Maynman:
Wakanda 5:5— as bitter as bitter leaf, your life will be much more bitter, you’ll have no reason to LAUGH, your live will be full of sorrow and agony.
Damaged worthless slave, your Murderer creator and his imbecil.e holy spirit are useless and can’t lift my di.ck.
Offspring of a murderer and a smelling momma
Legbegbe 6:66—It shall not be well with yahweh worshippers, including their deranged son of man and ESPECIALLY their imbecil.e HOLY SPIRIT, nothing good shall come their way.
Holyspirit smelly Ass 1:12: for there are many Murderers and Rapist. Their father and his imbecil.e HOLY SPIRT are empty barrels and nonentities and all together they are deranged homophiles.

johnw47:



Ecclesiastes 7:6
For as the crackling of thorns under a pot, so is the laughter of the fool



sewer mouth maynmaam

nothing in your head but repeated confusion and lies and blasphemy etc.etc.
poor dum lost soul

1Co 14:33  For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints

Joh 8:44 You are of your father the devil, and you want to do the desires of your father. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth because there is no truth in him. Whenever he speaks a lie, that is his natural way of speaking, for he is a liar and the father of lies.

Mar_3:29  but whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit never has forgiveness, but is guilty of an eternal sin

rev 20:15 And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire

Maynman:
Wakanda 5:5— as bitter as bitter leaf, your life will be much more bitter, you’ll have no reason to LAUGH, your live will be full of sorrow and agony.
Worthless slave, son of a smelling momma smelling like public toilet.
A slave is worth nothing except to base his miserable life on random books with UNKNOWN AUTHORS. Dejected unfortunate animal. You are doomed forever.
Holyspirit smelly Ass 1:12: for there are many Murderers and Rapist. Their father and his imbecil.e HOLY SPIRTare empty barrels and nonentities and all together they are deranged homophiles.
Legbegbe 4:19–20– Your father is satan, a Rapist and a Murderer, he’s long dead and useless and only found in jewish Fictions.
Your father, satan is a Liar and a MURDERER, The only thing worse than a liar is a liar that's also a hypocrite and it’s lies that KILLED him and soon his brainwashed followers and they shall be condemned in nereka which is the legbegbe DEATH!
Legbegbe 6:66—It shall not be well with yahweh worshippers, including their deranged son of man and ESPECIALLY their imbecil.e HOLY SPIRIT, nothing good shall come their way.

johnw47:


poor tormented, hateful, angry, and evil lost blasphemer:

Mar_3:29  but whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit never has forgiveness, but is guilty of an eternal sin

rev 20:15 And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire

Maynman:
Wakanda 5:5— as bitter as bitter leaf, your life will be much more bitter, you’ll have no reason to LAUGH, your live will be full of sorrow and agony.



A slave is worth nothing except to base his miserable life on random books with UNKNOWN AUTHORS. Dejected unfortunate animal. You are doomed forever.


Holyspirit smelly Ass 1:12: for there are many Murderers and Rapist. Their father and his imbecil.e HOLY SPIRTare empty barrels and nonentities and all together they are deranged homophiles.

johnw47:


you need to have the last word even though you are always wrong,
go on, you can have the last word oh tiny brain

TenQ:


By the way:
1. Is the Torah just one BOOK or a compilation of Books?
2. What does the word Injeel mean? Is it a book or a compilation of books?
Please cite references

TenQ:

Is the book of John part of the books of the Christians?

The Question is
1. What name does the Qur'an give to the books of Moses? Is it a single book? NO!
It is a Library of FIVE books.
2. What name does the Qur'an give to the books of the Christians? Injeel! But the Injeel is ALL the books of the Christians!

LegalWolf:
Hey TenQ,

Ran through a couple of Arabic Dictionaries here:

https://www.lexilogos.com/english/arabic_dictionary.htm#;

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english-arabic/bible?q=Bible (surprisingly, I think I saw a dictionary source where injil was translated as one of the four canon books of the NT. Not too sure on this.)

if you don't mind I share the link of an Arabic Bible App to you translating Each Gospel as Injil.

TenQ:

I asked you a question and you turn it around without answering the question as if I was implying that Gospel doesn't translate into Injeel. If you have answered the question, I would have asked you what does Gospel mean? For Injeel is meaningless without the meaning of Gospel. Therefore, I asked again, what does Injeel mean?

