ProphetJeroboam:
It’s women nature to hate self improvement. They will rather demonize that which compels them to get better. Women are the gender to find comfortability in every low points they find themselves in by their own actions. Obese becomes big, bold and beautiful, h0e becomes sexually liberated, broke and underachieving becomes feminists etc. it’s pretty hypocritical for a gender who wants to be accepted the way they are but constantly seek for the next best mate. Apparently in today’s world, woman wanting the best man for herself is a goal getter who doesn’t deserve less but a man wanting the best young woman for himself is fatphobic, a groomer having unrealistic standards for women and a misogynist porn addict, do you know why? Because the gynocentric world we live in caters to the insane demands of women through the actions of weak men. If men want all the 8s,9s and 10s, who’s gonna save the less desirable women?

Men should stop settling, if she doesn’t fvck with you at your low, she doesn’t deserve you at your best.

Below is the photo of the writer of the article. By making “women like me uncomfortable” , she means “why should i become better, it’s men who should lower their standards” , talks from women like this is born from the nonsensical false statement that “men will fvck anything” , therefore why should she improve when men will stick in their diccs in any warm wet hole. Do you know why disqualifying women works so much? Because you show them that you do have standards and you will not fvck anything, it resets their brain to rude awakening to reality. Maintain standards.

it's true,, women's problems with Adele's weight change is specifically because she did it for a man. In the sisterhood doing anything for the benefit of a man is like the top sin cause apparently women are perfect and men must appreciate whatever state a woman is in cause she's perfect. They're crazy.

A toxic male has no variation and is limited but a toxic female has variations and no limitations behaviorally.
She is highly neurotic/damaged,she has no control over her emotions, be it in a working/professional environment or otherwise, she'll display

When/if you ever cross paths with such women (which is likely,given the rate of unchecked mental health decadence in Nigeria) don't kill your frame by arguing or reacting to their rants.

Maintain frame always.

Speak less,act more ✌️

Don't say you want to show her that you're a man,the moment you react to her whims, you've lost the battle .

Be smart, control your emotions as a man Always

Ubunja, I have encounter this situation before. according to her, she is going to see someone that night then she will spend tomorrow night with me. she call me but i didn’t do anything with her, because she say I will pay her. The second girl said the same thing we exchange number I told her to call me when she is free and lonely but she hasn’t called till now

JESHAL:
The ooni of Ife is always settling down with post wall women and Wonder why his marriages are always having issues,he's a westernised beta even if he serves as a paramount ruler among the yorubas, he's still bluepilled as fxuck and since he schooled overseas, many aspects of the culture has not seeped into him, won't be surprised if this marriage also fails

The man lacks every trait of a great king.

Sijuwade (the late Ooni) and Adeyemi (the late Alaafin) were the last great kings the Yorubas will ever have.

The others fall short of their glory.

ubunja:
long distance relationships are such a scam lol. Your girl can ask you for money anytime but you literally have no way of getting any sex in return. It's definitely one of the ways ladies scam men out of money.

Plus I have known women in these long distance relationships who were actively sleeping with men who were around wherever they were while BF was lonely halfway across the country.

I heard we even have long distance marriages too!☺☺�

Kenogidi:


I heard we even have long distance marriages too!☺☺�

Kuku kee me!

The issue of texting and proximity reminds me of my university days.
I'm a bit of a nerd, so back then in my department people always wanted to join me to read and all that.
Naughty me always picked girls as reading partners and we only schedule night class for such reading sessions. I ended up f*cking almost all my "reading parners" at least once. Mind you.....I'm not that good looking, neither was I so financially buoyant back then but I never had issues getting into them panties.

I had always wondered at the back of my mind why I was easily getting what other guys paid dearly for. I mean right there while studying, these girls would be chatting with several guys simultaneously, some even sent them money right there in my presence. There was one that this man (a doctor based in USA) would always ask her stupid quwstions....Have you eaten?, Who is there with you? and all that and then boom! He sends money to a girl he's never met face to face.

Thinking back now, it's now getting clearer.

