Namdio:


With the basis of all our facts here being the bible after all these are bible stories, it seems that you are the one without facts.

And what is that supposed to mean?

Since when did the master and the messenger become confused?

What the master says and what the servant does are 2 different things.

The order to kill all the women and children was by Moses, mind you and not God. You keep overlooking that.

The story about the order to kill children and babies didn't even have anything to do with Moses.
See? There's so much murdering of children that one can point several places of its occurrence in the bible.
Now I'm telling you this, the bible clearly stated that the Christian god asked that children and babies be killed. What do you have to say about that?

you cannot row your boat aganist the wind

Namdio:


Yeah, I can definitely see where you're coming from, and while I could pick up another part of this post and argue about, I feel it has run it's beautiful course and should be ended with the following.

Under the examination lights
We have each kept our own
So now, let us agree
To disagree

Agree to disagree, we will

Instead of you guys to help the OP to find an atheist girl, you're debating the existence of God & religion. If I was a girl, I'd stand in for him.

kingxsamz:
And what is that supposed to mean?

So basically, since we are talking about the Bible, you need to back up what you're saying with scriptures

kingxsamz:

The story about the order to kill children and babies didn't even have anything to do with Moses.
See? There's so much murdering of children that one can point several places of its occurrence in the bible.
Now I'm telling you this, the bible clearly stated that the Christian god asked that children and babies be killed. What do you have to say about that?

You didn't provide me any basis for this.

You should cite several examples along with such statements

kingxsamz:

And where does that leave your country Nigeria? Religion is highly practiced here. Why is violence and crime way worse here?

I believe that Christianity is the true religion and the Jehovah witnesses are the only group practising true Christianity. They are not violent and are very peaceful.

And which Supreme being are you talking about? Is it the Christian god that was created thousands of years after many civilizations that you're attributing the invention of morals to?

Lol. The Christian God is the creator. He's the source of all life. Life didn't just start randomly like you guys think.

kingxsamz:

Exodus 10:16-17 shows he was remorseful and acknowledged he had sinned, only for his heart to be hardened, yet again.
Exodus 10:1 shows the Christian god hardened his heart on purpose so he could have a reason to flex his muscles.

Yes, I see. I am wrong, you are right.

kingxsamz:

lol, where did I mention that I have a problem with it?

Then why bring it up as a point of argument, we both have no problem with it so bringing it up was pointless.

Any way, I see that it was foolish of me to argue with you. You seem to read around everything I type in response, so you're not really looking for answers just trouble.

I appreciate your enlightening words, I apologise. I am foolish but allow me to exist in my foolishness.

kingxsamz:

Lol, just seeing this sef.
Again,Atheism stands for nothing. I've said that countless times. Atheism is the lack of belief in a god. Nothing more nothing less. It does not stand for freedom neither does it stand for captivity.
An atheist could support slavery, another atheist could be against it.
The Atheist who created this thread created it based on his experience and that has nothing to do with other atheists. Like I told you everyone has a choice. It's fine if Christians don't want to date Atheists, it's also fine if I don't want to have anything to do with someone who eats feaces. You seem not to understand these simple things. Atheism does not equate freedom. It stands for nothing and has no rules. SIMPLE. I don't give two bleeps about Christians not wanting atheists. Whining about it like the OP did is one just being a cry baby.

Where in the bible was that stated?
Show me where the Christian god created wives for Adam and Eve's children.


So is it okay to marry your cousins? Yes or no?
Give me a direct answer.


You keep avoiding my points.
The issue isn't about what was the norm back then, the issue is about this god giving men instructions to slaughter women who have been disvirgined and keeping those who are virgins for themselves.
You do know that quite a large number of little girls were married off to sick men right?
So if a god can instruct men to keep children for themselves for their sexual pleasure, what does that make him?
Abeg answer.

He asked the Christian god for a favour in return of human sacrifice. The Christian god helped him with the favour. Then this man went ahead to make the sacrifice which the Christian god accepted.
If someone asks you for 1 million naira in return of a human head and you go ahead to help him, what does that make you? An accomplice.
If police come, no be two of una dem go carry?