TenQ:

[i]FACTS
The use of the word Injeel predates Islam.
The word Injeel is STRICLY used by the Arab Christians as a Term for the first four books of their bible called Gospel (wherein is a collection of the life and ministry of Jesus Christ).

TenQ:

ABOUT THE INJEEL
[i]1. Is it true or is it false that the term Injeel predates Islam?
2. If the Arab Christians call the first four books of their Bible (Mathew, Mark, Luke and John) Injeel (Gospel) and the word Injeel predates Islam, what evidence do you have that Mohammed use the Word Injeel to mean something different from the usage of the Arab Christians?

TenQ:
PART THREE OF FOUR ....

TenQ:
PART FOUR OF FOUR .....

pschatri patient egalWolf:
PART THREE OF THREE

Finally, all I need to show here is that TenQ has the intent to deceive with his false statement. Please remember that the context of our conversation is whether the Book of John (and in extension, the NT) is of divine creation. If I can prove that Injil is a gospel, and not a compilation of books, the implication that follows is:
- The Quran made reference to Injil
- Unlike the Torah, Injil is a book
- The book of John is just one book, so also is Matthew, Luke, and Mark
- If we accept the book of John as Injil, then automatically, the other three cannot be Injil.
- In any event, the NT cannot be the Injil God asked us to believe in.

But on the other hand, if TenQ can show that Injil is used by Arab Christians pre-islam to refer to ALL their books or the first four of their books, his claims is strengthened.

However, I did tell him before he made the assertion that Injil translates as Gospel and even offered him the opportunity to backtrack. I made this repeatedly on several occasions and he still carried on with his lies. Moreover, he always cite references to sources (including Quran and hadith) but he did not when he made those two lies. And even at that, we are still begging him to show us clearly just one authoritative references for his two lies. This clearly shows an intent to deceive me in order to strengthen his argument.

Until he shows us that Injil (not its plural form) is a term used by Arab Christians for their first four books (not book) or ALL their books (not book). then he is an ignoble, shameless and worthless liar that you should not bother to engage.

He has made references to Torah being five books. I have never responded to that Since:
1. It is my opinion that he is incompetent on Judaism.
2. And even if he is not, Torah is not in issue/dispute here. You are alleging that the book of John (not Torah or any of the 5 books of Torah) and NT is of divine creation. So on what basis should I be discussing Torah which is irrelevant to the conversation?

When he cited the hadith of the prophet enforcing the Torah against a Jew (not Muslim), I did not respond to that. That is irrelevant to the discourse!

There are other places he has lied and when I have the time, I will pull that up.

cc: Ya Ikhwan (at copied) I just want to copy you all to know the kind of characters and shameless person you are engaging with!



Spectators:
NNTR
Sixfiguresmart



WHAT ARE ALL THESE STORIES POINTING TO?

LegalWolf:
Hey our Pretty Boy TenQ (for those I mention, I enjoy calling this guy pretty as I think he is actually pretty. LOL!)

PART ONE OF THREE

My purpose in this thread is a very simple one - to irrefutably show that our pretty handsome boy called TenQ is nothing but a shameless, ignoble, morally bankrupt and despicable LIAR and not worthy to be interacted with. Let me explain:

PRELUDE
The context is a very long one and I won't want to bore you all with details. To my mind, it may be necessary BUT not sufficient to prove that our pretty boy is a liar. In other words, it is okay to know the context but not too fundamental. The key points to bear in mind are:
a. I have insinuated in one of our previous arguments that the book of John (and the entire New Testament) can NEVER be a product of Divine Being (or even intelligent human). In fact, that is the immediate context to our current engagement.

b. Pretty boy claims otherwise. He has made copious references to the Quran where Allah (SWT) enjoined us to believe in the scriptures revealed before the Quran and specifically to Injil and the Torah. He has also cited an hadith where the prophet (pbuh) enforced the Torah.

c. These Quranic verses he quoted, I did not dispute. But I assert that the correct translation of Injil is 'Gospel' (not Gospels). This is very fundamental to know as it clearly shows how dubious our pretty boy is.

d. It goes without saying that if Injil is correctly translated as 'Gospel' (one book), and the New Testament is a collection of Gospels (because in truth, it is made up of 4 Gospels, some incoherently and poorly articulated epistles and the Acts of the apostles), THEN THE NEW TESTAMENT CAN NEVER BE THE INJIL ALLAH ENJOINED MUSLIMS TO HAVE FAITH IN' .

e. This is just pure logic, a subject matter our pretty boy apparently struggles to grasp.