I didn't text these girls or spend time chatting on phone with them. Our only communication was to schedule our meeting time and venue. Shikena! We'd see each other online and ignore. But once we're together in night class after reading for like 2-3 hours.....The kissing and touching starts and pants starts to shift.

Ubunja is right. A 5 who is close by has the edge over a 10 who is far away.

Alvelt14:


It takes more than just looks bro.

Looks is no King

Ozo is handsome but that bbn babe Nengi use am play bolo.

Except he's a complete fool, count Ozo's wins in terms of ladies; you will see that Nengi was a loss that looked like a drop of water in an ocean. Attractive guys do count losses too, just not alarming. It also doesn't get to them as they have tonnes of options.

ubunja:
no matter how attractive you are, if you're not there it doesn't matter.

Will it matter for a guy she's not attracted to?

Her mind is at the faraway place where the attractive dude is. It's just a matter of time before her body will arrive at the place. The chats with Chad have shown whom she's truly attracted to and desires sexually. Remember, girls ghost guys they don't like on Whatsapp.

Isn't it funny that you guys had to throw Chad to some faraway place before the 5 could get a chance? The fact that she's giving Chad attention on Whatsapp shows that that's the kind of man that triggers her.

The disregard for LOOKS IS KING is the reason why guys struggle and apply all kinds of strategies just to get a girl. What strategy did Chad use that he's dividing the girl's attention despite the 5 spending to take her out? None.

RikudoSennin:


I understand your perspective but what if the girl and the 5 both live in same vicinity and the 10 lives 30 miles from the girl? Who will fvck her first? What if the park is in front of the girl's apartment? What if the girl is using 10's attention as a ego boost?

Do you think proximity will help the 5? If a girl is not attracted to you, paying a visit to her bedroom won't help your course, except you want to r@pe her. Perhaps, a girl has never travelled interstate to see you before.

The idea that says the "10 is faraway and so I stand a chance" is the same idea that leaves men simping and trying to get a girl's attention. The fact that her attention is divided, with half of it for the Chad, is enough bad market for you. A smart fellow will sense that and quickly flee. But a simp will think he can game his way into her pant. A pant that is not wet for you can't come off for you.

A girl knows if she will sleep with you right from the moment she sees you approaching. She just has 15 seconds to place you in the friendzone or loverzone. Sadly, guys don't seem to realise they have been in the friendzone all along until it gets too late. The moment you meet a girl and engage her in discussion, ensure you build sexual tension. If she recoils, just admit that she's not into you. Flee immediately or else you will count a bigger loss. But simps don't even build such tension. An example is that 5 who took the girl to the Park. Why park and not his house? If he had invited her to his house and she turned him down or flaked, if he's smart, he will see the clear indication that he's not desired sexually.

Go for who desires you sexually.

Powerboi:



Cave you're a fuc*** gem to this thread, you keep spilling bars each day here, I always look forward to reading your posts, gracias

Thank you for your kind words. I do appreciate it. I promise to improve and do better.

Thanks.

CaveAdullam:


Thank you for your kind words. I do appreciate it. I promise to improve and do better.

Thanks.

Improve and do better... you're busting our brains out already my man.

I guess we have to prepare emergency kits for the next wave lol.

LifestyleTonite:


Do you think proximity will help the 5? If a girl is not attracted to you, paying a visit to her bedroom won't help your course, except you want to r@pe her. Perhaps, a girl has never travelled interstate to see you before.

The idea that says the "10 is faraway and so I stand a chance" is the same idea that leaves men simping and trying to get a girl's attention. The fact that her attention is divided, with half of it for the Chad, is enough bad market for you. A smart fellow will sense that and quickly flee. But a simp will think he can game his way into her pant. A pant that is not wet for you can't come off for you.

