Good move that should have come earlier.

DNAconverter:
Want a balance of power in Europe? Rearm Germany!

Re-arm Germany to do what?
Is it to conquer Europe again or to fight Russia?
Do well to expantiate..

Abdul05:
Go ahead guys..the world is behind you

the world is not foolish

Britain will achieve nothing fighting Russia. Whether Army top ranks or whatever, stop pushing the world to third world war that will eventually leads to your lost in position as world power. Stop wasting Human lives for nothing. Stop war mongering as no side will gain.

Only the dead have seen the end of war's.

Those who wish Russia evil will surely be brought to their kneels & their fall shall be brutal.

Slava Russia...!!!
Glory glory to mother Russia...!!!

NairalandMD:

You go attack who noh attack you??
UK and America special weapons are always classified, dem noh dey display for clout chasing.
They hardly sell there weapons offshore, M16 sef scarce for foreign hands but benin republic security guards sef dey use Russian AK47 like satchet water.

And who tell you ak47 is the only weapon Russian armies uses? Don't be deceived sir
We all knew, the NATO and USA are all scared of Russia, if not they would have invaded her.

ehinmowo:


On paper Russia has more tools and advantage than UK.

However, the Ukraine war has shown how Russia pads everything.

In addition, the war has significantly degrade Russia's capacity.

You're wrong sir, unless you're beign hypocrite. So, with all weapon and machineries sent by NATO (30 countries) to Ukraine, you still have the gut to downgrade Russia. Common, this war shows the mighty of Russia. A country vs 30+ countries and you call such country "WEAK".

Eagba:

The Rus started this war because they hope to establish the former Russia empire.
Russia are actually fight a war and strategically speaking, it's profitable for them to hurry up and conclude this war , so they move up to other goals.

Goals like establishing the former empire which includes; Belarus, Estonia, Latvia, Ukraine, etc. so the faster they conclude with Ukraine the better. so they're actually fighting Ukraine, but Ukraine is proving a hard nut to chew.

I understand your point sir. What I meant is that, ukraine doesn't have the resources to stay this long in war with Russia. Ukraine would have fallen since but, NATO is fighting Russia (proxy).

Britain with its less than 60K Army?

Its all hog wash to deceive the comedian president to keep sending his people to the Russian Meat Grinder. British doesnt have army strong enough to defend British home soil, lest go to war with Russia over Ukraine.

Just few days ago, Erdogan disclosed that Zelensky is worried that he has been lied to - supposedly by the West. People tend to forget that it was Borris Johnson that talked Zelensky out of negotiating peace talks with Russia when the 'war' started, convincing him that Ukraine will indeed defeat Russia. Alas, Ukrainians are dying in their thousands, and loosing vast territories to Russia, because of Britain's false hope and Zelensky's stupidity.

All this Britain chest-beating about joining the 'war' is all a show for Zelensky. Britain almost has no Army. If you know, you know.

They talk about war like bread and butter

internationalman:
Russia cannot afford to start another war when they are still struggling with ukraine.

With which resources.

You do be surprised that artillery yapa
Russia is not Nigeria �� don’t be deceived with Ukraine war that’s just child’s play

okeysoninv:
don't trust Britain , they are going to betray allied forces. at the end Russia will nuke Britain. London will enter into the sea. bookmark this.

What exactly makes you think that Britain does not have nuke?

Great0ne1:

Dunce, go and tell that idiotic Paul Carney running his mouth, It will take Russia just ONE nuclear lauch to whip Britain out of the face of earth forever. They will be gone before the so called allies will even retaliate.

Who is the dunce here? Britain too has standby nuclear bombs sitting around water bodies and ready to launch to anywhere around the world. Once st. Petersburg and Moscow are hit, 50% of Russian civilization is reversed for the next decade.

okeysoninv:
don't trust Britain , they are going to betray allied forces. at the end Russia will nuke Britain. London will enter into the sea. bookmark this.

Sink Britain? and where would Russia be?
Betray allied forces? for where in history was this recorded? Maybe you were thinking of US' Afghan pull out before you said this.
My friend, with this your contribution we suppose keep you for children church. This noise too much.

babyboy4every1:

You're wrong sir, unless you're beign hypocrite. So, with all weapon and machineries sent by NATO (30 countries) to Ukraine, you still have the gut to downgrade Russia. Common, this war shows the mighty of Russia. A country vs 30+ countries and you call such country "WEAK".

I can't say I am an authority in war affair, but I have fear knowledge of war analytics. Russia's capacity is very very low. A collision with strong military country would leave it in the dust.

