benalvino3:


Sly come here... are you the father of my chickens i am going to run a DNA test... hahahah
you know before you attack someone, there should be truth to it. let me show you how.

so all the things i say about you is true or stem from your mouth

So you want the potential father to attest that he may have slept with your wife.

My dad abused my Mom... Woah. I freely talk about that. Keep quoting it. Spreading it. I donate to charities who deal with Domestic Violence. Unlike you I'm strong enough to talk about it. Your father was poor in PH and you married a former prostitute. I'm sure you've seen your share of misery to make you hate yourself the way you do.

You should figure out how your Christianity marries with being sycophantic with people like Sly. Do you think who and what you represent on this forum aligns with the life Christ talked about? When you go to church on Sunday to denounce the gays and trans do you denounce yourself? When you go to Church this Easter Sunday will you bring Sly with you?

Btw. Mr. Christian(only when it comes to attacking people) is asking why I would rather get a hotel than "live" with an unmarried woman in Lagos. Of course it's easier for me as I can Afford it. But that's what happens when your life meets your values. As I said, your Christianity is something you seem to wear when it suits you.

IjeBos:


So you want the potential father to attest that he may have slept with your wife.

My dad abused my Mom... Woah. I freely talk about that. Keep quoting it. Spreading it. I donate to charities who deal with Domestic Violence. Unlike you I'm strong enough to talk about it. Your father was poor in PH and you married a former prostitute. I'm sure you've seen your share of misery to make you hate yourself the way you do.

You should figure out how your Christianity marries with being sycophantic with people like Sly. Do you think who and what you represent on this forum aligns with the life Christ talked about? When you go to church on Sunday to denounce the gays and trans do you denounce yourself? When you go to Church this Sunday will you bring Sly with you?

Btw. Mr. Christian(only when it comes to attacking people) is asking why I would rather get a hotel than "live" with an unmarried woman in Lagos. Of course it's easier for me as I can Afford it. But that's what happens when your life meets your values. As I said, your Christianity is something you seem to wear when it suits you.

Thank you. I don't lie. everything i say about you is the truth and stems from your mouth.
so whats the difference....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PANEcjhSfv4

benalvino3:


this is why you are a token nigga at Harvard

and this shows what you think about black people. but the rest of your babbles were just lies and this was made for bragging sake as usual.

Is this an insult? If you went to Yale it may be. But you didn't.
You're that toothless white guy who lives in a trailer park(PHC) with chicken running around talking about "He's just a nigger, a token Nigger at Harvard".

Be smart enough to be a token somewhere and come back to talk to me. Holy self unawareness. Lol.

IjeBos:


Is this an insult? If you went to Yale it may be. But you didn't.
You're that toothless white guy who lives in a trailer park(PHC) with chicken running around talking about "He's just a nigger, a token Nigger at Harvard".

Be smart enough to be a token somewhere and come back to talk to me. Holy self unawareness. Lol.

hahahahaha
Token Nigga proud of being a token nigga and bragging about it to nigerians.

IjeBos:

To give you a background. I'd probably be one of those "acceptable" black people white people like to talk about, you know the "non thuggish type". Highly educated, top schools, doing well, etc. etc.

IjeBos:

Not confused. Was referring to the subsequent potential indictment in Arkansas he settled.

I can do a gift article.

Thanks, it worked, but NYT not very good (me venting). Best they said was "professional conduct", but that's still not "for a consensual affair he had in another state".

raumdeuter, Clinton did not give up his Law license because of the numerous allegations of sexual assault against him. Most he gave up for sexual assault was a few thousand dollars.

Future #metoo debt must weigh heavily on him.

https://www.yourtango.com/2017307907/bill-clinton-sexual-assault-rape-allegations-list-women-timeline

benalvino3:



hahahahaha
Token Nigga proud of being a token nigga and bragging about it to nigerians.

When you speak I imagine this is what you and the misses (ex run girl that she is ) would look like in the US, screaming, "You a nigger, Token nigger from Harvard".