SETTING OUT THE ARGUMENT

This is where it gets interesting. Pretty boy asked me the following:



Down the same argument, he followed it with the following question and assertions.

(underlined mine).

Please you all remember that our pretty boy TenQ claims Injeel is ALL the books of the Christians. Not One, Not Four but All the Books of the Christians.

DID PRETTY BOY SHAMELESS LIED ?

But pretty boy's statement cannot be true. And as I will point out repeatedly in my next post (quoting myself this time and one or two references to pretty boy ).

Let me remind us the definition of a lie which goes thus:

'to say or write something that is not true in order to deceive someone'. Reference - https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/lie
In order words, to tell a lie,
a. You must have said something which is untrue; and
b. There is an intent to deceive someone.

I will prove before heaven and earth that these two are clearly present and pretty boy loves lying. And he is shameless at it!

cc: Ya Ikhwan (at copied) I just want to copy you all to know the kind of characters and shameless person you are engaging with!
AntiChristian
Fawaz050
Haekymbahd
gaskiyamagana


Spectators:
NNTR
Sixfiguresmart

LegalWolf:
PART THREE OF THREE

Finally, all I need to show here is that TenQ has the intent to deceive with his false statement. Please remember that the context of our conversation is whether the Book of John (and in extension, the NT) is of divine creation. If I can prove that Injil is a gospel, and not a compilation of books, the implication that follows is:
- The Quran made reference to Injil
- Unlike the Torah, Injil is a book
- The book of John is just one book, so also is Matthew, Luke, and Mark
- If we accept the book of John as Injil, then automatically, the other three cannot be Injil.
- In any event, the NT cannot be the Injil God asked us to believe in.

But on the other hand, if TenQ can show that Injil is used by Arab Christians pre-islam to refer to ALL their books or the first four of their books, his claims is strengthened.

However, I did tell him before he made the assertion that Injil translates as Gospel and even offered him the opportunity to backtrack. I made this repeatedly on several occasions and he still carried on with his lies. Moreover, he always cite references to sources (including Quran and hadith) but he did not when he made those two lies. And even at that, we are still begging him to show us clearly just one authoritative references for his two lies. This clearly shows an intent to deceive me in order to strengthen his argument.

Until he shows us that Injil (not its plural form) is a term used by Arab Christians for their first four books (not book) or ALL their books (not book). then he is an ignoble, shameless and worthless liar that you should not bother to engage.

He has made references to Torah being five books. I have never responded to that Since:
1. It is my opinion that he is incompetent on Judaism.
2. And even if he is not, Torah is not in issue/dispute here. You are alleging that the book of John (not Torah or any of the 5 books of Torah) and NT is of divine creation. So on what basis should I be discussing Torah which is irrelevant to the conversation?

When he cited the hadith of the prophet enforcing the Torah against a Jew (not Muslim), I did not respond to that. That is irrelevant to the discourse!

There are other places he has lied and when I have the time, I will pull that up.

cc: Ya Ikhwan (at copied) I just want to copy you all to know the kind of characters and shameless person you are engaging with!
AntiChristian
Fawaz050
Haekymbahd
gaskiyamagana


Spectators:
NNTR
Sixfiguresmart

LegalWolf:
Hey our Pretty Boy TenQ (for those I mention, I enjoy calling this guy pretty as I think he is actually pretty. LOL!)

PART ONE OF THREE

My purpose in this thread is a very simple one - to irrefutably show that our pretty handsome boy called TenQ is nothing but a shameless, ignoble, morally bankrupt and despicable LIAR and not worthy to be interacted with. Let me explain:

PRELUDE
The context is a very long one and I won't want to bore you all with details. To my mind, it may be necessary BUT not sufficient to prove that our pretty boy is a liar. In other words, it is okay to know the context but not too fundamental. The key points to bear in mind are:
a. I have insinuated in one of our previous arguments that the book of John (and the entire New Testament) can NEVER be a product of Divine Being (or even intelligent human). In fact, that is the immediate context to our current engagement.

b. Pretty boy claims otherwise. He has made copious references to the Quran where Allah (SWT) enjoined us to believe in the scriptures revealed before the Quran and specifically to Injil and the Torah. He has also cited an hadith where the prophet (pbuh) enforced the Torah.

