Watch how IPOBians will descend on him for speaking the truth they so much loathe. No be say the thing konsain dem o, but any narrative for and against the Yoruba is anathema to these children of hate.

Johnnyessence:
😂 na you be justice that will sit on the Appeal court of justice and Supreme Court of justice panel . Odi Aye Atunwa fun ijoba Oyetola ni ipinle Osun. Tinubu ma lule piii Lekan siii niiii. February 25th presidential poll is here . Protest votes on February 25th presidential poll

When learned MEN OF THE CLOTHE are speaking...

You should SHUT YOUR IGNORANT HOLE on your face .

IGNORAMUS!

Johnnyessence:
Oyetola will lose both in Appeal court and Supreme Court of justice

Few points on this judgement:
1. The first report given to APC actually showed over-voting in more than 700 polling units. It is actually around 1500 polling units or thereabout including units APC won. Therefore, the alleged over-voting is widespread although APC based their petition on units they lost (700). This was alluded to in the minority judgement. Therefore, it is not restricted to where PDP won.
2. The second report given to PDP was better but was also showing over-voting in some units as well. The majority ruling of the tribunal claimed that INEC colluded with PDP in the pendency of the petition by APC to produce the second reports. However, this argument is puerile at best by two reasons (a) PDP is entitled to ask for the same forms/reports given to APC to defend the petition and can only ask for it in the pendency of the petition. Why would the winner of election ask for BVAS report? PDP won the election. They asked for the report after studying the petition of APC.
(b) The second BVAS report cannot be said to be tampered with because it still showed over-voting as claimed by APC although in less polling units across the state.
3. The two reports are contradictory leaving the PDP to then ask for physical inspection of the BVAS machines. At least the reports are generated by BVAS machines. The BVAS machines were brought to the open court and inspected and the data there correspond with the election results. Now, there were three evidences. 2 BVAS reports (printed from server, mind you) and one physical reports of the BVAS machines in the open court. In fact the two BVAS reports are not in tandem with the results of the physical inspection of the BVAS machines. The majority ruling decided to go with first BVAS report, neglecting 2nd BVAS validly given to PDP and the data on the BVAS itself.
4. In the majority judgement, the judge harped heavily and compared the veracity of the two BVAS reports. He said the 2nd BVAS report is doctored. Okay, but what of the BVAS machines itself? Is it also doctored? The tribunal gave permission to inspect the machines by the two parties and everyone in court saw there was no over-voting in BVAS machines but the tribunal didn't even take a position on the results of BVAS inspection in their ruling.
5. The tribunal didn't dabble into whether the results of BVAS machines inspection are accurate or tampered with as well. The question is, are BVAS machines tampered with as well? I will answer in negative by two reasons:
(a) we learned that only the chairman of INEC and director of ICT can have access to data stored on the BVAS machines. Even one of them cannot access the machines data without the cooperation of other. We all know that immediately after election and after tribunal started sitting, the BVAS machines were housed in the tribunal and not with INEC in Osogbo.
(b) The second reason why I believe that the machines were not tampered with was because the inspection of the machines showed over-voting in 6 units. If INEC had tampered with it, no polling units will report over-voting.
5. There were 3 members of the tribunal. The chairman wrote the leading judgment and other member wrote minority judgement. The third member of the panel did not agree with either the majority or minority judgements in the open court. After reading of the judgment by the chairman, the third member only greeted people and say goodbye. No concurrence or otherwise. I dare to say there is no judgement of that tribunal.
In conclusion, I believe the fight is actually against BVAS machines to erode the confidence of people on the machines or INEC and bring apathy in the forthcoming general election. Everybody should endeavour to get their PVC and vote wisely. Your vote will count.

U are missing it dear... If you watch Femi Falana on Arise TV, u will understand that adeleke is gone

Cajal:

Let wait and see

Fresh election can only take place if the cancelled polling units are more than one 3rd majority
Kindly get the summary and read further down
Don't coat out of context

Adeleke has gone

It's unfortunate
That EDE PEOPLE ARE LESS SOPHISTICATED TO HAVE BYPASSED BVAS

CONGRATULATIONS TO OYETOLA

Are you minding that half-baked semi Literate

VillagePipu:


APC is winning fair nd square, beating its opponents at first ballot.

After it is overturned like this result in osun ,the APC will not accept it. That's why iam mentioning it.
Even America cannot survive if what happened in 2000 polls happen now as there are even more bitter divison there too.

