ogkrakkid:

Bro abeg ask her then me go collect from u

I'm not into women .. plus I'm not the one having a convo with her ...
Just telling ya that we can see everything here so better go to a more private platform

Autobot05:

I'm not into women .. plus I'm not the one having a convo with her ...
Just telling ya that we can see everything here so better go to a more private platform

Guy u worry ooo.
It's a free world man. D more u look d less u see. I am aware it's a public space so it's shouldn't b private. It's just a innocent convo we having bro.nairaland is too toxic filled with reapers both genders. Can't take any one here serious for any reason.

Currently fvcking a girl who has a serious boyfriend in Lagos. Am helping the boyfriend to warm the pvssy. Long distance relationships is not worth it.

Lag has high count of aids and hiv victims,so enjoy your std bro.

tnerro1:
Currently fvcking a girl who has a serious boyfriend in Lagos. Am helping the boyfriend to warm the pvssy. Long distance relationships is not worth it.

ogkrakkid:

Guy u worry ooo.
It's a free world man. D more u look d less u see. I am aware it's a public space so it's shouldn't b private. It's just a innocent convo we having bro.nairaland is too toxic filled with reapers both genders. Can't take any one here serious for any reason.

Lmao badt guy
Glad that men are finally opening their eyes ... apply it to reality too

Online relationship is an unequal relationship that favors women mostly. I will explain.

You see, male service to women by its very nature is not physical, meaning that you do not have to be present to be of use to a woman. You can send money to her, pay for a service for her (eg her hair, flight fee, etc), even her house rent and security, while you are far away.

But women's service to men by nature is physical. She has to be with you to fork you, do domestic activities, and support you. It is fundamentally unequal. So for a man to be in a long-distance relationship is to cheat himself, while tempting her with the opportunity to flirt/cheat with other men. Don't do it.

It's having all the privilege of being in a relationship, but without the responsibility. Or being paid a salary every month without going to work. If you love yourself, you should not participate in such.

The only time a long-distance relationship is acceptable is if it is temporary in nature (eg a short vacation), when you are married, and better if you guys have kids. The data for a long-distance relationship as the student doesn't look good, it's mostly two people just wasting their time.

I am a strong believer that we mostly suffer due to our own incompetence. Don't come later and scream how a girl cheats on you bla bla, when you can just avoid it with your sense. That's the point of having the ability to think. You analyze things and arrive at a factual conclusion.

It is hard, I know, but let her go. She didn't call you for two weeks already, she doesn't give a sheet about you. Acceptance comrade. Accept it and move on. She doesn't have to tell you, you should have known from her behaviors. Actions always communicate far more than words will ever do. Move on.

tnerro1:
Currently fvcking a girl who has a serious boyfriend in Lagos. Am helping the boyfriend to warm the pvssy. Long distance relationships is not worth it.

If i were you

I'll bury my head in shame. Instead of making it look like an achievement.

Autobot05:


Lmao badt guy
Glad that men are finally opening their eyes ... apply it to reality too

Lol Badt mahn.
Every thing is real just that a lot just choose being foolish. They refuse to read between lines mixing between stupidity and reality. I am me. No clowning.

Medianna:

If i were you

I'll bury my head in shame. Instead of making it look like an achievement.

Why? The girl is good

pansophist:
Online relationship is an unequal relationship that favors women mostly. I will explain.

You see, male service to women by its very nature is not physical, meaning that you do not have to be present to be of use to a woman. You can send money to her, pay for a service for her (eg her hair, flight fee, etc), even her house rent and security, while you are far away.

But women's service to men by nature is physical. She has to be with you to fork you, do domestic activities, and support you. It is fundamentally unequal. So for a man to be in a long-distance relationship is to cheat himself, while tempting her with the opportunity to flirt/cheat with other men. Don't do it.

It's having all the privilege of being in a relationship, but without the responsibility. Or being paid a salary every month without going to work. If you love yourself, you should not participate in such.

The only time a long-distance relationship is acceptable is if it is temporary in nature (eg a short vacation), when you are married, and better if you guys have kids. The data for a long-distance relationship as the student doesn't look good, it's mostly two people just wasting their time.

I am a strong believer that we mostly suffer due to our own incompetence. Don't come later and scream how a girl cheats on you bla bla, when you can just avoid it with your sense. That's the point of having the ability to think. You analyze things and arrive at a factual conclusion.

It is hard, I know, but let her go. She didn't call you for two weeks already, she doesn't give a sheet about you. Acceptance comrade. Accept it and move on. She doesn't have to tell you, you should have known from her behaviors. Actions always communicate far more than words will ever do. Move on.

Continuation.......

So when you hear a woman say that they do not need a man (usually because they have money), it a proof of what I wrote in the quoted above, that male service to women is NOT physical in nature. Mind you, none of these women that ''don't need a man'' will not go live in the forest with no trace of modern civilization.