c. These Quranic verses he quoted, I did not dispute. But I assert that the correct translation of Injil is 'Gospel' (not Gospels). This is very fundamental to know as it clearly shows how dubious our pretty boy is.

d. It goes without saying that if Injil is correctly translated as 'Gospel' (one book), and the New Testament is a collection of Gospels (because in truth, it is made up of 4 Gospels, some incoherently and poorly articulated epistles and the Acts of the apostles), THEN THE NEW TESTAMENT CAN NEVER BE THE INJIL ALLAH ENJOINED MUSLIMS TO HAVE FAITH IN' .

e. This is just pure logic, a subject matter our pretty boy apparently struggles to grasp.

SETTING OUT THE ARGUMENT

This is where it gets interesting. Pretty boy asked me the following:



Down the same argument, he followed it with the following question and assertions.

(underlined mine).

Please you all remember that our pretty boy TenQ claims Injeel is ALL the books of the Christians. Not One, Not Four but All the Books of the Christians.

DID PRETTY BOY SHAMELESS LIED ?

But pretty boy's statement cannot be true. And as I will point out repeatedly in my next post (quoting myself this time and one or two references to pretty boy ).

Let me remind us the definition of a lie which goes thus:

'to say or write something that is not true in order to deceive someone'. Reference - https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/lie
In order words, to tell a lie,
a. You must have said something which is untrue; and
b. There is an intent to deceive someone.

I will prove before heaven and earth that these two are clearly present and pretty boy loves lying. And he is shameless at it!

cc: Ya Ikhwan (at copied) I just want to copy you all to know the kind of characters and shameless person you are engaging with!
AntiChristian
Fawaz050
Haekymbahd
gaskiyamagana


Spectators:
NNTR
Sixfiguresmart

LegalWolf:
PART TWO OF THREE

Is Injeel ALL the Books of the Christians
Remember, the pretty boy asked me for the meaning of Injil and asked me cite references. This is what I told him:



The second link I shared from Cambridge translates injil as one of the four books of the Christians and not ALL the books of the Christians. Same thing with the other Arabic dictionary. In subsequent posts (which I do not want to bore you with), I provided link to an Arabic Quran which translated Injil to Gospel. All these were pointed out to TenQ but guess what he said:



LOL! You can see the dumb logic pervasive in his argument. When I pressed him further, and that what he intends to ask me if I had told him the answer is irrelevant. He has asked me a question and I have given him an answer with references. To my knowledge, he has not said Cambridge dictionary is wrong or the Arabic bible I provided translating Injil to 'gospel' is wrong. So, he should concede that my references are authoritative. (Of course, every litigation lawyer who knows his onions are clear on what exactly I want to do there ). Now hear what our pretty boy said:

(underline mine)

You will notice that Injil is not more ALL the books of the Christians but the first four books. LOL! But in logical terms, we do not have an idea which of the first four books. However, down that same post, he gave us a hint when he posed the following question:

. (underline mine)

Now we are clear on the first four books that:
a. Is a Term
b. (this term called Injeel is) used by Arab Christians;
c. For the first four books of their bible (which is Mark, Matthew, Luke and John).

AGAIN, this is a lie. Please help me beg TenQ to just cite one reference where the underline quote is true. Arab Christians cannot call ALL their Books and the First Four of their Books Injil at the same time. That contradicts commonsense TenQ. He has responded to my posts here:

and
.

Readers could go ahead and check these posts but I reckon it is meaningless to the meaning of Injil and whether it is a book or compilation of books. But wait, TenQ I am not too sure as I think you have modified your answer. There were some points you made that you clearly shot yourself on the foot but cannot find it.


