Is it true in the Qur'an that Allah made a direct COMMAND that failed miserably!?

LegalWolf:
Hey TenQ,

First off, you are a low-self esteemed, boastful, shameless, ignoble and fraudulent LIAR!

Since bursting your burble and showing you just two pieces of evidence (where there are more) that your yhwh is a deceptive crook that sends delusion to lawless ones so as believe a lie. To make matter worse, he is a lazy ass god who rested after 6 days of hard workWould you now tell us that you have partial or full ban?



The above was posted some minutes to 3 yesterday AFTER I posted in the morning. LOL! If not that you are an ignoble and shameless liar, I would have walked you down the whole of the bible while staining yhwh's white. Remember when I told you to assume that you met an atheist and told him about your religion. That our old atheist friend has decided to read the bible and the very first chapter (not ALL, the FIRST FOUR or ANY) of genesis contains stories of creation that contradicts science.... you remember that? That was my reference to Genesis 1.

Now, I have moved to Genesis chapter 2 to demonstrate that your yhwh is an absolutely lazy god. By1 the time I reach Genesis 50, hope you wouldn't have run mad. But anyways, as you are a shameless, ignoble liar, it is nauseating to engage a characterless person like you on religion. Absolutely distasteful!

See how you've started CRYING and WAILING on nairaland again. I didn't know this thing pain you like this!? Your cry-cry attitude did not allow you to see the topic of discussion.

Pele! Sorry!!
Don't cry again. That was why I presented a simpler question to you.


THE QUESTION:
It is understandable if Allah Deceived the Jews and the Romans. Can you as Muslims please explain the logical reason why Allah Deceived ALSO Mary the Mother of Jesus, all Jesus Disciples, Jesus's Family (brothers and sisters) and all followers and friends of Jesus?

Thank you!

LOL! Shameless, Ignoble, Lying, Low self-esteemed, braggadocious LIAR! .

Between Sunday and Today (just two days mana), you have attempted to divert the issue of yhwh's weakness to other things. First, you made U-turn and wanted to discuss creation in 6 days, now this! Do you think you are talking to your sheep? Jungle don dey mature, right? Yhwh is a weak ass god that rests AFTER WORK. I was not the one who said that, but the book of Genesis did!

Now that over 2 billion humans call on him to answer their prayers, don't you think you all are overworking him and he may die soon? LOL!

TenQ:

Is it true in the Qur'an that Allah made a direct COMMAND that failed miserably!?


See how you've started CRYING and WAILING on nairaland again. I didn't know this thing pain you like this!? Your cry-cry attitude did not allow you to see the topic of discussion.

Pele! Sorry!!
Don't cry again. That was why I presented a simpler question to you.


THE QUESTION:


It is understandable if Allah Deceived the Jews and the Romans. Can you as Muslims please explain the logical reason why Allah Deceived ALSO Mary the Mother of Jesus, all Jesus Disciples, Jesus's Family (brothers and sisters) and all followers and friends of Jesus?

Thank you!

And that reminds me, I assume you are Yoruba... But the Yorubas have a saying that a Liar is a potential thief! . So that is why I have been calling you little hushpuppi and until you tell us why you are lying and admit to your errors, we have just started.

TenQ:

Is it true in the Qur'an that Allah made a direct COMMAND that failed miserably!?


See how you've started CRYING and WAILING on nairaland again. I didn't know this thing pain you like this!? Your cry-cry attitude did not allow you to see the topic of discussion.

Pele! Sorry!!
Don't cry again. That was why I presented a simpler question to you.


THE QUESTION:
It is understandable if Allah Deceived the Jews and the Romans. Can you as Muslims please explain the logical reason why Allah Deceived ALSO Mary the Mother of Jesus, all Jesus Disciples, Jesus's Family (brothers and sisters) and all followers and friends of Jesus?

Thank you!

And on your questions, yhwh bears me witness that they are very simple. In fact, I will answer this question making references to the Books of the Prophets (Nevi'im) alone and not the entirety of the Old Testament or even the fraudulent NT. Just books of God's prophets and probably slight reference to the alleged books of Moses.

But the fundamental question still remains: why on earth would I engage a fraudulent, despicable, ignoble and shameless LIAR on matters of religion (if we bear in mind that RELIGION IS EVERYTHING MAN DOES TO PLEASE GOD) huh?

LegalWolf:
LOL! Shameless, Ignoble, Lying, Low self-esteemed, braggadocious LIAR! .

