The BIBLE isn't the Word of God rather it's a collection of historical stories,Biographies, illustrations & memoirs that was kept for future generation unborn.

#GsonEbuka..

blokoncept:
The BIBLE isn't the Word of God rather it's a collection of historical stories,Biographies, illustrations & memoirs that was kept for future generation unborn.

Gson Ebuka..

Before your religious mind consumes you; think on this HARD TRUTH.

John says: “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things were made through Him, and with-out Him nothing was made that was made.” (John 1:1-3).

This above verse immediately disqualifies the bible as the word of God.

Don't get it twisted that the LETTERS on your CHRISTIAN BIBLE ARE DEAD LETTERS except if the WORD OF GOD opens your mind to Understand the mind of God.

Again I say it that, the BIBLE isn't the WORD of God.

#GsonEbuka

blokoncept
So werrin come be the word of God.
Rozross,
Come and hear this one o!!!

fman:
blokoncept
So werrin come be the word of God.
Rozross,
Come and hear this one o!!!

He’s an atheist

Rozross:
He’s an atheist

An atheist indeed...

Your religious Mind won't let you understand the WORD OF GOD not what your Pastor or parents have been brainwashing you since childhood.

Open your mind and recieve wisdom.

blokoncept:


An atheist indeed...

Your religious Mind won't let you understand the WORD OF GOD not what your Pastor or parents have been brainwashing you since childhood.

Open your mind and recieve wisdom.

The light shall put right back on track, my heart goes out to you and all other atheists

Rozross:
The light shall put right back on track, my heart goes out to you and all other atheists

I laugh at your ignorance Simply because I didn't agree with what your Pastor has brainwashed you with..

I am bonafide Christian.

Be open minded to things of life;no one is monopoly of knowledge as it's progressive.

I wish you well in your foolishness and ignorance.

blokoncept:


I laugh at your ignorance Simply because I didn't agree with what your Pastor has brainwashed you with..

I am bonafide Christian.

Be open minded to things of life;no one is monopoly of knowledge as it's progressive.

I wish you well in your foolishness and ignorance.

Keep disguising( all atheists are never bold and proud though),you are very arrogant which is typical of all atheists. May you find peace. Have a nice century

Rozross:
He’s an atheist

Rozross:
Keep disguising( all atheists are never bold and proud though),you are very arrogant which is typical of all atheists. May you find peace. Have a nice century

So accusing him of being an atheist makes him wrong and you somehow right?

You go school at all?

Kobojunkie:


So accusing him of being an atheist makes him wrong and you somehow right?

You go school at all?

Exactly my point... God bless you Sir

blokoncept:


I laugh at your ignorance Simply because I didn't agree with what your Pastor has brainwashed you with..

I am bonafide Christian.

Be open minded to things of life;no one is monopoly of knowledge as it's progressive.

I wish you well in your foolishness and ignorance.

isn't it just amazing?
once you dare to think outside the box and ask questions about things that need to be question, once you do not agree with all the things their pastor and parents have been telling them in their ONE TRACK mind, you are an atheist.

superCleanworks:


isn't it just amazing?
once you dare to think outside the box and ask questions about things that need to be question, once you do not agree with all the things their pastor and parents have been telling them in their ONE TRACK mind, you are an atheist.

Religion is a tool for mind control.

People don’t understand the difference between truth and religion (corrupted truth)

When evidence is despised by those claiming they're students of a perfect teacher how do you expect a novice to discern the truth?

The God of the Bible gave an evidence that is indisputable so that all opposers may know He is working out something unique but false religion is the problem leading many into atheism!

OkCornel:

and
Religion is a tool for mind control.

People don’t understand the difference between truth and religion (corrupted truth)

Corrupt truth.. that one hit me hard

blokoncept:


Corrupt truth.. that one hit me hard

Yes bro, mix the truth with a little lie and error, you can easily deceive and manipulate the majority. The human mind is configured to overlook that little lie or error, provided majority of what is said is the truth.

That’s where religion (corrupted truth) comes in. Many are deceived.

OkCornel:



Yes bro, mix the truth with a little lie and error, you can easily deceive and manipulate the majority..

Lmao.
Have you found a Jewish historian to refute the Jesus myth yet or have you figured out that the magical jew born of a virgin is an example of “mix the truth with a little lie and error, you can easily deceive and manipulate the majority”

Have you prayed to the Chicago carpenter today?

This person put it succinctly:
“She painted a realistic picture of some white dude from Chicago. To Christians who worship white Jesus, she painted Jesus. To people who don’t have their heads up their rectums, she painted a white dude from Chicago.”

