Kazeem47:
.

Greyworld:


..

Faithti:
Lies
And more lies
So you are saying the us supplied Humvees(HMMWV) yet we haven't seen any in combat bros calm down na

Heart3030:
Chai see weapons...if Saddam irag forces had half of these.. America and it's nato allies would not have succeded in invading that nation after months of fighting and bombing.

princeeze1:

The very reason I have been telling them that Ukraine performed poorly. So much armament from nearly all NATO countries, yet they were pummeled to the ground by outdated soviet/Russia weapons systems. Mind you, the Russians never sent their latest systems to Ukraine like the T14 armata, su57, su35, even the old warhorse su27 did not feature, not did they commit more than 150k out of their 900k standing army. NATO has been disgraced in their proxy war. Imagine damaging a country beefed up by NATO’s best armaments with su24/25, mig 29, T62/72, Ukraine just failed.

chronique:
This is a list of the weapons and services the US has supplied to Ukraine since the start of the war in February between Ukraine and Russia. This is separate from what NATO, UK, Germany, Poland, France, Belgium, Czech Republic, Australia, Canada, Italy, Portugal and other European nations, have supplied Ukraine with. Despite all these arms and services, Ukraine is still on the back foot.

VictorUSA:
Those are outdated weapons and yet Russia couldn't crush Ukraine as expected.What if the US had supplied latest weapons?

Svlla:


What are the latest weapons The US could have supplied?

You need some serious education if you can't answer this

mike8804:
funniest thing is not for free, Ukraine will pay for it directly or indirectly

princeeze1:

The very reason I have been telling them that Ukraine performed poorly. So much armament from nearly all NATO countries, yet they were pummeled to the ground by outdated soviet/Russia weapons systems. Mind you, the Russians never sent their latest systems to Ukraine like the T14 armata, su57, su35, even the old warhorse su27 did not feature, not did they commit more than 150k out of their 900k standing army. NATO has been disgraced in their proxy war. Imagine damaging a country beefed up by NATO’s best armaments with su24/25, mig 29, T62/72, Ukraine just failed.

Drenimarcus:


I am seeing another batch of Ukrainian surrender.. What EU is buying, i hope they can afford it cos most of these weapons are being either captured by Russia or sold on the black market. There is an array of Terrorists already in Ukraine, i hope EU doesnt have a terror problem when this is over. Uncle Sam has been notorious for creating more problems than solutions.

chronique:


There have been pictures of several humvees destroyed by Russia since the start of the war.

Faithti:
and you didn't bother to post one

chronique:


Hope it helps you sleep at night.

Kazeem47:
The US can only donate decommissioned or outdated weapons they no longer use in the name of assistance.Why can't give them some of their latest and lethal weapons to deal with Russia after all they are helping the US to bring down Russia.The US doesn't wanna help;they go about causing confusion and propaganda.If they really want to help let them give them Drones equipped with Hellfire Missiles,B-52 Bombers,Fighter jets,Feed them with good intelligence or better still allow Ukraine to join NATO so that they will fully get involved in the war.But US won't;they are just using Ukraine for their selfish interest as usual.

udemzyudex:


Are you not tired of this nonsense copy and paste?