basilico:


Are you that dumb seriously? When you are as witness to a crime you need video evidence. What school did you go to?
I did not think you are that stupid

When, Basilico, did I become the court where eyewitness evidence is insufficient especially since eyewitnesses may give contradictory evidence?

Trust me. I know you are that stupid to think any evidence blind you claim to have witnessed would be accepted by me who knows you are blinded by kraken.

budaatum:


When, Basilico, did I become the court where eyewitness evidence is insufficient especially since eyewitnesses may give contradictory evidence?

Trust me. I know you are that stupid to think any evidence blind you claim to have witnessed would be accepted by me who knows you are blinded by kraken.

What are we differing about. Eye witness testimony is very important in legal esp criminal proceedings. If you shout right now in UK that you want the monarchy gone , they will come for you tomorrow.
All they will need is two witnesses corroborating that they saw and heard you shout Then your sorry buttt will be hauled off to jail.

What is the thing about believe all women? When there are only two people in a room . Do you need forensics to believe the women

budaatum:


We are showing you how dumb you are Ben.

Europe is showing you that it is willing to sacrifice its strong currency and economy to help Ukraine withstand the assault from Russia, and if you knew your history, you'd know it's not the first time Europe has sacrificed its currency and economy and the life of its own people to resist tyrants like Putin.

I don't know why you are feeding into that nincompoop with loud mouth and zero economic knowledge in his brains.

The Euro is performing well, the war has little impact on its performance.

The world is in a situation where a $40 trillion American stock market bubble is selling off into the dollar, making the dollar outstrip all its rivals who have free floating currencies. Only two or three countries who manipulate their currencies to peg to the dollar are keeping pace.

Using Japanese Yen and South Korean Won as control currencies, the Euro is outperforming them this year (pics below). The currency that is running away is the dollar as all the money printing that bloated the stock market is now being sold into dollar, and that has the potential to drive most of the world into poverty as most international trade is settled in dollars. We are seeing its effects in almost every third world country

I have already explained all this below. That nincompoop with poop for brains should keep quiet and stop exposing his ignorance all the time. I've never seen someone speak with such arrogance about a topic he knows nothing about. 6 months ago, the dollar was going to crash, instead the dollar is mooning, and he is using that same dollar performance to float his Putard narrative.

Ibime:
Every free floating currency is performing poorly against the dollar except those countries with foreign reserve to artificially prop against the dollar. Dollar is about the third best performing currency this year. That's because stockmarkets which have been pumped on steroids since the Quantitative Easing at the start of the pandemic are now selling those stocks into dollar. Marketcap of American companies is circa $40trln. If a quarter of that money flees, that's $10trln looking for a place to go - and a lot of it will go into dollar, some into bonds etc. Forget what you heard, Nigeria nor any third world country does not have enough foreign Reserve to keep up with the dollar. For context, that money Emefiele was spending ($3bln every 2 months) is equivalent to $18bln a year if he continued, which is equivalent to half of FGs annual budget. Of course, Foreign Reserve does not make up part of the budget but the comparison to budget gives some context.

Almost every other country is struggling right now from losing ground on the dollar. Below is the US dollar index DXY against a basket of blue chip currencies.

Ibime:

Below post from Geovanni is spot on. I'm shorting Nasdaq in periods leading up to CPI print and FOMC meetings and close positions on the day of the meeting or CPI print. Only thing I'm long on is dollar and Natgas. I'm not in crypto at all.

The calendar below is what I use as guide

https://www.forexfactory.com/calendar?week=aug28.2022

Ibime:


I don't know why you are feeding into that nincompoop with loud mouth and zero economic knowledge in his brains.

The Euro is performing well, the war has little impact on its performance.

The world is in a situation where a $40 trillion American stock market bubble is selling off into the dollar, making the dollar outstrip all its rivals who have free floating currencies. Only two or three countries who manipulate their currencies to peg to the dollar are keeping pace.

Using Japan and South Korean Won as control currencies, the Euro is outperforming them this year. The currency that is running away is the dollar as all the quantitative easing in that bloated the stock market is now being sold into dollar.

