hensben:
Zidane is a good coach but this is same feeling I have about him. He was loved by the players due to his legacy in the club and football world so they played with their heart for him which yielded those trophies. Can he succeed without those factors is the big question mark.

raumdeuter:


Only those who do well at certain level get that type of role. You need to get pass SS class prooition before you get a stab at WAEC. You cant go from primary school to WAEC
You think say dem go just bring manager from Wolves and give am billions to spend
Poch succeded at Spurs before he got PSG

Nuno didnt even survive 4 months

NinjaXmetahuman:
Lol so Nuno didn't succeed at wolves Abi?

What success did apari record in his first season at mancity to deserve the billions given to him?

Tottenham were not patient with Nuno, Just like Chelsea wouldn't have been patient with fraudiola if he had come to Chelsea instead of city.

Agreed?

raumdeuter:


How come Maradona didnt become a great coach, Or why is Henry now in Skysport and not coaching or Lothar Matthaus

You think your Chelsea players didnt love Lampard or did they love Tuchel more?

Lampard Maradona Henry Matthaus etc all had these and what became of them

raumdeuter:


His success at Wolves earned him Spurs and he failed, If he had succeeded at Spurs he would earn a top club like Pochetinno where he can spend billions

Peps success at Barcelona and Bayern earned him the patience and right to spend billions. From parable of talents, only those who do well with little will be entrusted with more

raumdeuter:


His success at Wolves earned him Spurs and he failed, If he had succeeded at Spurs he would earn a top club like Pochetinno where he can spend billions

Peps success at Barcelona and Bayern earned him the right to spend billions

hensben:
Does Chelsea have the caliber of players at Madrid then?

NinjaXmetahuman:
hahahahaha

Just see as you are dribbling your yourself.
He is talking as if Tottenham is one super club with billions to spend on successful managers

Nuno, a success at wolves. Went to toteham, a team that barely finished 6th previous season with last silverware around 2007 (and it's a fucking Caraboa cup)

Tottenham couldn't even wait half a season to sack him cos they were expecting instant success despite not willing to spend ti get that instant success like other big clubs. They gave him 75million to spend on players. (that's less down what mancity spent on shakushaku this season alone)



Fraudiola took over a UCL semi finalist and he spent 250 million and a full season but went trophyless and barely qualify for top 4 despite huge money spent.
Losing miserably to the Everton's of these world.

Mancity didn't sack him but rewarded his failure with more millions. (That's why he himself called mancity a small club) cos he couldn't believe it

Now answer the question, what was fraudiola's success in his first season to deserve the billions given to him?

raumdeuter:


Is it not the same players that Tuchel is using? Why did respect not work for Lampard

hensben:
So Barca and Bayern were inferior club/squad compare to man city?

hensben:
Didn’t Lampard do wonders too by qualifying the team to ucl with transfer ban, he signed good players and needed time but chelsea been chelsea no time for that. If anything, Lampard did well for chelsea according to the caliber of players at his disposal. Zidane had quality players at their peak.

raumdeuter:


Barca and Bayern did not spend as much money, His success at Bayern and Barca earned him the money and patience at City

Ibime:


Nope, Zidane succeeded at a backstabbing club where every player is out for his own interest. Players like Gareth Bale always beefing with him and putting out their own narratives.

How did Hazard play with his heart to give Zidane La Liga title? Hazard played with his stomach

raumdeuter:


If Lampard did well, he wont be fired and be currently jobless

Ibime:


Nope, Zidane succeeded at a backstabbing club where every player is out for his own interest. Players like Gareth Bale always beefing with him and putting out their own narratives.

How did Hazard play with his heart to give Zidane La Liga title? Hazard played with his stomach

raumdeuter:

Pep has built pedigree over his career which bought him time and billions to spend

Poch failed to win Ligue1 last season but was rewarded with Messi Ramos and more players because of his pedigree built at Spurs

If Nuno built something close to Pep and Poch, they would have given him time

raumdeuter:


Na so dem dey swap? No be work dem do to get to that position?

Why don't you also swap with Dangote to prove you can manage a multi million dynasty

NinjaXmetahuman:
Pochetino took over at half season and psg were already failing to win the league.
Yet, he managed to finish second and he didn't go trophyless or spend 250million to achieve that.
So rewarding him with more quality players makes sense.


Pep took over mancity, spent a full season and over 250 million and failed woefully.

So why was he given more money?

See the big difference.

raumdeuter:


Barca and Bayern did not spend as much money, His success at Bayern and Barca earned him the money and patience at City

hensben:
He had the squad at Bayern and barca. If anything? Pep failed at Bayern. Man city signed him due to his brand of football and they have the money to finance that. For pep to succeed he need quality players that can play his brand of football and to do that more money is needed. Before pep Bayern won treble, they won again after he left. He is good but overrated. Klopp is better than him.

TLona1:


Hen's brain strikes again!

NinjaXmetahuman:
hahahahaha

Just see as you are dribbling your yourself.
He is talking as if Tottenham is one super club with billions to spend on successful managers

Nuno, a success at wolves. Went to toteham, a team that barely finished 6th previous season with last silverware around 2007 (and it's a fucking Caraboa cup)

Tottenham couldn't even wait half a season to sack him cos they were expecting instant success despite not willing to spend ti get that instant success like other big clubs. They gave him 75million to spend on players. (that's less down what mancity spent on shakushaku this season alone)



Fraudiola took over a UCL semi finalist and he spent 250 million and a full season but went trophyless and barely qualify for top 4 despite huge money spent.
Losing miserably to the Everton's of these world.

Mancity didn't sack him but rewarded his failure with more millions. (That's why he himself called mancity a small club) cos he couldn't believe it

Now answer the question, what was fraudiola's success in his first season to deserve the billions given to him?

airmark:


Klopp would have won Ucl with all the resources provided for Fraudiola at Bayern and City.

Klopp got to 3 Ucl finals without spending 1bn on a Ucl semifinalist.

hensben:
He had the squad at Bayern and barca. If anything? Pep failed at Bayern. Man city signed him due to his brand of football and they have the money to finance that. For pep to succeed he need quality players that can play his brand of football and to do that more money is needed. Before pep Bayern won treble, they won again after he left. He is good but overrated. Klopp is better than him.

airmark:


[s]Klopp would have won Ucl with all the resources provided for Fraudiola at Bayern and City.
[/s]
Klopp got to 3 Ucl finals without spending 1bn on a Ucl semifinalist.

hensben:
Thats Roman been Roman, he want to win always and don’t have the patient to wait.

NinjaXmetahuman:
Pochetino took over at half season and psg were already failing to win the league.
Yet, he managed to finish second and he didn't go trophyless or spend 250million to achieve that.
So rewarding him with more quality players makes sense.


Pep took over mancity, spent a full season and over 250 million and failed woefully.

So why was he given more money?

See the big difference.

TLona1:
When it comes to slandering Pep, it is only UCL that matters .

Y'all have really placed this guy so high without even realising.