The Movement will suffer defections, accusations, betrayal, in-fighting, disillusionment, despair, infiltration, sabotage. As well as good, solid members, it will attract undesirables, dilettantes, the
curious and the demented. So what?
Every movement endures that. Fair-weather friends will come and go. Bandwagon people will jump on and then off again when something new comes along. So it goes. Those movements that have anything about them will grow stronger and prosper. Those that don’t will self-destruct and vanish. That’s Darwinism for you. Survival is not compulsory.
The key is to find leaders of men who are not
buffeted by the tides and eddies of the time: the world-historical individuals of whom Hegel spoke, the golden people who can change the world, the people who embody the destiny of their time.

The Power Elite have always had a reassuring
thought: the people are incapable of resistance. They are sheep. They will squabble amongst themselves rather than ever get seriously organised. They will find trivial reasons to disagree because they can never keep their eye on the main objective. They will be influenced by misinformation
and disinformation. Divide and rule. The oldest game in the book. The people don’t even have to be divided by the elite – they will do it to themselves, free of charge. It comes as part of their identity.
The Movement has no need for such people. They can only get in the way. A small group of highly talented, committed, focused people with a clear identity is far more likely to succeed than a large, disparate alliance of the disgruntled, but who have no true common identity.

The Movement, if it is to succeed, needs to recruit approximately 6,000 highly talented individuals, all of whom want to change the world. Not to ineffectually moan and groan about the Power Elite, but to actually take power from them by outsmarting them, by being more creative, by providing a superior vision and more inspirational leadership.

The key to controlling the world is controlling identity.
Politicians, business leaders, religious leaders, bankers, celebrities, advertisers, media moguls…they have full control of the means for constructing the identities of the peoples of the world. Controlling identity means controlling emotions rather than reason. Mainstream religions are not rational but emotional. People can be swayed by an appeal to their emotions in a way that can never be achieved through reason. That’s
why Richard Dawkins can’t succeed. He presents factual arguments, but they lack emotional resonance and people turn away from them. People need their emotional sustenance.

The key to freedom is allowing people to create their own identity, the one that truly expresses who they are, satisfies them emotionally and allows them to fulfil their personal talents.

The Old World Order: your identity is imposed on you by Religion, Society, the Power Elite, your parents. It doesn’t matter if the identity doesn’t “fit” you because you are the creation of others.

The New World Order: it is the duty of the state to allow you a flourishing, supportive environment where you create your own identity based on who you truly are, and regardless of all other people. All that matters is that your identity should fit you as a unique individual. You are your own creation. Which is it to be?

The Movement may or may not evolve into
something of real value. Its fate depends purely on the calibre of people it attracts. Already half of its members have fallen by the wayside – so of what use were they in the first place? They had no commitment, no strength, no vision, no will. Such people would never have taken the Movement
forward.
If the Movement perishes then it wasn’t fit
for purpose. If it succeeds then it was. It’s as simple as that.

Can you contribute? Can you make a difference? Are you a leader? Do not join the Movement if you are a follower because you will soon depart, as the sheep already have.
As things stand in this world, only 5% of the population are capable of leadership. It’s now clear that the Movement should direct its attention towards them and no others.
The initial incarnation of the Movement is already dead. Can it rise more gloriously like a Phoenix from the ashes?
Goodbye to those who departed. Waste someone else’s time in your feeble pursuit of an identity. As for those who already have an identity, are you capable of saying, as Nietzsche did, “I am not a man I am dynamite.”

The future belongs to those who can seize it by the neck. It does not and never will belong to those who whine on the sidelines, the Ignavi who can’t commit themselves to anything, who drift through life like motes of dust in the air, transient and pathetic, at the mercy of the currents.

Oga calm down.

U a smart guy, but u have come to dis world too early. The world is not ready for dis vibe.

We are creature's engineered by emotions.

Very smart/wise people don't go anywhere in life.

Sorry.

Fact.

LikeAking:
Oga calm down.

U a smart guy, but u have come to dis world too early. The world is not ready for dis vibe.

We are creature's engineer Ed by logic.

Very smart/wise people don't go anywhere in life.

Sorry.

Do you know why smart people don't go anywhere and What has held the world back?

The intelligent not engaging with the Id, not forming the necessary, even cruel, conclusions about the stupid – not having confidence in themselves, not doing what
needs to be done to bring about a Logos victory.

The intelligent must acquire a superiority complex and dictate to the barbarians. Or the
barbarians rule. Which one will it be?

"The best lack all conviction…"
"No weaklings should rule!" – Atatürk

“The Highest Man as Lawgiver [Lycurgus] of the Future.” – Nietzsche

"Until philosophers are kings, or the kings and princes of this world have the spirit and power of philosophy [within them] … cities will never have rest from their evils." – Plato, The Republic

“The philosopher must be our lawgiver. [!]” –
Nietzsche

“New species. (How the greatest species hitherto [for instance, the Greeks] were reared: this kind of accident must now be consciously striven for.) [The positive liberty regeneration of mankind.]” – Nietzsche

Only the strong State, led by the most exceptional geniuses, has the power to regenerate mankind itself into a completely new form, a new species.

The idea is to revalue all values, to re-order the human *condition* itself, not a few individuals here and there by accident, blind luck or chance, but on a grand scale, to re-order humanity’s relationship with itself.

Animals are to negative libertarians, as negative libertarians are to Statists. Just as animals lack the sufficient consciousness to completely re-order their environment, negative libertarians lack the sufficient consciousness to completely re-order the
human condition. (They believe it to be impossible: Just as animals believe re-ordering their environment to be impossible – beyond their meagre ability – so too do negative libertarians believe re-ordering the human condition to be impossible.)