A girl knows if she will sleep with you right from the moment she sees you approaching. She just has 15 seconds to place you in the friendzone or loverzone. Sadly, guys don't seem to realise they have been in the friendzone all along until it gets too late. The moment you meet a girl and engage her in discussion, ensure you build sexual tension. If she recoils, just admit that she's not into you. Flee immediately or else you will count a bigger loss. But simps don't even build such tension. An example is that 5 who took the girl to the Park. Why park and not his house? If he had invited her to his house and she turned him down or flaked, if he's smart, he will see the clear indication that he's not desired sexually.

Go for who desires you sexually.

bro they fk the one who is closer to them more, no matter how much they like the one that is far away. i know a girl that travel to another state to meet a guy she met online, she does that only when she has money. but she sneak to my place whenever shes Hot, she likes the other dude more, she even tell me that i no sabi anything compared to her .....state bf

Alhabaze:


Nice!

What stood out for me was the fact that you said texting kills communicate & sexual vibes.

What's your thought on sexting? By this, I mean sex chatting a girl.

Do you think it's possible to elicit the sexual tension via sexting which hitherto would have been impossible via normal texting?

Harddon touched on this during his early days & how he had escapades with them lady folks via texting alone. In fact, to him, it's for newbies who are still learning the ropes.

Thanks.

In my early twenties I loved texting--chatting. I've made girls do all sort of stuffs via chats..but now I consider much chatting or much texting as kid stuff as in for a girl u want to hookup with, have a relationship with, a fling, marriage, situationship etc. Better u guys meet one on one or video call and share dt much deep talks.

If not for work & and other important info I won't even be on social media.

Social media apps- texting-chatting etc have their advantages but at the same time have ruined the dating market. Not to even talk of marriages and relationships. They create this sense of illusion of choice to women.

A whole generation of depressed people. U wonder where the depression is coming from---all those gadgets, social media, all the pixels, much time on the screen n phone- Like some time I just plug off from the phone- to get some sanity & u feel much better.

✓✓ Video call/normal call & one on one meetups better than typing long epistles on WhatsApp etc.

✓✓ Hit the gym-do workouts. Find a sport u like make it a hubby better than any self improvement books or depression pills.

One of the disadvantage of texting is it can be used against u in the future. She can make screenshots of ur chats--make jest of u, her lover can see it and a simp might come 4 ur life because u hit the cookie of his babe & many more.

A real pro in the game knows the concept of 'ANONYMITY'.

If u aren't much of a texter (long chats) & a quiet person; like more of a listener--women can easily trust u & reveal their true self and deep secrets because u r different from 99 percent of other guys and they know if they have something with u it would be coded. U r likely not to spit it out to anyone. TRUE MATURITY.

Not some guy always chatting long texts and posting different stuffs on the status(when u aren't posting ur business).---im not including business ppl here that have to post their business ads.

Women r very observant. When they get ur number if she's all these new generation girls that can use a smart phone.. she's gonna asses ur socials & most importantly WhatsApp, see what kind of a guy u r. Either free spirited- judgemental-religious or anonymous.

Let me stop here.

LifestyleTonite:


Will it matter for a guy she's not attracted to?

Her mind is at the faraway place where the attractive dude is. It's just a matter of time before her body will arrive at the place. The chats with Chad have shown whom she's truly attracted to and desires sexually. Remember, girls ghost guys they don't like on Whatsapp.

Isn't it funny that you guys had to throw Chad to some faraway place before the 5 could get a chance? The fact that she's giving Chad attention on Whatsapp shows that that's the kind of man that triggers her.

The disregard for LOOKS IS KING is the reason why guys struggle and apply all kinds of strategies just to get a girl. What strategy did Chad use that he's dividing the girl's attention despite the 5 spending to take her out? None.

if a woman is hórñy NOW an average guy who's dealing Face to Face with her NOW who can pick up the indicators, read her vibe and act accordingly can fucc her faster than a better guy on her speed dial. If you can't believe this then I don't know what to tell you.