KnownUnknown:


Lmao.
Have you found a Jewish historian to refute the Jesus myth yet or have you figured out that the magical jew born of a virgin is an example of “mix the truth with a little lie and error, you can easily deceive and manipulate the majority”

Have you prayed to the Chicago carpenter today?

This person put it succinctly:
“She painted a realistic picture of some white dude from Chicago. To Christians who worship white Jesus, she painted Jesus. To people who don’t have their heads up their rectums, she painted a white dude from Chicago.”

Not my cup of tea if a Chicago carpenter looks like Jesus.

I guess doppelgänger is a strange term for you.

By the way, have you heard any updates from Jewish historians and scholars unanimously denying ”the existence” of Jesus Christ?


Keep me posted.

OkCornel:


Not my cup of tea if a Chicago carpenter looks like Jesus.

I guess doppelgänger is a strange term for you.

By the way, have you heard any updates from Jewish historians and scholars unanimously denying ”the existence” of Jesus Christ?


Keep me posted.

Lmao, it’s a doppelgänger now? I thought it was Jesus.
I guess we would hear of Jewish historians and “ scholars”unanimously denying the existence of a mythical character if that was part of their Job description.

Have Jewish historians and “scholars” confirmed the existence of Jesus?

Do we have the name and address of the Ghost that screwed the virgin?

KnownUnknown:


Lmao, it’s a doppelgänger now? I thought it was Jesus.
I guess we would hear of Jewish historians and “ scholars”unanimously denying the existence of a mythical character if that was part of their Job description.

Have Jewish historians and “scholars” confirmed the existence of Jesus?

Oh, you think there’s nobody in the past or present that looks exactly like you? Humour me a bit.

By the way, see the position of leading Jewish scholars and historians on the existence of Jesus Christ.

Feel free to argue with them if you know their history better than them.

OkCornel:


Oh, you think there’s nobody in the past or present that looks exactly like you? Humour me a bit.

By the way, see the position of leading Jewish scholars and historians on the existence of Jesus Christ.

Feel free to argue with them if you know their history better than them.

So acceptance of New Testament myth by a jewish “religious scholars” means that Jesus existed?

I see that there is no actual historian, Jewish or otherwise, to claim magic Jew existed. Not surprising. Please, don’t start presenting interpolations in Josephus’ works as support.

Back to the “scholars”. Their opinion doesn’t matter a lick. A bunch of religious scholars accepting the claims in a religious book doesn’t make the claims of the book true. And if the New Testament is the sole support for these “scholars”, then they have no standing.
For those that don’t venerate Jews, the opinion of their religious “scholars” is just that, opinion.

An Arab religious scholar regarding the Quran as “true” doesn’t make it so.


When HISTORIANS investigated the historicity of Moses, they didn’t just rely on the Old Testament.
The opinion of “scholars” did not matter a lick.

KnownUnknown:


So acceptance of New Testament myth by a jewish “religious scholars” means that Jesus existed?

I see that there is no actual historian, Jewish or otherwise, to claim magic Jew existed. Not surprising. Please, don’t start presenting interpolations in Josephus’ works as support.

Back to the “scholars”. Their opinion doesn’t matter a lick. A bunch of religious scholars accepting the claims in a religious book doesn’t make the claims of the book true. And if the New Testament is the sole support for these “scholars”, then they have no standing.
For those that don’t venerate Jews, the opinion of their religious “scholars” is just that, Opinion.

An Arab religious scholar regarding the Quran as “true” doesn’t make it so.

Simple questions, do you know the history of the Jews better than the Jews themselves?

Can you provide evidences of Jewish scholars and historians denying the existence of Jesus Christ?

If you can’t, don’t spam my mentions.

OkCornel:


Simple questions, do you know the history of the Jews better than the Jews themselves?

Can you provide evidences of Jewish scholars and historians denying the existence of Jesus Christ?

If you can’t, don’t spam my mentions.

I don’t need to know the history of the Jews better than them to reject tall tales, fairy tales, and other bullshit.

And this ridiculous question you keep posing is just plain stupid. “Deny the existence of Jesus” my ass. Shouldn’t it be confirm the existence?!!

I’ll spam your mentions anytime I want. Pray to the Chicago boy to stop me.

KnownUnknown:


So acceptance of New Testament myth by a jewish “religious scholars” means that Jesus existed?

I see that there is no actual historian, Jewish or otherwise, to claim magic Jew existed. Not surprising. Please, don’t start presenting interpolations in Josephus’ works as support.

Back to the “scholars”. Their opinion doesn’t matter a lick. A bunch of religious scholars accepting the claims in a religious book doesn’t make the claims of the book true. And if the New Testament is the sole support for these “scholars”, then they have no standing.
For those that don’t venerate Jews, the opinion of their religious “scholars” is just that, opinion.

