Weregonnalose:


ya mom is ah poor ya ijebos isa illegitimate anchor because of change ye kikikikiki

benalvino3:


The meaning or "May not" should be considered as well. Ambiguity is what i see there but that should be a discussion for another day. Good night.

benalvino3:
Wont you ask Ijebos to open the gates of the US for you? I heard he is the gate keeper. lol

Weregonnalose:


i ah think ya isa illegitimate child ye. anchor baby for tha money. ya dad isa not ah marry ya mom and ya prostitute mom isa need tha shelter at tha cost of tha black eye ye. kikikikikikikiki

IjeBos:


Posts like this .....

Weregonnalose:


Likey ya father ye kikikikikiki

IjeBos:


Domestic Violence: Why Nigeria is experiencing an upsurge
https://guardian.ng/saturday-magazine/domestic-violence-why-nigeria-is-experiencing-an-upsurge/

Weregonnalose:
https://web.facebook.com/?_rdc=1&_rdr

budaatum:

"A thousand sexuality" is not "according to liberals", since it is very obvious that not only liberals are creating their own sexuality! And any teacher who teaches that it is according to liberals should be excluded from indoctrinating children with ignorant propaganda.


Would you, on this ground, want to exclude race too, and social skills and critical thinking and about other religions, since "There are enough topics in mathematics science Geography etc not covered at this time"?

Perhaps have more faith in your child, and your ability to educate it, is what I suggest. After all, it would be irresponsible of you to just focus on "topics in mathematics science Geography etc", when even in those subjects you can be teaching about the percentages and geographical spread and the science behind sexuality.

If, say, you teach your child about percentages of prevalence of the thousands of sexualities in various geographical locations, your child might learn a lot of "mathematics science Geography etc".

budaatum:


Now, this I can not oppose, and in fact categorically agree with.

It also supports Raudeuter's objection to calling it the "don't say gay law", which it isn't, and is as ignorant as "Maths is racist".

3rd Grade is however for ages 8-9, and it would become age appropriate to teach about sexual orientation or gender identity if a child in their class is questioning either or has parents with either or both.

We would not after all want any particular child excluded nor bullied by the ignorant rest just because we did not teach them about "sexual orientation or gender identity" all be it of others.

raumdeuter:


What problem do you have with informing parents about the content of what their children are being taught

raumdeuter:


Race, quantitative aptitude are all part of the school approved curriculum. And there is enough materials for their test and education

Parents should take an active role in their kids education and what they learn and not leave to teachers who may or may not have their own agendas

No one can have the interest of your child more than you

That's why it's called a Parental right in education. A parents right don't stop at giving birth, you should also be a part of what they learn and approve including sexual materials

IjeBos:


Now why don't you post yours.

budaatum:


I would report you for violating privacy if I felt my privacy were violated.

Please know that you are on my do not discuss with list until you dedonkey yourself as I would not like to be infected by anything you catch from a donkey.

IjeBos:


Report me for what? How did I violate your privacy? You may want to direct your ire at the person who did violate your privacy. And you're a grown person, you can choose who you want to talk to or not to talk to. But I would think a racist who comes here to spew his brand of black racism, encourages others to do the same and congregates with the likes or may be the person who actually violated your privacy MAY be high on the list. Or is any conversation worth that?

budaatum:


I think those giving it attention encourage it most.

And no, my privacy is not violated. I just don't see value in associating with those who can't ignore donkeys.

IjeBos:

You're assumption is that if you ignore someone, they'll go away.

IjeBos:
I find noxious those who can't ignore Racists.

basilico:


You make wild claims. The current left has an extreme wing , the Marxists in name.
Why do the left block free speech.From Twitter files a lot of gov bodies were instructing Twitter on who ,what to censor.

basilico:


That was Biden who said that.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGRnhBmHYN0

BraniacX:
that is your proof? A 10s soundbite? Where is the full speech? You might as well be one of five blind men taken to feel an elephant who held it by the tail and proclaimed that an elephant is built like a rope! With such conclusive evidence no wonder why you've yet to lose a case in court, oh sorry,......you might as well wake up from your opioid dreams! You see what i meant by tolerating stupidity?

basilico:



Trust that you can read this with no bias.


https://conservativeplaylist.com/2022/10/09/the-war-on-ivermectin/


I was coming out now with ivermectin, and it threatened hundreds of billions of dollars in perpetuity for these insanely lethal vaccines, monoclonal antibodies, remdesivir, paxlovid, molnupiravir — all of the markets for their novel new pills to enter. I mean, I don’t think any medicine has ever threatened that much of a market.

IjeBos:


You still didn't answer how I invaded your privacy, or how anything I did could have even remotely violated your privacy. Again, your anger is misplaced.

You're assumption is that if you ignore someone, they'll go away. Being a politics thread, how did that work out for Trump and Clinton? I think everyone should have learned a lesson from ignoring people who broadcast lies after that election and esp. after Covid.

As I said, you're an adult. Do as you see fit. I find noxious those who can't ignore Racists.

basilico:


I know you are agnostic. Those who follow the scripturea would not molest a child .

Those who follow Islam can marry a girl at 9 years

BraniacX:
so, I'm supposed to take a publication with an obvious political bias as implied by the medium in which ìt was published from an author who has traded professionally regulated clinical practice for an unregulated and potentially profitable (if you can appeal to the right audience) telemedicine practice dependent on sales which is also dependent on personal recognition (Dr. Oz is a prime example) serious? Although i share his sentiments on the influence wielded by big pharma but you have to bring exclusively peer reviewed scientific facts to the table in a scientific or medical debate, peer review exists for a reason to make sure your findings are generally universally applicable and your results are not influenced by any sort of bias, yet you are asking people to accept claims from fringe doctors with non-medical motives lacking peer review for your political narratives? Sorry not sorry! I'm not a Republican i.e I'm not wilfully stup1d like you all! If I'm ever adjudged stup1d in my life it will be because i was ignorant of certain facts not because i chose to selectively ignore facts i don't like

budaatum:


There's always ambiguity, Ben. It's like you say one thing and someone, due to ambiguity or there own lack of understanding or just plain ignorance, or the desire to play on ambiguity, twists it to mean what was not meant, like you claiming buda wants to groom your daughter.

Those who want to avoid it will be honest and ask for explanations instead of peddling lies and adding to the ambiguity.


We Brits don't need anyone to open the gates to US for us. We just turn up at the US consulate with the requisite documents and provide proof of full vaccination against COVID-19, pay the visa fee and voila, gates open. In fact, these days we can just apply online.