VillagePipu:


Johnny boy, you will cry for the next 4 years.
Your bad luck ruined Adeleke

True talk. Anyone IPOBians support is heading for failure. From Jonathan in 2025, to Trump in 2020, to Adeleke in 2022 and Obi in 2023. The names are many, but let me just stop here.

Johnnyessence:
Oyetola will lose both in Appeal court and Supreme Court of justice

Few points on this judgement:
1. The first report given to APC actually showed over-voting in more than 700 polling units. It is actually around 1500 polling units or thereabout including units APC won. Therefore, the alleged over-voting is widespread although APC based their petition on units they lost (700). This was alluded to in the minority judgement. Therefore, it is not restricted to where PDP won.
2. The second report given to PDP was better but was also showing over-voting in some units as well. The majority ruling of the tribunal claimed that INEC colluded with PDP in the pendency of the petition by APC to produce the second reports. However, this argument is puerile at best by two reasons (a) PDP is entitled to ask for the same forms/reports given to APC to defend the petition and can only ask for it in the pendency of the petition. Why would the winner of election ask for BVAS report? PDP won the election. They asked for the report after studying the petition of APC.
(b) The second BVAS report cannot be said to be tampered with because it still showed over-voting as claimed by APC although in less polling units across the state.
3. The two reports are contradictory leaving the PDP to then ask for physical inspection of the BVAS machines. At least the reports are generated by BVAS machines. The BVAS machines were brought to the open court and inspected and the data there correspond with the election results. Now, there were three evidences. 2 BVAS reports (printed from server, mind you) and one physical reports of the BVAS machines in the open court. In fact the two BVAS reports are not in tandem with the results of the physical inspection of the BVAS machines. The majority ruling decided to go with first BVAS report, neglecting 2nd BVAS validly given to PDP and the data on the BVAS itself.
4. In the majority judgement, the judge harped heavily and compared the veracity of the two BVAS reports. He said the 2nd BVAS report is doctored. Okay, but what of the BVAS machines itself? Is it also doctored? The tribunal gave permission to inspect the machines by the two parties and everyone in court saw there was no over-voting in BVAS machines but the tribunal didn't even take a position on the results of BVAS inspection in their ruling.
5. The tribunal didn't dabble into whether the results of BVAS machines inspection are accurate or tampered with as well. The question is, are BVAS machines tampered with as well? I will answer in negative by two reasons:
(a) we learned that only the chairman of INEC and director of ICT can have access to data stored on the BVAS machines. Even one of them cannot access the machines data without the cooperation of other. We all know that immediately after election and after tribunal started sitting, the BVAS machines were housed in the tribunal and not with INEC in Osogbo.
(b) The second reason why I believe that the machines were not tampered with was because the inspection of the machines showed over-voting in 6 units. If INEC had tampered with it, no polling units will report over-voting.
5. There were 3 members of the tribunal. The chairman wrote the leading judgment and other member wrote minority judgement. The third member of the panel did not agree with either the majority or minority judgements in the open court. After reading of the judgment by the chairman, the third member only greeted people and say goodbye. No concurrence or otherwise. I dare to say there is no judgement of that tribunal.
In conclusion, I believe the fight is actually against BVAS machines to erode the confidence of people on the machines or INEC and bring apathy in the forthcoming general election. Everybody should endeavour to get their PVC and vote wisely. Your vote will count.

All these stories you write, adeleke was declared winner based on the result given to APC. So, that is what the court is upholding.

illuminutty:
The best gift Buhari gave to Nigerians in his 8 years of the abysmal failure of his administration is the signing of the new electoral law. APC and PDP cannot rig this election against Labour Party. We will vote enmass and our votes will count and deliver our incoming to Aso Rock to make Nigeria great ever.

Only a BIGOTED DINGBAT will say that the Buhari led FG failed holistically..

Being COGNITIVE these days is more like a scarce commodity..

You and your "Rice and Beans" development indice..

EKONGKING:
If want happens in osun as claimed by APC happens at national in presidential polls ,the country will go up in flames , whoever is the effected party.

Only EMPTY NONCOGNITIVE COWARDS mouth off this GIBBERISH you keep regurgitating..

Nigeria can NEVER again go up in any flames or nonsense you are fuming erroneously about..

The question is : how is BVAS data stored and retrieved?
Is data encrypted? Are serial numbers of the machines recorded on result sheets? Should BVAS data be made available during result collation? Data can be tampered with so BVAS information ought to be collated with the results at the collation center else it cannot be trusted.