I have already explained all this below. That nincompoop with poop for brains should keep quiet and stop exposing his ignorance all the time. I've never seen someone speak with such arrogance about a topic he knows nothing about.

At least you are not talking about the bombs of Hitler like the grey hair Mumu buda. although you too did not address the question you sound a bit more reasonable.

Others are ramping up energy production, even capitalizing on the Situation that is Russia's invasion, some European countries think it is the best time to go green. they never start... More protest as things gets bad.

The eurozone, which always had a trade surplus with the world, don knack into deficit. the euro is down 10%, against the U.S. dollar so far this year. devaluation only makes Europe even poorer.

Ibime:


I don't know why you are feeding into that nincompoop with loud mouth and zero economic knowledge in his brains.

I had time I guess, and I was bored.

Not only does "that nincompoop with loud mouth" not only have "zero economic knowledge in his brains", I doubt he has a brain, but if he has a brain he sure does not know how to use it.

basilico:


What are we differing about. Eye witness testimony is very important in legal esp criminal proceedings. If you shout right now in UK that you want the monarchy gone , they will come for you tomorrow.
All they will need is two witnesses corroborating that they saw and heard you shout Then your sorry buttt will be hauled off to jail.

What is the thing about believe all women? When there are only two people in a room . Do you need forensics to believe the women

You are very dumb. Have you considered I might pay two people to claim they witnessed me say "God bless the King" instead if all you have is your own "two witnesses"?

Its a trick your dump uses so why do you think I might not use it too, you dumb fùq!

budaatum:


You are very dumb. Have you considered I might pay two people to claim they witnessed me say "God bless the King" instead if all you have is your own "two witnesses"?

Its a trick your dump uses so why do you think I might not use it too, you dumb fùq!

kikikikiki ya got ah head of ah 3 people, but isa dumb as ah goat ye. kikikiki

budaatum:


You are very dumb. Have you considered I might pay two people to claim they witnessed me say "God bless the King" instead if all you have is your own "two witnesses"?

Its a trick your dump uses so why do you think I might not use it too, you dumb fùq!

Did not know that you are that dumb. I always thought you are one of those never do well critics who sit in their momma's basement and troll people.

The testimony of a witness that he saw the accused commit or participate in the commission of the crime for which the accused is being tried shall be admissible in evidence in a criminal prosecution in any trial court ordained and established under article III of the Constitution of the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 90–351, title II, § 701(a), June 19, 1968, 82 Stat. 211.)

basilico:


Did not know that you are that dumb. I always thought you are one of those never do well critics who sit in their momma's basement and troll people.

The testimony of a witness that he saw the accused commit or participate in the commission of the crime for which the accused is being tried shall be admissible in evidence in a criminal prosecution in any trial court ordained and established under article III of the Constitution of the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 90–351, title II, § 701(a), June 19, 1968, 82 Stat. 211.)

The testimony of a witness or witnesses alone cannot be used to prosecute a criminal case.
First you need there to be an actual murder. Meaning there has to be a body certified dead by a qualified medical doctor. You cannot assume a missing person even after 20 years as murder.

Secondly, in most cases you gave to present murder weapon or means of murder, and also a medical report that the murder weapon was the cause of death of the deceased.

Thirdly, you have to prove motive and premeditation to differentiate the case from manslaughter or even self defense.

Finally, you have to prove these beyond "all reasonable doubts".

If all you have in a murder case is a bunch of affidavits or witnesses, the judge will throw you out for wasting his or her time.

Replying your stupids assertions can be quite annoying. I do not expect to be explaining basic issues to a supposedly educated person.

wirinet:


The testimony of a witness or witnesses alone cannot be used to prosecute a criminal case.
First you need there to be an actual murder. Meaning there has to be a body certified dead by a qualified medical doctor. You cannot assume a missing person even after 20 years as murder.

Secondly, in most cases you gave to present murder weapon or means of murder, and also a medical report that the murder weapon was the cause of death of the deceased.