Roland1091:



Do you know why smart people don't go anywhere and What has held the world back?

The intelligent not engaging with the Id, not forming the necessary, even cruel, conclusions about the stupid – not having confidence in themselves, not doing what
needs to be done to bring about a Logos victory.

The intelligent must acquire a superiority complex and dictate to the barbarians. Or the
barbarians rule. Which one will it be?

"The best lack all conviction…"
"No weaklings should rule!" – Atatürk

“The Highest Man as Lawgiver [Lycurgus] of the Future.” – Nietzsche

"Until philosophers are kings, or the kings and princes of this world have the spirit and power of philosophy [within them] … cities will never have rest from their evils." – Plato, The Republic

“The philosopher must be our lawgiver. [!]” –
Nietzsche

“New species. (How the greatest species hitherto [for instance, the Greeks] were reared: this kind of accident must now be consciously striven for.) [The positive liberty regeneration of mankind.]” – Nietzsche

Only the strong State, led by the most exceptional geniuses, has the power to regenerate mankind itself into a completely new form, a new species.

The idea is to revalue all values, to re-order the human *condition* itself, not a few individuals here and there by accident, blind luck or chance, but on a grand scale, to re-order humanity’s relationship with itself.

Animals are to negative libertarians, as negative libertarians are to Statists. Just as animals lack the sufficient consciousness to completely re-order their environment, negative libertarians lack the sufficient consciousness to completely re-order the
human condition. (They believe it to be impossible: Just as animals believe re-ordering their environment to be impossible – beyond their meagre ability – so too do negative libertarians believe re-ordering the human condition to be impossible.)

True talk.

But y smartness,logic, Philosophy,etc, when even stupidity can produce beta results in your society?

If u apply too much smartness, logic, philosophy,etc in this world you may be doomed. I feel smartness, logic etc must restricted to non humans, eg product dev, biz strategy, in the lab, etc.

When dealing with humans we must activate/use emotions.

For example, asking a girl out with the greatest emotional punchline "I LOVE YOU" and the deep falling in love thing is logically impossible, but dis simple trick will produce great results than d highest logic.

LikeAking:



True talk.

But y smartness,logic, Philosophy,etc, when even stupidity can produce beta results in your society?

If u apply too much smartness, logic, philosophy,etc in this world you may be doomed. I feel smartness, logic etc must restricted to non humans, eg product dev, biz strategy, in the lab, etc.

When dealing with humans we must activate/use emotions.

For example, asking a girl out with the greatest emotional punchline "I LOVE YOU" and the deep falling in love thing is logically impossible, but dis simple trick will produce great results than d highest logic.

There is no where in the world were you'll find perfection in tyranny. Stupidity yields nothing but chaos. Look at the current human race and tell me any trace of perfection in it. Rationality replaces emotion!

There are things which we as a people have
celebrated in rhetorics and comedy but for which we are NOW paying the price. Suicide is on the rise among our youths and we wonder why? Eish!! - the answer is not far-fetched!:
My mother used to beat me like crazy but I turned out OK - LIES Eh!!!

Who are YOU to talk back to my father and
live But see me now? - LIES

YOU had NO choice growing up, YOU just did what YOU were told but we turned out ok - LIES

What is 'I LOVE you' doing in our house? But we turned out ok - LIES

My Father will NEVER hug you o, soldier like him, but we turned out ok - LIES

Chaiii back then, you make a single mistake like this ehn, the beating you'll get but I turned out OK - LIES

YOU did NOT turn out ok. You're still battling the fake perfectionism our parents handed down and you would know this if you could sit quiet for a while and try to KNOW what YOU feel? Do you know what YOU feel? Can
you articulate YOUR feelings without drowning in a sea of nervous ignorance and uncomfortable silences? Looool - of course you can't.

Growing up in homes where OUR emotions were a nusiance?? Where what YOU felt had NO bearing in the affairs of the house? Where HOW you felt ... what is that Was NEVER discussed or raised? Where you had NOT the liberty to make mistakes and even less room to brood over them
YOU know what you feel? What is it called?
YOU do NOT know what you feel! That's why
emptiness plagues us now more than ever and NOW our children!!! Our range of emotions so limited and sadly a reflection of those our predecessors had! Any new emotion is strange to us and uncomfortable! Empathy Looool - you've got to be kidding me! What?? Which is why Most of us find it hard to articulate our feelings without roping another person in or blaming someone Loool.
Years of being blamed for things you had NO idea of has made us think we cant possibly be SOLELY responsible for how we feel,
someone must have caused it or someone must have made us do it ... but you turned out ok?? Most of us are able to speak now because we have a platform which allows us to say "what's on YOUR mind" and details of even the most trivial things come spilling out of a pent up silence Cos WE ARE NOT OK
You still quake and tremble whenever you need to present an idea to your family for 'approval' cos the inscription of FEAR from yesteryears has left an indelible dent in OUR OWN decision making abilities, we still need that thundering presence to make us
feel secure ~ we thrive in DYSFUNCTION
We are NOT OK! YOUR fear of hurting YOUR mother has left you in a paralytic clasp where you hyperventilate every time you go to see her cos the guilt of being born, of being the reason for her so and so has NEVER left
YOU... and you say YOU turned out OK?
That insensitivity to how someone TRULY feels has become a culture and this because YOU had NO choice but to 'feel ok' else you would be caned or yelled at.

Tell me, were you ever asked what YOU
FELT about anything? Wasn't it command and obey? Hasn't that insensitivity persisted IN US so much we no longer can sense when our own has given up on LIVING? Isn't it why we assume everyone battles the same variables as us and as such should react to things in EXACTLY the same way we do?? Looool - And we turned out OK?