senatordave1:


Have you confirmed if the blurredness was from the bvas camera or the other copies are clear

We have the ctx copies of all the blurred irev report.

senatordave1:


Does it make obi winner?

But it makes the election rigged doesn't it

Lp party, agba joker. No b the same party that hired someone to collate for them using results from polling units and later stopped the process when they noticed they were losing. Even if they should ask labor to bring results from each polling units to collate, they can't find all bcuz they don't have, they were not given , not represented. Serious party will have agents in all polling units. Authentic one is from inec, if u dey among and they rigged u out, changed the figures and signed, otilo niyen, inec fit claim say na mistake, and the polling officer corrected it. And that's what they will upload where they planned to rigged.

senatordave1:


And he later said it isnt

I challenge you to quite where he said IREV is not a coalition system

MyPoint:


It is up to PEPT to determine who won.

And that will be done soon.

What LP has done is to show that there are deliberate manipulations. And that to come up with the calculation you need to recalculate.

PEPT will do the recalculation.

Lp will not do any recalculations,that is where you guys missed it.all the calculations shows tinubu still won but that there was massive irregularities necessitating a rerun.the court will only act on what lp has presented and proven.they will either uphold tinubu or order a rerun

Plutoman:

Can you steal a child of someone that never gave birth?

The court will determine that, after all proofs and evidences are presented.

senatordave1:


Inec can interpret it to mean anything they like

No, they can't. Our laws and rules are not at the mercy or subject to INEC interpretation. No wonder you sef wan kill yourself ontop false narratives.

Kukutenla:

But it makes the election rigged doesn't it

You still missed it.the law is settled that you must not just prove that there was rigging,you must show that it prevented you from winning.

IamV:


[ The witness continued ]

A. I sent the link to the office and further transfer to the drive.

Q. There were 3 levels of operations before the flash drive.

A. Yes

Q. The National Chairman of INEC seen in the video is still alive ?

A. Before I came into the court, he was alive, I don't know thereafter .

[ The 2nd and 3rd respondent cross examiner is done with cross examination of the witness .
The 4th respondent cross examiner is about to cross examine the witness ]

They are planning to bring in INEC chairman to come and counter the recorded video of what he said....

I will advise INEC chairman not to come and lie publicly. The whole nature will be against him and it's also contempt and liable to fine

00FFT00:


No, they can't. Our laws and rules are not at the mercy or subject to INEC interpretation. No wonder you sef wan kill yourself ontop false narratives.

A court already said inec can transmit anyhow

MatrixCircle:


2 additional states . It changes everything.

Moving. Tinubu from winning 12 states to 10 states is a change. 12 and 10 are different numbers. LP goes 14 states , Tinubu stays on 10. 14 and 10 are different figures.

It also proves they was a fraud.

This will put an eye in the figures of other states of other possible fraud.

So that 2 additional states is a game changer. It proves everything.

It is not enough to prove there was fraud, you have to prove the fraud was enough to give you more votes than your opponent, that's how Oshio bàbà became governor to start with.

Because there was fraud in Anambra state, the courts will never ever extrapolate that to Abia state, you have to proof every single vote counted that you are discarding or not counted that you want admitting.

It will be nice if LP lawyers start proving this electoral fraud because we are 10 days into the case already.

sonnie10:


I challenge you to quite where he said IREV is not a coalition system

O: it is part of your claim in your reports that some forms you downloaded from irev were blurred..will I be correct to say that whether transmission of the results from polling unit to irev failed or what you downloaded to irev wasn't blurred it won't change the result at the polling unit?
W: it will not change if it is properly used

O: irev is not a collation center. True?

W: it is not a collation center



So,you see that obi is losing? Rest please

MyPoint:


We have the ctx copies of all the blurred irev report.

You need to show that other copies were also blurred aside irev

IamV:


Q. What else can you see ?

A. There were blurred images and some that were not related to the analysis done. For instance, results of Senate replaced for House of Reps.

Q. When you refer to Blurred images of Forms EC8A, you did not mean the physical copies could be blurred?

A. I didn't see physical copies.

Q. In all your review, you did not see anything on the portal that suggests there is an electronic collation system?

A IREV portal is an electronic collation system

Q. Are you suggesting to the court that the portal is capable of collating and tabulating results?

Where is the the inconsistency here?

Page 18.
Congratulations to moi



Love the healthy argument.

Garfield, go and stretch your leg. Make sure they pay you allowance well cos your area for your group is the most difficult.

