It is not the driver that knocks the pedestrian, but the car.

It is not the Yahoo boy that bought the Range Rover, but his account.

It is not the man that killed those in the bank in Louisville Kentucky, but his gun.

In the same way,

It is not Tinubu that was charged for drug money of $460,000, but his bank account.

#FacebookTelevision

Civil forfeiture:

An in rem (against the property) court proceeding brought against property that was derived from or used to commit an offense, rather than against a person who committed an offense. Unlike criminal forfeiture, there is no criminal conviction required, although the government is still required to prove in court that the property was linked to criminal activity. The proceeding allows the court to gather anyone with an interest in the property in the same case and resolve all the issues with the property at one time. In a civil forfeiture case, the government is the plaintiff, the property is the defendant, and any person who claims an interest in the property is a claimant. Civil forfeiture allows the government to file cases against property that would not be reachable through criminal forfeiture, such as property of criminals located outside the United States, including terrorists, and fugitives. Civil forfeiture also permits recovery of assets held by deceased defendants or where no defendant can be identified.

LegendHero:
That is how civil forfeiture work in USA.

They can charge your property and not charge you. The problem of you guys is that you just come online to create topic without doing a simple google search.

It is also sometimes called civil asset forfeiture.

AcuraZDX:


Mûmu reasoning.

They can charge "your" property and not you.

So the name of the property will replace the "your" in this stupid analogy of yours right?

An in rem (against the property) court proceeding brought against property that was derived from or used to commit an offense, rather than against a person who committed an offense. Unlike criminal forfeiture, there is no criminal conviction required, although the government is still required to prove in court that the property was linked to criminal activity. The proceeding allows the court to gather anyone with an interest in the property in the same case and resolve all the issues with the property at one time. In a civil forfeiture case, the government is the plaintiff, the property is the defendant, and any person who claims an interest in the property is a claimant. Civil forfeiture allows the government to file cases against property that would not be reachable through criminal forfeiture, such as property of criminals located outside the United States, including terrorists, and fugitives. Civil forfeiture also permits recovery of assets held by deceased defendants or where no defendant can be identified.

LegendHero:
That is how civil forfeiture work in USA.

They can charge your property and not charge you. The problem of you guys is that you just come online to create topic without doing a simple google search.

It is also sometimes called civil asset forfeiture.


https://www.justice.gov/afms/types-federal-forfeiture

muhammaduyusufu:


Don't you know that alot of Nigerian youths with simple mind and lack of exposure can't think outside anything more difficult than 1+2=3.

It would be a very good idea if the government can invest more into the educational sector.

LegendHero:


This is directly from justice.gov website about civil forfeiture . Infact they can even charge the asset of a dead man alone without involving any human being in it.

I know the prerequisite to be an Obi supporter is for low intellectual reasoning. I forgive you for your ignorance.

https://www.justice.gov/afms/types-federal-forfeiture

AcuraZDX:


Go back to the US Court documents and see the defendants name.

Stop doing copy and paste like others.

LegendHero:


First agree that you are wrong about civil forfeiture and then we can go to the next argument.

The topic of this thread is about the fact that assets can be charged and not the person. Now you know because of how I explained.

At least thank me for curing you of your ignorance.

iSense247:
LegendHero, continue quoting and replying yourself with several accounts to deceive yours fellow zombies. Sensible people will always take you for who you are.

AcuraZDX:


Don't mind him.

He jumped on the thread in a bid to gaslight the topic and I bursted his fake ass. And now he has gotten his senses back.

Johnjustice:
It was a case of moving around the wrong circles, he lived in a block where dealers lived, and they mistakenly thought he was part of them. This things happen, guilty by association I guess.

Johnjustice:
It was a case of moving around the wrong circles, he lived in a block where dealers lived, and they mistakenly thought he was part of them. This things happen, guilty by association I guess.

LegendHero:
That is how civil forfeiture work in USA.

It is also sometimes called civil asset forfeiture.


https://www.justice.gov/afms/types-federal-forfeiture

iSense247:
The Logic in Agbado Kingdom

https://www.facebook.com/100047214812954/posts/748046123445875/?app=fbl

civil forfeiture

Civil forfeiture allows the government (typically the police) to seize — and then keep or sell — any property that is allegedly involved in a crime or illegal activity. Owners need not ever be arrested or convicted of a crime for their cash, cars, or even real estate to be taken away permanently by the government. The government does not have to charge the property owner with any specific crime in order to seize the property, and must prove only by a preponderance of the evidence that the property is legally forfeitable. After property has been seized, the burden of proof shifts to the owner, who must prove that the property was not involved in nor obtained as a result of illegal activity. While the government views civil forfeiture as a powerful tool against the drug trade, organized crime, and political corruption, it is often criticized as an unconstitutional exercise of government power, in violation of the Fourth, Fifth, and Eighth Amendments, and as against a fundamental element of due process.

Such a proceeding is conducted in rem, or against the property itself, rather than in personam, or against the owner of the property. For this reason, civil forfeiture case names often appear strange, such as United States v. Eight Rhodesian Stone Statues because the property is the defendant.

Civil forfeiture is codified in 18 U.S.C. §§ 981, 983, 984, and 985, as well as in 21 U.S.C. § 881.

Proponents argue that it is effective in thwarting criminal organizations by efficiently and directly harming suspected criminals economically while helping law enforcement financially. Critics argue that innocent owners can become entangled in the process where they are presumed guilty instead of being presumed innocent. Critics argue that the incentives lead to corruption and law enforcement misbehavior and abuse.

Omowale2023:

It is not me that got my wife pregnant, it is my penis......😂😂😂
Funny people.
Agbado Peoples' CORN-gress

AcuraZDX:


Mûmu reasoning.

They can charge "your" property and not you.

So the name of the property will replace the "your" in this stupid analogy of yours right?

Who do una this thing abeg?