Worthy of note is that Graphs from the Oryx visually-confirmed database of equipment losses show why Russia is losing the war in Ukraine, explain the main tactical advantage of the Ukrainian army over the Russians and explain why Ukraine is so successful in defying the Russian invasion: Ukrainians strike on enemy logistics.

Analyzing the graphs of lost equipment allows us to highlight the different phases of the war and determine changes in the tactics of the Russian army.

Thanks to the Oryx project, which collects and categorizes all video and photo evidence of destroyed and captured military equipment, it is possible to make well-founded conclusions about the course of the war. As the authors of the project say: “Only destroyed equipment, means, and equipment, confirmed by photos or videos belong to the list. Therefore, the actual amount of destroyed equipment significantly exceeds what is on the list.”

Some military analysts also note that the amount of the equipment in the video and photo can be distorted in some way (the Ukrainian information policy is not to show all losses). However, one can use not absolute numbers (they are incomplete anyway), but a ratio between the number of losses in Russian and Ukrainian reports. This ratio allows us to draw some interesting conclusions.

1. Overall casualties and the loss of armored vehicles

Let’s start with a general graph of all losses for the entire period of hostilities (graphs from Lee Drake):


General loss of equipment

The graph shows that Russia followed two approaches in its hostilities:

After the first two weeks when the intensity of losses (the slope on the curve on the graph) was the highest (when the Russians moved in columns deep into the territory of Ukraine, which left a lot of destroyed and abandoned equipment), as well as in the beginning of the offensive in the East (early April);

In April-May, the intensity of losses of the Russian equipment fell, which reflects a change in tactics – the Russians are trying to avoid contact battles and more often use long-range artillery strikes.

The graph of destroyed equipment confirms this theory: the growth rate of the number of destroyed equipment has fallen since the second week of April.


Number of destroyed vehicles

Another interesting graph is the percentage ratio between Russian and Ukrainian equipment lost. Pay attention to the lower right graph, which shows the ratio of total losses.

It is again noticeable that with the change in tactics in the East, the Russian army suffered smaller losses for a certain time (as a percentage), but recently Ukrainian troops seem to have adapted and now, the ratio has almost returned to the previous level: one unit of Ukrainian equipment to three units of Russian ones (25% and 75%).



2. Aviation and air defense
From these graphs, one can not only see the different dynamics/different phases of the war and the ratios (it is obvious that Ukraine destroys Russian aircraft faster than air defense systems) but also draw the main conclusion – after two months of the war, the Russians could not dominate the sky.





3. Logistics
Finally, the graphs for logistics and vehicles clearly show where the main efforts of the Ukrainian Army are targeted: for trucks, the ratio is 1 to 4, and for logistics systems – something like 1 to 15 in favor of Ukrainian forces.





As a conclusion to the previous two graphs, this diagram illustrates the main tactical preference of the Ukrainian forces: a strike on enemy logistics. The most successful ratio, 1:15 in Ukraine’s favor, is in the logistics. Ukraine’s ratio is the worst with aviation, but even there the coefficient is approximately 1:2.5 – for each of its aircraft shot down, Ukraine takes down 2.5 Russian ones.



https://euromaidanpress.com/2022/05/14/russia-losing-ukraine-war-equipment-losses-show/

Mynd44 Lalasticlala Seun

Now this is what I call detailed data collation which clearly shows why Russia shifted from infantry fighting to long range missile firing.

They knew they were being massively obliterated by the Ukrainian forces. A run of massive losses that was seriously affecting them but even at that Ukraine still adapted and as long as Russia focuses more on cruise missiles then Ukraine pushing them back even further is inevitable.

Russia is a declining power, this war has exposed Russia's Achilles heel

Jeez

Half the pictures aren't displaying

vastolord4:
Half the pictures aren't displaying

Check your browser settings. They are all displaying here

Ukrainians in the front line of war..


https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1525556432959070208

Coward Russia only knows how to use long range missiles lol in front they are useless

Benny6944:

Ukrainians in the front line of war..


https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1525556432959070208

Coward Russia only knows how to use long range missiles lol in front they are useless

I actually watched this video this morning and was beyond impressed.

Those soldiers were speaking Russian but are Ukrainians.

This is why that nonsense Putin said about helping Russian speakers in Ukraine is just a load of bullsh**t because almost all Ukrainians speak Russian.

