jasminer:


Lol, Yes or no can't answer your question if that's what you're waiting for because that would be generalization and one size can't fit all. I myself will kill a child if I feel my life is threatened and my actions can be or condemned or justified depending on the scenario.

Unprovoked, it's wrong to kill any human regardless of their age.

In war, whoever needs to die for the safety of your country and people should be killed without thinking twice even if it's a day old child.

God never asked anyone to rape any woman, the punishment for rape is death. If you have no proof of otherwise, don't repeat this question again because this is the second time I'm answering it.

Omo see the thinking of a Christian who’s suppose to be compassionate like Christ.
You said even if it’s a day old baby. Religion aside you’re just a terrible person for that thinking

jasminer:


Lol, Yes or no can't answer your question if that's what you're waiting for because that would be generalization and one size can't fit all. I myself will kill a child if I feel my life is threatened and my actions can be or condemned or justified depending on the scenario.

Unprovoked, it's wrong to kill any human regardless of their age.

In war, whoever needs to die for the safety of your country and people should be killed without thinking twice even if it's a day old child.

God never asked anyone to rape any woman, the punishment for rape is death. If you have no proof of otherwise, don't repeat this question again because this is the second time I'm answering it.

Nope you have to answer my questions unless you want to lie that infants who aren't even self aware yet pose a threat to men who are armed to the teeth. And take note of the context of the question being asked.
So I'll repeat it for you again because you failed woefully at your response.

Do you agree that it's right to kill children and babies as long as the parents of those children hurt you? Don't dodge. Answer the question.

This second question clearly asks you if it would be okay. It didn't ask whether the Christian god ordered it or not. Try again. Comprehend and answer.
Also, given that you said for every action there's a reaction, would it be okay if the Christian god specifically commanded men to rape women and children for the crimes committed by their husbands and fathers?

Let me know your answer.
If this was an exam you'd have failed badly.
Anyhow wey you dodge am, it'll always stare at you in the face. Discard the sermons and answer correctly.

suicidesheep:


Omo see the thinking of a Christian who’s suppose to be compassionate like Christ.
You said even if it’s a day old baby. Religion aside you’re just a terrible person for that thinking

She was trying to avoid it at first. But she is slowly coming to that conclusion.
She will tell me how an infant who cant crawl poses threat to her life that she has to kill it.

jasminer:

In war, whoever needs to die for the safety of your country and people should be killed without thinking twice even if it's a day old child.

Wonderful.
So can Buhari wipe out all the children and babies in the east if some men from Igbo land are causing havoc?
This is getting interesting.

kingxsamz:


She was trying to avoid it at first. But she is slowly coming to that conclusion.
She will tell me how an infant who cant crawl poses threat to her life that she has to kill it.

I say the thinking of some theist, will make you fear the human race. This one will think she’s different from those Muslim that are extremist

suicidesheep:


I say the thinking of some theist, will make you fear the human race. This one will think she’s different from those Muslim that are extremist

They always think they're morally upright until you put their beliefs to test.

suicidesheep:


Omo see the thinking of a Christian who’s suppose to be compassionate like Christ.
You said even if it’s a day old baby. Religion aside you’re just a terrible person for that thinking

Stop being a hypocrite. If I'm a terrible person for saying that in war anyone who needs to die should die, then we are all hypocrites.

So no children have died in the war against Boko Haram?
America hasn't killed any children in the war against terrorism?
Russia hasn't killed any children in the war against Ukraine?
Ukraine's missiles haven't killed children?
The pharmacies that make abortion pills nkor?

What difference does it make? One person entered Boko Haram camp and killed everyone there.
Another entered Boko Haram and killed all adults, left all the infants alive and healthy in sambisa forest and drove away

I forgot your atheist China which is the worst in committing war crimes.

If Nigeria hasn't been killing "innocent people" will there be a country called Nigeria?

kingxsamz:

Wonderful.
So can Buhari wipe out all the children and babies in the east if some men from Igbo land are causing havoc?
This is getting interesting.

It's about to get more interesting

Since you believe every question has a yes or no answer.

