RAGGA40:
what advice do you need

pansophist:


The video was eleven years ago, if she had said it now, she would have been publicly roasted on social media jungle style.

Martinez39s:
^{NB: this is for the sake of discussion and contribution since I am bored this evening. I have always wanted to give this take.}

Tenacious stupidity is really upon us. People who support the notion that men shouldn't physically retaliate when a woman goes physical on them because of the substantial strength difference between the average man and average woman are simply thoughtless; they have simply succumbed to the same old blue pill stupidity and puerile paradigm.

These silly folks act and react as if a man's fists and blows, however slight or moderate, are, in effect, lethal weapons of mass destruction when dealt on a woman. They act like a man's body is made of steel and is strong enough to easily fend off and effortlessly withstand any level of physical attack from women. They act like a woman's body is a fragile and weak thing and her physical attacks are like falling feathers in effect... and she can't possibly do more than that. This is laughable. They believe a man should endure a woman's physical attack (no matter what) and walk away for the sake of "dignity" and "maturity" as a "real man," or for the fear of killing or maiming the woman instead of retaliating. The jokes do write themselves.

The blue pill agents and idi0ts who subscribe to these notions and attitude stripe woman of accountability as they absolve women of the burden of self-restraint and shield them from the consequences of their bad decision to hit men who are stronger than them; this is a "privilege" that even weak men, and even boys, don't have against much stronger men. They also enable a certain toxic mindset and behaviour in women: that it's no big deal, and somewhat acceptable and understandable, when a woman hits a man. The red pill will never condone these, never! These vile notion and attitude also give room to physical abuse against men in the hands of women, and the lamentable belittlement, mockery, festering and dismissal of this phenomenon... much to the detriment of men and boys. These blue pill notion and attitude inadvertently give women the monopoly on physical assault.

If a female doesn't want to get hit by a male, then she must not hit a male. If a man or women intends to go about throwing punches and dishing out slaps, he or she must be prepared to receive the same or more in retaliation, and there should no immunity from the consequences of his or her action. As the red pill dictates, women are responsible for their actions and they must be held accountable for their every decision. If a woman doesn't like a man hitting her, then the onus is on her to make the decision not to hit a man. Accountability!

typing...

Martinez39s:
... typing


"... but men are much stronger than women." Well, is it not stupid for someone to hit and attack someone stronger than you? Why not stay off from someone stronger than you? In what sane world does a person hit or trifle with someone that's much stronger and demands that the stronger person not hit back? Thanks to simps and blue pill agents/idi0ts, this stupidity dwells amongst us and has been weaponised by females. Keeping in mind the second paragraph, if the supposed substantial strength difference is the basis upon which men shouldn't hit back, why don't these blue pill agents/idi0ts support the notion that a physically weak or average man shouldn't get hit back by a heavyweight boxer since the strength difference is large? We all know that they will be nonexistent if a weak/average man hits or slaps a heavyweight boxer and receives punches and a good beating in reprisal. They won't see the retaliation as reprehensible and unacceptable as they would have done if a female was at the receiving end. If by any chance these blue pill clowns are to mediate and resolve the issue and apportion blame in such a case, they will reprimand the weak/average man for making the decision to hit and attack the stronger man, unlike when a female is at the receiving end. They will hold the weak/average man accountable. "Substantial strength difference" goes through the window.

As you can see, "substantial strength difference" is just a thougtless pretext used to cover up this sort of pampering and double standard emanating from the pedestalisation of females. The white knight syndrome and the weakness of simping are simply at work here. SMH. 

"... but what if she collapses and die? Is it not better to walk away?" Another stupid blue pill concern. In Africa and many parts of the world, in the past and present, as many here can attest to while growing up, a lot of parents have the practice of whipping their kids with belts, slippers and other things as a way of disciplining them when they misbehave; this can be severe depending on the degree of misbehaviour and defiance. Even teachers indulge in this practice as many of us can attest to while growing up. Parents even dish out heavy slaps, conks on the head and a big smack on the backs of their kids to discipline and punish them. This is an ageless practice; even the bible says "spear the rod and spoil the child."