Thirdly, you have to prove motive and premeditation to differentiate the case from manslaughter or even self defense.

Finally, you have to prove these beyond "all reasonable doubts".

If all you have in a murder case is a bunch of affidavits or witnesses, the judge will throw you out for wasting his or her time.

Replying your stupids assertions can be quite annoying. I do not expect to be explaining basic issues to a supposedly educated person.

Very lazy people . Mike Tyson was convicted of rape . He went with a pageant to his hotel room at 3 am in the morning. Two days later she ran to the hospital claiming Tyson raped her. whether she was a gold digger or not no one knows. It was just her word against Tyson which got him 10 yeas sentence.

basilico:


Very lazy people . Mike Tyson was convicted of rape . He went with a pageant to his hotel room at 3 am in the morning. Two days later she ran to the hospital claiming Tyson raped her. whether she was a gold digger or not no one knows. It was just her word against Tyson which got him 10 yeas sentence.

Lies mixed with false narrative. The proof of evidence for rape is as stringent that of murder.
First you have to proof that there was sex in the first place, before you are required to prove whether its consensual or rape. You need medical, forensic and physical evidence to prove rape before a jury of 12. Finally you need witnesses to collaborate your evidences. Witnesses without any medical, forensic and physical evidence would be thrown out by the judge.
Watch his video to understand the perspectives of the Mike Tyson case.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlRawW--T24

Now where are the evidences of election rigging you guys are so obsessed with. Which evidences were presented before any courts before calling on witnesses to support?

wirinet:


Lies mixed with false narrative. The proof of evidence for rape is as stringent that of murder.
First you have to proof that there was sex in the first place, before you are required to prove whether its consensual or rape. You need medical, forensic and physical evidence to prove rape before a jury of 12. Finally you need witnesses to collaborate your evidences. Witnesses without any medical, forensic and physical evidence would be thrown out by the judge.
Watch his video to understand the perspectives of the Mike Tyson case.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlRawW--T24

Now where are the evidences of election rigging you guys are so obsessed with. Which evidences were presented before any courts before calling on witnesses to support?

I wont go into this but some guys are rough when it comes the act. It was her word against bad boy Tyson.

basilico:


I wont go into this but some guys are rough when it comes the act. It was her word against bad boy Tyson.

Rough or gentle, it's still boils down to evidence presented. What's actually happened in the room is between only the two of them and God. But the evidences presented in court was enough to convince a jury of 12 beyond all reasonable doubt.

There was zero evidence presented in court by Trump's lawyers to support the rigging allegations. They did not accuse any one (in court that is) of participating in the rigging. It it possible to bring a rigging allegations without charging and convicting those that did the rigging? Instead of Trump's lawyers to sue Dominion for rigging elections, its Dominion instead that is suing Trump's lawyers for defamation.

After his speech, Biden couldn’t find a way out of podium

wirinet:


Rough or gentle, it's still boils down to evidence presented. What's actually happened in the room is between only the two of them and God. But the evidences presented in court was enough to convince a jury of 12 beyond all reasonable doubt.

There was zero evidence presented in court by Trump's lawyers to support the rigging allegations. They did not accuse any one (in court that is) of participating in the rigging. It it possible to bring a rigging allegations without charging and convicting those that did the rigging? Instead of Trump's lawyers to sue Dominion for rigging elections, its Dominion instead that is suing Trump's lawyers for defamation.

How do you know that there was zero evidence? Incase the laws were changed unilaterally , the court should have granted a hearing.
The loser is also handicapped in getting hard evidence , thats why courts should have granted discovery And the relevant documents produced by election officers,

It doesnt take stupid to notice that MSM uses the same keywords no evidence, baseless, big lie, etc. this was a well coordinated take down . Ask Marc Elias how many states he convinced to switch to mail in voting for instance.

Lets leave it at that

basilico:


Did not know that you are that dumb. I always thought you are one of those never do well critics who sit in their momma's basement and troll people.

