jasminer:


You'll take care of all the children displaced during the war?

As opposed to what? Killing them?

kingxsamz:


So, in conclusion.
Killing children is right if necessary.
Meaning you can kill your own children,your sibling's kids and anyone's child "if necessary".
So don't complain if someone does the same to your children if they thought it was necessary.

Anybody who thinks it's necessary to kill my children will attempt to kill them. It's up to me to defend me and my children by killing whoever threatens me or their lives as well.
It's also up to me to not go about killing people unprovoked.
It's also up to me to ensure my children don't go and live with terrorists in a terrorist base otherwise everyone will blame me if anything happens to my children.

kingxsamz:


As opposed to what? Killing them?

Yes

DropsMic:
I usually don’t tell them I don’t believe in their God until after I’ve had coitus with them. After that, i take my time to unpeel my layers whilst making them see reasons why they should embrace humanity and discard the facade that is religion. Works all the time. My current girl although she still prays, she no dey go church again

Hmm I’m jealous do you have a big dick? This one that she didn’t leave you when she found out it must be the only reason

DropsMic:
I usually don’t tell them I don’t believe in their God until after I’ve had coitus with them. After that, i take my time to unpeel my layers whilst making them see reasons why they should embrace humanity and discard the facade that is religion. Works all the time. My current girl although she still prays, she no dey go church again

Hmm I’m jealous do you have a big dick? This one that she didn’t leave you when she found out,it must be the only reason

jasminer:


Anybody who thinks it's necessary to kill my children will attempt to kill them. It's up to me to defend me and my children by killing whoever threatens me or their lives as well.
It's also up to me to not go about killing people unprovoked.
It's also up to me to ensure my children don't go and live with terrorists in a terrorist base otherwise everyone will blame me if anything happens to my children.

It's up to anyone to kill your children too. No be only you sabi kill madam. Just don't complain if it happens. And don't complain when you hear of children being killed in the news because it was probably "necessary".
So when next you hear a child was killed, don't condemn, ask questions first like, "what did the child do?" before deciding whether to blame the child or the killer.

jasminer:


Yes

So if you can't help children, you kill them?

jasminer:


But he was still able to repent despite the hardening didn't he?

Yes. He hardened his heart whenever Moses came around to ask him to free his people and when Pharoah says no, another plague.
So it's like an "on/off" situation.

With all that happened to Job, would you have blamed him if he did something rash? But he decided not to despite the repeated plagues hitting him

Did something rash like what?

kingxsamz:


It's up to anyone to kill your children too. No be only you sabi kill madam. Just don't complain if it happens. And don't complain when you hear of children being killed in the news because it was probably "necessary".
So when next you hear a child was killed, don't condemn, ask questions first like, "what did the child do?" before deciding whether to blame the child or the killer.

Lol, but hope I am permitted to complain if adults are killed

kingxsamz:


So if you can't help children, you kill them?

If they're a threat to my safety and it's in my jurisdiction to eliminate threats, I will.
If it's possible to rehabilitate all of them totally, they are no longer a threat to me so why should I kill them?.

kingxsamz:

Yes. He hardened his heart whenever Moses came around to ask him to free his people and when Pharoah says no, another plague.
So it's like an "on/off" situation.
Did something rash like what?

Pharaoh could still have had no despite the thousand reasons in his head

Job could have done something rash like cursed God, blasphemed etc for his ill fortune or even committed suicide but he didn't do any of that.

jasminer:


Lol, but hope I am permitted to complain if adults are killed

If you have no issue with kids being killed, how much more an adult? It's up to you.

jasminer:


If they're a threat to my safety and it's in my jurisdiction to eliminate threats, I will.
If it's possible to rehabilitate all of them totally, they are no longer a threat to me so why should I kill them?.

How is a five months baby a threat to your safety?

jasminer:


Pharaoh could still have had no despite the thousand reasons in his head

The point here is that his heart was hardened after he asked for a forgiveness. That's the only thing that matters. There's nothing for you to twist here.

Job could have done something rash like cursed God, blasphemed etc for his ill fortune or even committed suicide but he didn't do any of that.

So if you sent cultists, thugs and kidnappers to torture your children just to win a bet, you will be more bothered about the fact that they cursed you out of pain rather than your irrational action to let these people torture your children?

kingxsamz:


If you have no issue with kids being killed, how much more an adult? It's up to you.

When last did you complain about a human being that was killed?

I passed about 3 on my way to an occasion, a child might be among them. Your complaining services might be needed

kingxsamz:


How is a five months baby a threat to your safety?