Between Sunday and Today (just two days mana), you have attempted to divert the issue of yhwh's weakness to other things. First, you made U-turn and wanted to discuss creation in 6 days, now this! Do you think you are talking to your sheep? Jungle don dey mature, right? Yhwh is a weak ass god that rests AFTER WORK. I was not the one who said that, but the book of Genesis did!

Now that over 2 billion humans call on him to answer their prayers, don't you think you all are overworking him and he may die soon? LOL!




And that reminds me, I assume you are Yoruba... But the Yorubas have a saying that a Liar is a potential thief! . So that is why I have been calling you little hushpuppi and until you tell us why you are lying and admit to your errors, we have just started.

LegalWolf:


And on your questions, yhwh bears me witness that they are very simple. In fact, I will answer this question making references to the Books of the Prophets (Nevi'im) alone and not the entirety of the Old Testament or even the fraudulent NT. Just books of God's prophets and probably slight reference to the alleged books of Moses.

But the fundamental question still remains: why on earth would I engage a fraudulent, despicable, ignoble and shameless LIAR on matters of religion (if we bear in mind that RELIGION IS EVERYTHING MAN DOES TO PLEASE GOD) huh?

Is it true in the Qur'an that Allah made a direct COMMAND that failed miserably!?

THE QUESTION:
It is understandable if Allah Deceived the Jews and the Romans. Can you as Muslims please explain the logical reason why Allah Deceived ALSO Mary the Mother of Jesus, all Jesus Disciples, Jesus's Family (brothers and sisters) and all followers and friends of Jesus?

LegalWolf:


And on your questions, yhwh bears me witness that they are very simple. In fact, I will answer this question making references to the Books of the Prophets (Nevi'im) alone and not the entirety of the Old Testament or even the fraudulent NT. Just books of God's prophets and probably slight reference to the alleged books of Moses.

But the fundamental question still remains: why on earth would I engage a fraudulent, despicable, ignoble and shameless LIAR on matters of religion (if we bear in mind that RELIGION IS EVERYTHING MAN DOES TO PLEASE GOD) huh?

You don't want to engage your supossed fraudulent ignoble and shameless liar but you've reached Page 3 of the thread in engaging him without answering his question. It's obvious you're just trying to avoid the question asked.

HisSplendor:


You don't want to engage your supossed fraudulent ignoble and shameless liar but you've reached Page 3 of the thread in engaging him without answering his question. It's obvious you're just trying to avoid the question asked.

Thank you so much for the observation. Every wise person reading this thread will notice this same thing?
The tantrums is just to avoid answering the QUESTION!

HisSplendor:


You don't want to engage your supossed fraudulent ignoble and shameless liar but you've reached Page 3 of the thread in engaging him without answering his question. It's obvious you're just trying to avoid the question asked.

I think you are missing the point - Oftentimes, the issue of engaging a liar is framed more of a question than an assertion of fact. So I have asked him that which I am asking you, if you care to engage, the very simple question: why should I engage a fraudulent, ignoble and shameless liar on matters of religion?

cc: TenQ

TenQ:




Is it true in the Qur'an that Allah made a direct COMMAND that failed miserably!?

THE QUESTION:
It is understandable if Allah Deceived the Jews and the Romans. Can you as Muslims please explain the logical reason why Allah Deceived ALSO Mary the Mother of Jesus, all Jesus Disciples, Jesus's Family (brothers and sisters) and all followers and friends of Jesus?

What is true is that:

a. the seventh day Yhwh had finished the work he had been doing; so on the seventh day he rested from all his work Genesis 2:3;

b. For this reason Yhwh sends them a powerful delusion so that they will believe the lie 2 Thessalonians 2:11

c. Then I said, “Alas, Sovereign Lord! How completely you have deceived this people and Jerusalem by saying, ‘You will have peace,’ when the sword is at our throats!” Jeremiah 4:10

(please note that all references to God are replaced with yhwh).

There you have your answers OR ARE THESE NOT TRUE, PRETTY BOY TENQ ?

Again the question still stands: Can you give me a reason why I should engage with a shameless, fraudulent and morally bankrupt liar?

LegalWolf:


I think you are missing the point - Oftentimes, the issue of engaging a liar is framed more of a question than an assertion of fact. So I have asked him that which I am asking you, if you care to engage, the very simple question: why should I engage a fraudulent, ignoble and shameless liar on matters of religion?

cc: TenQ

You've been engaging him up to 3 pages without saying anything.