The smaller guy told his partner that the Russian Orcs are behind that fence before the other one threw the hand grenade.

Notice that no more shots were fired after that grenade landed and exploded? Everywhere went quiet

I am sure that was a direct hit and those Russians at that fence are either dead or gravely wounded

No, russians are winning!

*Larry C. Johnson: "The Ukrainian Army Has Been Defeated. What's Left Is Mop-Up"*

*Interview with Mike Whitney • March 21, 2022*

*Question 1– Can you explain to me why you think Russia is winning the war in Ukraine?*

*Larry C. Johnson*– Within the first 24 hours of the Russian military operation in Ukraine, all Ukrainian Ground Radar Intercept capabilities were wiped out. Without those radars, the Ukrainian Air Force lost its ability to do air to air intercept. In the intervening three weeks, Russia has established a de facto No Fly Zone over Ukraine. While still vulnerable to shoulder fired Surface to Air Missiles supplied by the U.S. and NATO to the Ukrainians, there is no evidence that Russia has had to curtail Combat Air Operations.

Russia’s arrival in Kiev within three days of the invasion also caught my attention. I recalled that the Nazi’s in Operation Barbarossa took seven weeks to reach Kiev and the required 7 more weeks to subdue the city. The Nazis had the advantage of not pulling punches to avoid civilian casualties and were eager to destroy critical infrastructure. Yet many so-called American military experts claimed that Russia was bogged down. When a 24 mile (or 40 mile, depends on the news source) was positioned north of Kiev for more than a week, it was clear that Ukraine’s ability to launch significant military operations had been eliminated. If their artillery was intact, then that column was easy pickings for massive destruction. That did not happen. Alternatively, if the Ukrainian’s had a viable fixed wing or rotary wing capability they should have destroyed that column from the air. That did not happen. Or, if they had a viable cruise missile capability they should have rained down hell on the supposedly stalled Russian column. That did not happen. The Ukrainians did not even mount a significant infantry ambush of the column with their newly supplied U.S. Javelins.

The scale and scope of the Russian attack is remarkable. They captured territory in three weeks that is larger than the land mass of the United Kingdom. They then proceeded to carry out targeted attacks on key cities and military installations. We have not seen a single instance of a Ukrainian regiment or brigade size unit attacking and defeating a comparable Russian unit. Instead, the Russians have split the Ukrainian Army into fragments and cut their lines of communication. The Russians are consolidating their control of Mariupol and have secured all approaches on the Black Sea. Ukraine is now cut off in the South and the North.

I would note that the U.S. had a tougher time capturing this much territory in Iraq in 2003 while fighting against a far inferior, less capable military force. If anything, this Russian operation should scare the hell out of U.S. military and political leaders.

The really big news came this week with the Russian missile strikes on what are de facto NATO bases in Yavoriv and Zhytomyr. NATO conducted cyber security training at Zhytomyr in September 2018 and described Ukraine as a “NATO partner.” Zhytomyr was destroyed with hypersonic missiles on Saturday. Yavoriv suffered a similar fate last Sunday. It was the primary training and logistics center that NATO and EUCOM used to supply fighters and weapons to Ukraine. A large number of the military and civilian personnel at that base became casualties.

Not only is Russia striking and destroying bases used by NATO regularly since 2015, but there was no air raid warning and there was no shutdown of the attacking missiles.

*Question 2– Why is the media trying to convince the Ukrainian people that they can prevail in their war against Russia? If what you say is correct, then all the civilians that are being sent to fight the Russian army, are dying in a war they can’t win. I don’t understand why the media would want to mislead people on something so serious. What are your thoughts on the matter?*

*Larry C. Johnson*– This is a combination of ignorance and laziness. Rather than do real reporting, the vast majority of the media (print and electronic) as well as Big Tech are supporting a massive propaganda campaign. I remember when George W. Bush was Hitler. I remember when Donald Trump was Hitler. And now we have a new Hitler, Vladimir Putin. This is a tired, failed playbook. Anyone who dares to raise legitimate questions about is immediately tarred as a Putin puppet or a Russia stooge. When you cannot argue facts the only recourse is name calling.

