IamV:


[ 2ND AND 3RD RESPONDENTS CROSS-EXAMINATION ]:

Q. In Para 15,16,18 of your witness statement, you reproduced what INEC gave in its reply to the petition and are given your views to the replies.
Was it part of your brief to help Labour party give a reply ?

A. I'm a subject matter expert, the paragraphs speak to details of my expertise

[ He asks the question again ]

A. They didn't ask for that and I can't recall that conversation ever happening.

Q. Did you physically inspect any of the BVAS machine ?

A. No I didnt.

Q. did you as a person Interrogate Festus Okoye regarding this document ?

A. I did not

Q. In para 23, you referred to a LGA in Bauchi State.

A. That's correct

Q. Are you aware the PDP won in that LGA in the election?

A. I'm not aware.

Q: In paragraph 24, you referred to Anambra State, are you aware the Labour Party won in that LGA you referred and also the State with over 95%.
This party is the party that brought you here.

A: I am not aware. I am not bias.
I only gave expert services

Q: I didn’t say you are bias. Are you aware of the fact that Labour Party won states in the presidential election with over 6 million states

A: I am not aware

Q:You made reference to metadata, tell my Lords the meaning of the compound word.

A: I explained in my statement.

Q: Please say it out now

A: It describes information of other data.

OfoIgbo:


For your number 1 point, it was an internal party affair, until Shettima ran in earnest, for the vice presidency position in the past election. That immediately gave locus standi to Peter Obi, because he ran with that baggage, in an election that concerned Obi.

Another point you made is that Obi should use the hard copy of his agents. Such a move will not give Obi any advantage as CTCs from INEC are more admissible than copies from one's party agents.

The EC8A CTCs from INEC that Obi submitted as evidence is already good enough for Obi to prove this case. All his lawyers now have to do is to collate the results of the presidential election using those submitted EC8A forms. Afterall, whatever INEC declares should tally with the figures in those EC8As. If not, then the election is rigged, and a new collation is required.

Tinubu will be having serious problems. Tinubu's only hope is to corrupt the judges and justices. But if he does that, will Nigerians, NLC, TUC and Obidients just sit back and allow that to happen? Your guess is as good as mine.

You didn't read the apex court judgment well.isdues of nomination is purely internal according to section 84.again,the supreme court clearly stated that shettima never committed double nomination,that he submitted his resignation form before the nomination for vp form on time.therefore,that matter is dead.the appeal will not touch it.

Oga,obi obviously has recollated his agents result copies and found out that tinubu won.he now collated irev copies and found that tinubu also won but 18000 results were blurred.but the irev copy is secondary....even though there are disparity but it is not enough to affect the overall lead..tinubu has no issue.if you are versed in legal matters,you will know that obi has lost

We are dear brother

IamV:

Where's Loosecanon50,saintbillion,mypoint and many more I can't remember.
Guess your are doing great ?

IamV:


Q: In paragraph 24, you referred to Anambra State, are you aware the Labour Party won in that LGA you referred and also the State with over 95%.
This party is the party that brought you here.

A: I am not aware. I am not bias.
I only gave expert services

Q: I didn’t say you are bias. Are you aware of the fact that Labour Party won states in the presidential election with over 6 million states

A: I am not aware

Q:You made reference to metadata, tell my Lords the meaning of the compound word.

A: I explained in my statement.

Q: Please say it out now

A: It describes information of other data.

Q. In para 24, you Exhibit attached is made up of 11 pages .

A. You're not correct. It extends more than 11. There are 23 pages.


Q. You've given information in those 23 pgs which are not explained.

A. You're not correct.

Q. The information you supplied in these pages, are they decrypted ?

A. Yes

Q. Explain to decrypt.

A. It means the act of opening what is encrypted is readable. And what is contained there is readable.

Q. You also supplied some links in Para 23,24,26,27.

A. That's correct

Q. You want this honourable court to go and browse,access the links and download the information ?

A. No, I'm willing to explain.

[ He's not allowed to explain and there's arguments between Ikwueto and Wole SAN over allowing him to explain. ]

IamV:


A. Errors appear at time of testing and the probability of error arising is very small.

A. It is not impossible for errors to appear.

Q. In para 22, 23, you referred to meta data of IREV portal in relation to 3 polling units.

A. I used 3 polling units to show the meta data.

Q. Your point In para 22,23 I'd that the meta data showed some errors .

A. I didn't suggest errors, I provided fact.

Q. In respect of those 3 polling units, did you examine the physical forms EC8A

A. I did not have to.

Why is lp running away from physical copies which is primary?