And please, women desire for looks and Chad is every woman's dream but just take a look at all these women out here with UGLY BABIES. Who the hell is donating all these ugly sperms? Don't trust a gender that relies on ever-changing emotions to act consistently. Plenty of times scoring with women is basically a matter of being at the right place at the right time to benefit from that mood change. Women's preference for Chad is hardwired in their genes but for the simple reason that women are still dropping ugly offspring shows you it's not as black and white as it appears to be.

we can discuss why women are still having ugly babies in this day and age. That will be a far productive topic. Cause it definitely means Average guys are still getting that pucc.

LifestyleTonite:


Do you think proximity will help the 5? If a girl is not attracted to you, paying a visit to her bedroom won't help your course, except you want to r@pe her. Perhaps, a girl has never travelled interstate to see you before.

The idea that says the "10 is faraway and so I stand a chance" is the same idea that leaves men simping and trying to get a girl's attention. The fact that her attention is divided, with half of it for the Chad, is enough bad market for you. A smart fellow will sense that and quickly flee. But a simp will think he can game his way into her pant. A pant that is not wet for you can't come off for you.

A girl knows if she will sleep with you right from the moment she sees you approaching. She just has 15 seconds to place you in the friendzone or loverzone. Sadly, guys don't seem to realise they have been in the friendzone all along until it gets too late. The moment you meet a girl and engage her in discussion, ensure you build sexual tension. If she recoils, just admit that she's not into you. Flee immediately or else you will count a bigger loss. But simps don't even build such tension. An example is that 5 who took the girl to the Park. Why park and not his house? If he had invited her to his house and she turned him down or flaked, if he's smart, he will see the clear indication that he's not desired sexually.

Go for who desires you sexually.

and why then is it so hard for you to understand that a guy can meet a girl even at a park and do that, although the girl herself is busy with a more attractive guy on her phone? Isn't this what I'm talking about?

ubunja:
if a woman is hórñy NOW an average guy who's dealing Face to Face with her NOW who can pick up the indicators, read her vibe and act accordingly can fucc her faster than a better guy on her speed dial. If you can't believe this then I don't know what to tell you.

And please, women desire for looks and Chad is every woman's dream but just take a look at all these women out here with UGLY BABIES. Who the hell is donating all these ugly sperms? Don't trust a gender that relies on ever-changing emotions to act consistently. Plenty of times scoring with women is basically a matter of being at the right place at the right time to benefit from that mood change. Women's preference for Chad is hardwired in their genes but for the simple reason that women are still dropping ugly offspring shows you it's not as black and white as it appears to be.

we can discuss why women are still having ugly babies in this day and age. That will be a far productive topic. Cause it definitely means Average guys are still getting that pucc.

Don't make up instances. First, you made up an instance that favoured the Sub5 guy by throwing Chad in a faraway place. Now, you are making up another instance of if...if..if...if a woman is Hot. Let's assume the woman is Hot. Why do you think she was chatting with Chad when she had the Sub5 beside her? That's whom she was Hot for. Why did she choose to go to the Park with Sub5 instead of a bedroom with him? She wasn't Hot for him.

Of course, women will end up with Sub5 guys because Chad can't marry all of them and won't want the average-looking ones to carry his seeds. Guess what. Most times, what the Sub5 guys end up with has been sampled by Chad who just didn't see them worthy enough to wife.

Getting that pucc is different from getting that pucc. Getting the best when they are young and attractive is what matters. Also, going after the pucc is different from the pucc running after you.

JESHAL:
When looking for love or sex, make use of your sense,too much urge, too much desperation will cloud your judgement, you begin to simp and loose frame.

Nice point. The Bible itself recommended LOVE should be given as a reward for submission only, it's men who love before submission that mess up everything.

"Wives, place yourselves under your husbands’ authority. This is appropriate behavior for the Lord’s people. Husbands, love your wives, and don’t be harsh with them."
Colossians 3:18‭-‬19 GW
https://bible.com/bible/70/col.3.18-19.GW

As you can derive from that scripture a man must exercise authority for women to submit, but still, women are meant to submit. Also, he advised men not to be harsh against women because there are many things that could make one bitter against them. Though they must submit to earn that status.
God knows the tendency of women, and has never left man, the crown of his creation alone, yet men love to be sissy. God the creator and the brain behind masculinity said:
To the woman he said, “I will greatly increase your labor pains; with pain you will give birth to children. You will want to control your husband, but he will dominate you.”
Genesis 3:16 NET
https://bible.com/bible/107/gen.3.16.NET

You can all see that God knew that Eve will always want to manipulate and control Adam but he will dominate Eve. Whether men dominate their women or not in relationships is up to Men! By the way I combine positive masculinity with scripture. I am a pro-bible order. What Roosh V(one of the founders of the Red pill movement, now a Christian) calls God-pill.