You make comprehension too hard for yourself.
If the government should warn Nigerian soldiers about rape and these soldiers go ahead to rape. What would it mean if the government then decides to give women rules on how to be submissive to rapists instead of punishing and condemning those soldiers who rape?
You warned someone of an action, they went ahead to do that action, now instead of you to condemn the action, you went ahead to make rules to make that action more prevalent.
When you give rules to slaves rather than abolishing slavery, it means you're in support of slavery. Simple as that.

Wrong!
You don't even know your Bible.
Why didn't he respect Pharaoh's decision to free the Israelites rather than forcefully making him stubborn? Why didn't he respect the decision of the people of Sodom and Gomorrah? You no even sabi the book wey you dey read sef.


If you like avoid am ten times, I'll always repeat it.
The Christian god specifically gave men instructions to murder children and babies. The verse clearly says it. You can't hide from it.
This was not any man's decision. He asked them, he ordered them, he commanded them to kill children and babies.
No matter how much you avoid this particular one, I'll always remind you.
Since you said infanticide is wrong, tell us, why is it right for a good god to command men to slaughter children and babies? Then tell us if it'll be okay if he does it again.
Avoid this one again and I'll remind you.
I await your response.

You're not asking to learn, you're asking to argue. I answered your questions and you're telling me that I'm wrong without any Bible verse to back it up. Even where I stated that God could have created spouses for the offsprings of Adam and Eve if they didn't rush into it without his permission, you're asking me to show where God created spouses.
I won't marry my cousin because of the health implications but thousands of years ago the human DNA was stronger.
All the places you contradicted my answers, show me proof in the Bible. I'm the Christian here and you're the atheist.

I am the one who knows my religion and there's more to Christianity than what you read on your atheist Facebook page and if you want to challenge my answers on my religion, prove me wrong with verses from my Bible. Then I'll respond with verses from my Bible as well. Otherwise, take several seats...

NEXT!

Namdio:


Yes, I see. I am wrong, you are right.



Then why bring it up as a point of argument, we both have no problem with it so bringing it up was pointless.

You brought it up by quoting me. I was talking about it in a different conversation with someone else and you just quoted me and started arguing. Nawa.

Any way, I see that it was foolish of me to argue with you. You seem to read around everything I type in response, so you're not really looking for answers just trouble.

I appreciate your enlightening words, I apologise. I am foolish but allow me to exist in my foolishness.

Man, I don't know what your problem is. You quoted me complaining about intelligence and facts, now you're saying something else. If you didn't want to type and get responses you shouldn't have bothered in the first place.

jasminer:


You're not asking to learn, you're asking to argue. I answered your questions and you're telling me that I'm wrong without any Bible verse to back it up. Even where I stated that God could have created spouses for the offsprings of Adam and Eve if they didn't rush into it without his permission, you're asking me to show where God created spouses.

You want me to quote verses but don't want to provide scriptures of where the Christian god created wives for the sons of Adam. So you now make up stories and situations that never happened in your Bible? Ahn ahn, at least be fair nw.

I won't marry my cousin because of the health implications but thousands of years ago the human DNA was stronger.

I didn't ask if you would marry your cousin. I asked you if it was wrong or right.
Is sexual relationship between cousins okay in your religion?

I am the one who knows my religion and there's more to Christianity than what you read on your atheist Facebook page and if you want to challenge my answers on my religion, prove me wrong with verses from my Bible.

I'm sorry, I don't do atheist groups,forums or gatherings like that.

Then I'll respond with verses from my Bible as well. Otherwise, take several seats...
All the places you contradicted my answers, show me proof in the Bible. I'm the Christian here and you're the atheist.
NEXT!

Lol, okay.
You agreed that infanticide is wrong right?
Now tell me if it was okay for the Christian god to order Saul to carry out infanticide.

Before you type anything think o, because you have two options here. (1) Condemn the actions of your god. (2) justify infanticide which you already claimed is wrong, thereby shooting yourself in the foot.
1stSamuel 15:3 , that's it. Give it your best shot.

cornelboy:


I believe that Christianity is the true religion and the Jehovah witnesses are the only group practising true Christianity. They are not violent and are very peaceful.


Lol. The Christian God is the creator. He's the source of all life. Life didn't just start randomly like you guys think.

You're even a Jehovah witness sef.
Abeg, your opinion does not matter.

kingxsamz:

You're even a Jehovah witness sef.
Abeg, your opinion does not matter.