IamV:


Q. In para 24, you Exhibit attached is made up of 11 pages .

A. You're not correct. It extends more than 11. There are 23 pages.


Q. You've given information in those 23 pgs which are not explained.

A. You're not correct.

Q. The information you supplied in these pages, are they decrypted ?

A. Yes

Q. Explain to decrypt.

A. It means the act of opening what is encrypted is readable. And what is contained there is readable.

Q. You also supplied some links in Para 23,24,26,27.

A. That's correct

Q. You want this honourable court to go and browse,access the links and download the information ?

A. No, I'm willing to explain.

[ He's not allowed to explain and there's arguments between Ikwueto and Wole SAN over allowing him to explain. ]

I repeat,it is trite law for a petitioner not just to tender his evidence but to speak to it and explain for the court will not do it for him

senatordave1:


Why is lp running away from physical copies which is primary?

Watch and learn kid.

IamV:


Q. In para 24, you Exhibit attached is made up of 11 pages .

A. You're not correct. It extends more than 11. There are 23 pages.


Q. You've given information in those 23 pgs which are not explained.

A. You're not correct.

Q. The information you supplied in these pages, are they decrypted ?

A. Yes

Q. Explain to decrypt.

A. It means the act of opening what is encrypted is readable. And what is contained there is readable.

Q. You also supplied some links in Para 23,24,26,27.

A. That's correct

Q. You want this honourable court to go and browse,access the links and download the information ?

A. No, I'm willing to explain.

[ He's not allowed to explain and there's arguments between Ikwueto and Wole SAN over allowing him to explain. ]

Q. In your Metadata, how many characters are involved in what you supplied.
I suggest that there are 12,025 characters.

A. I don't need to know

Q. All not decrypted

A. They are decrypted.

Q. In your witness statement you only referred to 3 states, Bauchi, Anambra and Rivers.

A. 3 states ?
My witness statements included a lot, so you’re not right.

Q: Your witness statements says it

Q: Then show me where I said so in my statement .

IamV:


Q. In your Metadata, how many characters are involved in what you supplied.
I suggest that there are 12,025 characters.

A. I don't need to know

Q. All not decrypted

A. They are decrypted.

Q. In your witness statement you only referred to 3 states, Bauchi, Anambra and Rivers.

A. 3 states ?
My witness statements included a lot, so you’re not right.

Q: Your witness statements says it

Q: Then show me where I said so in my statement .

Q: In page 8 to 11 of your meta data submissions which shows Benue State but you didn’t refer to it in your statement .

A: That is not true

[The judges are now looking at the pages called]

Q: Did you refer to Benue State

A: Rephrase the question

Q: No

A: There’s Benue but not just Benue, other states are listed.


Q. In Para 24, you referred to a LGA in Anambra State. are you aware that in that LGA in Umuezechua Primary School 1, Labour Party won there with 117 votes and APC scored 0.

A. I'm not aware because it doesn't touch on my expertise

IamV:


Q. In para 24, you Exhibit attached is made up of 11 pages .

A. You're not correct. It extends more than 11. There are 23 pages.


Q. You've given information in those 23 pgs which are not explained.

A. You're not correct.

Q. The information you supplied in these pages, are they decrypted ?

A. Yes

Q. Explain to decrypt.

A. It means the act of opening what is encrypted is readable. And what is contained there is readable.

Q. You also supplied some links in Para 23,24,26,27.

A. That's correct

Q. You want this honourable court to go and browse,access the links and download the information ?

A. No, I'm willing to explain.

[ He's not allowed to explain and there's arguments between Ikwueto and Wole SAN over allowing him to explain. ]

It is settled law that parties are bound by their pleadings.he already explained only 11 pages and refused to explain the other.inother words,lp is bound by what he pleaded as he adopted it beforehand

IamV:


Q: In page 8 to 11 of your meta data submissions which shows Benue State but you didn’t refer to it in your statement .

A: That is not true

[The judges are now looking at the pages called]

Q: Did you refer to Benue State

A: Rephrase the question

Q: No

A: There’s Benue but not just Benue, other states are listed.


Q. In Para 24, you referred to a LGA in Anambra State. are you aware that in that LGA in Umuezechua Primary School 1, Labour Party won there with 117 votes and APC scored 0.

