Lightway:


There is no such thing... You're a liar


No job requires marriage as a criteria

Susily:



Things like what and what will society deny you cos you're not married??

Junnior:

K

Smartb0y:
There's actually a documentary, never knew

Lightway:

There is no such thing... You're a liar

No job requires marriage as a criteria

Lightway:


There is no such thing... You're a liar


No job requires marriage as a criteria

Susily:



Things like what and what will society deny you cos you're not married??

ubunja:
On Maintaining Frame....

Any understanding of how to maintain frame begins with understand this phrase:
WOMEN MAKE RULES FOR BETAS AND BREAK THEM FOR ALPHAS

This explains how frames work.

"frame" is reality. And "maintaining frame" simply means being in charge of your reality, your world, as in, it's your rules and your programme. You will is done.

Now, women make rules for Betas and break them for Alphas:

Every human being has his or her own frame. Men and women have their own frame. And generally 80% of the Male population (the Beta majority) by default break frame when they deal with women,, as in they leave their own frame and enter a woman's frame, as in they abandon their own dominance of their reality and break their own rules to satisfy/align with/live by, the woman's rules - which is her frame.

This is why, by default, women have control in conventional relationships and hold all the power. It's because women have maintained frame. And men have broken frame.

But, Women break rules for the alpha.....

If a woman perceives you to be Alpha, she's more than willing to "break frame" for you and enter your frame. This is the "women break rules for the alpha" part.

When you're a weak man, women enjoy controlling you, that is they pull you into their frame and you become a puppet on strings, doing their bidding (women make rules for Betas) saying lame stuff like "happy wife happy life"

But when you're strong, women WANT and are WILLING to hand over control and rest in their femininity with the full confidence that they're safe with you, that you know what you're doing and you're able to lead, protect etc (women break rules for alphas).

A weak man awakens a woman's masculinity. And gets pulled into her frame.

A strong man awakens a woman's femininity. And inspires her to break frame for him.

Whatever state you're in, a woman will automatically become the opposite of it, because male/female interactions are by nature based on contrasts.

luminouz:


Go watch a movie called 'Insurrection'
Your eyes would be opened on why feminism and liberalism was introduced by the 'powers that be' to mess up men and the next generation...all in a bid for world control

ProphetJeroboam:
Can you please help me with the site you downloaded the movie from?

ProphetJeroboam:
Can you please help me with the site you downloaded the movie from?

DieRich5:
type the name of the movie ND space ND add netnaija

Skepticus:


For some career-oriented, high-achieving folks, having a legal marriage would be an advantage, though, not mandatory, as the power to grow your career/achieve your ambitions, are in the hand of blue-pilled folks who view married men positively over single men, and it doesn't matter if you have a shît-show/sham for a marriage e.g Politics at the state/federal level. The society calls it "responsible".

In some professions, it is mandatory, even if your wife is the worst woman to live with, on the planet. As I'm aware, certain ranks in the Nigerian military (for commissioned officers), can only be attained (including other factors like competence) if you are legally married. If you meet criteria of dedication and competence, and you are not married, you'll be overlooked for your target rank/qualification etc.

I've always wanted to talk about this part, directed to men who don't wish to marry nor co-habit with women. It would be a dilemma, if you are involved in this types of professions (mandatorily requiring marriage). Personal sacrifices/risks would have to be made/endured for which ever option you choose as an individuals.

ProphetJeroboam:
Red pill through the eyes of a woman? I’ll pass.

waploger:


please can you assist me with N50 airtime to sub night plan and access my mtnapp?

Lightway:


Mumu

Coochies is your life achievement

You didn't tell us the millions you made after going monk mode

DieRich5:
I didn't see dis in midnight hours

ubunja:
not so fast comrade. you've to know the story behind this film before you write it off.