Answer this question yourself:

You're the military chief of a country has been constantly attacked brutally by terrorists camping in a certain location. The terrorists kill anything alive that they see.

These terrorists formed the entire country. When it's time to attack, all the males old enough to fire a weapon come out for the attack. The women fetch water for them, cook etc if possible.

Will you strike back at the enemy if there's no way to avoid infant casualties?

If yes, why?
If no, why?

Note: Every man in that small country is part of the army and every man's wife is an assistant to the army especially during war.

kingxsamz:


Nope you have to answer my questions unless you want to lie that infants who aren't even self aware yet pose a threat to men who are armed to the teeth. And take note of the context of the question being asked.
So I'll repeat it for you again because you failed woefully at your response.

Do you agree that it's right to kill children and babies as long as the parents of those children hurt you? Don't dodge. Answer the question.

This second question clearly asks you if it would be okay. It didn't ask whether the Christian god ordered it or not. Try again. Comprehend and answer.
Also, given that you said for every action there's a reaction, would it be okay if the Christian god specifically commanded men to rape women and children for the crimes committed by their husbands and fathers?

Let me know your answer.
If this was an exam you'd have failed badly.
Anyhow wey you dodge am, it'll always stare at you in the face. Discard the sermons and answer correctly.

I asked you a question, please respond with a yes or no and give your reason.

If you don't answer yes or no...
You're the biggest hypocrite alive

jasminer:


It's about to get more interesting

Since you believe every question has a yes or no answer.

Answer this question yourself:

You're the military chief of a country which was attacked brutally by terrorists camping in a certain location.

Will you strike back at the enemy if there's no way to avoid infant casualties?

If yes, why?
If no, why?

Remember, you're the religious one here and there are laid down rules for you to follow and maintain. After all, atheists are evil people and they don't ever do good. (according to your Bible). so don't expect much from me. I might support the killing of children, I might not. Doesn't matter.
You're the one with moral standards.

So now answer my question.
And don't forget the two other questions I asked. Like I said, it's getting interesting.
Answer.

kingxsamz:


Remember, you're the religious one here and there are laid down rules for you to follow and maintain. After all, atheists are evil people and they don't ever do good. (according to your Bible). so don't expect much from me. I might support the killing of children, I might not. Doesn't matter.
You're the one with moral standards.

So now answer my question.
And don't forget the two other questions I asked. Like I said, it's getting interesting.
Answer.

Lmfao
For you to call me evil and a hypocrite, you must have an idea of what a good person will do in that scenario.

So you must answer my question with a yes or a no just like you insisted even after I explained to you that each scenario is different.

jasminer:


Stop being a hypocrite. If I'm a terrible person for saying that in war anyone who needs to die should die, then we are all hypocrites.

So no children have died in the war against Boko Haram?
America hasn't killed any children in the war against terrorism?
Russia hasn't killed any children in the war against Ukraine?
Ukraine's missiles haven't killed children?
The pharmacies that make abortion pills nkor?

What difference does it make? One person entered Boko Haram camp and killed everyone there.
Another entered Boko Haram and killed all adults, left all the infants alive and healthy in sambisa forest and drove away

I forgot your atheist China which is the worst in committing war crimes.

If Nigeria hasn't been killing "innocent people" will there be a country called Nigeria?

The fact that you’re still defending yourself is funny. Your so called perfect God ordered killing of children and you’re here saying because it’s war anyone can die. I won’t even argue with you in that anymore.

Which war crime has china committed, like china has ever gone to war recently. I bet you don’t even know what a war crime is. Go back to school little boy

suicidesheep:


I say the thinking of some theist, will make you fear the human race. This one will think she’s different from those Muslim that are extremist

Answer this question with a yes or no otherwise you're worse than the extremists and fanatics yourself

You're the military chief of a country has been constantly attacked brutally by terrorists camping in a certain location. The terrorists kill anything alive that they see.

These terrorists formed the entire country. When it's time to attack, all the males old enough to fire a weapon come out for the attack. The women fetch water for them, cook etc if possible.