Cooning Scooby Snack Black

budaatum:


Thanks, it worked, but NYT not very good (me venting). Best they said was "professional conduct", but that's still not "for a consensual affair he had in another state".

raumdeuter, Clinton did not give up his Law license because of the numerous allegations of sexual assault against him. Most he gave up for sexual assault was a few thousand dollars.

Future #metoo debt must weigh heavily on him.

https://www.yourtango.com/2017307907/bill-clinton-sexual-assault-rape-allegations-list-women-timeline

The Clinton investigation was an actual witch hunt. It went far upstream from what the initial investigation was about. What did Monica Lewinsky's case even have to do with Paula Jones Arkansas case. Why would any Judge even allow that line of questioning in deposition?

IjeBos:


The Clinton investigation was an actual witch hunt. It went far upstream from what the initial investigation was about. What did Monica Lewinsky's case even have to do with Paula Jones Arkansas case. Why would any Judge even allow that line of questioning in deposition?

You mean Just like how Mueller started with investigating Russia collusion and ended up with stormy Daniels??

IjeBos:
What did Monica Lewinsky's case even have to do with Paula Jones Arkansas case. Why would any Judge even allow that line of questioning in deposition?

Better still, what did a failed land development called Whitewater investigation have to do with a case about sex.

It was nearly nine years ago, in his first presidential campaign, that Clinton and Hillary Rodham Clinton were first buffeted by questions about their investment in a failed land development called Whitewater. Following a tortuous path across the years, the questions about financial dealings spawned an independent counsel and eventually transmuted into a case about sex -- specifically whether the president committed perjury and sought to obstruct justice in the Jones sexual harassment case.

IjeBos:
The Clinton investigation was an actual witch hunt. It went far upstream from what the initial investigation was about.

Same is being said about dump. But, if
while investigating a crime a witch leads to other crimes I'd expect the law to hunt as far upstream as the witch leads.

And since we hunted can't keep his diq in his pants Clinton guess we definitely will hunt dump, I'm delighted to be reminded.

budaatum:


Thanks, it worked, but NYT not very good (me venting). Best they said was "professional conduct", but that's still not "for a consensual affair he had in another state".

ramdeuter, Clinton did not give up his Law license because of the numerous allegations of sexual assault against him. Most he gave up for sexual assault was a few thousand dollars.

Future #metoo debt must weigh heavily on him.

https://www.yourtango.com/2017307907/bill-clinton-sexual-assault-rape-allegations-list-women-timeline

So why has it taken this long for the long arms of the law and Metoo to get to him and convict him for his sex crimes which are well detailed
Why is it Trumps that was brought out

budaatum:

Better still, what did a failed land development called Whitewater investigation have to do with a case about sex.




Same is being said about dump. But, if
while investigating a crime a witch leads to other crimes I'd expect the law to hunt as far upstream as the witch leads.

And since we hunted can't keep his diq in his pants Clinton guess we definitely will hunt dump, I'm delighted to be reminded.

You're both siding this.

The Clinton situation started with a Whitewater investigation then led to an investigation about having sex with Lewinsky. What was the underlying crime that was being investigated with the Lewinsky sex?

Trump probe started with Russian collusion, a myriad of people were prosecuted with crimes arising from Russian collusion (Manfort, Russin Troll farm, etc etc. Then investigations all arose from that investigation). All of them had underlying crimes. The one's non tangential were known of before the Russian collusion investigation began. Trump was not a witch hunt.

Look at Bill Barr's Durham investigation. That is another classical right wing witch hunt.

raumdeuter:


So why has it taken this long for the long arms of the law and Metoo to get to him and convict him for his sex crimes which are well detailed
Why is it Trumps that was brought out

Funny how Ijebo and you are conflating issues.

Dump is not being prosecuted for sex crimes, and neither was, has, Clinton, yet.

raumdeuter:


So why has it taken this long for the long arms of the law and Metoo to get to him and convict him for his sex crimes which are well detailed
Why is it Trumps that was brought out

Me too is not a crime. And all Clinton's supposed "sex crimes' were investigated by conservatives (you know the who Special Counsel that got him impeached) and none were prosecuted. So they moved to the non crime Lewinsky.

budaatum:


Funny how Ijebo and you are conflating issues.

Dump is not being prosecuted for sex crimes, and neither was, has, Clinton, yet.

