Russia's Medvedev says more U.S. weapons supplies mean 'all of Ukraine will burn'


https://www.anews.com.tr/world/2023/02/04/russias-medvedev-says-more-us-weapons-supplies-mean-all-of-ukraine-will-burn

Russia's Medvedev says more U.S. weapons supplies mean 'all of Ukraine will burn'

"All of Ukraine that remains under Kyiv's rule will burn," journalist Nadana Fridrikhson quoted former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev as saying in a written interview with her.

Reuters WORLD
Published February 04,2023
S

Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev has said the supply of more advanced U.S. weaponry to Ukraine will only trigger more retaliatory strikes from Russia, up to the extent of Russia's nuclear doctrine.

"All of Ukraine that remains under Kyiv's rule will burn," journalist Nadana Fridrikhson quoted him as saying in a written interview with her.

Fridrikhson asked Medvedev, who as deputy chairman of the Security Council has become one of Russia's most hawkish pro-war figures since its invasion of Ukraine, whether the use of longer-range weapons might force Russia to negotiate with Kyiv.

"The result will be just the opposite," Medvedev replied, in comments that Fridrikhson posted on her Telegram channel.

"Only moral freaks, of which there are enough both in the White House and in the Capitol, can argue like that."

The Pentagon said on Friday that a new rocket that would double Ukraine's strike range was included in a $2.175 billion U.S. military aid package.

With the first anniversary of the invasion approaching on Feb. 24, Russian forces have been on the back foot for the last eight months, and do not fully control any of the four Ukrainian provinces that Moscow has unilaterally declared part of Russia.

President Vladimir Putin casts Russia's campaign in Ukraine as an existential defence against an aggressive West and has, like Medvedev, several times brandished the threat of a nuclear response, saying Russia will use all available means to protect itself and its people.

Asked what would happen if the weapons that Washington has promised Ukraine were to strike Crimea - which Russia seized from Ukraine in 2014 - or deep into Russia, Medvedev said Putin had addressed the matter clearly.

"We don't set ourselves any limits and, depending on the nature of the threats, we're ready to use all types of weapons. In accordance with our doctrinal documents, including the Fundamentals of Nuclear Deterrence," he said. "I can assure you that the answer will be quick, tough and convincing."

Russia's nuclear doctrine allows for a nuclear strike after "aggression against the Russian Federation with conventional weapons when the very existence of the state is threatened".

USA really hates Ukraine that why they want more death on Ukraine land.

But one thing is already crystal clear: While the war is not yet over, Ukraine has lost. Grasping that, we must first bring the fighting quickly to an end. Then we must mourn the dead. And, finally, we must get on with the task of rebuilding the country that Vladimir Putin has destroyed. Andrew Latham is a professor of international relations at Macalester College in Saint Paul, Minn., and a non-resident fellow at Defense Priorities in Washington, D.C. Follow him on Twitter @aalatham https://thehill.com/opinion/international/3261607-the-war-is-not-yet-over-but-ukraine-has-already-lost/

But I don't understand how in a war other countries go dey supply one side wit weapons. It means the fight is Russia versus US and co

Soulsymbol99:
But I don't understand how in a war other countries go dey supply one side wit weapons. It means the fight is Russia versus US and co

Russia gave weapons to Vietnam to kill USA military men which made USA to run from Vietnam.

Ukraine will be captured within a week, blabla for one year now, Ukraine is still standing. If the escalate more, US and UK will send attacking weapons

Putin is just too smart for the USA and NATO. If this war continues Ukraine will be obliterated while the USA and co will be left to lick their wounds. I know Zelenski and his biz partners would like it to run for a long time but Putin will pull the rug off their feet when he is ready to do so.

SecretSpy666:
Ukraine will be captured within a week, blabla for one year now, Ukraine is still standing. If the escalate more, US and UK will send attacking weapons

Russia will defeat all it enemies.

Nancy1986:
USA really hates Ukraine that why they want more death on Ukraine land.