Lol. See pride. Does yours matter too

cornelboy:

Lol. See pride. Does yours matter too

Your fellow Christians don't even regard you sef. Abeg goodnight.

kingxsamz:

You want me to quote verses but don't want to provide scriptures of where the Christian god created wives for the sons of Adam. So you now make up stories and situations that never happened in your Bible? Ahn ahn, at least be fair nw.

I didn't ask if you would marry your cousin. I asked you if it was wrong or right.
Is sexual relationship between cousins okay in your religion?

Lol, read these slowly and carefully... If you don't understand it, I won't bother continuing the conversation cus you obviously won't understand the rest. I can't be say A and you're quoting me claiming I said Y.

1. If God created a wife for Adam, could he not have created spouses for the offsprings of Adam and Eve when the time was right if they waited on his orders? Adam and Eve engaged in sex without God's approval (deceived by the snake) which is why the woman was cursed with a painful childbirth.

God as usual let man be but obviously, violence and corruption erupted as a result of the perversion and unguided population explosion neccessiting the destruction of the first set of occupants of the world save for Noah and his family.

2. Among the forbidden couples are parent-child, sister-brother, grandparent-grandchild, uncle-niece, aunt-nephew, and between half siblings and certain close in-laws. This "Levitical law" is found in Leviticus 18:6-18, supplemented by Leviticus 20:17-21 and Deuteronomy 27:20-23.

The bible does not forbid cousin marriage.

3. 1 Samuel 15 vs 2 - 3:
Thus saith the LORD of hosts, I remember that which Amalek did to Israel, how he laid wait for him in the way, when he came up from Egypt.
Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass.

Amalek attacked them and did the same to them without any provocation. God asked them to return the favour. This would definitely have happened anyway as it still happens up till today.
Amalek was simply getting the reward of what they did to Israel.
If Boko Haram releases a missile to Aso villa what will Buhari or the Military Chiefs do?
When Japan attacked Pearl Harbour, What did America do to Hiroshima?
Remember then there was no war crimes, all was fair in war.
Israel itself was operating under the Mosaic law: An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.

Show me where God asked the Israelites to kill anyone who did them no harm. Even the Gibeonites who were occupants of Canaan and came to make peace under disguise with Israel, didn't God ask them to honour the peace treaty.


4. Read this carefully, if you don't understand this one, otilo ooo

A. God gave man the right to rule on earth and make decisions and the spirit of God will never strive with the decisions of man except that decision of man directly opposes the word or laws of God, even at that, judgement follows after you've exercised your free will.
B. There are spoken laws from God and we know that those words can't break nor return to God till the end of the world. Some call it karma but for every action, there MUST be a reaction and they effect everyone on earth regardless of your religion and status. Some of those laws are as follows:
i. Whatever a man sows, that will he reap
Ii. Righteousness exalts a nation but sin is a reproach
iii. He that diggeth a pit will fall into that pit.

You see that first law, it's one of the greatest and unbreakable laws to the extent that everyone theist and atheist agrees it exists calls it karma and even calls it a bitch cus It'll painstakingly hound you and fulfil.

So even if God has vowed never to strive with man's decisions, man MUST reap the reward of his actions.
God never planned for violence and war and murder but if you start it, you're gonna reap it with interest.
So back to Amalek, the Amalekites did exactly the same thing to Israel, God ordered their revenge the same way. The Egyptians afflicted the Israelites. God afflicted the Egyptians in return and even before the firstborn of the Egyptians died, Moses warned them ahead and gave them two options:
Release the Israelites and live or refuse and your firstborns will die. Egypt refused to release the Israelites and they died.

Please reread my messages ooo, don't quote me and be saying off point

NeckingNgulping:
I'm an atheist, and I found that I'm incapable of dating women who are particularly religious. I could go out on a date with a religious woman, and that's usually solely by merit of me pretending the whole time as though I'm truly in for it.

Since long term relationship with these women would have necessitated that i make pretence a hobby, logic sets in and we inevitably part ways.

In a highly religious country like ours, it's quite hard to find a woman who's an atheist as me, let alone a decent one.

I Can fully relate to this , I’ve found my peace in getting a woman outside the country basically so yes I’ve found my peace in that

cornelboy:


I believe that Christianity is the true religion and the Jehovah witnesses are the only group practising true Christianity. They are not violent and are very peaceful.


