afraid Ricky is wrong!
Christians actually believe in the existence of others gods- devils and demons they are called.

Do you worship them?

SSIPON:
Do you worship them?

That doesn't matter.

a·the·ism

disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of God or gods

Kobojunkie:
That doesn't matter.

Tell me you don't understand the context of the post without telling me you don't understand the context of the post. Here Ricky is pointing out that Christians believe in one god and that all other gods/religions out there are flat out wrong. Atheists take it a step further by saying that all gods are false including yours. You reject all gods but one. Athiests reject all gods.

SSIPON:

Tell me you don't understand the context of the post without telling me you don't understand the context of the post. Here Ricky is pointing out that Christians believe in one god and that all other gods/religions out there are flat out wrong. Atheists take it a step further by saying that all gods are false including yours. You reject all gods but one. Athiests reject all gods.

Again, this is simple.

To be considered athiestic, one simply need to show lack of belief in the existence of God or gods.

Christians do not lack a belief in the existence of God and they also do not lack belief in the existence of gods(they refer to them as demons and devils), the other 99%!

SSIPON:

Tell me you don't understand the context of the post without telling me you don't understand the context of the post.

Lies love to hide in the darkness of Contexts and Contextes!

The Light of Truth has to be shone on the matter!

SSIPON:
Athiest: someone who believes in one less God than you - Ricky Gervais

You picked one story about one “God” out of a pile of 3000 stories about other “Gods” and think they’re right about everything because of something a 2,000 yr old book with texts and figures stolen from other previous religions said. The religion you happened to be born into, just happens to be the right one. How convenient!

Your belief in a magic zombie sky fairy doesn’t translate into reality, and isn’t a base for arguing anything. You keep arguing about faith because you know that you have literally no evidence to back up your claims.

Athiests only believe in one fewer religion, of the thousands, than you.

You're 99% atheist.

I always think they say atheists are intelligent people. These days, I am beginning to see lazy and unintelligent assumptions and conclusions from Atheists.

The author of the above write up needs proper education. When you take the general opinion around you to judge the whole, it is a sign of low intelligence.

Attacking a belief system isn't a smart thing either. Presenting top class argument is what intelligent people do. It seems atheists with such intelligence are now converted to what they once crucified as it is hard to find one today.

Just thinking....

Kobojunkie:
Again, this is simple.

To be considered athiestic, one simply need to show lack of belief in the existence of God or gods.

Christians do not lack a belief in the existence of God and they also do not lack belief in the existence of gods(they refer to them as demons and devils), the other 99%!

Do you believe Zeus exists?

hupernikao:


I always think they say atheists are intelligent people. These days, I am beginning to see lazy and unintelligent assumptions and conclusions from Atheists.

The author of the above write up needs proper education. When you take the general opinion around you to judge the whole, it is a sign of low intelligence.

Attacking a belief system isn't a smart thing either. Presenting top class argument is what intelligent people do. It seems atheists with such intelligence are now converted to what they once crucified as it is hard to find one today.

Just thinking....

Who are the intelligent atheists that have been converted?

LordReed:
Do you believe Zeus exists?

Are you asking if there is possibly a demon or devil behind even that belief? The answer is Yes!

Kobojunkie:
Are you asking if there is possibly a demon or devil behind even that belief? The answer is Yes!

No that's not what I am asking. I am asking if you believe a god named Zeus exists not a demon.

LordReed:
No that's not what I am asking. I am asking if you believe a god named Zeus exists not a demon.

As I already made clear, what you call gods are nothing but demons and devils to us. So the one you call Zeus, is of demons and devils.

Kobojunkie:
As I already made clear, what you call gods are nothing but demons and devils to us. So the one you call Zeus, is of demons and devils.

Then you don't believe a god called Zeus exists. No need for this rigmarole. Gods are not demons by definition so this semantic game you're playing is just pointless.

LordReed:
Then you don't believe a god called Zeus exists. No need for this rigmarole. Gods are not demons by definition so this semantic game you're playing is just pointless.

Again, this is simple.

To be considered athiestic, one simply need to show lack of belief in the existence of God or gods.

Christians do not lack a belief in the existence of God and they also do not lack belief in the existence of gods(they refer to them as demons and devils), the other 99%!

Atheists roaming around in the religion section have low IQ.

The curious case of God and god:

Kobojunkie:
Again, this is simple.

To be considered athiestic, one simply need to show lack of belief in the existence of God or gods.

Say the word God out loud.

Say the word god out loud

What is the difference?!

Kobojunkie:
Again, this is simple.

To be considered athiestic, one simply need to show lack of belief in the existence of God or gods.

Christians do not lack a belief in the existence of God and they also do not lack belief in the existence of gods(they refer to them as demons and devils), the other 99%!

You do like to play these pointless semantic games don't you. I ask you for a cake and you bring me bread insisting that because they are are made from the same ingredients and baked in the same oven then they are the same. Bread is not cake just like gods are not demons. You don't believe in a god called Zeus whether you believe in a demon called Zeus is even debatable but the clear fact is you don't believe in certain gods, your attempts at reclassification are pointless.