A. I'm not aware because it doesn't touch on my expertise

[ That's that for the cross examination of the witness by the 2nd & 3rd respondents.
The 4th respondent is about to cross examine the witness]

4TH RESPONDENT CROSS-EXAMINATION:

Q. There's always an agreement betwen authorities of AWS & customer.

A. Yes, it's called Service Level Agreement

Q. This agreement will normally contain details of the terms and security features

A. If your security feature mean availability, yes.

We are not interested Jagaban has won

Ddeliverer007:


Watch and learn kid.

They have only Friday. Or do you think they will compute those documents in their address without allowing the respondents to interrogate them during cross-examination? That is why they object to them.

IamV:

[ That's that for the cross examination of the witness by the 2nd & 3rd respondents.
The 4th respondent is about to cross examine the witness]

4TH RESPONDENT CROSS-EXAMINATION:

Q. There's always an agreement betwen authorities of AWS & customer.

A. Yes, it's called Service Level Agreement

Q. This agreement will normally contain details of the terms and security features

A. If your security feature mean availability, yes.

A: The security features agreement are only known to parties and they can unlock it at anytime

A: No. I’m afraid that is incorrect

Q: The agreement is know only to the parties

A: No, but the SLA you can choose the service you want.

Q: So it’s to the public the one you choose

A: It’s not displayed to the public

Q: Wow, I like your voice.

A: I appreciate yours too.

Q: In your statement on exhibit A, you listed 12 PU results .

A: Yes

Q: Face the judges. Stop looking at your lawyers!
Who helped you do this report ?

A: I did it myself, why would I need people to do my report for me ?.

A: So you don’t have juniors, we lawyers have juniors

W: No, I did it myself.

tinsel:

They have only Friday. Or do you think they will compute those documents in their address without allowing the respondents to interrogate them during cross-examination? That is why they object to them.

Obi is trying to use ict to prove irregularities in an election that took place offline and voting and collation manually based.funny.how will you sit in your house and speculate if there was infractions in so so and so unit

IamV:


A: The security features agreement are only known to parties and they can unlock it at anytime

A: No. I’m afraid that is incorrect

Q: The agreement is know only to the parties

A: No, but the SLA you can choose the service you want.

Q: So it’s to the public the one you choose

A: It’s not displayed to the public

Q: Wow, I like your voice.

A: I appreciate yours too.

Q: In your statement on exhibit A, you listed 12 PU results .

A: Yes

Q: Face the judges. Stop looking at your lawyers!
Who helped you do this report ?

A: I did it myself, why would I need people to do my report for me ?.

A: So you don’t have juniors, we lawyers have juniors

W: No, I did it myself.

Wow,that further suggests miss clarity perjured

You are speaking Nonsense...this witness must be tagged 'Hostile' because he is making your Agbadorian SAN look so shallow. Why are you defending on Nairaland, but you can create a thread to counter all these weighty allegations against APC and useless INEC.


Peter OBI's legal representation is smashing you senselessly and you are here disturbing the peace with shallow reasoning .

senatordave1:


It is settled law that parties are bound by their pleadings.he already explained only 11 pages and refused to explain the other.inother words,lp is bound by what he pleaded as he adopted it beforehand

senatordave1:


Why is lp running away from physical copies which is primary?

You don't even understand what is happening to you guys.

LP has 5 prayers to the court. The battle is (LP vs APC) and (LP Vs PDP)

See the strategy very here:

1. If the court rules and disqualify's Shettima, or Tinubu on the basis of dual citizenship or drug records, APC looses and the battle will now be between PDP and LP

2. If the court rules on 25% of FCT this handles APC and PDP. LP will tak it.

3. If the court rules on the process and decides to recount(which is the reason of all the documents brought by LP), LP will take the day. That was reason the LP brought witness from Adamawa.

All the witnesses you see today are focusing on presenting that the election went well but INEC did not upload result for a simple reason to rig the election..

IamV:


A: The security features agreement are only known to parties and they can unlock it at anytime

A: No. I’m afraid that is incorrect

Q: The agreement is know only to the parties

A: No, but the SLA you can choose the service you want.

Q: So it’s to the public the one you choose

A: It’s not displayed to the public

Q: Wow, I like your voice.

A: I appreciate yours too.

Q: In your statement on exhibit A, you listed 12 PU results .

A: Yes

Q: Face the judges. Stop looking at your lawyers!
Who helped you do this report ?

A: I did it myself, why would I need people to do my report for me ?.

A: So you don’t have juniors, we lawyers have juniors

W: No, I did it myself.

