The Professor of mathematics presented by the Labour Party before the Presidential Election Petitions Court, Eric Ofuegbu, says he only analyzed reports from two states.

The two states are Benue and Rivers state where the Labour Party and Peter Obi contend recorded massive over-voting that affected the overall result of the February 25, 2023 presidential election.

Ofuegbu who claimed not to have been paid for the research he did on the results from the two states, admitted to have relied on data from the INEC result viewing portal for his analysis.

He claimed in his witness statement that based on his collation and mathematical tabulation, there were cases of massive over voting in the two states.

Under cross examination by INEC’s lead counsel Abubakar Mahmoud, the witness was presented with a copy of the presidential election result sheet from polling unit 002, in Degema, Rivers state showing that 40 persons were accredited and 40 persons voted in the polling unit, with the INEC lawyer suggesting that the equal number of accredited voters and those who voted contradicts the claim of over voting.

Under further questioning on why he chose Rivers and Benue states as his main areas of interest, the witness said it was just random. The Professor was then asked whether an analysis of election results from just two states is enough to make conclusions on a presidential election, and he said he was limited by time.

Under further questioning on why he chose Rivers and Benue states as his main areas of interest, the witness said it was just random. The Professor was then asked whether an analysis of election results from just two states is enough to make conclusions on a presidential election, and he said he was limited by time.

He claimed in his witness statement that based on his collation and mathematical tabulation, there were cases of massive over voting in the two states. Under cross examination by INEC’s lead counsel Abubakar Mahmoud, the witness was presented with a copy of the presidential election result sheet from polling unit 002, in Degema, Rivers state showing that 40 persons were accredited and 40 persons voted in the polling unit, with the INEC lawyer suggesting that the equal number of accredited voters and those who voted contradicts the claim of over voting.

seunmsg:
The Professor of mathematics presented by the Labour Party before the Presidential Election Petitions Court, Eric Ofuegbu, says he only analyzed reports from two states

The two states are Benue and Rivers state where the Labour Party and Peter Obi contend recorded massive over-voting that affected the overall result of the February 25, 2023 presidential election.

Ofuegbu who claimed not to have been paid for the research he did on the results from the two states, admitted to have relied on data from the INEC result viewing portal for his analysis.

He claimed in his witness statement that based on his collation and mathematical tabulation, there were cases of massive over voting in the two states.

MUST READ: JUST IN: Obi, Labour Party Tender 18,088 Blurry Result Sheets

Under cross examination by INEC’s lead counsel Abubakar Mahmoud, the witness was presented with a copy of the presidential election result sheet from polling unit 002, in Degema, Rivers state showing that 40 persons were accredited and 40 persons voted in the polling unit, with the INEC lawyer suggesting that the equal number of accredited voters and those who voted contradicts the claim of over voting.

Under further questioning on why he chose Rivers and Benue states as his main areas of interest, the witness said it was just random. The Professor was then asked whether an analysis of election results from just two states is enough to make conclusions on a presidential election, and he said he was limited by time.


https://ait.live/breaking-labour-partys-maths-professor-prepared-reports-for-only-two-states/


Cc: Mynd44 nlfpmod

Throwback:
Hahahaha!

When the candidate sef na confirm olodo.

Limited by time abi limited by lies that cannot become truth?

ganisucks:


I hate to discuss things that are not peripheral, but in this case I'll make an exception. I hope you know that what you just posted is actually not in your favour. If two states could produce 18,000 blurred result sheets, how many would the other 34 states produce. It's 1...2...3 elementary.

ganisucks:


I hate to discuss things that are not peripheral, but in this case I'll make an exception. I hope you know that what you just posted is actually not in your favour. If two states could produce 18,000 blurred result sheets, how many would the other 34 states produce. It's 1...2...3 elementary.

ganisucks:


I hate to discuss things that are not peripheral, but in this case I'll make an exception. I hope you know that what you just posted is actually not in your favour. If two states could produce 18,000 blurred result sheets, how many would the other 34 states produce. It's 1...2...3 elementary.

Breadandpeppers:
What's the essence of this thread?