NATO did not send weapons to defeat Russia. Just to keep them at bay. If NATO wants Russia out of Ukraine, it will happen within 2 months without them physically involved. 100-200 HIMARS with ATACMS would turn every Russian position to dust, wipe out the Kerch bridge and cut off Crimea from Russia Mainland. Throw in about 50 F-16s and a couple of NASAMS.

See don't let me talk. Just take it that Russia is weak. The west is romancing the situation.

prettyayomide01:
War of Ego

Yeah, Putin is fighting to feed his ego. The West, to preserve an ideology. One of the reasons you can hurl abuses on a public figure here online and still move out freely, untrailed. One of the reasons why a small country will have a sense of security in the intervention of a world justice system in the face rising threats to her sovereignty.

Masturbator2020:

Britain stand no chance against Russia.

Ukraine is still standing after 6 months, with a struggling, clumsy Russian invasion.
How much more a relatively stronger Britain?
Take off sentiments and do the maths

Tonitoniton:
Britain can not fight a successful war with out the backing of America.

Britain is deceptive

Britain is a rogue nation

Britain cant be trusted

You sound like Shekau

They are all working together, Russia,UK, US CHina etc all serve the same master, the only goal of their war is depopulation and drastic change to way of life.

Many people dont know that Adolf hitler was a British agent trained in Liverpool.

And there were many reports of during ww2 German uboats re supplying British ships at see.

Just like all the trucks used by vietkong to fight US in Vietnam were supplied with American ford engines from ford factory in Russia.

Just like often the same ship would travel Nigeria coast line to supply weapons to Nigeria and Biafra during the so called Nigerian civil war.

They are all on the same side, and which ever civilians ever gets caught up in their war is the intended target, for the human sacrifice they do to thier gods in babarian Europe.

They are Yahoo boys who do thier sacrifcice on industrial scale, they call it war. And they often start in March , the month named after their god of war. example Iraq conflict started 20 march 2003 , Ukraine conflict stared 24 February 2022

Goddson:
After reading most comments here, I believe most are still colonized mentality… And you believe the U.K will make that grave mistake to enter war with Russia? That will be automatic world war 3 and total annihilating of the island (U.k) with nuclear weapon. No country can face Russia at the moment in Europe, you can quote me from anywhere.
The country that has the most capable army in Europe is Turkey and Ukraine, we can all see how Ukraine is being slaughtered.

...and you came with confidence to spew all this trash? Capable army in Europe and you mentioned Ukraine on that list?
who did these to you?

seanwilliam:
how?
Are Russia soldiers better than British?
Do you even know what you’re saying ? Do Russia have better tech than British ?
I’m sure u are indirectly referring to nukes? Does Russia own all the nukes in the world? So if Russia attacks London, you think kremlin and Moscow are safe?

Bros, the idiots wey dey nairaland plenty like sand. That seuny4life na their president.

Great0ne1:

Trust me, it will not. The British are like the Chihuahua. They bark and make alot of noise, but no real power. They are just doing there thing

You kids here attribute a country's might to her land mass. That's why you glorify Russia and see Britain as a Chihuahua.
Dem go just open mouth wah...

ehinmowo:


I can't say I am an authority in war affair, but I have fear knowledge of war analytics. Russia's capacity is very very low. A collision with strong military country would leave it in the dust.

NATO did not send weapons to defeat Russia. Just to keep them at bay. If NATO wants Russia out of Ukraine, it will happen within 2 months without them physically involved. 100-200 HIMARS with ATACMS would turn every Russian position to dust, wipe out the Kerch bridge and cut off Crimea from Russia Mainland. Throw in about 50 F-16s and a couple of NASAMS.

See don't let me talk. Just take it that Russia is weak. The west is romancing the situation.

You're ignorant...
It'll be a gross waste of time explaining things to you..

Reference:


Are you referring to the 'War Dogs' of the world, Great Britain?
Boy, there is no country on this planet that the British have not fought, none, absolutely none.
Win or lose they are not scared of anyone.

From antiquity their ancestors fought the Romans, the Ottomans, fought the French and defeated Napoleon, fought the Portuguese, fought the Spaniards, in modern times fought in India, Indo-China, fought all over Africa, captured half the middle-east, battled in Afghanistan to a stand still, fought China, fought Japan (all before the United States entered the war).... and fought the Almighty America in the bloody war of Independence and it took the help of France for America to prevail. Fought Germany and the Axis powers in World War 1 and 2.