True.
"Little by little we managed to collect 8 million signatures" https://odysee.com/@RTDocumentary:4/Battle-for-Africa:9

ogmask:
Putin is just too smart for the USA and NATO. If this war continues Ukraine will be obliterated while the USA and co will be left to lick their wounds. I know Zelenski and his biz partners would like it to run for a long time but Putin will pull the rug off their feet when he is ready to do so.

op pls remind me how old is d war now, something nlders pro Putin predicted 2weeks

mytime24:
op pls remind me how old is d war now, something nlders pro Putin predicted 2weeks

Pls remind me how many years US and allies spent in Vietnam against AK-47 wielding farmers, Pro US predicted 1 week...

mytime24:
op pls remind me how old is d war now, something nlders pro Putin predicted 2weeks

how many times will we say it putin never said that it was USA military General that told congress that Russia will capture Ukraine in few weeks.

BentizilL:

Pls remind me how many years US and allies spent in Vietnam against AK-47 wielding farmers, Pro US predicted 1 week...

20 years and they ran away from Afghanistan farmers and left over 80 billion worth of equipment.

Kingsnairaland:
Russia's Medvedev says more U.S. weapons supplies mean 'all of Ukraine will burn'


https://www.anews.com.tr/world/2023/02/04/russias-medvedev-says-more-us-weapons-supplies-mean-all-of-ukraine-will-burn

Russia's Medvedev says more U.S. weapons supplies mean 'all of Ukraine will burn'

"All of Ukraine that remains under Kyiv's rule will burn," journalist Nadana Fridrikhson quoted former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev as saying in a written interview with her.

Reuters WORLD
Published February 04,2023
S

Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev has said the supply of more advanced U.S. weaponry to Ukraine will only trigger more retaliatory strikes from Russia, up to the extent of Russia's nuclear doctrine.

"All of Ukraine that remains under Kyiv's rule will burn," journalist Nadana Fridrikhson quoted him as saying in a written interview with her.

Fridrikhson asked Medvedev, who as deputy chairman of the Security Council has become one of Russia's most hawkish pro-war figures since its invasion of Ukraine, whether the use of longer-range weapons might force Russia to negotiate with Kyiv.

"The result will be just the opposite," Medvedev replied, in comments that Fridrikhson posted on her Telegram channel.

"Only moral freaks, of which there are enough both in the White House and in the Capitol, can argue like that."

The Pentagon said on Friday that a new rocket that would double Ukraine's strike range was included in a $2.175 billion U.S. military aid package.

With the first anniversary of the invasion approaching on Feb. 24, Russian forces have been on the back foot for the last eight months, and do not fully control any of the four Ukrainian provinces that Moscow has unilaterally declared part of Russia.

President Vladimir Putin casts Russia's campaign in Ukraine as an existential defence against an aggressive West and has, like Medvedev, several times brandished the threat of a nuclear response, saying Russia will use all available means to protect itself and its people.

Asked what would happen if the weapons that Washington has promised Ukraine were to strike Crimea - which Russia seized from Ukraine in 2014 - or deep into Russia, Medvedev said Putin had addressed the matter clearly.

"We don't set ourselves any limits and, depending on the nature of the threats, we're ready to use all types of weapons. In accordance with our doctrinal documents, including the Fundamentals of Nuclear Deterrence," he said. "I can assure you that the answer will be quick, tough and convincing."

Russia's nuclear doctrine allows for a nuclear strike after "aggression against the Russian Federation with conventional weapons when the very existence of the state is threatened".

.


Seems your fresh supply of Russian cheap weed just landed, smoke it very well it has no effect with the victory of Ukraine but only makes you more and more stu**pid

Hotice085:
.


Seems your fresh supply of Russian cheap weed just landed, smoke it very well it has no effect with the victory of Ukraine but only makes you more and more stu**pid

move along to the next door I don't have time for insult.

Kingsnairaland:
move along to the next door I don't have time for insult.

Then stop all "feel good stories" when you know Russia is suffering blockhead

Former Israeli PM Bennett:"I asked Putin: Are you going to kill Zelensky?.He replied,I'm not going to kill Zelensky.I told Zelensky Putin will not kill him.2 hours later Zelensky went into his office and filmed himself there on the phone with the words: "I'm not afraid!"

Once or twice a week we struck Iranian targets there,” he (Bennet) said.

Russia, which is a superpower has S-300 missiles stationed there that can take Israel’s aerial sorties in the Syrian skies, he said.