HisSplendor:


You've been engaging him up to 3 pages without saying anything.

Ohh really? But you also did not answer my question. Let me put it in highlight so you can see clearly : CAN YOU GIVE ME ONE REASON WHY I SHOULD ENGAGE ON MATTERS OF RELIGION WITH A FRAUDULENT LIAR ?

Mind you, this is fun for me and nothing more. This guy called TenQ has been caught lying in a previous thread. He ran away from that thread to open this one so he thinks we will forget his lie and continue with his questions here. That does not work that way HisSplendor. You cannot think my faith is bad and still have the audacity to be telling lies.

Anyways, he mentioned me on this thread not that I came uninvited. So, it is at MY SOLE DISCRETION to deal with my host ANYWAY I deem fit and that, with all due respect, is none of your business. But you could help him out by answering the highlighted question. If not, respectfully take a bow

LegalWolf:


What is true is that:

a. the seventh day Yhwh had finished the work he had been doing; so on the seventh day he rested from all his work Genesis 2:3;

b. For this reason Yhwh sends them a powerful delusion so that they will believe the lie 2 Thessalonians 2:11

c. Then I said, “Alas, Sovereign Lord! How completely you have deceived this people and Jerusalem by saying, ‘You will have peace,’ when the sword is at our throats!” Jeremiah 4:10

(please note that all references to God are replaced with yhwh).

There you have your answers OR ARE THESE NOT TRUE, PRETTY BOY TENQ ?

Again the question still stands: Can you give me a reason why I should engage with a shameless, fraudulent and morally bankrupt liar?

For the last time,

Is it true in the Qur'an that Allah made a direct COMMAND that failed miserably!?

THE QUESTION:
It is understandable if Allah Deceived the Jews and the Romans. Can you as Muslims please explain the logical reason why Allah Deceived ALSO Mary the Mother of Jesus, all Jesus Disciples, Jesus's Family (brothers and sisters) and all followers and friends of Jesus?

TenQ:


For the last time,

Is it true in the Qur'an that Allah made a direct COMMAND that failed miserably!?

THE QUESTION:
It is understandable if Allah Deceived the Jews and the Romans. Can you as Muslims please explain the logical reason why Allah Deceived ALSO Mary the Mother of Jesus, all Jesus Disciples, Jesus's Family (brothers and sisters) and all followers and friends of Jesus?

Hahahahaha....LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL! This is not the last time my dear. We are still on a very long road. Trust me, the journey will be exciting as I will be a guest in your mentions.

First off, you have not answered my very simple question which is: Why should I engage a fraudulent, shameless, ignoble and morally bankrupt LIAR in matter of religion? .

Secondly, and as a direct response to your question, I can only tell you what I know. Therefore, what I know that is true is what I have told you in my previous post, Or would you want me to send delusions to you?

LegalWolf:


Ohh really? But you also did not answer my question. Let me put it in highlight so you can see clearly : CAN YOU GIVE ME ONE REASON WHY I SHOULD ENGAGE ON MATTERS OF RELIGION WITH A FRAUDULENT LIAR ?

Mind you, this is fun for me and nothing more. This guy called TenQ has been caught lying in a previous thread. He ran away from that thread to open this one so he thinks we will forget his lie and continue with his questions here. That does not work that way HisSplendor. You cannot think my faith is bad and still have the audacity to be telling lies.

Anyways, he mentioned me on this thread not that I came uninvited. So, it is at MY SOLE DISCRETION to deal with my host ANYWAY I deem fit and that, with all due respect, is none of your business. But you could help him out by answering the highlighted question. If not, respectfully take a bow

We don't know whatever it is you guys have been arguing before now. As it stands, both of you are pointing on each other as a liar. Since we don't know what that matter is all about for which you call yourselves liars, we cannot be judges.

But for this current matter on this current thread, we only want answers and relevant engagements. I wasted a lot of time and data reading your unrelated posts to the questions asked.

It's better to avoid engagement or ever accept defeat than to spend 3 pages on a thread just to say " I don't engage liars." Interestingly, your accused is also accusing you to be a liar.

HisSplendor:


We don't know whatever it is you guys have been arguing before now. As it stands, both of you are pointing on each other as a liar. Since we don't know what that matter is all about for which you call yourselves liars, we cannot be judges.

But for this current matter on this current thread, we only want answers and relevant engagements. I wasted a lot of time and data reading your unrelated posts to the questions asked.