Summary

- Till date, pretty boy has not faulted Cambridge Dictionary's interpretation of Injil as one of the four books of Christians.
- Till date, he has not shown evidence that Injil is a Term for the first four books of Arab Christians
- Pretty boy claims Injil is All the books of the Christians. This is false! The Acts of Apostles, the Epistles to the Hebrew and the other Pauline Epistles are not 'Injil'
- Pretty boy said that the first four books (not book) of Arab Christians is called Injil (Gospel) [not gospels!] and that is clearly false as well.
- Both statements cannot be true at the same time. But they can be false and each of them is false.

cc: Ya Ikhwan (at copied) I just want to copy you all to know the kind of characters and shameless person you are engaging with!
AntiChristian
Fawaz050
Haekymbahd
gaskiyamagana


Spectators:
NNTR
Sixfiguresmart

LegalWolf:
PART THREE OF THREE

Finally, all I need to show here is that TenQ has the intent to deceive with his false statement. Please remember that the context of our conversation is whether the Book of John (and in extension, the NT) is of divine creation. If I can prove that Injil is a gospel, and not a compilation of books, the implication that follows is:
- The Quran made reference to Injil
- Unlike the Torah, Injil is a book
- The book of John is just one book, so also is Matthew, Luke, and Mark
- If we accept the book of John as Injil, then automatically, the other three cannot be Injil.
- In any event, the NT cannot be the Injil God asked us to believe in.

But on the other hand, if TenQ can show that Injil is used by Arab Christians pre-islam to refer to ALL their books or the first four of their books, his claims is strengthened.

However, I did tell him before he made the assertion that Injil translates as Gospel and even offered him the opportunity to backtrack. I made this repeatedly on several occasions and he still carried on with his lies. Moreover, he always cite references to sources (including Quran and hadith) but he did not when he made those two lies. And even at that, we are still begging him to show us clearly just one authoritative references for his two lies. This clearly shows an intent to deceive me in order to strengthen his argument.

Until he shows us that Injil (not its plural form) is a term used by Arab Christians for their first four books (not book) or ALL their books (not book). then he is an ignoble, shameless and worthless liar that you should not bother to engage.

He has made references to Torah being five books. I have never responded to that Since:
1. It is my opinion that he is incompetent on Judaism.
2. And even if he is not, Torah is not in issue/dispute here. You are alleging that the book of John (not Torah or any of the 5 books of Torah) and NT is of divine creation. So on what basis should I be discussing Torah which is irrelevant to the conversation?

When he cited the hadith of the prophet enforcing the Torah against a Jew (not Muslim), I did not respond to that. That is irrelevant to the discourse!

There are other places he has lied and when I have the time, I will pull that up.

cc: Ya Ikhwan (at copied) I just want to copy you all to know the kind of characters and shameless person you are engaging with!
AntiChristian
Fawaz050
Haekymbahd
gaskiyamagana


Spectators:
NNTR
Sixfiguresmart

TenQ:


The Question is
1. What name does the Qur'an give to the books of Moses? Is it a single book? NO!
It is a Library of FIVE books.
2. What name does the Qur'an give to the books of the Christians? Injeel! But the Injeel is ALL the books of the Christians!

TenQ:

FACTS
The use of the word Injeel predates Islam.
The word Injeel is STRICLY used by the Arab Christians as a Term for the first four books of their bible called Gospel (wherein is a collection of the life and ministry of Jesus Christ).
..................
If the Arab Christians call the first four books of their Bible (Mathew, Mark, Luke and John) Injeel (Gospel) and the word Injeel predates Islam, what evidence do you have that Mohammed use the Word Injeel to mean something different from the usage of the Arab Christians?

Both statements cannot be true at the same time, pretty boy . In fact, both statements are untrue and you know it.

TenQ:


The LIES (ACCORDING TO LEGALWOLF) THAT TENQ MADE!?[/b
]
"Al-Injeel is Arabic for the Book of Jesus, or [b]what Christians call the New Testament. "

https://www.crescentproject.org/blog/istheinjeelcorrupted


Here is an Islamic website written by Muslims for Muslims like LegalWolf.

The word ‘gospel’ is derived from the Anglo-Saxon term ‘god-spell’, meaning ‘good story’, a rendering of the Latin ‘evangelium’ and the Greek ‘euangelion’ (Arabic; Injil), meaning ‘good news’ or “good telling”. The 73 or 66 books of Bible include four Gospels. The Gospel, is any of four biblical narratives covering the life, the person, death (according to Christian belief) and the teachings of Prophet Jesus (peace be upon him), as he was remembered by the Christian community.

https://salaamone.com/theology/guidance/sacred-scriptures/bible/new-testament/gospels/

TenQ:
Mr LegalWolf

RESPOND to the QUESTIONS if you are not of Shaitan!

Your kind of noise is what you get when you allow Muslims to escape answering Questions that would have solved major problems of comprehension along the road.


Islam and LIES is indistinguishable! The more reason you will not answer my question. It is NOT by noisemaking. It is about logically defending your position which is exposed with simple questions.