The testimony of a witness that he saw the accused commit or participate in the commission of the crime for which the accused is being tried shall be admissible in evidence in a criminal prosecution in any trial court ordained and established under article III of the Constitution of the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 90–351, title II, § 701(a), June 19, 1968, 82 Stat. 211.)

English Language has always been your problem.

Did you see the bit where it says "admissible in evidence"? It means it may be presented in court, and not that the accused is guilty because of the "testimony of a witness", you dummy. Otherwise, your witness will testify like they did for dump in all his cases, and the judge would simply rule in his favour, but you go see how many cases the courts threw out because all he had was "testimony of a witness".

wirinet:


The testimony of a witness or witnesses alone cannot be used to prosecute a criminal case.
First you need there to be an actual murder. Meaning there has to be a body certified dead by a qualified medical doctor. You cannot assume a missing person even after 20 years as murder.

Secondly, in most cases you gave to present murder weapon or means of murder, and also a medical report that the murder weapon was the cause of death of the deceased.

Thirdly, you have to prove motive and premeditation to differentiate the case from manslaughter or even self defense.

Finally, you have to prove these beyond "all reasonable doubts".

If all you have in a murder case is a bunch of affidavits or witnesses, the judge will throw you out for wasting his or her time.

Replying your stupids assertions can be quite annoying. I do not expect to be explaining basic issues to a supposedly educated person.

We should not suppose he is an educated person because he clearly can not possibly have been educated and just makes crap up in his head and asserts.

basilico:


Very lazy people . Mike Tyson was convicted of rape . He went with a pageant to his hotel room at 3 am in the morning. Two days later she ran to the hospital claiming Tyson raped her. whether she was a gold digger or not no one knows. It was just her word against Tyson which got him 10 yeas sentence.

Tyson was not convicted just because a witness said he raped her. If not, Clarence Thomas and Kavanaugh would have been jailed too.

https://www.indianapolismonthly.com/longform/down-for-the-count-lawyers-look-mike-tyson-rape-trial

Graham proposes 15 week Nationwide abortion Ban. Seeking to unite republicans.

I still wonder what exactly is the GOP issue with women? For those that do abortion due to one or two reasons,I see no reason why Men should be the one to block them

And for those of us that haven't had any abortion before it has nothing to do with morals religion or anything. Those that want to have it should have it

happney65:
Graham proposes 15 week Nationwide abortion Ban. Seeking to unite republicans.

I still wonder what exactly is the GOP issue with women? For those that do abortion due to one or two reasons,I see no reason why Men should be the one to block them

And for those of us that haven't had any abortion before it has nothing to do with morals religion or anything. Those that want to have it should have it

Funny that they are now running away from their abortion ban now that the Supreme Court has scraped RvW and left the decision to the State and thereby the voting people.

I tell you, I so love democracy!

budaatum:


Funny that they are now running away from their abortion ban now that the Supreme Court has scraped RvW and left the decision to the State and thereby the voting people.

I tell you, I so love democracy!

Abi,shebi it is now in the hands of states so why are they still wanting to do a Nationwide outright Ban then cos I am not understanding

Na wahoo

budaatum:


Tyson was not convicted just because a witness said he raped her. If not, Clarence Thomas and Kavanaugh would have been jailed too.

https://www.indianapolismonthly.com/longform/down-for-the-count-lawyers-look-mike-tyson-rape-trial

Displaying ignorance. For Tyson it was rape.No witnesses to determine whether it was consensual or forced. For both Justices women crawled out of the woodwork claiming that they were talked to in a sexxual manner and they only came out when it came to supreme court nomination while both had been vetted before .

Tyson was a curious case because I dont see how a guy with a reputation hits on you, picks you up at 2 am and you go to his hotel room. Maybe she did not like it , some men are brutes And Tyson with his bad boy image was not exactly a darling of the jury.

budaatum:


Funny that they are now running away from their abortion ban now that the Supreme Court has scraped RvW and left the decision to the State and thereby the voting people.

I tell you, I so love democracy!