An Arab religious scholar regarding the Quran as “true” doesn’t make it so.


When HISTORIANS investigated the historicity of Moses, they didn’t just rely on the Old Testament.
The opinion of “scholars” did not matter a lick.

And by the way, who told you these historians and scholars relied on the New Testament only to arrive at their conclusion?

Let me guess, the Antiquities of the Jews written by first century historian - Josephus Flavius is also a fairytale right?

No offence, I don’t have time for silly arguments.

When you are ready to provide evidences of Jewish historians and scholars unanimously denying the existence of Jesus Christ, let me know.

KnownUnknown:


I don’t need to know the history of the Jews better than them to reject tall tales, fairy tales, and other bullshit.

And this ridiculous question you keep posing is just plain stupid. “Deny the existence of Jesus” my ass. Shouldn’t it be confirm the existence?!!

I’ll spam your mentions anytime I want. Pray to the Chicago boy to stop me.

And now he throws tantrums in the absence of evidence showing Jewish scholars and historians unanimously denying the existence of Jesus Christ.

So predictable.

Now humour me some more. Entertain me.

OkCornel:


And by the way, who told you these historians and scholars relied on the New Testament only to arrive at their conclusion?

Let me guess, the Antiquities of the Jews written by first century historian - Josephus Flavius is also a fairytale right?

No offence, I don’t have time for silly arguments.

When you are ready to provide evidences of Jewish historians and scholars unanimously denying the existence of Jesus Christ, let me know.

Josephus is not proof of Jesus. Clear interpolations in Josephus do not prove that Jesus existed. If Josephus really wrote about Jesus, it would have been more than a couple of sentences mentioning the guy in passing.

They claim Josephus wrote “….if he could have been called a man”. Wouldn’t such a character require more than a passing mention.

You don’t have time for silly arguments? Boy, your beliefs are the epitome of silly.

KnownUnknown:


Josephus is not proof of Jesus. Clear interpolations do not proof that Jesus existed. If Josephus really wrote about Jesus, it would have been more than a couple of sentences clearly written by Christians.

They claim Josephus wrote “….if he could have been called a man”. Wouldn’t such a character require more than a passing mention.

You don’t have time for silly arguments? Boy, your beliefs are the epitome of silly.

Oh my, Tacitus, Suetonius and Josephus wrote about someone who never existed?

Entertain me more some more. Your thought process is a comedy show. You’ll give comedians a run for their money.

Dear Nairalanders, KnownUnknown suddenly knows better than first century historians who attested to the existence of Jesus Christ.

Let’s get entertained.

KnownUnknown suddenly knows the history of the Jews better than the Jews themselves.

OkCornel:


Oh my, Tacitus, Suetonius and Josephus wrote about someone who never existed?

Entertain me more some more. Your thought process is a comedy show. You’ll give comedians a run for their money.

Tacitus never mentioned Jesus but Chrestus. Seutonius never mentioned Jesus but Chresto.
Hell, there is no reason why they couldn’t have been followers of Serapis Chrestus instead of Jesus being that there would have been Jewish worshippers of Serapis Chrestus.
The only clown is the one who thinks magical things happen to Jews and their myths are true.

OkCornel:
Dear Nairalanders, KnownUnknown suddenly knows better than first century historians who attested to the existence of Jesus Christ.

Let’s get entertained.

KnownUnknown suddenly knows the history of the Jews better than the Jews themselves.

Knownunknown doesn’t know the history of Jews better than them but knownunknown obviously knows how to tell fact from fiction, unlike OKCornel.

KnownUnknown:


Tacitus never mentioned Jesus but Chrestus. Seutonius never mentioned Jesus but Chresto.
Hell, there is no reason why they couldn’t have been followers of Serapis Chrestus instead of Jesus being that there would have been Jewish worshippers of Serapis Chrestus.
The only clown is the one who thinks magical things happen to Jews and their myth are true.

Fringe theorist. Kindly argue with the scholars Jesus Christ never existed nau?

Thorough research has been undertaken on this, and those with your viewpoint are seen as quacks.

OkCornel:


Fringe theorists. Kindly argue with the scholars Jesus Christ never existed nau?

Thorough research has been undertaken on this, and those with your viewpoint are seen as quacks.

Jesus never existed. No arguments needed when you have no proof. A bunch of “scholars” with Christian sympathies calling something “fringe” doesn’t matter.

KnownUnknown:


Knownunknown doesn’t know the history of Jews better than them but knownunknown obviously knows how to tell fact from fiction, unlike OKCornel.

In other words, KnownUnknown is telling us the historians and scholars in the screenshots below believe in fiction.