KnownUnknown:
The curious case of God and god:



Say the word God out loud.

Say the word god out loud

What is the difference?!

None! They just like to insist they know the god with a capital g as his name.

Kobojunkie:
Are you asking if there is possibly a demon or devil behind even that belief? The answer is Yes!

bruh

hupernikao:



Attacking a belief system isn't a smart thing either.

most people would not have any problems with religion, if it is not used as a basis to run the country and justify senseless laws.

SSIPON:
most people would not have any problems with religion, if it is not used as a basis to run the country and justify senseless laws.

Well this is the main reason why you people should agree that the one and only true religion have nothing to do with how your society is governed!
True Christians have their own government globally yet they submit to whatever people in the society they live agree upon.
But false religions don't have anything tangible other than thinking of how to take control of the society they live in. When they are few in number they'll be protesting of being marginalized but when they gain the majority they'll be fighting for power!

MaxInDHouse:


Well this is the main reason why you people should agree that the one and only true religion have nothing to do with how your society is governed!
True Christians have their own government globally yet they submit to whatever people in the society they live agree upon.
But false religions don't have anything tangible other than thinking of how to take control of the society they live in. When they are few in number they'll be protesting of being marginalized but when they gain the majority they'll be fighting for power!

Ok

SSIPON:
most people would not have any problems with religion, if it is not used as a basis to run the country and justify senseless laws.

1. You still assumed here and confirmed my post, by using most people. That's an assumption. Even on nairaland here, the numbers of these set can't be called most.


2. Use your PVC/right to vote who you want, not holding unto another man's belief. In a system of government where you can decide, please use the power of that "most people" and get your irreligious candidate there.

I wonder how you can have a religious person governing you in the first place, if "most people" have issues with that. That means the most aren't being smart or aren't most.


3. it's a convenience to have issues with another man's belief on the basis of his commitment to it. It's a lazy convenience.

There are only bad leaders and good leaders. That is it. We have irreligious leaders who are bad, we have religious leaders who are good. So it's a poor yardstick for governance.

That is how leadership is judge not base on religion, tribe, race or family. If he is good, keep him, if he is bad, remove him.

---

4. Lastly, read this well.
The one who judge governance by a man's religions has the same problem with the one who govern using his religion. They have the same mentality, same mindset. A poor one. Because their mindset is captivated on the circle of:

- One of them feel, religion is what can make me do well in governance.

- The other feel, religion is what make people do bad in governance.

Both stands have lost focus on the essence of good governance. And start picking stones. They will both produce bad leadership with such mindset.

LordReed:


Who are the intelligent atheists that have been converted?

"it seems"

That was my text. That means it can be one of the possibilities because these days such atheists are fewer.

But aren't you okay with that? Atheist conversion? I see you a step closer, just a last leg-wide jump and you are there.

hupernikao:


"it seems"

That was my text. That means it can be one of the possibilities because these days such atheists are fewer.

But aren't you okay with that? Atheist conversion? I see you a step closer, just a last leg-wide jump and you are there.

Sure it's a possibility but I wanted to know if you have actual facts which as always is lacking.


Do you mean me converting to Christianity? Not even if I was granted a million lifetimes.

LordReed:


Sure it's a possibility but I wanted to know if you have actual facts which as always is lacking.


Do you mean me converting to Christianity? Not even if I was granted a million lifetimes.

I pointed you to the fact that I said "it seems" but it also seems you have a target or opinion to hold. You will be the one to start reading with a good mindset to avoid reading like this.

So, you could see that you are the one always making assumptions.

On you and Christianity issues. It's not a discussion. I have seen people use words like "over my dead body", yet their bodies refused to die when reality dawn.

So, don't let us put it up for discussion, I just pointed out what I know, that you are closer to the end of that "a million lifetimes" you needed, where you can now receive the gospel afterwards.

hupernikao:



I pointed you to the fact that I said "it seems" but it also seems you have a target or opinion to hold. You will be the one to start reading with a good mindset to avoid reading like this.

So, you could see that you are the one always making assumptions.

On you and Christianity issues. It's not a discussion. I have seen people use words like "over my dead body", yet their bodies refused to die when reality dawn.

So, don't let us put it up for discussion, I just pointed out what I know, that you are closer to the end of that "a million lifetimes" you needed, where you can now receive the gospel afterwards.

Yes you people always know me better than myself. Just so that we are clear, is this a prophecy or you saw it in dream? LMFAO!

LordReed:


Yes you people always know me better than myself. Just so that we are clear, is this a prophecy or you saw it in dream? LMFAO!

Prophecy? Saw you? That means I must have eaten jollof rice to sleep such night.

I gave you my personal opinion. But like I said, it's not needed for discussion.

hupernikao:


Prophecy? Saw you? That means I must have eaten jollof rice to sleep such night.

I gave you my personal opinion. But like I said, it's not needed for discussion.

Well your opinion is wrong since I have no intention of ever becoming religious in any sense of the word.