Back to this question again?
Be like say argument don finish

kingxsamz:

The point here is that his heart was hardened after he asked for a forgiveness. That's the only thing that matters. There's nothing for you to twist here.


So if you sent cultists, thugs and kidnappers to torture your children just to win a bet, you will be more bothered about the fact that they cursed you out of pain rather than your irrational action to let these people torture your children?

Hardened or softened, he could have let the Israelites go. The lesson of the the last plague should have taught him a lesson.

If I sent cultists to torture my children, it shows how much trust I have in them in that capacity and if the bet is about how they'll react to me, then I should be bothered about their reaction. And they should be proud to know we won the bet and I'll be prouder .

It's just like a woman who permitted her friend to attempt to seduce her husband to win a bet or a man permitting his friend to woo his woman just to prove a point about their partner's faithfulness, they will be bothered about their spouse's reaction to the wooing or seduction.

Meanwhile It's very very funny that you're using emotional reasoning to try to win an argument while I'm using logic

jasminer:


When last did you complain about a human being that was killed?

I passed about 3 on my way to an occasion, a child might be among them. Your complaining services might be needed

Obviously you have nothing to say anymore.
When your kids and the kids of those you know, or the kids from your tribe or kids in your country are killed. Don't complain or condemn. It was probably necessary.

jasminer:


Back to this question again?
Be like say argument don finish

Yes obviously because you keep dancing around. Shouldn't be too hard to answer.

jasminer:


Hardened or softened, he could have let the Israelites go. The lesson of the the last plague should have taught him a lesson.

If I sent cultists to torture my children, it shows how much trust I have in them in that capacity and if the bet is about how they'll react to me, then I should be bothered about their reaction. And they should be proud to know we won the bet and I'll be prouder .

It's just like a woman who permitted her friend to attempt to seduce her husband to win a bet or a man permitting his friend to woo his woman just to prove a point about their partner's faithfulness, they will be bothered about their spouse's reaction to the wooing or seduction.

Meanwhile It's very very funny that you're using emotional reasoning to try to win an argument while I'm using logic

Mother of the year.
A mother who seems to have no issue with sending cultists and murderers to torture her children just to prove a point.
I'm using emotions because that's what your religion relies on. Is there any where in Christianity where it's allowed for one to send murderers to torture kids?
You abandoned the tenets of your religion to defend irrational acts. Makes me wonder, are you really a Christian?
You have defended the indefensible just to have a stance in the argument. Is that what Jesus would do? Sending murderers to torture kids?
This one have forgotten that she's supposed to be empathetic. That action alone of sending murderers to torture children is a sin, but you have no problem with it because you want to be right.
Hell is definitely sure for you.

jasminer:

And that's what happens when you try to use logic to defend religious beliefs.
You've strayed further away from righteousness, now you're defending torturing kids. What next will you defend? Rape?

kingxsamz:


Obviously you have nothing to say anymore.
When your kids and the kids of those you know, or the kids from your tribe or kids in your country are killed. Don't complain or condemn. It was probably necessary.

When last did you complain over the death of anyone not related to you ?

kingxsamz:


Yes obviously because you keep dancing around. Shouldn't be too hard to answer.

What about my only question which you refused to answer?

I don't understand how you expect me to give you the answer you want to hear when that's not my opinion.
So because you blame christians and their God for certain things, I have to make ridiculous statements so that you can screenshot and frame it and place it at the altar in your atheist church and dance round about it half naked...

Anything other than that, you keep repeating questions while never answering a single question yourself.
I mean...

kingxsamz:


Mother of the year.
A mother who seems to have no issue with sending cultists and murderers to torture her children just to prove a point.
I'm using emotions because that's what your religion relies on. Is there any where in Christianity where it's allowed for one to send murderers to torture kids?
You abandoned the tenets of your religion to defend irrational acts. Makes me wonder, are you really a Christian?
You have defended the indefensible just to have a stance in the argument. Is that what Jesus would do? Sending murderers to torture kids?
This one have forgotten that she's supposed to be empathetic. That action alone of sending murderers to torture children is a sin, but you have no problem with it because you want to be right.
Hell is definitely sure for you.

Lol...You're smart but I'm smarter. I saw your trap, twerked all over it and hopped over it with one toe

You paint scenarios, I answer then automatically, because I answered, that's what my religion teaches... Very sly of you.

It's amazing how non Christians speak NONSENSE about Christianity with so much audacity and authority because they have read psalm 23 and the book of Genesis.

