airmark:


They don't give Ucl trophy to a loser in the final.

Name a league title won by Pochettino without Messi, I am waiting.

FirstbornWds:


Even Ancelotti, a serial winner went to the lowest of lows by signing for Everton before returning to top-flight football.

Enrique developed too and that materialized in Spain national team.

popizaino:


False equivalence.........Roma is a bigger prospect than Everton,Luiz Enrique should have left his mark there and not needing a prime Barcelona to be called a serial winner.

popizaino:



What is there to stabilise after winning the UCL back to back to back and winning the league as well?

What is there to stabilise after conquering european and world club football? Even pep Guardiola couldn't inspire his then Barcelona side after winning 2 UCL in 4years but Zidane has to become Metuzelah at real Madrid before we rate him.


Pls come up with a better reasons,these ones are just falling flat.

popizaino:


False equivalence.........Roma is a bigger prospect than Everton,Luiz Enrique should have left his mark there and not needing a prime Barcelona to be called a serial winner.

popizaino:






That's what happen when you talk too much and post unnecessary stuffs,you begin to contradict yourself.

andrew444:


Roma cannot afford the players everton can afford to buy

If mourinho and co cannot leave their mark at spurs with their huge spendings ,then you shouldn’t be expecting Enrique to leave a mark at as Roma

Roma was his first job after leaving Barca B

That’s all I can say

popizaino:


Show me Conte's UCL semifinals appearance from italy to England? I am also waiting.

Skimpledawg:

Oh wow, Leicester is dancing around relegation? Didn't see this coming when this season started.

Southie may not survive this relegation man.

sod09:
Ajegunle romano fabrizio

airmark:


They don't give Ucl trophy to a loser in the final.

Name a league title won by Pochettino without Messi, I am waiting.

MorataFC:
Mushin Chapter

Capaldi:

The season is very much not over. We can still win the Champions League and 3 to 4 straight league wins put us in the top 4 fight, we need consistency. Enrique is inept and should not be considered for anything.

MorataFC:
Mushin Chapter

FirstbornWds:


Asin, it is the way he sells himself as intelligent that amuses me. Niggur can't even beat 12 year old in a spelling Bee

sod09:
Ajegunle romano fabrizio

MorataFC:
Mushin Chapter

Leyqute:
Unlimited22 skimpledawg

Who do you think will get relegated?

popizaino:


False equivalence.........Roma is a bigger prospect than Everton,Luiz Enrique should have left his mark there and not needing a prime Barcelona to be called a serial winner.

A001:
This "long-term project" I dey see everywhere dey look like we could be in for Potter 2.0 especially if Nagelsmann gets the nod and fails to meet expectations.

I don't know when Chelsea management go learn. Make dem no give any coach a long-term contract.

FirstbornWds:


Again, stop comparing Zidane with Pep.. They are miles apart, in terms of coaching ability... Make your point, but do not try to justify anything Zidane achieved and use Pep as a reference...

Why?

Since you want to make excuses for Zidane's lack of stability and team development at Madrid. Let me set the record straight and give you the real difference between Pep's legacy at Barcelona and Zidane's legacy at Madrid. Stability isn't just about winning back to back to back UCLs.

First and foremost, let's talk about stability. Yes, Madrid won the UCL back-to-back-to-back, but what happened after that? They fell apart. Zidane couldn't keep the team together, and they had a very underwhelming performance in La Liga. Meanwhile, when Pep was at Barcelona, he created a system that was built to last. He brought in players who fit his style of play, and he developed young players who went on to become some of the best in the world. Barcelona was dominant for years, and that's all thanks to Pep's stability.

Now, let's talk about team development. Yes, Madrid conquered European and world club football, but that doesn't mean they developed as a team. In fact, it's quite the opposite. Madrid relied heavily on individual brilliance from players like Ronaldo, but they never truly developed as a cohesive unit. On the other hand, Pep's Barcelona was the epitome of team development. He created a style of play that was built on passing and movement, and every player on the team had a role to play. They worked together as a team and they dominated the footballing world.

As for the argument that Pep couldn't inspire his Barcelona side after winning two UCL in four years, that's just nonsense. Pep's Barcelona went on to win numerous La Liga titles and even another UCL after he left. Meanwhile, Zidane had to come back to Madrid after they fell apart without him. That just goes to show the difference between the legacies that these two managers left, until ANCELOTTI, an old guard happened to Madrid.

Simply put, the difference between Pep's legacy at Barcelona and Zidane's legacy at Madrid is clear. Pep brought stability and team development, while Zidane didn't.

BlueAngel444:
no be D same management put £13m clause for potter contract, why u dey feel like say na mumus dey run Chelsea

Leyqute:

Yes o.

8 of the 10 teams in the bottom half of the table are facing relegation.

Rodgers ran Leicestershire to the ground. They should’ve sacked him earlier.

I think Leeds will survive somehow. And Everton too.

You see that So’ton ehn? I’m sure they’ll get relegated. And I’ll be happy when it happens. Why? They’ve been brazenly complacent over the years.

They sell their top players, don’t replace them and just flirt with relegation. Every season.

It’s not surprising that they’re where they are right now. The miracle will be if they don’t get relegated.

I fashion Bournemouth to get relegated too. But they can stay up- if they keep their recent performances up and Brennan Johnson doesnt lose form.

FirstbornWds:


Again, stop comparing Zidane with Pep.. They are miles apart, in terms of coaching ability... Make your point, but do not try to justify anything Zidane achieved and use Pep as a reference...

Why?

FirstbornWds:


Since you want to make excuses for Zidane's lack of stability and team development at Madrid. Let me set the record straight and give you the real difference between Pep's legacy at Barcelona and Zidane's legacy at Madrid. Stability isn't just about winning back to back to back UCLs.


First and foremost, let's talk about stability. Yes, Madrid won the UCL back-to-back-to-back, but what happened after that? They fell apart. Zidane couldn't keep the team together, and they had a very underwhelming performance in La Liga. Meanwhile, when Pep was at Barcelona, he created a system that was built to last. He brought in players who fit his style of play, and he developed young players who went on to become some of the best in the world. Barcelona was dominant for years, and that's all thanks to Pep's stability.

FirstbornWds:

Now, let's talk about team development. Yes, Madrid conquered European and world club football, but that doesn't mean they developed as a team. In fact, it's quite the opposite. Madrid relied heavily on individual brilliance from players like Ronaldo, but they never truly developed as a cohesive unit. On the other hand, Pep's Barcelona was the epitome of team development. He created a style of play that was built on passing and movement, and every player on the team had a role to play. They worked together as a team and they dominated the footballing world.

FirstbornWds:

As for the argument that Pep couldn't inspire his Barcelona side after winning two UCL in four years, that's just nonsense. Pep's Barcelona went on to win numerous La Liga titles and even another UCL after he left. Meanwhile, Zidane had to come back to Madrid after they fell apart without him. That just goes to show the difference between the legacies that these two managers left, until ANCELOTTI, an old guard happened to Madrid.

FirstbornWds:

Simply put, the difference between Pep's legacy at Barcelona and Zidane's legacy at Madrid is clear. Pep brought stability and team development, while Zidane didn't.