The Professor was then asked whether an analysis of election results from just two states is enough to make conclusions on a presidential election, and he said he was limited by time.

ganisucks:


I hate to discuss things that are not peripheral, but in this case I'll make an exception. I hope you know that what you just posted is actually not in your favour. If two states could produce 18,000 blurred result sheets, how many would the other 34 states produce. It's 1...2...3 elementary.

seunmsg:


I may be wrong but where exactly in the report did you get the information that the two states have 18k blurred result sheets? The 18k topic is an ad for another story and not part of this report please. The Prof. never said anything about 18k blurry result sheets. His testimony was about over voting in the presidential election and he based his analysis only on two states.

Even the issue of the blurry result sheets on IREV that was raised about two days ago proves nothing. Camera position, room visibility/lightning, poor knowledge of how to use BVAS camera by polling officers, camera defect etc can cause pictures to be blurry. All INEC needs to do is present the original and clear copies to the court. A blurry 18k result sheets out of over 177k is barely 10% so the success rate of uploaded clear result is still around 90% and that’s good enough.

ganisucks:


I hate to discuss things that are not peripheral, but in this case I'll make an exception. I hope you know that what you just posted is actually not in your favour. If two states could produce 18,000 blurred result sheets, how many would the other 34 states produce. It's 1...2...3 elementary.

BIZNess123:
Obi said inec defaulted in its promise of uploading the results in real time ....which he(obi) got 6m vote....

Is obi now saying his 6m vote is authentic while others are fraudulent....

Jagungidi:


What? Where? How? No way we just read the same article.

seanfer:


Don't mind him, the 2 states poling units are just 9,544.. Benue 5,102 and Rivers 4,442 I don't know why people will be twisting facts.

helinues:


Is that promise backed by law?

ganisucks:

The article's sole purpose is to misinform the public, the same way the INEC lawyer lied that Yakubu gave a statement in which he said he would no longer transmit the results via the IREV. It's obvious APC has decided to create chaos as a way to Whip up sympathy when the courts sack Baba Lagos. The Hague will become the new home of APC SWAGA.

ganisucks:

18000 blurred sheets.

oyebanji44:
Don't mind that idiot called obi..so far so good has he proved his case beyond all reasonable doubts

he has no case ..let him continue fooling his supporters. ..

seunmsg:
The Professor of mathematics presented by the Labour Party before the Presidential Election Petitions Court, Eric Ofuegbu, says he only analyzed reports from two states

The two states are Benue and Rivers state where the Labour Party and Peter Obi contend recorded massive over-voting that affected the overall result of the February 25, 2023 presidential election.

Ofuegbu who claimed not to have been paid for the research he did on the results from the two states, admitted to have relied on data from the INEC result viewing portal for his analysis.

He claimed in his witness statement that based on his collation and mathematical tabulation, there were cases of massive over voting in the two states.

Under cross examination by INEC’s lead counsel Abubakar Mahmoud, the witness was presented with a copy of the presidential election result sheet from polling unit 002, in Degema, Rivers state showing that 40 persons were accredited and 40 persons voted in the polling unit, with the INEC lawyer suggesting that the equal number of accredited voters and those who voted contradicts the claim of over voting.

Under further questioning on why he chose Rivers and Benue states as his main areas of interest, the witness said it was just random. The Professor was then asked whether an analysis of election results from just two states is enough to make conclusions on a presidential election, and he said he was limited by time.


https://ait.live/breaking-labour-partys-maths-professor-prepared-reports-for-only-two-states/


Cc: Mynd44 nlfpmod

helinues:


Is that promise backed by law?

ganisucks:

The article's sole purpose is to misinform the public, the same way the INEC lawyer lied that Yakubu gave a statement in which he said he would no longer transmit the results via the IREV. It's obvious APC has decided to create chaos as a way to Whip up sympathy when the courts sack Baba Lagos. The Hague will become the new home of APC SWAGA.

seunmsg:


You are the one trying to misinform the public. INEC chairman clearly stated before the election that results won’t be transmitted real time to IREV from polling units and the story was reported by leading national newspapers like Punch, tribune and Vanguard. Links were provided on the thread that was moved to front page about the subject matter.

BIZNess123:


For where na


Even if it is backed by law ....is obi saying they should declare him winner of an election he claimed is fraudulent.....