*Question 3– Last week, Colonel Douglas MacGregor was a guest on the Tucker Carlson Show. His views on the war are strikingly similar to your own. Here’s what he said in the interview:*

*“The war is really over for the Ukrainians. The)y have been ground into bits, there is no question about that despite what we hear from our mainstream media. So, the real question for us at this stage is, Tucker, are we going to live with the Russian people and their government or we going to continue to pursue this sort of regime change dressed up as a Ukrainian war? Are we going to stop using Ukraine as a battering ram against Moscow, which is effectively what we’ve done.” (Tucker Carlson– MacGregor Interview)*

*Do you agree with MacGregor that the real purpose of goading Russia into a war in Ukraine was “regime change”?*

*Second, do you agree that Ukraine is being used as a staging ground for the US to carry out a proxy-war on Russia?*

*Larry C. Johnson*– Doug is great analyst but I disagree with him—I don’t think there is anyone in the Biden Administration that is smart enough to think and plan in those strategic terms. In my view the last 7 years have been the inertia of the NATO status quo. What I mean by that is that NATO and Washington, believed they could continue to creep east on Russia’s borders without provoking a reaction. NATO and EUCOM regularly carried out exercises—including providing “offensive” training—and supplied equipment. I believe reports in the United States that the CIA was providing paramilitary training to Ukrainian units operating in the Donbass are credible. But I have trouble believing that after our debacles in Iraq and Afghanistan, we suddenly have Sun Tzu level strategists pulling the strings in Washington.

There is an air of desperation in Washington. Besides trying ban all things Russian, the Biden Administration is trying to bully China, India and Saudi Arabia. I do not see any of those countries falling into line. I believe the Biden crew made a fatal mistake by trying to demonize all things and all people Russian. If anything, this is uniting the Russian people behind Putin and they are ready to dig in for a long struggle.

I am shocked at the miscalculation in thinking economic sanctions on Russia would bring them to their knees. The opposite is true. Russia is self-sufficient and is not dependent on imports. Its exports are critical to the economic well-being of the West. If they withhold wheat, potash, gas, oil, palladium, finished nickel and other key minerals from the West, the European and U.S. economies will be savaged. And this attempt to coerce Russia with sanctions has now made it very likely that the U.S. dollar’s role as the international reserve currency will show up in the dustbin of history.

*Question 4– Ever since he delivered his famous speech in Munich in 2007, Putin has been complaining about the “architecture of global security”. In Ukraine we can see how these nagging security issues can evolve into a full-blown war. As you know, in December Putin made a number of demands related to Russian security, but the Biden administration shrugged them off and never responded. Putin wanted written assurances that NATO expansion would not include Ukraine (membership) and that nuclear missile systems would not be deployed to Romania or Poland. Do you think Putin’s demands are unreasonable?*

*Larry C. Johnson*– I think Putin’s demands are quite reasonable. The problem is that 99% of Americans have no idea of the kind of military provocation that NATO and the U.S. have carried out over the last 7 years. The public was always told the military exercises were “defensive.” That simply is not true. Now we have news that DTRA was funding biolabs in Ukraine. I guess Putin could agree to allow U.S. nuclear missile systems in Poland and Romania if Biden agrees to allow comparable Russian systems to be deployed in Cuba, Venezuela and Mexico. When we look at it in those terms we can begin to understand that Putin’s demands are not crazy nor unreasonable.

*Question 5– Russian media reports that Russian “high precision, air-launched” missiles struck a facility in west Ukraine “killing more than 100 local troops and foreign mercenaries.” Apparently, the Special Operations training center was located near the town of Ovruch which is just 15 miles from the Polish border. What can you tell us about this incident? Was Russia trying to send a message to NATO?*

*Larry C. Johnson*– Short answer—YES! Russian military strikes in Western Ukraine during the past week have shocked and alarmed NATO officials. The first blow came on Sunday, March 13 at Yavoriv, Ukraine. Russia hit the base with several missiles, some reportedly hypersonic. Over 200 personnel were killed, which included American and British military and intelligence personnel, and hundreds more wounded. Many suffered catastrophic wounds, such as amputations, and are in hospital. Yet, NATO and the western media have shown little interest in reporting on this disaster.

Yavoriv was an important forward base for NATO (see here). Until February (prior to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine), the U.S. 7th Army Training Command was operating from Yavoriv as late as mid-February. Russia has not stopped there. ASB Military news reports Russia hit another site, Delyatyn, which is 60 miles southeast of Yavoriv (on Thursday I believe). Yesterday, Russia hit Zytomyr, another site where NATO previously had a presence. Putin has sent a very clear message—NATO forces in Ukraine will be viewed and treated as combatants. Period.