They might be independent of being catered to financially by a man because they have their own money, but they are dependent on the systems and structures men built. Their so-called independence at best can be described as interdependence. If her house is on fire and she called the firefighter, she will prefer for a man to show up.

If she wants to build a house with her money, she will go for the best engineers, and they are mostly men, same with fixing her car, being her driver, etc. Women by their very biological nature must need men, if not directly as a partner, but indirectly in other areas of their life.

So when you hear some women make the statement that they do not need men, just see it as a manifestation of an ungrateful being expressing her ungratefulness.

But for men, it is different. Our needs from women are physical. Apart from sex, most men do not need anything from women. Sex is usually a woman's trump card and her only card. If you ignore sex, most women may not be useful to you. If you have any gay friends, ask them.

I can boldly say that as a man, the women you know usually don't help you with money, save you from danger, or fight for you when physically attacked, in fact, you may know their birthdays but many don't know yours, and sometimes, it's deliberate from their own part, to prevent them from having the responsibility to give you anything.

The above paragraph is also why I question male/female friendship because it's basically a boyfriend/husband duty that is not equally reciprocated. I have heard a story of a guy injured by another man just because his bestie's ex wants her back. He inherited a problem and was given a free beating just because he was a friend of a girl a violent man is interested in.

Yea, the ex-boyfriend did the wrong thing, but prevention is better than cure. Regardless if the ex was arrested for injuring an innocent man, why do you want to be in such a situation? Women need security and provision, and any man regardless of boyfriend/friendship status can offer that. But what is she giving you in return?

Men don't need provisioning and security, hence, the only thing you need is probably sex (excluding marriage), you are not getting it because you are in one bondage called a long-distance relationship. Are you mad?

So since men can be of use to women without being in a relationship with them, then you cheat yourself by giving the service of a boyfriend/husband from afar, while she is not doing the same to you in person, physically.

You live life with sense, not emotions.

Mehn you’re so intelligent, I want to be like you when i grow up

pansophist:


Continuation.......

So when you hear a woman say that they do not need a man (usually because they have money), it a proof of what I wrote in the quoted above, that male service to women is NOT physical in nature. Mind you, none of these women that ''don't need a man'' will go live in the forest with no trace of modern civilization.

They might be independent of being catered to financially by a man because they have their own money, but they are dependent on the systems and structures men built. Their so-called independence at best can be described as interdependence. If her house is on fire and she called the firefighter, she will prefer for a man to show up.

If she wants to build a house with her money, she will go for the best engineers, and they are mostly men, same with fixing her car, being her driver, etc. Women by their very biological nature must need men, if not directly as a partner, but indirectly in other areas of their life.

So when you hear some women make the statement that they do not need men, just see it as a manifestation of an ungrateful being expressing her ungratefulness.

But for men, it is different. Our needs from women are physical. Apart from sex, most men do not need anything from women. Sex is usually a woman's trump card and her only card. If you ignore sex, most women may not be useful to you. If you have any gay friends, ask them.

I can boldly say that as a man, the women you know usually don't help you with money, save you from danger, or fight for you when physically attacked, in fact, you may know their birthdays but many don't know yours, and sometimes, it's deliberate from their own part, to prevent them from having the responsibility to give you anything.

The above paragraph is also why I question male/female friendship because it's basically a boyfriend/husband duty that is not equally reciprocated. I have heard a story of a guy injured by another man just because his bestie's ex wants her back. He inherited a problem and was given a free beating just because he was a friend of a girl a violent man is interested in.

Yea, the ex-boyfriend did the wrong thing, but prevention is better than cure. Regardless if the ex was arrested for injuring an innocent man, why do you want to be in such a situation? Women need security and provision, and any man regardless of boyfriend/friendship status can offer that. But what is she giving you in return?

Men don't need provisioning and security, hence, the only thing you need is probably sex (excluding marriage), you are not getting it because you are in one bondage called a long-distance relationship. Are you mad?

So since men can be of use to women without being in a relationship with them, then you cheat yourself by giving the service of a boyfriend/husband from afar, while she is not doing the same to you in person, physically.

You live life with sense, not emotions.

How old are you??

Yusufisraelj:
You are having the lower end of the stick bro, that's not good. I switched from long distance relationship to relationship within my reach, long distance relationship is only beneficial when you both have met in a location and have established understanding, connection and defined boundaries and values to live by and preferable methods of consistent communication.


A relationship where the vibe is not mutual rarely ends well, one party will feel used and the other cares less, at this point you need to decide what's best for you, if you'll sit down and talk things through and make the relationship work towards a mutually beneficial one or you walk away for your saneness and peace of mind.

Slynation:
Two ignorant fellows deceiving themselves...!!

Exactly 100%.