Abba114:
bro they fk the one who is closer to them more, no matter how much they like the one that is far away. i know a girl that travel to another state to meet a guy she met online, she does that only when she has money. but she sneak to my place whenever shes Hot, she likes the other dude more, she even tell me that i no sabi anything compared to her .....state bf

The exception proves the rule.

LifestyleTonite:


Don't make up instances. First, you made up an instance that favoured the Sub5 guy by throwing Chad in a faraway place. Now, you are making up another instance of if...if..if...if a woman is Hot. Let's assume the woman is Hot. Why do you think she was chatting with Chad when she had the Sub5 beside her? That's whom she was Hot for. Why did she choose to go to the Park with Sub5 instead of a bedroom with him? She wasn't Hot for him.

Of course, women will end up with Sub5 guys because Chad can't marry all of them and won't want the average-looking ones to carry his seeds. Guess what. Most times, what the Sub5 guys end up with has been sampled by Chad who just didn't see them worthy enough to wife.

Getting that pucc is different from getting that pucc. Getting the best when they are young and attractive is what matters. Also, going after the pucc is different from the pucc running after you.

this debate is becoming pointless. Have a good day.

emmaodet:
https://www.nairaland.com/7320727/what-did-wrong-supporting-career#116439492

Guys check this thread out.

Just a slight opportunity and the last don panshy her bestie.

I trust my naija girls to serve that hot breakfast when necessary. The funny thing is that the tutorial "format" she used in deceiving this guy to go get dick is one that any sensible guy will decode on the spot. Anyway, it's a hard lesson learnt, when guys try to personalize these hoes.

These days, I have noticed it, that men rate "serious dating/relationships" than women unlike the other way round before the recent sexual evolution. It's probably tied to men being moral. The women just show up in the "relationship/situationship" where the guy is used as a placeholder for beta-buxxing while she goes on fucking multiple dicks that she fancies.

I've never been a fan of "relationships" nor needed one to get sex like most men are conditioned. With modern realities, it's useless for MOST men.

Powerboi:



Cave you're a fuc*** gem to this thread, you keep spilling bars each day here, I always look forard to reading your posts, gracias

DAY 252, REDPILL 2022

My reaction to: https://www.nairaland.com/7320727/what-did-wrong-supporting-career#116439492

The reaction: https://www.nairaland.com/7320727/what-did-wrong-supporting-career/1#116492742

Or, below:

1. Though the stories many of you share here are fictional, however, it reflects the true state of men when it comes to women and romantic relationship. Even fiction still encodes truth and reality.

2. Women are manipulative when it comes to sexual relationships. They are logical about it and will take proper steps before execution.

But men on the other hand, just want women for sex and reproduction. Women are practical about romance and relationships, men are oblivious to the facts that belie.

3. Your story is another credit to the fact that at the right time, right place, and right man, women will fvck regardless of their romantic engagement with their boyfriends, fiance, or husband. This is the alpha fvck side of women's nature termed hypergamy(alpha fvcks; beta bucks).

4. All women may not experience this but it is a tendency that is rooted in women's psychology. Women never want to miss that chance of getting a quality gene for their offspring. It is fvck now and thinks later.

5. Religion understands this hence, so much restriction is placed on women's sexuality. Raw data from social science and research carried out prof J.D Unwin came up with substantial facts that if women are allowed to be promiscuous, the rate of societal growth will decline.

6. Religious men from different parts of the world understood this early, especially middle eastern men, and for that reason, placed huge restrictions on women.