Lol. The Christian God is the creator. He's the source of all life. Life didn't just start randomly like you guys think.

but the Christian God started randomly?

omonnakoda:
but the Christian God started randomly?

Are you blind. I said the Christian God is the creator.

kingxsamz:

Your fellow Christians don't even regard you sef. Abeg goodnight.

Lol. We don't need human validation. Na the true God dé our side.

Your really blind and dumb.

Christ taught us to love our neighbors, ourselves and our enemies.
But other Christian would participate in wars and kill each other while the Jehovah witnesses would never pick up weapons.

The Jehovah witnesses do not participate in politics and are patiently waiting for God's kingdom while other Christians would participate in politics and even become each other enemies.

Jesus explained that his kingdom is not of this world and he never participated in politics. The early church was politically neutral as well.

Who are the true Christian?

Whoa. I see your using style to run from the discussion. É no matter whether I be JW or Catholic na

suicidesheep:


Lol, I would love to know which science is that

all science. Science states energy can neither be created nor destroyed, yet the Bingbang claims everything was created from nothing. That claim contradicts the law.

jasminer:


Lol, read these slowly and carefully... If you don't understand it, I won't bother continuing the conversation cus you obviously won't understand the rest. I can't be say A and you're quoting me claiming I said Y.

1. If God created a wife for Adam, could he not have created spouses for the offsprings of Adam and Eve when the time was right if they waited on his orders? Adam and Eve engaged in sex without God's approval (deceived by the snake) which is why the woman was cursed with a painful childbirth.

God as usual let man be but obviously, violence and corruption erupted as a result of the perversion and unguided population explosion neccessiting the destruction of the first set of occupants of the world save for Noah and his family.

2. Among the forbidden couples are parent-child, sister-brother, grandparent-grandchild, uncle-niece, aunt-nephew, and between half siblings and certain close in-laws. This "Levitical law" is found in Leviticus 18:6-18, supplemented by Leviticus 20:17-21 and Deuteronomy 27:20-23.

The bible does not forbid cousin marriage.

3. 1 Samuel 15 vs 2 - 3:
Thus saith the LORD of hosts, I remember that which Amalek did to Israel, how he laid wait for him in the way, when he came up from Egypt.
Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass.

Amalek attacked them and did the same to them without any provocation. God asked them to return the favour. This would definitely have happened anyway as it still happens up till today.
Amalek was simply getting the reward of what they did to Israel.
If Boko Haram releases a missile to Aso villa what will Buhari or the Military Chiefs do?
When Japan attacked Pearl Harbour, What did America do to Hiroshima?
Remember then there was no war crimes, all was fair in war.
Israel itself was operating under the Mosaic law: An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.

Show me where God asked the Israelites to kill anyone who did them no harm. Even the Gibeonites who were occupants of Canaan and came to make peace under disguise with Israel, didn't God ask them to honour the peace treaty.


4. Read this carefully, if you don't understand this one, otilo ooo

A. God gave man the right to rule on earth and make decisions and the spirit of God will never strive with the decisions of man except that decision of man directly opposes the word or laws of God, even at that, judgement follows after you've exercised your free will.
B. There are spoken laws from God and we know that those words can't break nor return to God till the end of the world. Some call it karma but for every action, there MUST be a reaction and they effect everyone on earth regardless of your religion and status. Some of those laws are as follows:
i. Whatever a man sows, that will he reap
Ii. Righteousness exalts a nation but sin is a reproach
iii. He that diggeth a pit will fall into that pit.

You see that first law, it's one of the greatest and unbreakable laws to the extent that everyone theist and atheist agrees it exists calls it karma and even calls it a bitch cus It'll painstakingly hound you and fulfil.

So even if God has vowed never to strive with man's decisions, man MUST reap the reward of his actions.
God never planned for violence and war and murder but if you start it, you're gonna reap it with interest.
So back to Amalek, the Amalekites did exactly the same thing to Israel, God ordered their revenge the same way. The Egyptians afflicted the Israelites. God afflicted the Egyptians in return and even before the firstborn of the Egyptians died, Moses warned them ahead and gave them two options:
Release the Israelites and live or refuse and your firstborns will die. Egypt refused to release the Israelites and they died.