Will you strike back at the enemy if there's no way to avoid infant casualties?

If yes, why?
If no, why?

Note: Every man in that small country is part of the army and every man's wife is an assistant to the army especially during war.

Please teach us what a good person should do in this case, I "trust" your good judgement

jasminer:


I asked you a question, please respond with a yes or no and give your reason.

If you don't answer yes or no...
You're the biggest hypocrite alive

Is that how it works? You're asked a question but because you're too scared of contradicting yourself, you want to turn it on me by asking another question instead of just facing it head on. if you're so confident in your religious beliefs and rules, it shouldn't be too hard to answer.
I already told you that I could even support the killing of babies for no reason. It still wouldn't matter because I uphold no religious rules.
Your morals which you claim to be the standard is being put to test.
So answer these questions.

Do you agree that it's right to kill children and babies as long as the parents of those children hurt you? Don't dodge. Answer the question.

Also, given that you said for every action there's a reaction, would it be okay if the Christian god specifically commanded men to rape women and children for the crimes committed by their husbands and fathers?
No matter the deflection, it'll be here waiting for you.

jasminer:


It's about to get more interesting

Since you believe every question has a yes or no answer.

Answer this question yourself:

You're the military chief of a country has been constantly attacked brutally by terrorists camping in a certain location. The terrorists kill anything alive that they see.

These terrorists formed the entire country. When it's time to attack, all the males old enough to fire a weapon come out for the attack. The women fetch water for them, cook etc if possible.

Will you strike back at the enemy if there's no way to avoid infant casualties?

If yes, why?
If no, why?

Note: Every man in that small country is part of the army and every man's wife is an assistant to the army especially during war.

See what you’re doing, do you want to compare war of before and now, then men fought with s swords and before you could get to the infants, you must have wipes out the army. So nothing like war casualties.

The Israelites deliberately killed women and children after killing the men in battle.

Chai, see how dumb and inhumane religion has made you

suicidesheep:


The fact that you’re still defending yourself is funny. Your so called perfect God ordered killing of children and you’re here saying because it’s war anyone can die. I won’t even argue with you in that anymore.

Which war crime has china committed, like china has ever gone to war recently. I bet you don’t even know what a war crime is. Go back to school little boy

Really? Should I list war crimes china committed? Google is your friend. Answer my questions first

jasminer:


Lmfao
For you to call me evil and a hypocrite, you must have an idea of what a good person will do in that scenario.

So you must answer my question with a yes or a no just like you insisted even after I explained to you that each scenario is different.

I never called you evil or a hypocrite, or have I?
Or you're just making up stuff to have some sort of defense?
I can feel the fear behind those words and emojis. Scared of busting your bubbles?
Answer my question.

jasminer:


Really? Should I list war crimes china committed? Google is your friend. Answer my questions first

Ok start listing

suicidesheep:


See what you’re doing, do you want to compare war of before and now, then men fought with s swords and before you could get to the infants, you must have wipes out the army. So nothing like war casualties.

The Israelites deliberately killed women and children after killing the men in battle.

Chai, see how dumb and inhumane religion has made you

I love the highlighted part, we're getting somewhere

You didn't have to wipe out entire armies to get to the families. Forget about what you watch in game of thrones. Battles are rarely fought in open vast fields hours away from the safety of home..

Battles are fought in the streets, homes, farms of the opponent. It was usually attack or defense. If you're attacking, it'll start in your opponent's house and if you lose, they'll chase you till they kill you and proceed to your home to play with your kids .

Please answer my question let me learn from your wisdom

suicidesheep:


Ok start listing

See attached.
Emphasis on forced disappearances.

kingxsamz:


I never called you evil or a hypocrite, or have I?
Or you're just making up stuff to have some sort of defense?
I can feel the fear behind those words and emojis. Scared of busting your bubbles?
Answer my question.

You've been insinuating I'm not being sincere na

I've been answering your questions for the past two days. I asked one question and you can't answer?

jasminer:


Really? Should I list war crimes china committed? Google is your friend. Answer my questions first

Keep up the good fight, you have done what I cannot do, Kudos!!

