.

Amujale:


Sources!?

There's no serious minded historian that will come up with the nonsensical gibberish that you're projecting here.

According to history, Jesus is a fictional character.

Given that neither you or any of your tutors can provide us with proof for your fictional characters or your false narratives, there are no second hand witness accounts, there's no evidence out there that can pass as being genuine and authentic, then, it stands to reason that your fictional characters never existed to begin with, and that you and your tutors are peddling a false representation of history.

you are an ignorant man
Nearly all scholars of antiquity agree that that the books of the Gospels are historical.
https://handwiki.org/wiki/Religion:Historical_reliability_of_the_Gospels

Steep:

Nearly all scholars of antiquity agree that that the books of Gospel.

There's not one serious minded historian or academic that co-signs any of the Abrahamic religious text, instead they are rendered as false narratives.

The Christian bible isn't a history textbook.

Its common knowledge that your fantasy book is solely based on fakery and falsehood.

Furthermore, it was these same type of Eurocentric ideologues that perpetrated colonisation and slavery who also invented the Christian bible.

Hence, you can miss me with your disengenous and unhonest rhetoric.

Steep:

you are an ignorant man
Nearly all scholars of antiquity agree that that the books of the Gospels are historical.
https://handwiki.org/wiki/Religion:Historical_reliability_of_the_Gospels

Furthermore, the article above tells you that there's no archaeological evidence for the Jesus character nor any of your other fictional characters that you intend on peddling here.

It's pretty simple, we ought to bin all these foreign extremist ideologies and concentrate our focus on reality.




According to Eric Cline, someone who is considered a theology expert, "there is no direct archaeological evidence of the existence of a historical Jesus, nor any of the apostles"...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_reliability_of_the_Gospels

Amujale:


Furthermore, the article above tells you that there's no archaeological evidence for the Jesus character nor any of your other fictional characters that you intend on peddling here.

It's pretty simple, we ought to bin all these foreign extremist ideologies and concentrate our focus on reality.




"According to Eric Cline, someone who is considered a theology expert, there is no direct archaeological evidence of the existence of a historical Jesus, nor any of the apostles"...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_reliability_of_the_Gospels

Did you actually read, what is in your screen short? You just shot yourself on the foot you don't know it yet.
Read slowly again.
The article said lack archeological proof doe not disprove existence of someone however Jesus has indirect archeological proof.
Read well before coming to share ignorance.

Steep:

Read well before coming to share ignorance....

You aren't making any sense.


You claimed that there is tons of archaeological evidence for your fictional characters and I simply point you to the admissions in the article you posted.

It's you who obviously cannot read properly.

Anyways, we await the proof you claim to have as the sources you posted are either not in support of your argument or are completely unreliable.

Perhaps you don't know what is being asked of you.

The consensus amongst all serious minded historians and academics is that the Jesus Christ character is fictional.

There are various reasons it's agreed that the Jesus character is fictional, one of these is due to the fact that there are no evidence anywhere on the planet for the said character that passes as being authentic. Be it archaeological or any other kind.

Kindly provide us with proof of your fictional characters and false narratives or accept the facts as stated above.

Amujale:


You aren't making any sense.


You claimed that there is tons of archaeological evidence for your fictional characters and I simply point you to the admissions in the article you posted.

It's you who obviously cannot read properly.

Anyways, we await the proof you claim to have as the sources you posted are either not in support of your argument or are completely unreliable.

Perhaps you don't know what is being asked of you.

The consensus amongst all serious minded historians and academics is that the Jesus Christ character is fictional.

There are various reasons it's agreed that the Jesus character is fictional, one of these is due to the fact that there are no evidence anywhere on the planet for the said character that passes as being authentic. Be it archaeological or any other kind.

Kindly provide us with proof of your fictional characters and false narratives or accept the facts as stated above.

Did you read where it said there are indirect archeological evidence?

What consensus Said Jesus is fictional except you are reading back of your phone because that site said all major scholars and historians agree that Jesus is a real and historical person.

Steep:
Did you read where it said there are indirect archeological evidence?....

Is that your submission?

Are you submitting that your proof for your fictional character is based on an indirect archaeological evidence?

Thanks for chiming into the discussion and I hope you continue to study, research and re-educate yourself with regards to history

Since by your own admission, the proof you claim to have for your fictional characters aren't based on evidence that can pass as being authentic, then there's no need for further discussion.

Africans invented all the better things in life, these are the things that can be proven beyond any doubt.

Amujale:




Is that your submission?

Are you submitting that your proof for your fictional character is based on an indirect archaeological evidence?

Thanks for chiming into the discussion and I hope you continue to study, research and re-educate yourself with regards to history

Since by your own admission, the proof you claim to have for your fictional characters aren't based on evidence that can pass as being authentic, then there's no need for further discussion.

Africans invented all the better things in life, these are the things that can be proven beyond any doubt.

You are just as terrible as white racists.
I as a follower of Jesus christ love everyone regardless of race gender or religion.

Repent and believe in Jesus christ

Steep:
Did you read where it said there are indirect archeological evidence?

All the Pharoahs of KM.T are listed on the walls, there are archeological evidence for the majority of the Pharoahs of KM.T, and these African rulers predates all the foreign extremist ideologically based narratives that you peddle.

You have no evidence for any of your fictional characters, you know this, I know this, and they out there, they know it as well.

This is one of the reasons I implore you to free yourself from the artificial hold that these foreign extremist ideologies have on you, noone can free you but you.

Redirect this same energy into making our world a better place.

We ought to bin all these foreign extremist ideologies and concentrate our focus on reality.

Steep:

I as a follower of Jesus christ love everyone regardless of race gender or religion.

Repent and believe in Jesus christ

You aren't making any sense.

Jesus is a fictional character.

You are better off taking into consideration the legacy that came about due to the brilliance of our parents and feed off of that in order to make our world a better place, oppossed to giving your soul away to fictional characters that were created by foreign extremist ideologues.

I suppose the actions of the Uttah District is a call out to our educators to make these same things reflect in their curriculum going forward.

God's word should be treated at home it is the responsibility of a father to teach his children the rules of his own God {Deuteronomy 6:6-7} not in schools where children from different religious sects converge to learn about societal values!