Illimitable:


Why would United refuse a release clause? If Haaland wanted to sleep with the Queen of England as part of his personal terms, we should have given him.

A club that has failed massively from making good money from transfer sales should have welcomed a release clause.

Haaland wanted a release clause? No problem. Set it to £900m. If any club is stupid enough to pay that amount to prise Haaland out of United, it is good news.

When was the last time United sold a player for profit? £89m Pogba walked away free to another club. That’s how bad the decision makers at United have been.

Illimitable:


Why would United refuse a release clause? If Haaland wanted to sleep with the Queen of England as part of his personal terms, we should have given him.

A club that has failed massively from making good money from transfer sales should have welcomed a release clause.

Haaland wanted a release clause? No problem. Set it to £900m. If any club is stupid enough to pay that amount to prise Haaland out of United, it is good news.

When was the last time United sold a player for profit? £89m Pogba walked away free to another club. That’s how bad the decision makers at United have been.

Trevor012:

These people calling him a shit.. and kpon kpon footballer are also Trevor

DanieleLorenzo:

What happened to the remaining 3%?
Kroos wey de get 100% pass accuracy, how many heads he get?

kozmicity:
so you big pass who dey get 2 accounts??

Trevor012:
Only 7 more chances created than Grealish who has played 7 games less. Grealish is a beast unlike the stat padder. Grealish who is the Best player and captain of Aston Villa but you won't see him taking penalities to pad his stats. All I need next season is Grealish or/and Sancho in this team.

WhoDeyHause:
Another failure like Ole and ronaldo.

eph12:

The one against LFC was a scruffy chance first of all. It was not like he looked up and delivered a beautiful weighted pass to elanga. I can't even remember today's own. He needs to do better if we're being sincere. Hold the ball better and deliver better passes

eph12:

The point is that if that's how he's hoping to create chances every game, that's a big problem for the team. Strikers won't score all the chances they get. I don't know any striker that did

Expert17:


The scruffy chance that led to 1 V 1? He stretched to win a 50-50 challenge against Van Dijk, and you here talking about scruffy. Lmao

I know you can't remember the big chance he created today but the mistakes he made in 2020 is still fresh in your memory.

Get used to it, Captain Bruno will start and finish all our games.

Expert17:


Was that how he created his 80+ chances last season?

Trevor012:

Yes I own all the accounts calling Fraudnandes a useless and kpon kpon footballer on his performance thread on redcafe

https://www.redcafe.net/threads/bruno-fernandes-2022-23-performances.471416/page-23

ChristoBam:

He'd literally be playing for City now if we accepted the clause.

And how the fvck are they going to accept a clause higher than 100m? This is the reason he's not here. You're funny sha.

kokaneprodigy:

Are you going to include the clause after he has signed?
Cos I’m thinking how he’ll sign a contract with a ridiculous amount in release clause, perhaps with a gun to his head.
Your emotion is getting the best of you.

Illimitable:


City won’t pay that amount for any player.



You people don’t understand how release clauses work. I would implore you to go and check the release clauses of all Barca players during that era when they were unbeatable.

Ansu Fati and Pedri(several tiers lower than Haaland) have €1 billion clauses. Messi had €700m clause in his final contract at Barca. Vinicius has €700m clause, Benzema has €1 billion clause.

All what these means is if you can pay the release clauses, the player is yours(no argument). This was how PSG were able to buy Neymar. Neymar’s clause was €220m. PSG called their bluff and they paid and the player became PSG’s property.

Illimitable:


City won’t pay that amount for any player.



You people don’t understand how release clauses work. I would implore you to go and check the release clauses of all Barca players during that era when they were unbeatable.

Ansu Fati and Pedri(several tiers lower than Haaland) have €1 billion clauses. Messi had €700m clause in his final contract at Barca. Vinicius has €700m clause, Benzema has €1 billion clause.

All what these means is if you can pay the release clauses, the player is yours(no argument). This was how PSG were able to buy Neymar. Neymar’s clause was €220m. PSG called their bluff and they paid and the player became PSG’s property.

ChristoBam:


Firstly, Man City paid 100m for Grealish but they won't pay for Haaland?



Secondly, you know release clauses are compulsory in Spain, right? That's why they go through the trouble.

Any player that comes to an EPL club with a release clause wants to leave at a certain time. Haaland wanted to come here and leave after 3 years or so. Now tell me why in this world, they'd agree to a release clause of an impossible amount?

You said we should have put in a release clause of 900m. Dortmund agreed to a release clause of 70m. Why the hell will he choose United?

Illimitable:


Haaland can’t sign for United and then go to City.

It’s literally impossible.

ChristoBam:

How's it not possible? When he has a release clause. Bro just agree the deal was impossible.

Illimitable:


How many times has a United player gone straight to Man City?

Illimitable:


Haaland can’t sign for United and then go to City.

It’s literally impossible.

United would have offered triple the wages Dortmund offer with plenty of commercial deals. He would have become the face of Man Utd with the team built around him.

ChristoBam:
Last season, City were the ones in the best position to sign Haaland. Probably the only ones that could, given the costs.

So imagine he was at United, with our disaster of a season. He wouldn't have got to City? You're having a laugh.

Illimitable:


City wouldn’t bid for him if he was at United - that’s the point. This is like expecting Ramos to join Barcelona.

ChristoBam:

Haha City wouldn't go for one of the best strikers in this generation because he's at United? Because the respect us?

Illimitable:


They won’t.

It’s the equivalent of United trying to sign Trent Alexander . City would have gone back to sign Kane or Lewandowski(short term), Aubameyang or an unknown entity from South America.

No top 6 team in the PL would dare to.

Nezzjnr:
I didn't see all these Haaland stories up until his Hatrick today or did he Join Mancity this Morning??

Ellexy:
Ajax I take God beg una, release Antony please

ChristoBam:

FYI, City tried to sign Pogba. Reported by Fabrizio, Laurie Whitwell and any tier one reporter you rate.

afrodoc2:


You didn't see because you didn't want to see.

Nezzjnr:

He wouldn't have come though considering the fact that Raiola never had a nice relationship with Manu