You do the highest work honestly.

senatordave1:


Obi won benue- by 20,000 votes according to irev which is useless afterall tinubu won him by 8000 going by inec.
Unfortunately,atiku is not claiming any state tinubu won unlike obi.he is only claiming irregularities and blurred results...

It is statistically possible to win with even 5 states and this is why you guys lost.you don't know how to win elections.you are looking at merely winning states while tinubu is looking at margins.you can win 30 states with narrow margins with me getting above 25% while I win 6 states massively by 95% and above.thevlaw says get the highest votes and spread.the key is margin not number of states won.

Not possible. Leave that discussion for another day.

I like th reporting as though it's televised.

IamV:


^Counsels:

PETITIONERS LEGAL TEAM [ LABOUR PARTY & PETER OBI ]

LEAD: DR LIVY UZOUKWU SAN
- Awa Kalu SAN
- PIN Ikwueto SAN
- Ben Anechebe SAN
- Ikechukwu Ezechukwu SAN
- Valerie Azinge SAN
- Emeka Opoko SAN
- Alex Ejesieme SAN
- Peter Afuba SAN
- Audu Anuga SAN

- Rita Garba Esq
- Olusola Esq
- Emelia Esq

senatordave1:


You still missed it.the law is settled that you must not just prove that there was rigging,you must show that it prevented you from winning.

Bla bla bla the law.
The election was rigged. Even if you hide under the law, it didn't change the fact that the election was rigged.

Kukutenla:

He said the he randomly chose the two states and that their results stand out as different from the announced. He never claimed to have worked on all the states. Quit the lies

It is the same thing.other states are consistent

Kukutenla:

Bla bla bla the law.
The election was rigged. Even if you hide under the law, it didn't change the fact that the election was rigged.

All elections all over the world are rigged.every winner rigs obi rigged as a governor

ogunijebu18:
Igbos are slaves

Yorubas are satan worshippers. They worship a fallen god, that's why all their "pastors" are false prophet who cannot give legit prophecy

MyPoint:



Not possible. Leave that discussion for another day.

Forget about the case,focus on 2027

senatordave1:


O: it is part of your claim in your reports that some forms you downloaded from irev were blurred..will I be correct to say that whether transmission of the results from polling unit to irev failed or what you downloaded to irev wasn't blurred it won't change the result at the polling unit?
W: it will not change if it is properly used

O: irev is not a collation center. True?

W: it is not [b]a collation center[b]



So,you see that obi is losing? Rest please

I don’t see where “collation system” appear on what you quoted

aswani:


It is not enough to prove there was fraud, you have to prove the fraud was enough to give you more votes than your opponent, that's how Oshio bàbà became governor to start with.

Because there was fraud in Anambra state, the courts will never ever extrapolate that to Abia state, you have to proof every single vote counted that you are discarding or not counted that you want admitting.

It will be nice if LP lawyers start proving this electoral fraud because we are 10 days into the case already.

Gbam.cc kukutenla,sonnie10,iamv

kollinz1234:
Yorubas are satan worshippers. They worship a fallen god, that's why all their "pastors" are false prophet who cannot give legit prophecy

you wish. Yorubas are blessed by GOD. You have been backdoor hating for long time. Yorubas are eternally blessed. You people have been trying to paint yoruba black for decades but will always fail. Don't know what type of so called Christian writes "yoruba are satan worshippers" and then will pretend to be saint after that. That's the mindset of anti yoruba nigerians

senatordave1:


Gbam.cc kukutenla,sonnie10,iamv

Please quote where the Prof said IREV is not a coalition system.

sonnie10:

Please quote where the Prof said IREV is not a coalition system.

Obi will lose in court

senatordave1:


All elections all over the world are rigged.every winner rigs obi rigged as a governor

That's a bloody lie. Don't sit in your cocoon and make generalisations.
Reducing the whole world to your Nigerian charades

senatordave1:


It is the same thing.other states are consistent

How is it the same thing
Stop disgracing your English teacher

senatordave1:


Obi will lose in court

That is not my question. From page one, you have consistently lied about what the Prof said.
Please quote for us where the Prof said IREV is not a coalition system

senatordave1:


Gbam.cc

But it doesn't change the fact APC stole two states

senatordave1:


The only issue is that based on adeleke vs oyetola supra,results or data that are transmitted to server are secondary or tertiary and unreliable.again,the prof failed to cross-check if the other copies were blurred...for instance if a photocopy of my ssce is blurred, common sense demands that my original will be perused except no other copy exist.same thing happened to apc in osun.they relied on server copy instead of looking at the primary data from bvas...

Correct, all copies of materials and recorded numbers are valid and official, but only one is authentic and admissible.