It's better to avoid engagement or ever accept defeat than to spend 3 pages on a thread just to say " I don't engage liars." Interestingly, your accused is also accusing you to be a liar.

Brother, you cannot be clever by half through hypocrisy. Again, you failed to answer the basic question!.

Now to your points, you want answers and relevant engagement . So also do I. I think the English people have a saying that Barbarians talk in thousands. And I even think it is completely insane that one person should keep asking questions where there are unfinished conversations on other questions, don't you share the same view.

Finally, you think it is proper that that one accepts defeat than to spend 3 pages on a thread just to say 'I don't engage liars'. But you have no words of rebuke for the other party engaging him for the same 3 pages (instead of showing that he is not a fraudulent liar which should keep my mouth shut)? Or do you because I cannot find it. Doesn't that stink of hypocrisy ?

HisSplendor:


We don't know whatever it is you guys have been arguing before now. As it stands, both of you are pointing on each other as a liar. Since we don't know what that matter is all about for which you call yourselves liars, we cannot be judges.

But for this current matter on this current thread, we only want answers and relevant engagements. I wasted a lot of time and data reading your unrelated posts to the questions asked.

It's better to avoid engagement or ever accept defeat than to spend 3 pages on a thread just to say " I don't engage liars." Interestingly, your accused is also accusing you to be a liar.

And mind you, if you claimed to have read the post to this page three, you would have seen that TenQ mentioned others who ignored him because of his previous fraudulent lies. Yet, he mentions them occasionally for their silence and draws negative inference from that. But No, you find no faults in that. But is me that I have agreed to answer his question only when issues of his character is settled first that YOU have issues with. Again, both Hypocrisy and Hissplen... should be synonyms, don't you think?

LegalWolf:


Brother, you cannot be clever by half through hypocrisy. Again, you failed to answer the basic question!.

Now to your points, you want answers and relevant engagement . So also do I. I think the English people have a saying that Barbarians talk in thousands. And I even think it is completely insane that one person should keep asking questions where there are unfinished conversations on other questions, don't you share the same view.

Finally, you think it is proper that that one accepts defeat than to spend 3 pages on a thread just to say 'I don't engage liars'. But you have no words of rebuke for the other party engaging him for the same 3 pages (instead of showing that he is not a fraudulent liar which should keep my mouth shut)? Or do you because I cannot find it. Doesn't that stink of hypocrisy ?

This is a public forum. We don't know of any unfinished business you two have together. We're only aware of this thread.

He has also called you a liar. I've neither sided with him nor yourself. I only chided you for wasting 3 pages to repeat irrelevant posts.

If you have unfinished business I e questions poised at him from which you claimed he ran away, then, a link to such thread at the foot of your allegation would have sufficed for confirmation.

LegalWolf:


And mind you, if you claimed to have read the post to this page three, you would have seen that TenQ mentioned others who ignored him because of his previous fraudulent lies. Yet, he mentions them occasionally for their silence and draws negative inference from that. But No, you find no faults in that. But is me that I have agreed to answer his question only when issues of his character is settled first that YOU have issues with. Again, both Hypocrisy and Hissplen... should be synonyms, don't you think?

I can't see it from your point of view. Were you all mentioned folks involved in your said argument with TenQ?

The fact that others choose not to do any Justice to his question only points us to one thing - they have no answers. You further confirmed it by not answering too. You seem to have appeared only to tell people that you didn't run away.

This is getting interesting. Please note the underlined in the comment below

HisSplendor:


I can't see it from your point of view. Were you all mentioned folks involved in your said argument with TenQ?

The fact that others choose not to do any Justice to his question only points us to one thing - they have no answers. You further confirmed it by not answering too. You seem to have appeared only to tell people that you didn't run away.

(underline mine)

Now see exactly what you said some minutes ago below:

HisSplendor:


We don't know whatever it is you guys have been arguing before now. As it stands, both of you are pointing on each other as a liar. Since we don't know what that matter is all about for which you call yourselves liars, we cannot be judges.

But for this current matter on this current thread, we only want answers and relevant engagements. I wasted a lot of time and data reading your unrelated posts to the questions asked.

It's better to avoid engagement or ever accept defeat than to spend 3 pages on a thread just to say " I don't engage liars." Interestingly, your accused is also accusing you to be a liar.

(emphasis mine)

Can you also smell your hypocrisy. In one breadth, you claimed that it is better to avoid engagement, in the other you said avoiding engagement only shows they have no answer. C'mon man! No matter how you try to disguise it, your hypocrisy stinks to the high heavens...Doesn't it?