After arguing vehemently that the federal government should not be the one ruling on abortion but should be left to the individual states. Hypocrisy and Republicans are synonyms.

After criminal trump quickly entered DC there was rife rumors that maybe he was going to turn himself in.
But we were met with this image showing what meeting he came to handle. Tell me you see this image and you see men who are looking peaceful

happney65:
Graham proposes 15 week Nationwide abortion Ban. Seeking to unite republicans.

I still wonder what exactly is the GOP issue with women? For those that do abortion due to one or two reasons,I see no reason why Men should be the one to block them

And for those of us that haven't had any abortion before it has nothing to do with morals religion or anything. Those that want to have it should have it

20 years into the future, Graham is going to release a biopic how he was a Democrat insider who had a long plan of helping to finally destroy the maga Republiqan party.

basilico:


Displaying ignorance. For Tyson it was rape.No witnesses to determine whether it was consensual or forced. For both Justices women crawled out of the woodwork claiming that they were talked to in a sexxual manner and they only came out when it came to supreme court nomination while both had been vetted before .

Tyson was a curious case because I dont see how a guy with a reputation hits on you, picks you up at 2 am and you go to his hotel room. Maybe she did not like it , some men are brutes And Tyson with his bad boy image was not exactly a darling of the jury.

Never tired of embarrassing yourself. You are comparing Nigerian standard of rape to the US.

In the US rape is defined as unconsented penetration. Even if she comes into your bedroom naked at 4AM, allowed you to kiss her and handle her breasts, the minutes she says no to penetration and you forcefully proceed. That would be termed rape in the US.

Obrigardo:


20 years into the future, Graham is going to release a biopic how he was a Democrat insider who had a long plan of helping to finally destroy the maga Republiqan party.

Remember when he said Trump was going to destroy them?I think that is going to be a false prophecy. Guess he was referring to himself thinking it was trump he was referring to

happney65:
Graham proposes 15 week Nationwide abortion Ban. Seeking to unite republicans.

I still wonder what exactly is the GOP issue with women? For those that do abortion due to one or two reasons,I see no reason why Men should be the one to block them

And for those of us that haven't had any abortion before it has nothing to do with morals religion or anything. Those that want to have it should have it

GOP women are already started complaining, there's always more to this than abortion but people who wear moral veil don't want to see it, anyone who thinks these guys will stop at Roe v Wade need to think again

https://www.msnbc.com/know-your-value/out-of-office/quarter-gop-women-feel-their-party-doesn-t-care-about-n1298829

happney65:


Remember when he said Trump was going to destroy them?I think that is going to be a false prophecy. Guess he was referring to himself thinking it was trump he was referring to

You don't say

sanpipita:


GOP women are already started complaining, there's always more to this than abortion but people who wear moral veil don't want to see it, anyone who thinks these guys will stop at Roe v Wade need to think again

https://www.msnbc.com/know-your-value/out-of-office/quarter-gop-women-feel-their-party-doesn-t-care-about-n1298829

One needs to understand that some people want to send women back to the kitchen and kid rearing and the women are not having any of it.

The time has come when they realise Eve saved stupid Adam from perpetual slavery and they are not going back to joining him in it if he is refusing to eat the fruit that would eliminate his ignorance and give him knowledge to free himself.

happney65:
Graham proposes 15 week Nationwide abortion Ban. Seeking to unite republicans.

I still wonder what exactly is the GOP issue with women? For those that do abortion due to one or two reasons,I see no reason why Men should be the one to block them

And for those of us that haven't had any abortion before it has nothing to do with morals religion or anything. Those that want to have it should have it

Senator Graham knows the bill is DOA. What he is doing is just political theater to fire up the conservative-Republican base to turn up in November.
Nonetheless, if the GOP can squeak out a majority in both houses, then he may reintroduce his bill.

Obrigardo:
After criminal trump quickly entered DC there was rife rumors that maybe he was going to turn himself in.
But we were met with this image showing what meeting he came to handle. Tell me you see this image and you see men who are looking peaceful

Oh no, a crowd of unathletic old men, the horror!