Please reread my messages ooo, don't quote me and be saying off point

So in conclusion infanticide is okay only in some cases? Please I want you to answer because the point here is about the specific detail of murdering children and babies. And we both know that those babies did nothing wrong but exist.
So do you agree that it's right to kill children and babies as long as the parents of those children hurt you? Don't dodge. Answer the question.

Also, given that you said for every action there's a reaction, would it be okay if the Christian god specifically commanded men to rape women and children for the crimes committed by their husbands and fathers?

I won't bother responding to the other ones because I want us to focus on this one.

Don't give unnecessary sermons, just answer the question directly. Thank you.

cornelboy:

Lol. We don't need human validation. Na the true God dé our side.

Your really blind and dumb.

Christ taught us to love our neighbors, ourselves and our enemies.
But other Christian would participate in wars and kill each other while the Jehovah witnesses would never pick up weapons.

The Jehovah witnesses do not participate in politics and are patiently waiting for God's kingdom while other Christians would participate in politics and even become each other enemies.

Jesus explained that his kingdom is not of this world and he never participated in politics. The early church was politically neutral as well.

Who are the true Christian?

Whoa. I see your using style to run from the discussion. É no matter whether I be JW or Catholic na

There's no discussion to be held. You avoided what I said only to tell me you're part of another delusional set of Christianity.
Good day.

kingxsamz:


So in conclusion infanticide is okay only in some cases? Please I want you to answer because the point here is about the specific detail of murdering children and babies. And we both know that those babies did nothing wrong but exist.
So do you agree that it's right to kill children and babies as long as the parents of those children hurt you? Don't dodge. Answer the question.

Also, given that you said for every action there's a reaction, would it be okay if the Christian god specifically commanded men to rape women and children for the crimes committed by their husbands and fathers?

I won't bother responding to the other ones because I want us to focus on this one.

Don't give unnecessary sermons, just answer the question directly. Thank you.

All is fair in war...
Their parents killed other people's infants as well UNPROVOKED. That's war and it's collateral damage. That's their karma fulfilling itself.
Let's even assume only the adults were killed, doesn't that still spell a slow but sure death for the infants?
The actions of the parents always affect the children just like your parent's actions and inactions are affecting you today. The parents killed someone's children, someone killed their own children. Case closed.

Definition of infanticide: infanticide, the killing of the newborn. It has often been interpreted as a primitive method of birth control and a means of ridding a group of its weak and deformed children; but most societies actively desire children and put them to death (or allow them to die) only under exceptional circumstances.

This definition includes abortion and medically induced abortion as infanticide which come to think of, you and a girlfriend must have committed abortion sometime ago. Abortint you ?

That's not even in the context of what we're discussing here otherwise even our good doctors
performing medically induced miscarriages for whatever reason are guilty as well.

The murder of children meant is like children sacrifice, unprovoked murder of human life. Make no mistake, as nice as I am, if my life is attacked or that of my children, I will defend myself and them to the extent of murder if possible and no law can blame me for that. Afterall even christian soldiers will make heaven if they are good christians after all the killings they carried out. However, if my life is not threatened, there's no offence or anger that will make me take a life, not even an angel from heaven.

If you were a soldier, you'll kill anything in your way as well. There's no country that has never committed "infanticide" during war up till today.

Secondly, God never commanded or permitted rape. Prove me wrong.

jasminer:

Afterall even christian soldiers will make heaven if they are good christians after all the killings they carried out.

I just want to focus on this. Even David, the apple of God's eyes killed people. But outside of battle David was a good man who sought God's heart, which is the main thing.

Edit: Even David's killings weren't without consequences. David wanted to build the temple but God did not allow him to because he had killed.

kingxsamz:

There's no discussion to be held. You avoided what I said only to tell me you're part of another delusional set of Christianity.
Good day.

You haven't even say anything meaningful, just some worthless assumptions of how people cohabited before the invention of religion. You were never there to know whether a supreme being created the first man and gave them religion or not.

You claimed that religion and God was invented later on by humans.
Bring your prove na.

And who invented humans?

Namdio:


I just want to focus on this. Even David, the apple of God's eyes killed people. But outside of battle David was a good man who sought God's heart, which is the main thing.

Edit: Even David's killings weren't without consequences. David wanted to build the temple but God did not allow him to because he had killed.