HisSplendor:


This is a public forum. We don't know of any unfinished business you two have together. We're only aware of this thread.

He has also called you a liar. I've neither sided with him nor yourself. I only chided you for wasting 3 pages to repeat irrelevant posts.

If you have unfinished business I e questions poised at him from which you claimed he ran away, then, a link to such thread at the foot of your allegation would have sufficed for confirmation.

LOL! Mine is just to sit down and burst your bubble using pure logic.

Your claim here presupposes that I am doing a kind of public good. That when I answer TenQ or when he does the same, he contemplates YOU or OTHER members of the public in mind. That is not the way it works my dear Hissplendor. You, for example, are responding to me with the dominant intention of answering my questions not what any other stranger (or other member of the public) may think. This is just common sense. And if any member of the public wants to wade in, they should be the one asking for background not the other way round.

In any event, are you in anyway insinuating that in all of these thread, I have not quoted the post (whereby you can click on the link) where I alleged TenQ lied?

LegalWolf:
This is getting interesting. Please note the underlined in the comment below

(underline mine)

Now see exactly what you said some minutes ago below: (emphasis mine)

Can you also smell your hypocrisy. In one breadth, you claimed that it is better to avoid engagement, in the other you said avoiding engagement only shows they have no answer. C'mon man! No matter how you try to disguise it, your hypocrisy stinks to the high heavens...Doesn't it?

You're not getting it. I already asked a question that gave clarity to the underlined statement. "Were all you folks mentioned involved in your supposed previous argument?' He mentioned about 6 or more monickers. Were all previously involved?

Secondly, you have begun to twist my words. I had said in a previous post that 'it's better to avoid engagement...' Did I ever say to avoid engagement because the OP is lying or have unfinished business with you?'

In most cases, people avoid engagements in matters for which they have no answers. This happens 80% of the time.

LegalWolf:


LOL! Mine is just to sit down and burst your bubble using pure logic.

Your claim here presupposes that I am doing a kind of public good. That when I answer TenQ or when he does the same, he contemplates YOU or OTHER members of the public in mind. That is not the way it works my dear Hissplendor. You, for example, are responding to me with the dominant intention of answering my questions not what any other stranger (or other member of the public) may think. This is just common sense. And if any member of the public wants to wade in, they should be the one asking for background not the other way round.

In any event, are you in anyway insinuating that in all of these thread, I have not quoted the post (whereby you can click on the link) where I alleged TenQ lied?

A public post is made for public consumption. If you think you're speaking only to the person currently engaging you, you deceive yourself.

I've not seen a link to any previous post confirming your allegations against TenQ. If I have omitted it in error, kindly repost.

HisSplendor:


You're not getting it. I already asked a question that gave clarity to the underlined statement. "Were all you folks mentioned involved in your supposed previous argument?' He mentioned about 6 or more monickers. Were all previously involved?

Secondly, you have begun to twist my words. I had said in a previous post that 'it's better to avoid engagement...' Did I ever say to avoid engagement because the OP is lying or have unfinished business with you?'

In most cases, people avoid engagements in matters for which they have no answers. This happens 80% of the time.

Our good Hissplendor

Now you are quoting questionable/dubious statistics. Where did you get that '80% of the time' from? Was it National Bureau of Statistics or Pew Research center? LOL!

I still fail to see the connection of your question to what is at hand. Of what importance does it make if all the moniker were previously involved in our engagement or not. Like, please tell me what difference it makes.

See, all my professional life, my work involves bursting lies and unravelling hypocrisy at trial. And you will agree with me that your hypocrisy is apparent from the first word. There are several reasons why people avoid answering questions and it is dubious to claim the only reason, or 80% of the time, it is because they have no answers.

Now let me put the question to you: if you know X is a unrepentant yahoo boy. Now X has initiated an engagement on the morality or otherwise of 'scamming' people. Are you trying to tell me that the fact you decide to ignore him points to one thing - that you have no answers to his questions?

Just a succinct yes or no answer will be appreciated, please

HisSplendor:


A public post is made for public consumption. If you think you're speaking only to the person currently engaging you, you deceive yourself.

I've not seen a link to any previous post confirming your allegations against TenQ. If I have omitted it in error, kindly repost.

LOL!

LegalWolf:


Our good Hissplendor

Now you are quoting questionable/dubious statistics. Where did you get that '80% of the time' from? Was it National Bureau of Statistics or Pew Research center? LOL!