LegalWolf, I INSIST that you answer ALL these questions one by one.

PRELUDE:
The Qur'an agrees that
1. Jesus is a Man (Human and a Prophet)
2. Jesus is the Word of Allah (Kalimatullah)
3. Jesus is the Spirit of Allah (Ruhullah)



INITIAL QUESTIONS
Can you please explain HOW
1. Jesus is a Human being, the Spirit of Allah and the Word of Allah all at the same time?
2. If Jesus is human, where is His grave?
3. Is the Word of Allah is uncreated and eternal?
4. Is the Spirit of Allah uncreated and external?


ABOUT THE INJEEL
1. Is it true or is it false that the term Injeel predates Islam?
2. If the Arab Christians call the first four books of their Bible (Mathew, Mark, Luke and John) Injeel (Gospel) and the word Injeel predates Islam, what evidence do you have that Mohammed use the Word Injeel to mean something different from the usage of the Arab Christians?
3. Do Muslims have any shred of evidence to show that Jesus wrote any book?
(Jesus did ministry for only THREE years). If He did, where is it or its remaining fragments?
4. Does Allah know if the people of the book have more than three books namely Taurat, Zabur and Injeel as part of their scripture?
5. If the Books of the Jews and Christians were ALREADY corrupted, why would Allah instruct Mohammed to confirm the Quran from the People of the Book.
6. If the Books of the Jews and Christians were just THREE, why would Allah instruct Mohammed to confirm the Quran from the People of the Book and not specify to them which book?
7. What name did your prophet call the BOOK of the Christians? Did he have any other name apart from Injeel and What name does the Qur'an give to the books of Moses?

ABOUT THE BIBLE
8. I gave a challenge:
Can you find me Islamic/Muslim Sources that EMPHATICALLY DENY that Muhammad is Prophesied by Jesus from the book of John. Failure to find examples is a prove that you tell a lie with your answer.
9. I then followed up with a PERSONAL Question to You LegalWolf
Allah says in the Quran that Mohammed's name is found written in the books of the Jews and Christians (Quran 7:157)
a. Is this a TRUE or FALSE statement by Allah?
b. If the above is TRUE, LegalWolf, where can the reference to Mohammed be found in the books of the Christians?
c. If the Mohammed is NOT Referenced by the books of the Christians, did Allah tell a lie?

10. Is the Torah just one BOOK or a compilation of Books?
My Questions again:
11. Can you prove that the Scriptures Allah was referring to in the Quran had gone into extinction or Allah believed that the books were still with the Jews and Christians?
12. If the books were lost, why would Allah himself give the title "People of the Book" to Jews and Christians?
13. Did your prophet Muhammad make judgement of stoning an adulteress by asking the Jews to refer to the Torah (remember when a Jew covered the word stoning in the Torah...LOL!)?


All these Questions are NOT new: but you avoided answering.

Make the answers short please!

LegalWolf:
PART TWO OF TWO.

You have been asking me to answer your questions. yhwh bears me with witness that I will answer your questions. Each and everyone of them. But not when your reputation at stake TenQ. Are these not the questions?

TenQ.
LOL! I will give you a one liner or at most three liners to it. Everyone of them. But your character is in question TenQ. Remember you said something along the line that religion is everything man do to please God! Is your god yhwh please with you lying to win an argument? If you can lie in one breadth that injeel is All the Books of the Christian and in another, claim it is the first four books of the christian, what gives us the confidence you would not lie again?

LegalWolf:
PART ONE OF TWO
Pretty Boyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy!!!! Welcome back TenQ. We have missed you. And how is your rapist defending lawyer friend ? Hope you guys still discuss about other rape cases and how client matters? Huh? Now to the meat of the matter.

You have essentially done three things, in my opinion. Rambled to save your reputation as a liar with weak evidence, challenged my reputation (without proof) and rehashed a couple of questions (some of which you lied you have asked me before, others I have answered while others are completely irrelevant to our discussion). I will address them.

YOUR REPUTATION

These were your words pretty boy

(underline mine).

Further you said:

(underline mine)

Both statements cannot be true at the same time, pretty boy . In fact, both statements are untrue and you know it. This is my evidence and that makes it intentional that you are a liar! Now let us examine the piece of evidence you cited.