“If they press a button Israeli pilots will be downed and who will help rescue them? Will [US President Joe] Biden do it or Zelensky?” he asked noting that it would be Israel’s problem to deal with the fallout.

Hotice085:


Then stop all "feel good stories" when you know Russia is suffering blockhead

the door is wide open move there I don't have time for insult.

Nancy1986:
USA really hates Ukraine that why they want more death on Ukraine land.

russia loves ukraine that why they are sending more relief items to them

leofab:
russia loves ukraine that why they are sending more relief items to them

Cuba could have been like Ukraine but because Russia loves peace they solved the problem with USA back then

But now.

USA hate Ukraine that why they want Russia to burn it to the ground by using them for proxy war which they have said many times they no longer hide it because they are confused.

Kingsnairaland:
20 years and they ran away from Afghanistan farmers and left over 80 billion worth of equipment.

Shithole People Can Only Argue Without The Sense Of Government

Kingsnairaland:
Cuba could have been like Ukraine but because Russia loves peace they solved the problem with USA back then

But now.

USA hate Ukraine that why they want Russia to burn it to the ground by using them for proxy war which they have said many times they no longer hide it because they are confused.

yes abs cuba is the greatest nation on earth today

leofab:
yes abs cuba is the greatest nation on earth today

Much better than Ukraine at the moment.

leofab:
yes abs cuba is the greatest nation on earth today

to live long is better than joining Russia or USA collision lol

How's Ukraine going for you

Watch videos of women crying that they don't want war again in Ukraine lol

Men running that they no longer want to be part of the army.

Kingsnairaland:
to live long is better than joining Russia or USA collision lol

How's Ukraine going for you

Watch videos of women crying that they don't want war again in Ukraine lol

Men running that they no longer want to be part of the army.

it’s happening in both sides.. Russia is an autocratic state so people don’t speak up.. the few that protested were arrested and send to the front.. many escaped russia and ran neighboring country to avoid being conscripted

leofab:
it’s happening in both sides.. Russia is an autocratic state so people don’t speak up.. the few that protested were arrested and send to the front.. many escaped russia and ran neighboring country to avoid being conscripted

If you suddenly decide to declare Russia an international aggressor, read these facts and figures. Over 3 million people - that's how many foreigners the US military has killed in 60 invasions of sovereign nations under the pretext of bringing "democracy"?
Cuba (1906) - ?
Nicaragua (1912) - ?
Haiti (1915) - ?
Dominican Republic (1916) - ? 29
Russia (1918) - 2,000
Japan (1945)- 246000
Philippines (1948-1953) - 160,000
Puerto Rico (1950) - 29
Korea (1950-1953) - 570
Guatemala (1954) - 100000
Lebanon (1958) - ?
Panama (1958) - 734
Laos (1959) - 3,000
Haiti (1959) - 2204
Ecuador (1960) - ?
Guatemala (1960) - ?
Dominican Republic (1965) - 2500
Vietnam (1964-1975) - ? 850132
Guatemala (1966) - ?
Indonesia (1966) - ?
Philippines (1966) - ?
Cambodia (1967) - ? 300.000
Laos (1971-1973) - ?
Nicaragua (1972) - ?
El Salvador (1977) - ? 75.000
Grenada (1983) - ?
Libya (1986) - ?
Iran (1980) - ?
Lebanon (1982) - ? 144000
Grenada (1983) - 141
Libya (1986) - 45
Honduras (1988) - ?
Iran (1988) - 290
Virgin Islands (1989) - ?
Panama (1989) - ? 734
Iraq (1991) - ?
Bosnia and Herzegovina (1992 - 1995) - ? 98.000
Somalia (1992 -1994) - ? 1,000
Haiti (1994) - ? 200
Sudan (1998) - ?
Yugoslavia (1999) - 5,700
Afghanistan (2001-2021) - 103000
Iraq (2003-2011) - 690000
Iraq (2011-2017) - 170000
Liberia (2003) - 150000
Pakistan (2004) - 108000
Libya (2011) - 40000
Syria (2013) - 2286
Yemen (2015) - 11000
Cameroon (2015) - ?
Libya (2015) - 1,000
And then there were the color revolutions perpetrated (or thwarted) by the US in Georgia (2003), Ukraine (2004, 2014), Kyrgyzstan (2005), Tunisia (2011), Armenia (2008, 2015), Russia (2010, 2013), Belarus (2020), and Kazakhstan (2022).
The sanctions imposed on the US for this age-old international terrorism are 0.
Judge for yourself. No politics, just numbers.