Q. These 12 polling unit results, none of them were original form EC8A they were downloaded from IREV.

A. Yes, they are still there

Q. You did not interact with any of the presiding officers who officiated in those polling units.

A. No I didn't.

Q. You did not see the hard copy of Forms EC8A.

A. I didn't have to, I didn't.

Q. The attachment to your report, the 4th one, you said that was an incorrect upload

A. Yes I did, in my comments.

Q. In the process of uploading, when did you determine the incorrect image .

A. I'm not sure

Q. Who uploaded it

A. I don't know who, but it came from the BVAS and I know which BVAS uploaded it.

Imagine a SAN asking what is decrypt!!!

These Agbadorian SANs are truly quota system hacks.


WITNESS FOR LP is on FIRE!!

NIGERIANs, see how your true president assembles people with smashing credentials to actually rubbish 'quota system' SANs that are antiquated in their thinking

Peter Obi is articulate and excellent!!.

IamV:


Q. In para 24, you Exhibit attached is made up of 11 pages .

A. You're not correct. It extends more than 11. There are 23 pages.


Q. You've given information in those 23 pgs which are not explained.

A. You're not correct.

Q. The information you supplied in these pages, are they decrypted ?

A. Yes

Q. Explain to decrypt.

A. It means the act of opening what is encrypted is readable. And what is contained there is readable.

Q. You also supplied some links in Para 23,24,26,27.

A. That's correct

Q. You want this honourable court to go and browse,access the links and download the information ?

A. No, I'm willing to explain.

[ He's not allowed to explain and there's arguments between Ikwueto and Wole SAN over allowing him to explain. ]

Why is this not on front page yet, considering the number of viewers already here?

IamV:


Q. These 12 polling unit results, none of them were original form EC8A they were downloaded from IREV.

A. Yes, they are still there

Q. You did not interact with any of the presiding officers who officiated in those polling units.

A. No I didn't.

Q. You did not see the hard copy of Forms EC8A.

A. I didn't have to, I didn't.

Q. The attachment to your report, the 4th one, you said that was an incorrect upload

A. Yes I did, in my comments.

Q. In the process of uploading, when did you determine the incorrect image .

A. I'm not sure

Q. Who uploaded it

A. I don't know who, but it came from the BVAS and I know which BVAS uploaded it.

Q. Have you found out the correct result for that polling unit ?

A. No, I didn't have to.

Q. Does that result exist ?

A. I wouldn't know.

Q. You also did not Interrogate INEC on that result or any one attached to your report .

A.I did not Interrogate INEC but I interrogated INEC manual.

Q. You did not Interrogate any official ?

A. No

Q. Did you ask those who contracted you, LP, for the results ?

A. I didn't

Q. You also did not Interrogate the AWS ?

A. In some ways I did because I interrogated their server and it gave me this, a picture of a book instead of a result.

This WITNESS is smashing Agbadorian SANs oooo..see groove abeg!!!


This is intoxicating and heartwarming!!!

IamV:


Q. These 12 polling unit results, none of them were original form EC8A they were downloaded from IREV.

A. Yes, they are still there

Q. You did not interact with any of the presiding officers who officiated in those polling units.

A. No I didn't.

Q. You did not see the hard copy of Forms EC8A.

A. I didn't have to, I didn't.

Q. The attachment to your report, the 4th one, you said that was an incorrect upload

A. Yes I did, in my comments.

Q. In the process of uploading, when did you determine the incorrect image .

A. I'm not sure

Q. Who uploaded it

A. I don't know who, but it came from the BVAS and I know which BVAS uploaded it.

MyPoint:



You don't even understand what is happening to you guys.

LP has 5 prayers to the court. The battle is (LP vs APC) and (LP Vs PDP)

See the strategy very here:

1. If the court rules and disqualify's Shettima, APC looses and the battle will now be between PDP and LP

2. If the court rules on 25% of FCT this handles APC and PDP. LP will tak it.

3. If the court rules on the process and decides to recount(which is the reason of all the documents brought by LP), LP will take the day. That was reason the LP brought witness from Adamawa.

All the witnesses you see today are focusing on presenting that the election went well but INEC did not upload result for a simple reason to rig the election.






We are challenging the process.

So that we can make his lordship ask that the counting be repeated.

1) your prayers cannot disqualify tinubu as he was never an exconvict or under any punishment and if he was,time has lapsed.the apex court has stated that shettima was never guilty of double nomination...