Cajal:

Let wait and see

Fresh election can only take place if the cancelled polling units are more than one 3rd majority
Kindly get the summary and read further down
Don't coat out of context

Adeleke has gone

It's unfortunate
That EDE PEOPLE ARE LESS SOPHISTICATED TO HAVE BYPASSED BVAS

CONGRATULATIONS TO OYETOLA

you and this your made in ede English. What is "don't coat out of context?"

Taiggarr:


Only EMPTY NONCOGNITIVE COWARDS mouth off this GIBBERISH you keep regurgitating..

Nigeria can NEVER again go up in any flames or nonsense you are fuming erroneously about..

So said a moronic idiot who cannot travel on any roads with out being kidnapped and Butchered like a goat.

asobo1:
APC still trying hard to defend this jankara judgement

The problem with your likes is that you don't engage with facts just innuendos and bukka talks.....The judgement is clear that there was overvotting in 744 polling units...Overvoting is called "RIGGING".....and the law is clear "the presiding officer shall cancel those PUs"......the tribunal followed the law and you are calling it jankara judgment...smh

the other admission of the tribunal that nobody is talking about is the admission of all three judges that Adeleke's certificate is fake....if he appeals it APC will still argue that Adeleke should be sacked over presentation of fake certificate as it happened to APC elected governor in Bayelsa who was never sworn in due to falsification on his certificate....if you are not a zombie you will admit the bitter truth that Adeleke is gone

Kennyfancy:
They are questioning Adeleke certificate but keep mute when we talk about Tinubu certificate, Nigeria is funny

Who's stopping you from going to Court?

EcoBrick:


https://www.vanguardngr.com/2023/01/osun-how-bvas-exposed-pdps-rigging-machine/

Omipidan doesn't know anything. Adeleke is your governor till 2026.

Johnnyessence:
Oyetola will lose both in Appeal court and Supreme Court of justice

Few points on this judgement:
1. The first report given to APC actually showed over-voting in more than 700 polling units. It is actually around 1500 polling units or thereabout including units APC won. Therefore, the alleged over-voting is widespread although APC based their petition on units they lost (700). This was alluded to in the minority judgement. Therefore, it is not restricted to where PDP won.
.

You never learn anything for wetin happen in Imo

Johnnyessence:
😂 na you be justice that will sit on the Appeal court of justice and Supreme Court of justice panel . Odi Aye Atunwa fun ijoba Oyetola ni ipinle Osun. Tinubu ma lule piii Lekan siii niiii. February 25th presidential poll is here . Protest votes on February 25th presidential poll

I actually feel your pains but you need to know that Adeleke has less than 20% chance of victory . Court case is not based on emotion but grounded on the law of land.

VillagePipu:


Johnny boy, you will cry for the next 4 years.
Your bad luck ruined Adeleke

I swear,that kid is full of bad luck 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Johnnyessence:
Ismail omipidan the clueless press Secretary to Oyetola lies and propaganda are Siamese twins. Awon ole oni ro jati jati

It is not just enough to call him names, kindly take your time to point out the lies with verifiable information at your disposal. simple

There is nothing APC is capable of roguely that PDP can't do .... the public don't even know who to believe anymore

What happened is that APC is smarter than PDP, was it that no over voting in polling units won by APC? absolutely No, but they are the one that file the case.
Why can't PDP counter challenge APC during the hearing on results from PU APC wins? Judges will only hear cases as presented by the petitioner.

The Osun tribunal judgement is an eye opener for all political parties, and INEC. The best appeal court can do is to call for fresh election in those PU.

Enemyofpeace:
you and this your made in ede English. What is "don't coat out of context?"

How has your queen's English helped your life?
trouble maker
Onikure

You are ignorant of the electoral act provision
Chech section 51 sub section 3 of the 2022 amended electoral act.

Cajal:

Let wait and see

Fresh election can only take place if the cancelled polling units are more than one 3rd majority
Kindly get the summary and read further down
Don't coat out of context

Adeleke has gone

It's unfortunate
That EDE PEOPLE ARE LESS SOPHISTICATED TO HAVE BYPASSED BVAS

CONGRATULATIONS TO OYETOLA

You are ignorant of the electoral act provision
Chech section 51 sub section 3 of the 2022 amended electoral act.
For your information Ede people did not bybass any BVAS machine but server report creates the confusion. You can go and check the BVAS machine used in that regard.