I still fail to see the connection of your question to what is at hand. Of what importance does it make if all the moniker were previously involved in our engagement or not. Like, please tell me what difference it makes.

See, all my professional life, my work involves bursting lies and unravelling hypocrisy at trial. And you will agree with me that your hypocrisy is apparent from the first word. There are several reasons why people avoid answering questions and it is dubious to claim the only reason, or 80% of the time, it is because they have no answers.

Now let me put the question to you: if you know X is a unrepentant yahoo boy. Now X has initiated an engagement on the morality or otherwise of 'scamming' people. Are you trying to tell me that the fact you decide to ignore him points to one thing - that you have no answers to his questions?

Just a succinct yes or no answer will be appreciated, please

You claimed those monikers refused to answer TenQ because he ran away from a previous post wherein he lied? If all the monikers mentioned were not involved in the previous thread, why is it that others who weren't involved are keeping mute? Or are they all involved? I think my point should be clear to you now.

A Yahoo boy who asks such a question would receive responses in accordance to the occasion.

If he asks the question privately, he'll receive the bashing of his life.

If he asks the question publicly, he'll receive a good bashing plus a detailed answer so that others can learn.

HisSplendor:


You claimed those monikers refused to answer TenQ because he ran away from a previous post wherein he lied? If all the monikers mentioned were not involved in the previous thread, why is it that others who weren't involved are keeping mute? Or are they all involved? I think my point should be clear to you now.

A Yahoo boy who asks such a question would receive responses in accordance to the occasion.

If he asks the question privately, he'll receive the bashing of his life.

If he asks the question publicly, he'll receive a good bashing plus a detailed answer so that others can learn.

LOL! you completely avoided my question. Hypocrisy is like smoke beloved Hissplendor , you cannot cover it. Note that it is completely irrelevant whether he asked you in private or public.

If you decide to keep mum when he is trying to argue the morality of scamming people to you, knowing fully well his antecedents, does that mean that you do not have an answer to his question? Why dancing galala up and down to a simple closed question?

HisSplendor:


You claimed those monikers refused to answer TenQ because he ran away from a previous post wherein he lied? If all the monikers mentioned were not involved in the previous thread, why is it that others who weren't involved are keeping mute? Or are they all involved? I think my point should be clear to you now.

A Yahoo boy who asks such a question would receive responses in accordance to the occasion.

If he asks the question privately, he'll receive the bashing of his life.

If he asks the question publicly, he'll receive a good bashing plus a detailed answer so that others can learn.

So I don't miss this out, I claimed they know he is a liar. They need not be part of the previous thread to know he is a liar! It is commonsense Hissplendor!

LegalWolf:


So I don't miss this out, I claimed they know he is a liar. They need not be part of the previous thread to know he is a liar! It is commonsense Hissplendor!

But frankly, may i allude to a previous post on this thread wherein you lied?

Secondly, you can't speak for them. You most probably don't even know any of them in person.

LegalWolf:


LOL! you completely avoided my question. Hypocrisy is like smoke beloved Hissplendor , you cannot cover it. Note that it is completely irrelevant whether he asked you in private or public.

If you decide to keep mum when he is trying to argue the morality of scamming people to you, knowing fully well his antecedents, does that mean that you do not have an answer to his question? Why dancing galala up and down to a simple closed question?

I thought you'll be reasonable, but I'm so dissapointed in you.

HisSplendor:


I thought you'll be reasonable, but I'm so dissapointed in you.

LOL! Again beloved Hissplendor you cannot run away from the obvious. Why won't you be disappointed? When you reach the limit of your intelligence, you run. I asked you a simple question and you are trying to run away. LOL!

HisSplendor:


But frankly, may i allude to a previous post on this thread wherein you lied?

Secondly, you can't speak for them. You most probably don't even know any of them in person.

LOL! Please it is my pleasure... not just allude, quote me.

LegalWolf:


LOL! Again beloved Hissplendor you cannot run away from the obvious. Why won't you be disappointed? When you reach the limit of your intelligence, you run. I asked you a simple question and you are trying to run away. LOL!

You asked a question about a Yahoo boy for which I provided 2 answers suited to two possible scenarios. Now, you're saying I'm running. Man, na confam liar you be!

HisSplendor:


You asked a question about a Yahoo boy for which I provided 2 answers suited to two possible scenarios. Now, you're saying I'm running. Man, na confam liar you be!

LOL, is that the lie Or something else?