*Question 6– Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has been lionized in the western media as a “wartime leader” and a modern-day “Winston Churchill”. What the media fails to tell its readers is that Zelensky has taken a number of steps to strengthen his grip on power while damaging fragile democratic institutions in Ukraine. For example, Zelensky has “banned eleven opposition-owned news organizations” and tried to bar the head of Ukraine’s largest opposition party, Viktor Medvedchuk, from running for office on a bogus “terrorist financing” charge. This is not the behavior of a leader that is seriously committed to democracy.*

*What’s your take on Zelensky? Is he really the “patriotic leader” the media makes him out to be?*

*Larry C. Johnson*– Zelensky is a comedian and an actor. Not a very good one at that in my view. The West is cynically using the fact he is Jewish as a diversion from the size-able contingent of Neo-Nazis (and I mean genuine Nazis who still celebrate the Ukrainian Waffen SS unit’s accomplishments while fighting with the Nazis in WW II). The facts are clear—he is banning opposition political parties and shutting down opposition media. I guess that is the new definition of “democracy.”

*Question 7– How does this end? There’s an excellent post at the Moon of Alabama site titled “What Will Be The Geographic End State Of The War In Ukraine“. The author of the post, Bernard, seems to think that Ukraine will eventually be partitioned along the Dnieper River “and south along the coast that holds a majority ethnic Russian population.” He also says this:*

*“This would eliminate Ukrainian access to the Black Sea and create a land bridge towards the Moldavian breakaway Transnistria which is under Russian protection. The rest of the Ukraine would be a land confined, mostly agricultural state, disarmed and too poor to be build up to a new threat to Russia anytime soon. Politically it would be dominated by fascists from Galicia which would then become a major problem for the European Union.”*

*What do you think? Will Putin impose his own territorial settlement on Ukraine in order to reinforce Russian security and bring the hostilities to an end or is a different scenario more likely?*

*Larry C. Johnson*– I agree with Moon. Putin’s primary objective is to secure Russia from foreign threats and effect a divorce with the West. Russia has the physical resources to be an independent sovereign and is in the process of making that vision come true.

*Bio– Larry C Johnson is a veteran of the CIA and the State Department’s Office of Counter Terrorism.

He is the founder and managing partner of BERG Associates, which was established in 1998.

Larry provided training to the US Military’s Special Operations community for 24 years.

He has been vilified by the right and the left, which means he must be doing something right.

His analysis and commentary can be found at his blog, A Son of the New American Revolution*

obua:
*Larry C. Johnson: "The Ukrainian Army Has Been Defeated. What's Left Is Mop-Up"*

*Interview with Mike Whitney • March 21, 2022*

Wake up we are in May 15th which is almost 2 months from the day this your nonsensical article was sent out as propaganda.

The war is already in it's 80th day which is almost 3 months and you are posting an article from 2 months ago

You Putin bots will never stop making yourselves look absolutely stupid

Even the OP clearly detailed the progress of the war from the beginning up till now but trust you Putin bot to come posting nonsense

You guys have zero sense left. If Russia is losing then why did Lloyd Austin first made a call to Sergei Shoigu?

Continue living your propaganda. Awon propagandized ode..

[s]

Igbofam:
Worthy of note is that Graphs from the Oryx visually-confirmed database of equipment losses show why Russia is losing the war in Ukraine, explain the main tactical advantage of the Ukrainian army over the Russians and explain why Ukraine is so successful in defying the Russian invasion: Ukrainians strike on enemy logistics.

Analyzing the graphs of lost equipment allows us to highlight the different phases of the war and determine changes in the tactics of the Russian army.

Thanks to the Oryx project, which collects and categorizes all video and photo evidence of destroyed and captured military equipment, it is possible to make well-founded conclusions about the course of the war. As the authors of the project say: “Only destroyed equipment, means, and equipment, confirmed by photos or videos belong to the list. Therefore, the actual amount of destroyed equipment significantly exceeds what is on the list.”

Some military analysts also note that the amount of the equipment in the video and photo can be distorted in some way (the Ukrainian information policy is not to show all losses). However, one can use not absolute numbers (they are incomplete anyway), but a ratio between the number of losses in Russian and Ukrainian reports. This ratio allows us to draw some interesting conclusions.