Cajal:

Let wait and see

Fresh election can only take place if the cancelled polling units are more than one 3rd majority
Kindly get the summary and read further down
Don't coat out of context

Adeleke has gone

It's unfortunate
That EDE PEOPLE ARE LESS SOPHISTICATED TO HAVE BYPASSED BVAS

CONGRATULATIONS TO OYETOLA

Johnnyessence:
Oyetola will lose both in Appeal court and Supreme Court of justice

Few points on this judgement:
1. The first report given to APC actually showed over-voting in more than 700 polling units. It is actually around 1500 polling units or thereabout including units APC won. Therefore, the alleged over-voting is widespread although APC based their petition on units they lost (700). This was alluded to in the minority judgement. Therefore, it is not restricted to where PDP won.
2. The second report given to PDP was better but was also showing over-voting in some units as well. The majority ruling of the tribunal claimed that INEC colluded with PDP in the pendency of the petition by APC to produce the second reports. However, this argument is puerile at best by two reasons (a) PDP is entitled to ask for the same forms/reports given to APC to defend the petition and can only ask for it in the pendency of the petition. Why would the winner of election ask for BVAS report? PDP won the election. They asked for the report after studying the petition of APC.
(b) The second BVAS report cannot be said to be tampered with because it still showed over-voting as claimed by APC although in less polling units across the state.
3. The two reports are contradictory leaving the PDP to then ask for physical inspection of the BVAS machines. At least the reports are generated by BVAS machines. The BVAS machines were brought to the open court and inspected and the data there correspond with the election results. Now, there were three evidences. 2 BVAS reports (printed from server, mind you) and one physical reports of the BVAS machines in the open court. In fact the two BVAS reports are not in tandem with the results of the physical inspection of the BVAS machines. The majority ruling decided to go with first BVAS report, neglecting 2nd BVAS validly given to PDP and the data on the BVAS itself.
4. In the majority judgement, the judge harped heavily and compared the veracity of the two BVAS reports. He said the 2nd BVAS report is doctored. Okay, but what of the BVAS machines itself? Is it also doctored? The tribunal gave permission to inspect the machines by the two parties and everyone in court saw there was no over-voting in BVAS machines but the tribunal didn't even take a position on the results of BVAS inspection in their ruling.
5. The tribunal didn't dabble into whether the results of BVAS machines inspection are accurate or tampered with as well. The question is, are BVAS machines tampered with as well? I will answer in negative by two reasons:
(a) we learned that only the chairman of INEC and director of ICT can have access to data stored on the BVAS machines. Even one of them cannot access the machines data without the cooperation of other. We all know that immediately after election and after tribunal started sitting, the BVAS machines were housed in the tribunal and not with INEC in Osogbo.
(b) The second reason why I believe that the machines were not tampered with was because the inspection of the machines showed over-voting in 6 units. If INEC had tampered with it, no polling units will report over-voting.
5. There were 3 members of the tribunal. The chairman wrote the leading judgment and other member wrote minority judgement. The third member of the panel did not agree with either the majority or minority judgements in the open court. After reading of the judgment by the chairman, the third member only greeted people and say goodbye. No concurrence or otherwise. I dare to say there is no judgement of that tribunal.
In conclusion, I believe the fight is actually against BVAS machines to erode the confidence of people on the machines or INEC and bring apathy in the forthcoming general election. Everybody should endeavour to get their PVC and vote wisely. Your vote will count.

You are only making superlative arguments and not point of law. Sometimes your arguments might sound logical but not back with instant law. Second BVAS report and BVAS machine were brought to the court after election tribunal has started sitting; you know what that means. Assuming INEC disowned the BVAS report given to APC then it would have been different .

Johnnyessence:
Oyetola will lose both in Appeal court and Supreme Court of justice