My point is, despite all these disciplinary actions, there were no concerns that the kids would drop dead. Why is it then a concern accorded to females when you dish them a retaliation that doesn't even surpass or come close to what parents and teachers do to kids in primary and secondary schools, especially stubborn kids? Are female bodies exceedingly fragile compared to that of kids (male and FEMALE kids)? Are they that weak? Since when did a slap or punch become so dreaded and lethal? Parents, in general, love their kids and, just like our teachers, they have no intention of killing them, yet they employ the disciplinary measures we experienced while growing up. Why then are blue pill idi0ts/clowns and agents acting like a slap or punch will most likely kill a woman?

The concern that a female who is physically assaulting you will die or collapse when you lay your hands on her is laughable in general. It is an excuse which comes from the notions and attitude discussed earlier in my write-up, which in turn is rooted in the pedestalisation of females and the white knight syndrome.

Sometimes, even some men that know they should retaliate and have claimed they would do so become toothless when the situation arises even if it is clear that they can get away with it. They succumb to this excuse and concern like the rest. You see, when men don't have the balls and frame to go the hard route by putting a woman in check and hitting her when she lays her hands on him, he tows the easy route out of cowardice: walking away and/or succumbing to indifference as she keeps hitting him. His ego won't let him concede that he lacks balls, so he hides behind the excuse to feel justified.

It is okay to defend yourself against a women that is physically assaulting you.

Calibrator:
I have learnt to flip this psychological manipulation on them.... I came to realise that girls at the beginning of the relationship will do anything to make you hooked including giving you unconventional sexual acts.

At the beginning, I usually request for small and little derivative sexual styles, before long, we are doing things which will make the devil give thumbs up.

Before she knows what is up, I am bored and on to the next one


Retired now though

pansophist:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBzJWiyzzf8

Please watch comrades. Make una no vex, I'm in a vawulence mood today

CaveAdullam:
DAY 149, REDPILL 2022

Dear men, there is no pride in bringing your father down because of your woman. There is no gain in comparing your mother to your wife. There is no pleasure in making jest of your brother because of your woman. There is no sense in insulting your sister because of the sweetness of your woman. You want to prove a point, however, that point is useless and a fool's errand!

Blood is thicker than water for a reason. Your family members are your number one allies, and no matter how harsh life become for you, family will always welcome and tolerate you.

Your woman knows this, hence, she channels her resources back home to her father, mother, siblings, cousins etc. But you're the one that's stupid and veiled with the sweetness and warmness of a woman that you have not consider these things.

Show love to father. Be kind to mother. Pat your siblings on the back. Have respect for family. And make sure everyone is on check.

Don't be a stupid man.

Authority: Family first.

Trex4:
You guys don't understand Redpill REDPILL IS THE TRUTH. Or aims to be. Wether you're poor or rich the truth is still the truth.

For example, picture a nice Chicken dish. You're seeing it well garnished and cooked, That's BLUE PILL. Redpill will show the truth about the dish. Like the torture the chickens go through, the artificial additives, the under paid Chefs and other unhygienic processes used in arriving at the final product. Wether it's a Mama put or expensive 5 star restaurant chicken. It's still the same process.

The creator of the thread Glycolysis named this thread REALITY EVERY GUY SHOULD KNOW. Not every rich guy, or every poor guy. He said every guy. Cause I've seen some people here in past claim redpill is only for poor people

This whole, Get money Bla Bla is becoming stale. It's like preaching to the choir. I believe everyone here is hustling for money. I know Mj bolt and Die rich from the crypto thread, I know cave A dullam is coding and some people here like pansophist are based abroad self.

MORAL: Wether you have money or not, Redpill or female nature will still be the same! Try to get money yes, But understand Redpill as a man it'll help you in many spheres of life.

heartofcity12:
You’re just noticing such acts on this thread? This is not the first time. One of those monickers you mentioned always try so hard to make redpillers seem like bitter ppl hating on women, like we’re doing too much and not applying “common sense” where it is due. What Dierich5 captioned and posted is just the reality no matter how harsh that might sound but you can clearly see how they twisted the whole narrative to make him look bad. You won’t see them using that energy to commend great posts they find useful but they can’t wait to criticize and look for plot holes in posts they could have simply ignored..