1. Overall casualties and the loss of armored vehicles

Let’s start with a general graph of all losses for the entire period of hostilities (graphs from Lee Drake):


General loss of equipment

The graph shows that Russia followed two approaches in its hostilities:

After the first two weeks when the intensity of losses (the slope on the curve on the graph) was the highest (when the Russians moved in columns deep into the territory of Ukraine, which left a lot of destroyed and abandoned equipment), as well as in the beginning of the offensive in the East (early April);

In April-May, the intensity of losses of the Russian equipment fell, which reflects a change in tactics – the Russians are trying to avoid contact battles and more often use long-range artillery strikes.

The graph of destroyed equipment confirms this theory: the growth rate of the number of destroyed equipment has fallen since the second week of April.


Number of destroyed vehicles

Another interesting graph is the percentage ratio between Russian and Ukrainian equipment lost. Pay attention to the lower right graph, which shows the ratio of total losses.

It is again noticeable that with the change in tactics in the East, the Russian army suffered smaller losses for a certain time (as a percentage), but recently Ukrainian troops seem to have adapted and now, the ratio has almost returned to the previous level: one unit of Ukrainian equipment to three units of Russian ones (25% and 75%).



2. Aviation and air defense
From these graphs, one can not only see the different dynamics/different phases of the war and the ratios (it is obvious that Ukraine destroys Russian aircraft faster than air defense systems) but also draw the main conclusion – after two months of the war, the Russians could not dominate the sky.





3. Logistics
Finally, the graphs for logistics and vehicles clearly show where the main efforts of the Ukrainian Army are targeted: for trucks, the ratio is 1 to 4, and for logistics systems – something like 1 to 15 in favor of Ukrainian forces.





As a conclusion to the previous two graphs, this diagram illustrates the main tactical preference of the Ukrainian forces: a strike on enemy logistics. The most successful ratio, 1:15 in Ukraine’s favor, is in the logistics. Ukraine’s ratio is the worst with aviation, but even there the coefficient is approximately 1:2.5 – for each of its aircraft shot down, Ukraine takes down 2.5 Russian ones.



https://euromaidanpress.com/2022/05/14/russia-losing-ukraine-war-equipment-losses-show/

Mynd44 Lalasticlala Seun

[/s]

dapoRead:
You guys have zero sense left. If Russia is losing then why did Lloyd Austin first made a call to Sergei Shoigu?

Continue living your propaganda. Awon propagandized ode..

You guys have zero sense left. If Russia is winning why did they for the first time since the war began take the call from Lloyd Austin and why did Sergei Shoigu tell him over the phone that Moscow will never SURRENDER in Ukraine?

Note the word "SURRENDER"

I thought it was Ukraine who was supposed to surrender

dapoRead:
You guys have zero sense left. If Russia is losing then why did Lloyd Austin first made a call to Sergei Shoigu?

Continue living your propaganda. Awon propagandized ode..

[s][/s]

The stupified Propagandist is actually you bro

80 days and now Ukraine has got Russia on the defensive

I thought Russia said they would take Kyiv in 72hrs? How far na?

[s]

Igbofam:


You guys have zero sense left. If Russia is winning why did they for the first time since the war began take the call from Lloyd Austin and why did Sergei Shoigu tell him over the phone that Moscow will never SURRENDER in Ukraine?

Note the word "SURRENDER"

I thought it was Ukraine who was supposed to surrender

[/s]

First get some sense by listening to a detailed analysis here and know one or two things about war.

https://www.nairaland.com/7127842/gonzalo-lira-why-did-lloyd#112853791


Now answering your question. Only the weak link and the one losing always place the first call for negotiation, temporary truce, or Ceasefire (usually for them to regroup or re-organize)...

Russia has always welcome negotiations. Russia will always be open to picking up any call. Russia is not the one making the call. Another way to look at it is this When you call someone, who pays for it? The person you are calling or you that is calling?

I said it, one sense is not left again in any one of you spreading pure lies and propaganda everywhere. You should borrow some brains even though I know you have zero left. Pls, borrow some.