Few points on this judgement:
1. The first report given to APC actually showed over-voting in more than 700 polling units. It is actually around 1500 polling units or thereabout including units APC won. Therefore, the alleged over-voting is widespread although APC based their petition on units they lost (700). This was alluded to in the minority judgement. Therefore, it is not restricted to where PDP won.
2. The second report given to PDP was better but was also showing over-voting in some units as well. The majority ruling of the tribunal claimed that INEC colluded with PDP in the pendency of the petition by APC to produce the second reports. However, this argument is puerile at best by two reasons (a) PDP is entitled to ask for the same forms/reports given to APC to defend the petition and can only ask for it in the pendency of the petition. Why would the winner of election ask for BVAS report? PDP won the election. They asked for the report after studying the petition of APC.
(b) The second BVAS report cannot be said to be tampered with because it still showed over-voting as claimed by APC although in less polling units across the state.
3. The two reports are contradictory leaving the PDP to then ask for physical inspection of the BVAS machines. At least the reports are generated by BVAS machines. The BVAS machines were brought to the open court and inspected and the data there correspond with the election results. Now, there were three evidences. 2 BVAS reports (printed from server, mind you) and one physical reports of the BVAS machines in the open court. In fact the two BVAS reports are not in tandem with the results of the physical inspection of the BVAS machines. The majority ruling decided to go with first BVAS report, neglecting 2nd BVAS validly given to PDP and the data on the BVAS itself.
4. In the majority judgement, the judge harped heavily and compared the veracity of the two BVAS reports. He said the 2nd BVAS report is doctored. Okay, but what of the BVAS machines itself? Is it also doctored? The tribunal gave permission to inspect the machines by the two parties and everyone in court saw there was no over-voting in BVAS machines but the tribunal didn't even take a position on the results of BVAS inspection in their ruling.
5. The tribunal didn't dabble into whether the results of BVAS machines inspection are accurate or tampered with as well. The question is, are BVAS machines tampered with as well? I will answer in negative by two reasons:
(a) we learned that only the chairman of INEC and director of ICT can have access to data stored on the BVAS machines. Even one of them cannot access the machines data without the cooperation of other. We all know that immediately after election and after tribunal started sitting, the BVAS machines were housed in the tribunal and not with INEC in Osogbo.
(b) The second reason why I believe that the machines were not tampered with was because the inspection of the machines showed over-voting in 6 units. If INEC had tampered with it, no polling units will report over-voting.
5. There were 3 members of the tribunal. The chairman wrote the leading judgment and other member wrote minority judgement. The third member of the panel did not agree with either the majority or minority judgements in the open court. After reading of the judgment by the chairman, the third member only greeted people and say goodbye. No concurrence or otherwise. I dare to say there is no judgement of that tribunal.
In conclusion, I believe the fight is actually against BVAS machines to erode the confidence of people on the machines or INEC and bring apathy in the forthcoming general election. Everybody should endeavour to get their PVC and vote wisely. Your vote will count.

Mr Johnny, you just wrote a long piece of trash up there. If you must know, during appeals,
1. no new evidence is introduced.
2. The case is not reopened. The appeal is based on whether the judges were fair or unfair in their carriage of justice.

So talking about 1500 polling unit is a waste of time. No one will listen to you.

Cajal:
It's unfortunate Adeleke would have to be penalized for INEC fault
Neither Appeal nor supreme can impeach the tribunal rulling
It is crystal clear

how many plp seat at tribunal? Apeal Court and Supreme court?

What made you think Apeal will not upturn don't forget that national interest is considered in law and if the Civil unrest continue and get a good counsel I see no reason why the Apeal will not upturn the outcome as this machine will be compromised for Federal election.. so let's wait and see the outcome of Apeal

Over voting claim of APC was from 1750 polling units from which APC brought 749 polling units which favours them to court and the report was from server not the BVAS machine itself.
The physical inspection of the BVAS machine used in the election revealed no issue of over voting which was found on server that might have been affected by Network issues.

The issue of certificate forgery was based on the document he submitted in 2018 and the appeal court has cleared in him on that in 2019 and the judgement was filed at the tribunal who ignored it. He only submitted BSc and diploma certificate in 2022 which are found to be genuine.

IgOga:


The problem with your likes is that you don't engage with facts just innuendos and bukka talks.....The judgement is clear that there was overvotting in 749 polling units...Overvoting is called "RIGGING".....and the law is clear "the presiding officer shall cancel those PUs"......the tribunal followed the law and you are calling it jankara judgment...smh

the other admission of the tribunal that nobody is talking about is the admission of all three judges that Adeleke's certificate is fake....if he appeals it APC will still argue that Adeleke should be sacked over presentation of fake certificate as it happened to APC elected governor in Bayelsa who was never sworn in due to falsification on his certificate....if you are not a zombie you will admit the bitter truth that Adeleke is gone

EcoBrick:


https://www.vanguardngr.com/2023/01/osun-how-bvas-exposed-pdps-rigging-machine/

. The Tribunal chairman 'no send anybody ' He was frank and precise in his. judicial interpretation of laws and evidences.

Johnnyessence:
Ismail omipidan the clueless press Secretary to Oyetola lies and propaganda are Siamese twins. Awon ole oni ro jati jati

But you did not bring up any argument to counter his point

Tinubuwins2023e:
Ipob miscreants will think otherwise. Useless people

cc: Seun, Dominique, Justwise, Missyb3, Fynestboi, Oma4j, Farano, Rocktation
Rule 2

So in APC strong holds there was no over-voting .