What happened here is that a certain lady feminist set out to write about the hateful misogynistic men's movement called the Redpill. As part of her research, she spent time in redpill circles undercover observing and taking notes. In her own words she said she was surprised cause the feminist narrative of the redpill as a diabolic womanhating movement was proved totally false. Where she expected insults and denigrating commentary directed at femalefolk, she found divorced men lamenting their forced separation from their children, men voicing their injustices in a woman-favoring world and the like. She was amazed! She put everything she had learned together into a documentary, including interviews of prominent Redpill figures and happily submitted this to her superiors declaring her happy discovery that the redpill was not a womanhating faction after all, but instead a misunderstood group not given a chance to express their views. She thought everyone would be impressed. But instead found herself ostracized and cut off. Determined, she sort to have the film shown in cinemas. But to her surprise many cinema houses rejected the film. And I specifically remember in Australia feminists coming out strong and blocking the screening of the film.
But that film has lived on as one woman's take of the redpill in a world where women don't want to hear anything about it. It's a friendly film.
Don't judge it too harshly.

Skepticus:


For some career-oriented, high-achieving folks, having a legal marriage would be an advantage, though, not mandatory, as the power to grow your career/achieve your ambitions, are in the hand of blue-pilled folks who view married men positively over single men, and it doesn't matter if you have a shît-show/sham for a marriage e.g Politics at the state/federal level. The society calls it "responsible".

In some professions, it is mandatory, even if your wife is the worst woman to live with, on the planet. As I'm aware, certain ranks in the Nigerian military (for commissioned officers), can only be attained (including other factors like competence) if you are legally married. If you meet criteria of dedication and competence, and you are not married, you'll be overlooked for your target rank/qualification etc.

I've always wanted to talk about this part, directed to men who don't wish to marry nor co-habit with women. It would be a dilemma, if you are involved in this types of professions (mandatorily requiring marriage). Personal sacrifices/risks would have to be made/endured for which ever option you choose as an individual.

boninho:

Well, the field is a continuously evolving area. A year on the average should be enough to get a good hang of everything and then keep developing competence further. For someone already having programming knowledge, 6months to a year can get you up to speed.

Although nothing is cast in stone, job can also come within the periods aforementioned depending on the role.

SIBF:
Anyone recommends Twitter handle about diet to attain masculine body and performance.
Thanks.

sajmark:
Had to watch this movie because of Ben Affleck, whom due to ONEities opts into killing his wife's lovers instead of moving on with his life.
Guys please let Abundance mindset be etched in your conscious and subconscious mind, incidents like this happen a lot in reality... Men (SIMPs) are sending themselves to the grave at an alarming rate because of ONE woman.

Funny thing is how quickly the wife moves on to find a new lover after he kills the last.

ah jesu and 20 years ago this dude of a teacher was saying marriage is a requirement for job seeking

Lightway:


There is no such thing... You're a liar


No job requires marriage as a criteria

ubunja:
not so fast comrade. you've to know the story behind this film before you write it off.

What happened here is that a certain lady feminist set out to write about the hateful misogynistic men's movement called the Redpill. As part of her research, she spent time in redpill circles undercover observing and taking notes. In her own words she said she was surprised cause the feminist narrative of the redpill as a diabolic womanhating movement was proved totally false. Where she expected insults and denigrating commentary directed at femalefolk, she found divorced men lamenting their forced separation from their children, men voicing their injustices in a woman-favoring world and the like. She was amazed! She put everything she had learned together into a documentary, including interviews of prominent Redpill figures and happily submitted this to her superiors declaring her happy discovery that the redpill was not a womanhating faction after all, but instead a misunderstood group not given a chance to express their views. She thought everyone would be impressed. But instead found herself ostracized and cut off. Determined, she sort to have the film shown in cinemas. But to her surprise many cinema houses rejected the film. And I specifically remember in Australia feminists coming out strong and blocking the screening of the film.
But that film has lived on as one woman's take of the redpill in a world where women don't want to hear anything about it. It's a friendly film.
Don't judge it too harshly.