What am I conflating? Be precise.

IjeBos:


You're both siding this.

The Clinton situation started with a Whitewater investigation then led to an investigation about having sex with Lewinsky. What was the underlying crime that was being investigated with the Lewinsky sex?

Trump probe started with Russian collusion, a myriad of people were prosecuted with crimes arising from Russian collusion (Manfort, Russin Troll farm, etc etc. Then investigations all arose from that investigation). All of them had underlying crimes. The one's non tangential were known of before the Russian collusion investigation began. Trump was not a witch hunt.

Look at Bill Barr's Durham investigation. That is another classical right wing witch hunt.

"Started" and led to the discovery of crimes, so yes, I support it.

It's like starting with search of home of suspect of theft and a dead body is found. Suspect must be investigated for homicide, no?

IjeBos:


What am I conflating? Be precise.

You are both focusing on the sex when it suits you, and ignoring their actual crimes.

What was Clinton's crime?

What is dump's crime?

It's for you both.

IjeBos:


Me too is not a crime.

Finally! Metoo is not the crime for neither Clinton nor dump, in there current cases, one might be inclined to cautiously add, since metoo was a crime for Weinstein and Cosby almost , and can still catch up with them both.

budaatum:


You are both focusing on the sex when it suits you, and ignoring their actual crimes.

What was Clinton's crime?

What is dump's crime?

It's for you both.

No. My argument is simple. If there is no underlying crime, there should be no investigation. Clinton was impeached for lying about something that wasn't an underlying crime by an Independent Counsel(Kenn Starr) who most everyone agrees went too far and will live in infamy.


But you're both siding this.

What was the underlying crime being Investigated for Clinton?
What was the underlying crime being investigated for Trump?

budaatum:


Finally! Metoo is not the crime for neither Clinton nor dump, in there current cases, one might be inclined to cautiously add, since metoo was a crime for Weinstein and Cosby almost , and can still catch up with them both.

Me too is not a legal definition of a crime. The crimes are usually sexual assault, rape, etc.

basilico loco is just hiding out, reading the debates but too deflated to join in cos all his arguments have been busted. There's no wins he can come up with from the rethugs and criminal defendant trump for weeks. All he does is whataboutism and defending Criminal conduct.

There's no greater joy than destroying any purveyor of fake right wing outrage.

I hope you won't delete your account after 2024.

IjeBos:


No. My argument is simple. If there is no underlying crime, there should be no investigation. Clinton was impeached for lying about something that wasn't an underlying crime by an Independent Counsel(Kenn Starr) who most everyone agrees went too far and will live in infamy.

What was the underlying crime being Investigated for Clinton?

What was the underlying crime being investigated for Trump?

There were underlying crimes for both! Investigations began because of suspected underlying crimes which led to other crimes!

The underlying suspected crime for Clinton was financial dealings and investment in a failed land development called Whitewater. It led to overlying crime of lying under oath, which is the even greater crime that he got sanctioned for.

For dump I won't even bother, but he was impeached twice for what could be considered underlying crimes², though there's some that call he's a witch hunt too like you do for Clinton, but as far as I'm concerned good for the goose good for the gander. After all, it's not as if there's much witchhunting of criminally unsuspected former presidents.

IjeBos:


Me too is not a legal definition of a crime. The crimes are usually sexual assault, rape, etc.

And neither dump nor Clinton have been arraigned for sexual assault, rape, etc., yet is my point.

I think the black man hater benalvino will be suited to explain this away.

When someone says I'm the Least Racist, what does that mean in vernacular? Lol that he is racist but just down a notch?

Anytime I hear that it's just so funny and sad at the same time.

This fake outrage artist is the most stupid Australian I've ever seen in my life. Oh and omarosa burnt criminal defendant trumps ass.

Basilico loco, care to chime in?

IjeBos:


When you speak I imagine this is what you and the misses (ex run girl that she is ) would look like in the US, screaming, "You a nigger, Token nigger from Harvard".

Cooning Scooby Snack Black

And I want to ask ben if he's a cousin fùcker too just like these miserable people since he loves cosplaying as a backwater illiterate non educated christo fascist white man?

budaatum:


There were underlying crimes for both! Investigations began because of suspected underlying crimes which led to other crimes!