Fought with NATO in Kosovo, in Iraq, in Afghanistan
Abeg talk about another country, not Britain.
They may not have the physical resources like other nations but they punch far above their weight..... and have the best special forces on this planet.

Read your history not stories very, very well.
Check google: Britain is No. 1 without question having fought about 110 wars in all history and the longest war with France lasting over 1,000 years.

God bless you. See person wey dey read.
The rest na bet9ja slips and dreadlocks dem carry for head.
When dem see Russia as e big for map, dem go begin think say, country wey small for map na small pikin.
Them no know say smaller countries are more conscious of existential threat, double up on their military potency and are given more to preemptive attacks than defence. They're characterized by hifi intelligence units/systems and are more offensive as deterrent. Not to talk of a country given to fighting of wars through her history. See the Arab war with Israel as an example.

Karnice600:


You kids here attribute a country's might to her land mass. That's why you glorify Russia and see Britain as a Chihuahua.
Dem go just open mouth wah...

Opono!! Can you highlight anywhere in that comment, that i mentioned landmass ? Or do you have reading disability ?

Great0ne1:

Thank you my brother. The then British prime minister Winston Churchill admitted how he repeatedly woed Roosevelt for American assistance during World War two. They were practically begging United States to come to there aide. This is a country along with France, declared war on nazi Germany, after German invasion of Poland. Without the United States, Britain is nothing

This is not true. Roosevelt wanted to, on his own, but was looking fora reason to get the support and approval of the congress. Of course anyone who fights Britain, fights America directly. NO US president would tolerate an attack on Britain. So it wasn't about Churchill dragging the US in, it was about the US' obligation to her allies in upholding the ideology they represent.

RepoMan007:
Who is the dunce here? Britain too has standby nuclear bombs sitting around water bodies and ready to launch to anywhere around the world. Once st. Petersburg and Moscow are hit, 50% of Russian civilization is reversed for the next decade.

russias sarmat is the longest travelling intercontinental ballistic missile on the face of earth. The worst part of this, is that it changes trajectory and cannot be detected accurately and shut down. Britain does not have such arsenal in there disposal. The entire British Island will be gone and will not be able to retaliate. Even when they are able to retaliate, there nuclear missile will be detected and shut down. Moreover Russia is more than twice the size of united States. It will take many successful launch to flaten Russia. In reality, Britain alone has absolutely no chance whatsoever of defeating Russia in a full blown conventional or nuclear war . They will definitely need there big brother the United States

Great0ne1:

Very funny bullcrap. If usa and nato member countries are so sure of defeating Russia. They would admit Ukraine into nato and send there troops to Ukraine to kick the Russian ass. But unfortunately, THEY ARE SCARED

You again, smearing feaces everywhere on nairaland. This section is not for you. Run to the sports section.
Do you know the process involved in joining NATO? You think say na Jamb form? You know how many countries wey don apply tey tey but them never approve them?
You're ignorant on these matters but na you make noise pass.
Which kine pikin

Karnice600:


You sound like Shekau

Shekau is even afraid of me

Great0ne1:
russias sarmat is the longest travelling intercontinental ballistic missile on the face of earth. The worst part of this, is that it changes trajectory and cannot be detected accurately and shut down. Britain does not have such arsenal in there disposal. The entire British Island will be gone and will not be able to retaliate. Even when they are able to retaliate, there nuclear missile will be detected and shut down. Moreover Russia is more than twice the size of united States. It will take many successful launch to flaten Russia. In reality, Britain alone has absolutely no chance whatsoever of defeating Russia in a full blown conventional or nuclear war . They will definitely need there big brother the United States

what matters is the ability of both sides to hurt one another and not these your misplaced analysis of inconsequential facts.

babyboy4every1:

You're wrong sir, unless you're beign hypocrite. So, with all weapon and machineries sent by NATO (30 countries) to Ukraine, you still have the gut to downgrade Russia. Common, this war shows the mighty of Russia. A country vs 30+ countries and you call such country "WEAK".

I don't need to ask you if you attended history class or read a book about such. I can see your spellings are not errors but an evidence of bad practices from negligence, through the peak of your learning years. So I'll suggest a safe way to learn without bruising your ego- Instead of making assertions, ask questions. Only humility can help you right now.

Karnice600:


Ukraine is still standing after 6 months, with a struggling, clumsy Russian invasion.
How much more a relatively stronger Britain?
Take off sentiments and do the maths

You non get sense,if you get sense you're suppose to know that Russia is flight us and UK in Ukraine. Mumu