izzou:


No sir, you're the emotional one here

You have labelled Obi "corrupt" because of the Pandora case (which I agree with you), but when it got to where you man should be questioned, you typed an essay of 150 words without calling him a thief for which he is.

But I understand. Someone needs to sell Integrity to the others

larride:


Which evidence are you speaking with? That the FBI could not go to Lagos to investigate the money that he says belong to his mother and wife? Which evidence exactly?

Android17:
Bro, only 1 person is assuming anything and that person is you. Or else, is your argument not that BAT is guilty because he did not try to prove that the 460K was genuine?

That is not the way the law works. It is the FBI to prove that the money confiscated was indeed from narcotics. If they had proven their case why let him keep 1M USD?

homesteady:


Wait, so the two of you did not even read the court papers I posted?
Na wa oh. You people would have spared me all the energy I used in typing if you had simply read it.

I know that there is a saying that “The best way to hide something from Black people is to put it in a book”, in this case, a write up, but I know you guys are not like that, it should be a one off thing.

donjazet:


Classic gaslighting tactics. They make you question your own reality.

Android17:
I feel it is too early in the game to switch to this method.

If you lose your receipt for an item that you need changed or you want a refund for is that proof that you stole said item?

BlueRayDick:
Donstan18

Abeg me I need the “sauce” of this ur new cooking ; Make we sef feel am. Post links abeg

homesteady:


Android17 for the sake of brevity, in one sentence explain what is written here.

donjazet:
The larrides out there are shaking in their boots.
Hundeyin shock them.
https://twitter.com/VictorIsrael_/status/1547181712492355584?t=QUAg0de9M6TZaqvgVhHwDg&s=19

Itsrm:
Na only one person dey post for this whatsapp group?

The kind propaganda wey go fly for this election ehn.

Eyes have not seen, ears have not heard.

But there's nothing new with Tinubu. Na Shettima fit shock us as we move on

donjazet:

donstan18:


Lots of links and “sauce” littered on Twitter.

Use the search words below on Twitter.


shettima kabiru

Shettima sokoto

Shettima Fannami Gubio

Shettima Kuje

Shettima Boko haram

Shettima Chibok

Search, read, you’ll see lots of links and “sauce” to satisfy your curiosity, read and be lowkey happy that the notorious fullani puppet Tinubu will soon end like the blood sucking Abiola who murdered people, pushed drugs and sponsored coups for the Fulani and still got disgraced.

Android17:
That 460K in USD was ordered by the court to be forfeited by BAT due to provisions in the US code 1956 & 1957.

I can explain more but let me keep it simple. Look at the attached.

homesteady:
But thinking of it ehh, I wonder what is giving you guys the confidence to say Tinubu will win Atiku in the North.

The same mouth that you people are using to say yorubas will vote for their son is the same mouth you are using to say the Northerners(NE/NW) will not vote for their son??

NE/NW are not so distinctively different enough for a NW person to say he won’t vote for a NE person or the other way round.
These people will even consider someone from Niger 1st as their person before they consider someone from the South and you people are confident that they will come out in support of Tinubu over Atiku??

izzou:




The kind propaganda wey go fly for this election ehn.

Eyes have not seen, ears have not heard.

But there's nothing new with Tinubu. Na Shettima fit shock us as we move on

homesteady:


Aha, we are making progress.
So now you have clearly seen where it is written that it represents proceeds of narcotics trafficking abi? So was I the one making it up??

Itsrm:


Make people just dey careful the kind propaganda dem dey fly. E get the one you go post na DSS go begin find you.

The man who named his dog Buhari was locked up for a year before charges were dropped.

homesteady:


Aha, we are making progress.
So now you have clearly seen where it is written that it represents proceeds of narcotics trafficking abi? So was I the one making it up??

homesteady:


Aha, we are making progress.
So now you have clearly seen where it is written that it represents proceeds of narcotics trafficking abi? So was I the one making it up??

homesteady:


Aha, we are making progress.
So now you have clearly seen where it is written that it represents proceeds of narcotics trafficking abi? So was I the one making it up??

Android17:
Bro, , you clearly don't know how the law works.

I showed you that those proceeds that can be seized can be done so under tax evasion reasons. Do you agree? How quickly you respond will help me to show you what you keep missing.

Android17:
So if the FBI could prove that the 1.46M in his account were all direct or indirect proceeds from narcotics, they had the right to seize everything and then find BAT guilty via the court. That would have locked him away for 20 years. Rather, they bought his evidence for 1M, did not buy what he offered for the 460K part and therefore seized it. Do you understand it now?

homesteady:


I wanted to reply this, then I saw this.



Ok, so relate this to the tax evasion.

Android17:
And proceeds from specified unlawful activity can be both direct proceeds or indirect proceeds. The court is allowed to seize your money that a drug dealer paid you for genuine services. Do you know that? Take note of the US code being cited here. It is in the screenshot you attached from the court paper.

homesteady:


This argument is gradually coming to an end.

My argument since morning has been that the money was seized due to been associated with narcotics trafficking which you have been denying.

I have not described how Tinubu was involved at any point of this argument.

So see you now trying to tell me there is a probability that he was indirectly involved

homesteady:


This argument is gradually coming to an end.

My argument since morning has been that the money was seized due to been associated with narcotics trafficking which you have been denying.

I have not described how Tinubu was involved at any point of this argument.

So see you now trying to tell me there is a probability that he was indirectly involved