7. However, the world is now secular and liberal, with no codes and conducts to guide men and women and protect society, everyone has gone wild.

We are all victims of the mess we created and yet still complain about it. Cognitive dissonance? Oh yeah. Hypocrisy? You are right.

8. The true test of a woman's loyalty is when she has access to other men. If she doesn't succumb to their titillating carrots, then, she is someone worth committing to. However, this is true for the outliers amongst women. Women are first loyal to their feelings, to defy that feeling at that moment is to be raised and guided by strict adherence to principles and masculine leadership. Just a few women; the majority will soon succumb.

9. It is because women cannot be trusted to this extent when it comes to seduction and temptation that they must be constantly watched. You must hold their hands from infancy to death, else, any slight opportunity, they will leverage their sexuality, emotions, and beauty to cause emotional and psychological damage to themselves. And like it or not, any damage they cause, it returns to affect men and society both directly and indirectly. Refer to 5 above.

10. You don't place women in the face of temptation and expect them not to succumb. They will, even the religious among them. Women hardly walk through temptations and hell without coming out dàmaged. For this reason, once you decide to commit to women, just know that you are about to increase your work and make many sacrifices.

11. The telltale that a relationship is coming to an end is when she cheats on you or compares you to other men sexually, physically, or financially. Once you notice this, please don't bother looking for any marriage counselor to advise and help you, end the relationship and let her go.

12. There are many ways to identify these red flags, but if you are too point-focused on the satisfaction of your libido and bamboozled by her body and romance you will fail to see these red flags. Women are loyal to their feelings but with time as a result of physical contact and interactions, they will expose themselves.

13. Bro, from a humanity standpoint, you have done well for her. But don't be taken away that if you help a woman she will always be there for you. Help her out of charity and not romance, else, you will always meet with disappointments.

14. Women are loyal to their feelings and when it comes to their feelings no matter how tangible your good to them in the past, not even yesterday, they will never show sympathy. Refer to 8 and 13 above.

15. The most efficient way to even help a woman is to help her father, brothers, boyfriend, fiance, and husband. These are males that will in turn take care of her. Because once a woman's status is in a crescendo, she will never consider these men any longer or show them respect. Just look around and observe the behavior of so-called independent women - arrogance, contemptuousness, entitlement mentality, and the like.


16. A woman can only be loyal to one man, and if she is the type that distributes herself among different men, it means her pair bonding ability has fallen drastically. And you should leave her and let her go, she is for the street.

Avoid claiming a monopoly for a product that wants to be commercialized by the public.

Be a wise man.

Authority: Be a wise man.

ubunja:
and why then is it so hard for you to understand that a guy can meet a girl even at a park and do that, although the girl herself is busy with a more attractive guy on her phone? Isn't this what I'm talking about?

ubunja:
this debate is becoming pointless. Have a good day.

It's so hard for him/her to understand becauuuusse, to anyone who still remembers the past silly activities of that moniker, he is a detractor and a willful antagonist of the red pill. He is either an odious blackpiller who chooses to play silly games here or a blue pill detractor who is just weaponising the black pill to counter and antagonise.

===================
Most of the redpillers on this thread are too matured —or shall I say friendly and too decent of a human being— that they always, with the passage of time, sweep under the carpet the silly and stupid activities of certain monikers, especially when these monikers take some time off, come back again and subtly wiggle their way back into our discussions.

In their decency or immense maturity (whichever one) in this regard, most redpillers hope to give these monikers some sort of "second chance" thinking bygones are bygones and that these monikers will surely straighten up themselves and behave maturely, intelligently and accordingly, and everyone will get along. I have been guilty of this in how I treated people way back. Sometimes, these monikers come back and appear to be talking sense or getting along only for them to revert to their usual pattern and games; some are more clever and cautious when reverting back, but you can spot them easily.