Learn or know one or two things about shooting war first.

dapoRead:
[s][/s]

First get some sense by listening to a detailed analysis here and know one or two things about war.

https://www.nairaland.com/7127842/gonzalo-lira-why-did-lloyd#112853791


Now answering your question. Only the weak link and the one losing always place the first call for negotiation, temporary truce, or Ceasefire (usually for them to regroup or re-organized)...

Russia has always welcome negotiations. Russia will always be open to picking up any call. Russia is not the one making the call. Another way to look at it is this When you call someone, who pays for it? The person you are calling or you that is calling?

I said it, one sense is not left again in any one of you spreading pure lies and propaganda everywhere. You should borrow some brains even though I know you have zero left. Pls, borrow some.

Learn or know one or two things about shooting war first.

So I guess when Russia FIRST reached out to Kyiv for negotiations and surrender they were the weaker ones right?

Do you see why I always say You Putin bots are extremely senseless?

The rest of your post as usual is senseless gibberish

[s]

Igbofam:


So I guess when Russia FIRST reached out to Kyiv for negotiations and surrender they were the weaker ones right?

Do you see why I always say You Putin bots are extremely senseless?

The rest of your post as usual is senseless gibberish

[/s]

Russia did not reach out to Kiev first. Russia went to UN and asked the U.S that is the puppet master of Ukraine to get the puppet to sign a peace deal that will include Ukraine not joining NATO.

What happened? The empire refused and offered nonsense document that did not even involve Russia's security concern. Then Russia started its special military operation and was opened to negotiations.

The Stupid puppet installed in Kiev obviously did not get the message. Since Mink agreement is not followed, let this people have their own country which Russia has already recognized as two separate nations (Lugansk and Donetsk).

(AS WE SPEAK LUGANSK IS COMPLETELY CLEARED, MARIUPOL is CLEARED, Azovstal iron and steel works is completely encircled - a part of Donetsk taken and Ukrainian soldiers are dying by its 400 per day in this regions).

Kiev following his puppet master could have just accepted the offer from the onset (Just like a more smarter Georgians did in 2008). Accept the offer and live to fight tomorrow. No they decided to fight. By the way, the stupid puppet then (Mikheil Saakashvili) did fight too but war ended in 5 days.

Now, the fight has been on going. Who blinks first?

RUSSIA OR THE PUPPET MASTER (Ukraine is non existence here due to NON-Government in Ukraine)

From the position of Strength---- What that call means is simple. THEY ARE LOSING AND MAY NOT BE LONG BEFORE THEY TOTAL MORAL COLLAPSE..

ALL THE NONESENSE YOU AND THE WEST ZIO-MEDIA have been posting is what is boasting those over brainwashed Azov and its likes.



I have not been commenting recently because of the too much lies that is not even worth my time. I just needed this one. Please you guys should get some brain cos no one left..

[quote author=dapoRead post=112854493]

Russia did not reach out to Kiev first. Russia went to UN and asked the U.S that is the puppet master of Ukraine to get the puppet to sign a peace deal that will include Ukraine not joining NATO.

And this is not Russia demanding a Surrender from Ukraine?

What happened? The empire refused and offered nonsense document that did not even involve Russia's security concern. Then Russia started its special military operation and was opened to negotiations.

The Stupid puppet installed in Kiev obviously did not get the message. Since Mink agreement is not followed, let this people have their own country which Russia has already recognized as two separate nations (Lugansk and Donetsk).

(AS WE SPEAK LUGANSK IS COMPLETELY CLEARED, MARIUPOL is CLEARED, Azovstal iron and steel works is completely encircled - a part of Donetsk also taken and Ukrainian soldiers are dying by its 400 per day).

This same Mariupol Russia reached out to the defenders of Azovstal to Surrender I guess that also makes Russia the weaker ones too right?

Kiev following his puppet master could have just accepted the offer from the onset (Just like a more smarter Georgians did in 2008). Accept the offer and live to fight tomorrow. No they decided to fight. By the way, the stupid puppet then did fight too but war ended in 5 days.

Now, the fight has been on going. Who blinks first?

RUSSIA OR THE PUPPET MASTER (Ukraine is non existence here due to NON-Government in Ukraine)

Another nonsensical gibberish

From the position of Strength---- What that call means is simple. THEY ARE LOSING AND MAY NOT BE LONG BEFORE THEY TOTAL MORAL COLLAPSE..