Martinez39s:


I really don't know the cheap points, if any, they were bent on scoring. As I have said here before, this thread is not centered around anyone. As long as someone isn't breaking the rules of this thread and his post and discussion are in line with the purpose of this thread, he can post what he wants. If you don't like it or you feel it is the same old news and nothing surprising, simply skip it and keep scrolling. If the discussions that are dominating the thread are not what you want to see, simply take a break and come back later or start your own discussion. How hard is that? I thought life is simply and shouldn't be complicated. If redpillers decide to discuss or reference the Amber Heard situation tomorrow, they can and are permitted to do so; it doesn't take anything away from them and they are forcing no one to care or participate.

It is selfish and thoughtless to act like a discussion shouldn't take place because you have moved on from the topic and you are tired of hearing it, and then get worked up or express disapproval when people exercise their liberty to engage in such discussions. Others are not obliged to flow with you. People won't desist from a discussion because of you; this thread is not centered around anyone. Worse is when the people exercising their liberty to engage in their discussions are misrepresented and have tones, intentions, and attitudes wrongly attributed to their posts in a bid to make a nonsensical and irrelevant point instead of focusing on the message being passed. SMH. This is really not the first such nonsense will befall this thread.

heartofcity12:


Well said

Martinez39s:
Most surprising is that there are post made by others, including those two, that anyone can similarly ask "who cares?" and easily attribute to them what they attributed to DièRich5. Anyway, we move.

CaveAdullam:
Awesome post!
.
.
.
PS: This was meant to be an appraisal of your post but it just came better as:
DAY 160, REDPILL 2022

Authority: Violence does not pay. Maintain frame.

chairmanawe:
I can give you for free

sajmark:

Can I send you a mail?

AlphaAlex:
Wanna Know how Women Deceive Men ? They make men Believe they wouldn’t Do or are incapable of doing the same things men would do

You will hear statements Like I cannot just see a guy and want to have sex with him there has to be a connection first Or

I can’t have sex with my male friends that’s just awkward

Or When I’m in a relationship I don’t cheat and when I’m single I’m single I don’t Double Date


Gentleman this is a Big Lie women are just as capable of doing the things the call men out for they can set up situations for running things behind your back and you would never suspect at first but they are doing it, Gentlemen women are out here Having fun and living life as they please while creating a false persona for whoever would fall for their whims


Remember gentlemen
She is capable of one night Stands she just doesn’t want the world to know it



She is capable of having several sexual relationships or encounters with multiple partners without any feelings involved she just doesn’t want the world to know that


She is capable of handling multiple relationships without Other parties knowing what is up


Whatever she tells you she is incapable of Doing trust and Believe she is very capable of doing said thing all it takes is the right person and scenario .... Stay Safe Gents Don’t Believe the Bullshit!!!!!!!!!!!

Tranquility2345:


Don’t worry about what I am doing about third world problems. You don’t know me and that is for me to take care of. But I really would like to know how Johnny Depp winning the civil case against Amber is a win for a man sitting and suffering in a shit hole third world country….

Kipaji:
It equally seems to me that women don't know how to love (at least not in the way men do and expect to be loved). With this in mind, men should measure their expectations when it comes to women.

okrikaboi:
I have deleted her number and gotten another girl mark this space I'll update y'all when she comes back to me. She always comes back

okrikaboi:

She called few hours ago was asking for urgent 2k I said no so she asked me to make slippers for her on her birthday for free I still said no that she will pay but I'll offer her discount she started moaning with every word. She misses my pecker and all that nonsense buh I don't care me I have another girl simpiing over me here, a true worshipper. Until she apologises for insulting me because I smoke reefer she would not get this d and no one can shake her legs like I do, I proudly say it!

Uptheante:

U seem to be a female disguising as a male to derail & destabilize this thread.
Go tell ur feminist sisters that ur mission here is doomed for failure

Uptheante:

Perfect bro.
This applies to girls who pretend to like church activities & also pretend to be self righteous

Polynek:

Nice write-up, keep it up bro

ubunja:
belated birthday,,

Happy Birthday Johnny Depp 9 June.