Let's not project our maturity and decency unto these people. Let us handle people strictly the way people who are experienced in dealing with people do: when someone has been spotted playing (or known to play) silly games or other childish and emotional nonsense, let that person remain in our "personal blacklist." Either we ignore him or we don't take such person too seriously to engage in serious or lengthy discussions. We will continue to see such person in light of his silly actions and nonsense until he, of his own accord, publicly owns up to his past silly actions thoroughly and in details, declare that he shouldn't have done what he did and that he will act accordingly from henceforth, and he must then consistently follow up with the appropriate behaviour. This should be the standard regardless of what the person subsequently posts. We must hold people accountable.

This is how I treat people in real life, online or offline. I hold everyone accountable (man or woman); I don't sweep anything under the carpet; I have a good long-term memory and I always study and remember people's past behaviour, attitude and patterns, and I treat them according to their behavioural track record until they own up their silliness thoroughly and in details by listing what they did, (of course, it must be of their own accord and without any pressure or obvious ulterior motives). Owning up this way will make me treat such people differently, albeit very cautiously, by letting them create a new track record with their future actions.

Many times, we see people come here and do the following:
(1) antagonise the red pill and redpillers,
(2) strawman the red pill and redpillers to antagonise and combat us,
(3) troll us,
(4) chase relevance by whatever silly and annoying means (eg. misrepresenting us to make a point, cleverly playing the moral card or writing posts that appeal our moral sensibilities or human decency even when this is not what this thread is about, etc.)
(5) play silly, childish and emotional games,
(6) refusing to create or go to other threads that align with their views and being insistent on staying here and writing things that are antithetical to the red pill, only to play victim or egotistically act like a sagacious outlier when redpillers come en masse to put them in their place. Sometimes, when outrightly cornered, they disingenuously double down on their silly and childish games and ignorance instead of owning up to their actions like men,
(8 ) always trying to turn everything into ( "logical" ) arguments and trying to come out on top during the argument by all means,
(9) what have you,

Redpillers see these things and are displeased, only for most of them to give these silly individuals a "second chance" and let bygones be bygones with the passage of time thinking things have settled and they will all get along. This usually backfires to the detriment of this thread. We must know that some people developed and are just wired differently for whatever reason; people usually know what they are doing and will never change. Their mentality and attitude defy immense intellectual and attitudinal maturity, and smart and matured folks don't see their actions coming. The least we can do is hold them accountable and treat them as they ought to be treated. People must laboriously earn their "second chance." Unfortunately, when a troll or clown resurfaces later and starts making little sense or writing posts that appeal to our moral sensibility and human decency, a lot of redpillers skip their past misdeeds. Let's start acting right with these trolls and clown.

_{Edit: treating trolls or clowns accordingly doesn't mean we hate them. However, we do not throw pearls to pigs. Holding them accountable doesn't mean we hate them.}

Clowning

Those of you writing long epistles are stressing us out, please make it short in multiple posts and pass your messages. Take a clue from ubunja. I’m still trying not to bring violence on this thread sha, May God keep helping me �

Skepticus:



I trust my naija girls to serve that hot breakfast when necessary. The funny thing is that the tutorial "format" she used in deceiving this guy to go get dick is one that any sensible guy will decode on the spot. Anyway, it's a hard lesson learnt, when guys try to personalize these hoes.

These days, I have noticed it, that men rate "serious dating/relationships" than women unlike the other way round before the recent sexual evolution. It's probably tied to men being moral. The women just show up in the "relationship/situationship" where the guy is used as a placeholder for beta-buxxing while she goes on fucking multiple dicks that she fancies.

I've never been a fan of "relationships" nor needed one to get sex like most men are conditioned. With modern realities, it's useless for MOST men.

I pity many men because they are not even aware of what is really happening now.
They still have the old believe of women and many will up for rude awakening in the future.

CaveAdullam:


DAY 252, REDPILL 2022

My reaction to: https://www.nairaland.com/7320727/what-did-wrong-supporting-career#116439492

The reaction: https://www.nairaland.com/7320727/what-did-wrong-supporting-career/1#116492742

Or, below:

1. Though the stories many of you share here are fictional, however, it reflects the true state of men when it comes to women and romantic relationship. Even fiction still encodes truth and reality.