When faced with the same logic they cannot answer.

kingxsamz:



Is that how it works? You're asked a question but because you're too scared of contradicting yourself, you want to turn it on me by asking another question instead of just facing it head on. if you're so confident in your religious beliefs and rules, it shouldn't be too hard to answer.
I already told you that I could even support the killing of babies for no reason. It still wouldn't matter because I uphold no religious rules.
Your morals which you claim to be the standard is being put to test.
So answer these questions.

Do you agree that it's right to kill children and babies as long as the parents of those children hurt you? Don't dodge. Answer the question.

Also, given that you said for every action there's a reaction, would it be okay if the Christian god specifically commanded men to rape women and children for the crimes committed by their husbands and fathers?
No matter the deflection, it'll be here waiting for you.

Reverse psychology won't work on me, neither will gaslighting. You should have noticed that by now

I answered one question three times and you still weren't satisfied. So I want to learn from your wisdom. What good People should do in such a scenario.

Namdio:


Keep up the good fight, you have done what I cannot do, Kudos!!

When faced with the same logic they cannot answer.

Lol, they fell into my trap and they didn't see it coming.
I'm very eager to learn from their response. We learn everyday

jasminer:


You've been insinuating I'm not being sincere na

I've been answering your questions for the past two days. I asked one question and you can't answer?

How did you not being sincere translate to me calling you evil?
You have been deflecting, avoiding the questions I asked and that's what I've been hinting on.
And are you blind? I already told you that I could support such actions and it doesn't matter because I'm not the one upholding religious laws.

Answer my question if you ain't chicken.

jasminer:


Reverse psychology won't work on me, neither will gaslighting. You should have noticed that by now

I answered one question three times and you still weren't satisfied. So I want to learn from your wisdom. What good People should do in such a scenario.

The questions asked was this.

Do you agree that it's right to kill children and babies as long as the parents of those children hurt you? Don't dodge. Answer the question.

Also, given that you said for every action there's a reaction, would it be okay if the Christian god specifically commanded men to rape women and children for the crimes committed by their husbands and fathers?

Your answer should go like this: I agree, I don't agree. Which you have failed in doing.
So madam, you haven't said anything yet apart from beating around the bush.

Namdio:


Keep up the good fight, you have done what I cannot do, Kudos!!

When faced with the same logic they cannot answer.

The other dude doesn't seem to be able to defend his points.
His argument about war crimes or whatever has nothing to do with what she and I are discussing. Good fight ko.

jasminer:


Lol, they fell into my trap and they didn't see it coming.
I'm very eager to learn from their response. We learn everyday

No one fell into anything abeg. The other dude just can't give you responses that'll make you deflect and confused.

kingxsamz:


How did you not being sincere translate to me calling you evil?
You have been deflecting, avoiding the questions I asked and that's what I've been hinting on.
And are you blind? I already told you that I could support such actions and it doesn't matter because I'm not the one upholding religious laws.

Answer my question if you ain't chicken.

Answer my first question since this discussion began please

kingxsamz:


No one fell into anything abeg. The other dude just can't give you responses that'll make you deflect and confused.

So why are you dancing up and down instead of showing me how it's done by answering my question with superior logic

kingxsamz:


The questions asked was this.

Do you agree that it's right to kill children and babies as long as the parents of those children hurt you? Don't dodge. Answer the question.

Also, given that you said for every action there's a reaction, would it be okay if the Christian god specifically commanded men to rape women and children for the crimes committed by their husbands and fathers?

Your answer should go like this: I agree, I don't agree. Which you have failed in doing.
So madam, you haven't said anything yet apart from beating around the bush.

Since you said my answers are wrong, please sir, teach me how to answer by answering my question

jasminer:


Answer my first question since this discussion began please

I promise, if you answer both of my questions directly, I'll answer yours sincerely.
I'm an athiest and you are religious. You uphold religious rules. If I kill an innocent person does that mean that it's justified for you to kill an innocent person too?
Don't you get it?