First of, you have basically shot yourself in the foot. Although the 'gospel' in English is not what we are debating. However, and as you correctly cited, the Gospel (which is the direct translation is injil in Arabic) is ANY of the four biblical narratives TenQ. Key word here is ANY not the FIRST FOUR BOOKS or ALL THE BOOKS. According to your sources, Injil is any of four books. Any means one of not ALL of. You went to University Mr. TenQ and I should not be teaching this. Therefore, YOU LIED BY ASSERTING AS A FACT THAT INJIL IS A TERM FOR THE FIRST FOUR BOOKS OF ARAB CHRISTIAN'S BIBLE

On the second witness (i.e., website of crescent project) Barrister TenQ your evidence are contradictory. One of your sources claims Injil is any of four books, the other made an outlandish claim that it is what the Christians know as the New Testament. So one of it must be false and CERTAINLY it is the Crescent Project. The reason is because it is not as authoritative as Cambridge I cited, neither is it a dictionary. Also, it is a review (or probably summary) of a book we have not read. So, why would you be citing hearsay (opinion by someone summarizing a book you have not read yourself) as authoritative source for Injil?

Summary
- You made a claim that Injil is ALL the books of the Christians. I acknowledge you cited an outlandish reference (which called Injil the New Testament) for this which another reference of your contradicts.

- You made a claim that Injil is a term for the first four books of the Christians. You HAVE NOT PROVIDED A SINGLE REFERENCE FOR THIS!!!!. IN FACT, YOUR REFERENCE UNEQUIVOCALLY states that it is ANY of the four gospels. . Therefore, Injil is a book/gospel and not the New Testament.

- Both statements are lies which you know. INJIL IS NEITHER THE NEW TESTAMENT NOR THE FIRST FOUR BOOKS OF THE NEW TESTAMENT BUT JUST A BOOK. SO WHY ARE YOU LYING?

TenQ:

This is not a retrial as you are finished! Mr LIAR, you can't wriggle out: you've been caught in your own web of lies and misinformation.

It is a done deal that you've been busted to your face!
You who follow a worthless and shameless man who coveted and took the young wife of his adopted son by the urging of your Allah!

As I see you have no better things to say, go hang your Legal Wigs in SHAME!

TenQ:

This is not a retrial as you are finished! Mr LIAR, you can't wriggle out: you've been caught in your own web of lies and misinformation.

It is a done deal that you've been busted to your face!
You who follow a worthless and shameless man who coveted and took the young wife of his adopted son by the urging of your Allah!

As I see you have no better things to say, go hang your Legal Wigs in SHAME!

LegalWolf:


Your emotional outbursts won’t help you, my cute little pretty boy . You keep claiming I have been bursted. Pretty boy just one credible evidence would shut me up. I was not the one who said Injil is ALL the books of the Christians AND the first four books of the Christians at the same time.

You did and having given you opportunity to correct yourself, you still keep insisting on your lies! Are you here to win an argument of you are after the truth? Or you are selective with the Truth to believe?

Is the book of John of divine creation or not? Neither head or tail of your answer we do not know. You want to use reference to Injil to strengthen your claim shameless liar !

Bring credible evidence that Injil is ALL the Christians and you’re yarning dust. Bring evidence that it is the first four books of Arab Christians and you cannot. Can’t you Christians do without lying?

cc: sixfiguresmart

LegalWolf:


LOL!

Pretty boy . It’s not by shouting Liar up and down like a senseless bulldog. I call you a LIAR and if I’m asked for my evidence, I will say:

1. You said that Injil is ALL the books of the Christians.

2. When logic failed, you claimed the first four books (not book) of the Arab Christians is Injil (Gospel) .

3. These two statements cannot be true at the same time. In fact both are false. .

4. Even the reference you provided translated Injil as Any of the Four books… not the first four books as you shamelessly lied.

My Pretty boy TenQ, is all that have said not true? Are your claims in 1 and 2 not false? So why are you lying? Are you not after the Truth and not to win an argument again?

TenQ:



With clear EVIDENCES and to your face I TenQ have DISPLAYED your lies and completly EXPOSED your fabrications.

LegalWolf, Your tantrums will not deliver you. You are finished completly!
UNREPENTANT CHRONIC LIAR!



If you have no further words to say, kindly get OFF my mention. LegalWolf, You are a confirmed Liar and thus, I can only ask God to help you.