2. Women are manipulative when it comes to sexual relationships. They are logical about it and will take proper steps before execution.

But men on the other hand, just want women for sex and reproduction. Women are practical about romance and relationships, men are oblivious to the facts that belie.

3. Your story is another credit to the fact that at the right time, right place, and right man, women will fvck regardless of their romantic engagement with their boyfriends, fiance, or husband. This is the alpha fvck side of women's nature termed hypergamy(alpha fvcks; beta bucks).

4. All women may not experience this but it is a tendency that is rooted in women's psychology. Women never want to miss that chance of getting a quality gene for their offspring. It is fvck now and thinks later.

5. Religion understands this hence, so much restriction is placed on women's sexuality. Raw data from social science and research carried out prof J.D Unwin came up with substantial facts that if women are allowed to be promiscuous, the rate of societal growth will decline.

6. Religious men from different parts of the world understood this early, especially middle eastern men, and for that reason, placed huge restrictions on women.

7. However, the world is now secular and liberal, with no codes and conducts to guide men and women and protect society, everyone has gone wild.

We are all victims of the mess we created and yet still complain about it. Cognitive dissonance? Oh yeah. Hypocrisy? You are right.

8. The true test of a woman's loyalty is when she has access to other men. If she doesn't succumb to their titillating carrots, then, she is someone worth committing to. However, this is true for the outliers amongst women. Women are first loyal to their feelings, to defy that feeling at that moment is to be raised and guided by strict adherence to principles and masculine leadership. Just a few women; the majority will soon succumb.

9. It is because women cannot be trusted to this extent when it comes to seduction and temptation that they must be constantly watched. You must hold their hands from infancy to death, else, any slight opportunity, they will leverage their sexuality, emotions, and beauty to cause emotional and psychological damage to themselves. And like it or not, any damage they cause, it returns to affect men and society both directly and indirectly. Refer to 5 above.

10. You don't place women in the face of temptation and expect them not to succumb. They will, even the religious among them. Women hardly walk through temptations and hell without coming out dàmaged. For this reason, once you decide to commit to women, just know that you are about to increase your work and make many sacrifices.

11. The telltale that a relationship is coming to an end is when she cheats on you or compares you to other men sexually, physically, or financially. Once you notice this, please don't bother looking for any marriage counselor to advise and help you, end the relationship and let her go.

12. There are many ways to identify these red flags, but if you are too point-focused on the satisfaction of your libido and bamboozled by her body and romance you will fail to see these red flags. Women are loyal to their feelings but with time as a result of physical contact and interactions, they will expose themselves.

13. Bro, from a humanity standpoint, you have done well for her. But don't be taken away that if you help a woman she will always be there for you. Help her out of charity and not romance, else, you will always meet with disappointments.

14. Women are loyal to their feelings and when it comes to their feelings no matter how tangible your good to them in the past, not even yesterday, they will never show sympathy. Refer to 8 and 13 above.

15. The most efficient way to even help a woman is to help her father, brothers, boyfriend, fiance, and husband. These are males that will in turn take care of her. Because once a woman's status is in a crescendo, she will never consider these men any longer or show them respect. Just look around and observe the behavior of so-called independent women - arrogance, contemptuousness, entitlement mentality, and the like.


16. A woman can only be loyal to one man, and if she is the type that distributes herself among different men, it means her pair bonding ability has fallen drastically. And you should leave her and let her go, she is for the street.

Avoid claiming a monopoly for a product that wants to be commercialized by the public.

Be a wise man.

Authority: Be a wise man.

Wise man, Every single thing you've put down here is true

[i]Whatever you want from a woman is what you will receive. If you ask for a gentle girl that is what you receive, if you ask for a bad girl thats what you get. A woman can date 5 men and exhibit 5 different characters.

A girl can act like a saint to you when you approach her and start professing love, even when she is a slut. She will even delay sex to you but give it fast for other guys. This is the fluid nature of women.

[b][/b]How you start with her is how you end with her[/i]