Kingsnairaland:
If you suddenly decide to declare Russia an international aggressor, read these facts and figures. Over 3 million people - that's how many foreigners the US military has killed in 60 invasions of sovereign nations under the pretext of bringing "democracy"?
Cuba (1906) - ?
Nicaragua (1912) - ?
Haiti (1915) - ?
Dominican Republic (1916) - ? 29
Russia (1918) - 2,000
Japan (1945)- 246000
Philippines (1948-1953) - 160,000
Puerto Rico (1950) - 29
Korea (1950-1953) - 570
Guatemala (1954) - 100000
Lebanon (1958) - ?
Panama (1958) - 734
Laos (1959) - 3,000
Haiti (1959) - 2204
Ecuador (1960) - ?
Guatemala (1960) - ?
Dominican Republic (1965) - 2500
Vietnam (1964-1975) - ? 850132
Guatemala (1966) - ?
Indonesia (1966) - ?
Philippines (1966) - ?
Cambodia (1967) - ? 300.000
Laos (1971-1973) - ?
Nicaragua (1972) - ?
El Salvador (1977) - ? 75.000
Grenada (1983) - ?
Libya (1986) - ?
Iran (1980) - ?
Lebanon (1982) - ? 144000
Grenada (1983) - 141
Libya (1986) - 45
Honduras (1988) - ?
Iran (1988) - 290
Virgin Islands (1989) - ?
Panama (1989) - ? 734
Iraq (1991) - ?
Bosnia and Herzegovina (1992 - 1995) - ? 98.000
Somalia (1992 -1994) - ? 1,000
Haiti (1994) - ? 200
Sudan (1998) - ?
Yugoslavia (1999) - 5,700
Afghanistan (2001-2021) - 103000
Iraq (2003-2011) - 690000
Iraq (2011-2017) - 170000
Liberia (2003) - 150000
Pakistan (2004) - 108000
Libya (2011) - 40000
Syria (2013) - 2286
Yemen (2015) - 11000
Cameroon (2015) - ?
Libya (2015) - 1,000
And then there were the color revolutions perpetrated (or thwarted) by the US in Georgia (2003), Ukraine (2004, 2014), Kyrgyzstan (2005), Tunisia (2011), Armenia (2008, 2015), Russia (2010, 2013), Belarus (2020), and Kazakhstan (2022).
The sanctions imposed on the US for this age-old international terrorism are 0.
Judge for yourself. No politics, just numbers.

were these invasion approved by the United Nations Security council.. it’s like comparing how many people the police has executed and those that an assassin has executed

If there are no consequences from the Russians for US/Ukraine, they probably would have given Kiev nukes by now. Consequences in itself is a deterrent for something worse.

leofab:
it’s happening in both sides.. Russia is an autocratic state so people don’t speak up.. the few that protested were arrested and send to the front.. many escaped russia and ran neighboring country to avoid being conscripted

Russia is definitely not an autocratic state. that depends on your definition. Putin was voted for every time he stepped forward for an election. He has brought prosperity to Russia and made the country strong again. The Western countries developed organically over the years with their own turbulence and changes to grow their institutions. They should allow emerging economies to find their feet also without interference. Sometimes, democracy is not the best form of governance for a state. For instance, I dare you to give me any prosperous or powerful middle eastern democracy. That is because their natural culture and religion is not in line with democracy. Even places like Dubai are autocratic and westerners keep supporting them and nobody is making noise about it. The moment a country is against USA, it suddenly becomes a dictatorship. I refuse to accept that we must adopt the western mode of democracy to become prosperous. China is prospering and it is operating its own natural style. That self-pride is what will eventually kill the western world. The world is no more revolving around their stupid rules.

leofab:
were these invasion approved by the United Nations Security council.. it’s like comparing how many people the police has executed and those that an assassin has executed

no war has been approved by un.

It's like this Medvedev is more hardcore than Putin.

Now I am beginning to understand the hegemony of US with recent revelation of NordStream.

Interesting scarry times ahead