ALL THE NONESENSE YOU AND THE WEST ZIO-MEDIA have been posting is what is boasting those over brainwashed Azov and its likes.

This one lives in kavuki land

I have not been commenting recently because of the too much lies that is not even worth my time. I just needed this one. Please you guys should get some brain cos no one left..

I am sure you wouldn't know what sense looked like if it slapped you in the face.
See Russian lying propagandist coming here to claim others are lying

Ogbeni will you getat

[s]

Igbofam:


This same Mariupol Russia reached out to the defenders of Azovstal to Surrender cheesy I guess that also makes Russia the weaker ones too right?

[/s]

Answering you is a total waste of time but I needed to just answer this.

Many of you don't even know anything.

For others to have an idea. It's like the whole of Lagos. Saying IkeJa and Lagos Island(Mariopol) has been taken completely and what is left is Dangote steel industry at the end of Lagos Island leading to a seaport completely surrounded. (This is not a full scale war from the Russian perspective, it's a special military operation).

This is why, you will hear Russian soldier often politely asking the defending forces to surrender first. The same thing happened on the Snake Island. Surrender or die. You want to die or surrender?

IF YOU DO NOT ANSWER THE QUESTION..

WHO BLINKED FIRST SINCE THE MILITARY OPERATION HAS STARTED AND THE FIRST FORMAL NEGOTIATION HAS FAILED?

Since Kiev and its puppet master believe they can get leverage on the ground.

ONE OF THEM has blinked first..

WHO DID?

If you cannot answer that. I won't reply this again.
There is no point continue UN-brainwashing the brainwashed.


Awon ode..

[s]

dapoRead:
[s]

Answering you is a total waste of time but I needed to just answer this.

Many of you don't even know anything.

For others to have an idea. It's like the whole of Lagos. Saying IkeJa and Lagos Island(Mariopol) has been taken completely and what is left is Dangote steel industry at the end of Lagos Island leading to a seaport completely surrounded. (This is not a full scale war from the Russian perspective, it's a special military operation).

This is why, you will hear Russian soldier often politely asking the defending forces to surrender first. The same thing happened on the Snake Island. Surrender or die. You want to die or surrender?

IF YOU DO NOT ANSWER THE QUESTION..

WHO BLINKED FIRST SINCE THE MILITARY OPERATION HAS STARTED AND THE FIRST FORMAL NEGOTIATION HAS FAILED?

Since Kiev and its puppet master believe they can get leverage on the ground.

ONE OF THEM has blinked first..

WHO DID?

If you cannot answer that. I won't reply this again.
There is no point continue UN-brainwashing the brainwashed.


Awon ode..[/s]

Still doesn't change the fact that Russia has lost 3 to 4 times more equipment and personnel than Ukraine according to the OP and the fact that they are losing generally and have specifically lost Kharkiv and on the verge of losing Izyum and thereafter their plan in Donbas would fail woefully

By the way did you know that Russia lost over 500 men in their failed river crossing in Bilohorivka, Luhansk region?

Bloody nose na ya mate?

By the way why are you busy contradicting yourself na

I thought you said the one who reached out first is not only the weaker one but also the one losing but here you are trying to justify why Russia reached out first

E be like say you don finally craze.

From the fake news purveyor

Elvictor:


From the fake news purveyor

Bring your own true news o you brainwashed Russian propagandist

Counter the OP if you can

Igbofam:


Bring your own true news o you brainwashed Russian propagandist

Counter the OP if you can

I don't need to, what happened to your Iraq and Germany gas deal?

Lets start from there

[s]

Elvictor:


I don't need to, what happened to your Iraq and Germany gas deal?

Lets start from there

[/s]

I know you so badly want to detail this thread but sorry ooo I am way smarter than you and all your fellow Russian bots combined

Igbofam:
[s][/s]

I know you so badly want to detail this thread but sorry ooo I am way smarter than you and all your fellow Russian bots combined

You always spam that in every thread, so what happened to your IRAQ AND GERMANY GAS DEAL?

[s]

Elvictor:


That is your business, WHAT HAPPENED TO YOUR GERMANY AND IRAQ GAS DEAL? that you have been spamming every threads in Nairaland with?

[/s]

[s]

Elvictor:


You always spam that in every thread, so what happened to your IRAQ AND GERMANY GAS DEAL?

[/s]

Take it or leave it, Russia is over hyped.