2) if the court rules that fct 25% is mandatory,it will involve a rerun only between tinubu and atiku knocking out obi.

3) the court cannot order a recount as obi time has lapsed.he should have done that ever since.he already recollated the irev copies and still lost...

No amount of witness can prove non transmission.you need at least 5000 witness and obi only called three which only affects that particular unit they worked.the witnesses all stated that the fault was from bvas and not inec and also that they eventually submitted the hard copies and uploaded offline

sultanofpigs:
You are speaking Nonsense...this witness must be tagged 'Hostile' because he is making your Agbadorian SAN look so shallow. Why are you defending on Nairaland, but you can create a thread to counter all these weighty allegations against APC and useless INEC.


Peter OBI's legal representation is smashing you senselessly and you are here disturbing the peace with shallow reasoning .

What a pity.you don't even know what a hostile witness is

senatordave1:


It is settled law that parties are bound by their pleadings.he already explained only 11 pages and refused to explain the other.inother words,lp is bound by what he pleaded as he adopted it beforehand

He explained it. But your lawyers are only suggesting their opinions to him to create technicality.

IamV:


Q. These 12 polling unit results, none of them were original form EC8A they were downloaded from IREV.

A. Yes, they are still there

Q. You did not interact with any of the presiding officers who officiated in those polling units.

A. No I didn't.

Q. You did not see the hard copy of Forms EC8A.

A. I didn't have to, I didn't.

Q. The attachment to your report, the 4th one, you said that was an incorrect upload

A. Yes I did, in my comments.

Q. In the process of uploading, when did you determine the incorrect image .

A. I'm not sure

Q. Who uploaded it

A. I don't know who, but it came from the BVAS and I know which BVAS uploaded it.

Self destruct mode

IamV:


Q. Have you found out the correct result for that polling unit ?

A. No, I didn't have to.

Q. Does that result exist ?

A. I wouldn't know.

Q. You also did not Interrogate INEC on that result or any one attached to your report .

A.I did not Interrogate INEC but I interrogated INEC manual.

Q. You did not Interrogate any official ?

A. No

Q. Did you ask those who contracted you, LP, for the results ?

A. I didn't

Q. You also did not Interrogate the AWS ?

A. In some ways I did because I interrogated their server and it gave me this, a picture of a book instead of a result.

Q. You did not attach your Interrogation to your report.

A. I did

Q. Mention the pages where you interrogated the AWS in respect of these 12 documents.

A. In para 24, last sentence there refer to an attachment.
[he reads it].
What else do you want?

Q. There are 3 items mentioned there.

A. There are 3 items mentioned here

Q. Are you aware that there are 176,000 polling units ?

A. Actually, there are 176,846.

Q. And you picked 12 ?

A. With proof of consent

LO FAGBEMI:
I'm angry, I'm not asking you any questions again .

[ ]

[ That's that for the cross examination of the witness by the 4th Respondent ]

IamV:


Q. Have you found out the correct result for that polling unit ?

A. No, I didn't have to.

Q. Does that result exist ?

A. I wouldn't know.

Q. You also did not Interrogate INEC on that result or any one attached to your report .

A.I did not Interrogate INEC but I interrogated INEC manual.

Q. You did not Interrogate any official ?

A. No

Q. Did you ask those who contracted you, LP, for the results ?

A. I didn't

Q. You also did not Interrogate the AWS ?

A. In some ways I did because I interrogated their server and it gave me this, a picture of a book instead of a result.

This witness is rubbishing Pandora singlehandedly

IamV:


Q. In para 24, you Exhibit attached is made up of 11 pages .

A. You're not correct. It extends more than 11. There are 23 pages.


Q. You've given information in those 23 pgs which are not explained.

A. You're not correct.

Q. The information you supplied in these pages, are they decrypted ?

A. Yes

Q. Explain to decrypt.

A. It means the act of opening what is encrypted is readable. And what is contained there is readable.

Q. You also supplied some links in Para 23,24,26,27.

A. That's correct

Q. You want this honourable court to go and browse,access the links and download the information ?

A. No, I'm willing to explain.

[ He's not allowed to explain and there's arguments between Ikwueto and Wole SAN over allowing him to explain. ]

Men this Guy is a tough nut to crack. It is like he already has personal beef with the lawyers. Nawa oo.

MyPoint:


He explained it. But your lawyers are only suggesting their opinions to him to create technicality.

He wasn't allowed to explain sir.he trapped himself like lp lawyers are notorious for