The underlying suspected crime for Clinton was financial dealings and investment in a failed land development called Whitewater. It led to overlying crime of lying under oath, which is the even greater crime that he got sanctioned for.

For dump I won't even bother, but he was impeached twice for what could be considered underlying crimes², though there's some that call he's a witch hunt too like you do for Clinton, but as far as I'm concerned good for the goose good for the gander. After all, it's not as if there's much witchhunting of criminally unsuspected former presidents.

You're obfuscating. Clinton was impeached for lying to a grand jury about having oral s*x with Monica Lewinsky. What underlying crime did he commit or was being investigated for in re: to having sex with Monika Lewinsky that he was being questioned about it in a Grand Jury? That seems to be the definition of a witch hunt.

Metoo was just the movement that exposed the sexual depravity of these powerful men which led investigators to dig deep and find the crimes.
Which led to the prosecution of the men.
Metoo was catching up to criminal defendant trump in the lead up to the 2016 election but he had to catch and kill the stories before they came up. He even had his personal bodyguard threaten "Jane doe", the 13 year old girl he raped with Epstein.
He's still trying to fend off the other women accusing him of sexual harrasment and now the famous E Jean Carrol case which was a product of metoo is about to wring him further.

So metoo was just the movement, and it exposed the crimes which eventually brought down these powerful deviants and it's still bringing others down till date.

IjeBos:


You're obfuscating. Clinton was impeached for lying to a grand jury about having oral s*x with Monica Lewinsky. What underlying crime did he commit or was being investigated for in re: to having sex with Monika Lewinsky that he was being questioned about it in a Grand Jury? That seems to be the definition of a witch hunt.

You speak as if an underlying crime has to be related to subsequent crimes, which is not the case, or that I should be against witchhunting that catches the hunted, which I definitely am not, since in most cases, like Clinton's and hopefully dump's, witches have been found, and where none is found compensation is paid to the hunted.

Clinton's lie was discovered during the witchhunting of the underlying suspected crime in his financial dealings and investment in a failed land development called Whitewater.

And dump is in court because we witchhunted him because we suspect him of being a witch. We impeached him twice, do note.

Obrigardo:
Metoo was just the movement that exposed the sexual depravity of these powerful men which led investigators to dig deep and find the crimes.
Which led to the prosecution of the men.
Metoo was catching up to criminal defendant trump in the lead up to the 2016 election but he had to catch and kill the stories before they came up. He even had his personal bodyguard threaten "Jane doe", the 13 year old girl he raped with Epstein.
He's still trying to fend off the other women accusing him of sexual harrasment and now the famous E Jean Carrol case which was a product of metoo is about to wring him further.

So metoo was just the movement, and it exposed the crimes which eventually brought down these powerful deviants and it's still bringing others down till date.

Same as sexually deviant Clinton. They sound exactly like the same one person.

budaatum:


You speak as if an underlying crime has to be related to subsequent crimes, which is not the case, or that I should be against witchhunting that catches the hunted, which I definitely am not, since in most cases, like Clinton's and hopefully dump's, witches have been found, and where none is found compensation is paid to the hunted.

Clinton's lie was discovered during the witchhunting of the underlying suspected crime in his financial dealings and investment in a failed land development called Whitewater.

And dump is in court because we witchhunted him because we suspect him of being a witch. We impeached him twice, do note.

No. I'm saying Prosecutors just can't bring you into a Grand Jury and ask you about random things until you lie and then try to indict you for that lie. They brought Clinton into a Grand Jury and asked him whether he had sex with Monica Lewinsky? What was the purpose of that? What was the purpose of asking him about his consensual sexual life? So Clinton subsequently "lied" about that and they impeached him for that. He was pressed on a matter that had no underlying crime. That is what I consider a witch hunt.

If they were investigating Clinton and found out he had raped a woman and asked him about that in a Grand Jury and he lied. I'd be with the prosecutors. This is closer to what is happening with Trump.

Hey basilico see this drag queen getting very queeny

Is dump going lower than defund police?