LegalWolf:


Although he may be a war criminal, yhwh bears me witness that I have always been after the truth and not winning argument. If I say you lie, the evidence is there.

- Did you not claim injil is ALL the books of the Christians?

-Did you not contradict yourself that it is a term used by Arab Christians to refer to their first four books? So which lie have I told?

you made two false claims that are untrue with the intent to deceive!!!! . I’ll pursue you all over this forum until you acknowledge you are a shameless, ignoble, morally bankrupt being not worthy to be engaged.

Cc: NNTR
sixfiguresmart

TenQ:

LIAR!

LegalWolf:


Proof?

TenQ:


The Proof of your lies is NOT hidden, I had ALREADY posted to you on this thread. Read if you are not blind.


Mr LegalWolf
If you are not of Shaitan, answer and stop hiding behind volumes of words.

I wonder why you think that volumes of words will free you from the quagmire you have fallen into.

RESPOND to the QUESTIONS if you are not of Shaitan!

Your kind of noise is what you get when you allow Muslims to escape answering Questions that would have solved major problems of comprehension along the road.


Islam and LIES is indistinguishable! The more reason you will not answer my question. It is NOT by noisemaking. It is about logically defending your position which is exposed with simple questions.



LegalWolf, I INSIST that you answer ALL these questions one by one.

PRELUDE:
The Qur'an agrees that
1. Jesus is a Man (Human and a Prophet)
2. Jesus is the Word of Allah (Kalimatullah)
3. Jesus is the Spirit of Allah (Ruhullah)



INITIAL QUESTIONS
Can you please explain HOW
1. Jesus is a Human being, the Spirit of Allah and the Word of Allah all at the same time?
2. If Jesus is human, where is His grave?
3. Is the Word of Allah is uncreated and eternal?
4. Is the Spirit of Allah uncreated and external?


ABOUT THE INJEEL
1. Is it true or is it false that the term Injeel predates Islam?
2. If the Arab Christians call the first four books of their Bible (Mathew, Mark, Luke and John) Injeel (Gospel) and the word Injeel predates Islam, what evidence do you have that Mohammed use the Word Injeel to mean something different from the usage of the Arab Christians?
3. Do Muslims have any shred of evidence to show that Jesus wrote any book?
(Jesus did ministry for only THREE years). If He did, where is it or its remaining fragments?
4. Does Allah know if the people of the book have more than three books namely Taurat, Zabur and Injeel as part of their scripture?
5. If the Books of the Jews and Christians were ALREADY corrupted, why would Allah instruct Mohammed to confirm the Quran from the People of the Book.
6. If the Books of the Jews and Christians were just THREE, why would Allah instruct Mohammed to confirm the Quran from the People of the Book and not specify to them which book?
7. What name did your prophet call the BOOK of the Christians? Did he have any other name apart from Injeel and What name does the Qur'an give to the books of Moses?

ABOUT THE BIBLE
8. I gave a challenge:
Can you find me Islamic/Muslim Sources that EMPHATICALLY DENY that Muhammad is Prophesied by Jesus from the book of John. Failure to find examples is a prove that you tell a lie with your answer.
9. I then followed up with a PERSONAL Question to You LegalWolf
Allah says in the Quran that Mohammed's name is found written in the books of the Jews and Christians (Quran 7:157)
a. Is this a TRUE or FALSE statement by Allah?
b. If the above is TRUE, LegalWolf, where can the reference to Mohammed be found in the books of the Christians?
c. If the Mohammed is NOT Referenced by the books of the Christians, did Allah tell a lie?

10. Is the Torah just one BOOK or a compilation of Books?
My Questions again:
11. Can you prove that the Scriptures Allah was referring to in the Quran had gone into extinction or Allah believed that the books were still with the Jews and Christians?
12. If the books were lost, why would Allah himself give the title "People of the Book" to Jews and Christians?
13. Did your prophet Muhammad make judgement of stoning an adulteress by asking the Jews to refer to the Torah (remember when a Jew covered the word stoning in the Torah...LOL!)?


All these Questions are NOT new: but you avoided answering.

Make the answers short please!

Do you want yhwh to detest you?

LegalWolf:


LOL! Remember Proverbs 16: 16 - 17 that one of the six things yhwh hates is a lying tongue... And a fundamental commandment is not to bear false witness. So, point out to my lie please!!! Our pretty boy, why are you lying? Do you want yhwh to detest you?