Correct... You can't say because murder is a sin, people shouldn't defend themselves or strike back when attacked.
Because America or the UK are christian countries, U can't shoot one missile and they forgive and forget

jasminer:


All is fair in war...
Their parents killed other people's infants as well UNPROVOKED. That's war and it's collateral damage. That's their karma fulfilling itself.
Let's even assume only the adults were killed, doesn't that still spell a slow but sure death for the infants?
The actions of the parents always affect the children just like your parent's actions and inactions are affecting you today. The parents killed someone's children, someone killed their own children. Case closed.

Definition of infanticide: infanticide, the killing of the newborn. It has often been interpreted as a primitive method of birth control and a means of ridding a group of its weak and deformed children; but most societies actively desire children and put them to death (or allow them to die) only under exceptional circumstances.

This definition includes abortion and medically induced abortion as infanticide which come to think of, you and a girlfriend must have committed abortion sometime ago. Abortint you ?

That's not even in the context of what we're discussing here otherwise even our good doctors
performing medically induced miscarriages for whatever reason are guilty as well.

The murder of children meant is like children sacrifice, unprovoked murder of human life. Make no mistake, as nice as I am, if my life is attacked or that of my children, I will defend myself and them to the extent of murder if possible and no law can blame me for that. Afterall even christian soldiers will make heaven if they are good christians after all the killings they carried out. However, if my life is not threatened, there's no offence or anger that will make me take a life, not even an angel from heaven.

If you were a soldier, you'll kill anything in your way as well. There's no country that has never committed "infanticide" during war up till today.

Secondly, God never commanded or permitted rape. Prove me wrong.

You keep dodging my question and repeating the same thing.
I'll type it out here again for you to answer.
Answer the two questions I asked and forget about the lengthy sermons. Answer my questions.

Do you agree that it's right to kill children and babies as long as the parents of those children hurt you? Don't dodge. Answer the question.

Also, given that you said for every action there's a reaction, would it be okay if the Christian god specifically commanded men to rape women and children for the crimes committed by their husbands and fathers?

Your answer should go like this: "I agree it's right because...", "It wouldn't be okay because...".
If you're having comprehension issues, read it ten times and you'll definitely understand. You're not a kid.

And we both know why you don't want to answer because you'll have to shoot yourself in the foot.

And here below is what infanticide means.
Maybe you've forgotten that certain words have different meanings and different contexts they can be used in.
Answer my question directly or chicken out with another sermon.

cornelboy:

Are you blind. I said the Christian God is the creator.

Is your father blind?

cornelboy:

You haven't even say anything meaningful, just some worthless assumptions of how people cohabited before the invention of religion. You were never there to know whether a supreme being created the first man and gave them religion or not.

You claimed that religion and God was invented later on by humans.
Bring your prove na.

And who invented humans?

These are childish questions. I'm sorry I can't entertain them.

kingxsamz:


You keep dodging my question and repeating the same thing.
I'll type it out here again for you to answer.
Answer the two questions I asked and forget about the lengthy sermons. Answer my questions.

Do you agree that it's right to kill children and babies as long as the parents of those children hurt you? Don't dodge. Answer the question.

Also, given that you said for every action there's a reaction, would it be okay if the Christian god specifically commanded men to rape women and children for the crimes committed by their husbands and fathers?

Your answer should go like this: "I agree it's right because...", "It wouldn't be okay because...".
If you're having comprehension issues, read it ten times and you'll definitely understand. You're not a kid.

And we both know why you don't want to answer because you'll have to shoot yourself in the foot.

And here below is what infanticide means.
Maybe you've forgotten that certain words have different meanings and different contexts they can be used in.
Answer my question directly or chicken out with another sermon.

Lol, Yes or no can't answer your question if that's what you're waiting for because that would be generalization and one size can't fit all. I myself will kill a child if I feel my life is threatened and my actions can be or condemned or justified depending on the scenario.

Unprovoked, it's wrong to kill any human regardless of their age.

In war, whoever needs to die for the safety of your country and people should be killed without thinking twice even if it's a day old child.

God never asked anyone to rape any woman, the punishment for rape is death. If you have no proof of otherwise, don't repeat this question again because this is the second time I'm answering it.

kingxsamz:

These are childish questions. I'm sorry I can't entertain them.

Lol

omonnakoda:
Is your father blind?

Oh sorry not many people are reasonable here.

cornelboy:

Oh sorry not many people are reasonable here.

Just you