I am the Christian, so what I tell you about Christianity is the fact. All this nonsense impositions and insults won't make any point. If you watch, I've never insulted you since we began this discussion but you have been insulting me and even my God directly and indirectly which is a big disrespect to me.

I overlooked it because of people who genuinely need answers to questions about Christianity.

I asked you one question but you never answered. Even if you answered, your answer will be the same as mine. You'll act the same way the Christians act in the same situation, you know this, anyone reading this knows this... What's the whole hypocrisy about?

kingxsamz:

And that's what happens when you try to use logic to defend religious beliefs.
You've strayed further away from righteousness, now you're defending torturing kids. What next will you defend? Rape?

My fellow hypocrite, I condem killing anyone unprovoked, I defend killing anyone who tries to kill you as a person even if it's a child (self defense), I also defend killing anyone who not only tries to kill you, but anyone who poses a threat to you as a military personnel especially in war.
In the same vein, you defended killing children as well in certain scenarios.

What next will we defend my fellow hypocrite

kingxsamz:

And that's what happens when you try to use logic to defend religious beliefs.
You've strayed further away from righteousness, now you're defending torturing kids. What next will you defend? Rape?

I know you've run out of ideas to argue about So let me give you some

Do you know that as a Christian, I believe that God can take anyone's life at anytime he chooses without giving anyone any explanation because all living things and non living things belong to Him.

I mean, the most innocent children, and the most Holy prophets. He can decide for any reason best known to Him and nobody can question Him because He owns all.

Oya... Food don land

kingxsamz:

And that's what happens when you try to use logic to defend religious beliefs.
You've strayed further away from righteousness, now you're defending torturing kids. What next will you defend? Rape?

Let me also give you another shocking side of Christianity...

There was a king called Manasseh who killed people, sacrificed children, killed prophets etc and just before he died, he repented and sought for forgiveness and he was forgiven.

After all the killings, God forgave him just like that. What can you say about this

kingxsamz:

And that's what happens when you try to use logic to defend religious beliefs.
You've strayed further away from righteousness, now you're defending torturing kids. What next will you defend? Rape?

Let me nau drop the Hiroshima bomb because I want this thread to reach 100 pages

Do you know that Jesus himself in Matthew 24 vs 3-31 that in the end time just before rapture, there will be floods, famines, wars and rumours of wars and all these are just the beginning of sorrows

kingxsamz:

And that's what happens when you try to use logic to defend religious beliefs.
You've strayed further away from righteousness, now you're defending torturing kids. What next will you defend? Rape?

Let me nau drop the Hiroshima bomb because I want this thread to reach 100 pages

Do you know that Jesus himself in Matthew 24 vs 3-31 that in the end time just before rapture, there will be floods, famines, wars and rumours of wars and all these are just the beginning of sorrows

Why will He say that? Hmmmmmm

jasminer:


Let me nau drop the Hiroshima bomb because I want this thread to reach 100 pages

Do you know that Jesus himself in Matthew 24 vs 3-31 that in the end time just before rapture, there will be floods, famines, wars and rumours of wars and all these are just the beginning of sorrows

But has there ever been a time in human history when we don’t have floods, famines, wars or rumors of wars?

jasminer:


Yes they are wrong.

Buy you however haven't told me why beastiality is wrong since we're all animals according to atheists.

I'm sorry jasminer, but you've been thoroughly misled by theist propaganda. Atheism has no relationship with biology. The single unifying idea among atheists is that there exists no evidence for the existence of God or gods. What you have done is commit the Fallacy of Composition by assuming that ALL atheists believe that humans are animals because a select few probably do. Lack of belief in God has no connection to taxonomy, so your question is misguided at best.

That being said, I'll still bite. Note that I'm speaking for myself here and not kingxsamz. To give you some context, I believe morality is an individualistic concept and so I don't think bestiality is objectively immoral -- in fact I couldn't care less if you decided to walk out right now and hump your neighbor's goat. Ultimately it comes down to how you perceive it subjectively. I personally feel it's disgusting and bizarre, and could lead to people acquiring awful diseases. The only argument I could make asserting the immorality of bestiality is that animals possibly lack the ability to give consent, so sex with animals can be considered non-consensual, which is the very definition of rape. And we all know rape is wrong because it is an infringement and/or violation on others' free will and right to make their own informed decisions.

kingxsamz:

Now please answer me, quickly.
Is genocide, infanticide, incest, slavery and rape wrong?
I need direct answers. Thank you.

jasminer:
Yes they are wrong.

It's curious that you affirm that genocide, infanticide and slavery are wrong given that the Bible seems to support these acts. Could this be an implicit condemnation of morality in the Bible?