senatordave1:


Facts are against pandora

According to agbadoo urchinns

Am interested

saintbillion:

Your so call lawyers don't even know the exact numbers of pu's. Lol but the witness corrected him by stating the exact number. Who is in for business? That alone should tell u he means business. If out of 12 units he Carried out his research and saw different pictures in all and discrepancies in the 12 units, what's the needs of wasting time in the remaining faulty 176?

In the eyes of the law,he actually did nothing as irregularities in 12 units only affects the 12 and nowhere else.he failed to call witnesses from that units to corroborate his claims

PoliticalUpdate:


Men this Guy is a tough nut to crack. It is like he already has personal beef with the lawyers. Nawa oo.

My brother laff wan Kee me here oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooh

IamV:


[ 2ND AND 3RD RESPONDENTS CROSS-EXAMINATION ]:

Q. In Para 15,16,18 of your witness statement, you reproduced what INEC gave in its reply to the petition and are given your views to the replies.
Was it part of your brief to help Labour party give a reply ?

A. I'm a subject matter expert, the paragraphs speak to details of my expertise

[ He asks the question again ]

A. They didn't ask for that and I can't recall that conversation ever happening.

Q. Did you physically inspect any of the BVAS machine ?

A. No I didnt.

Q. did you as a person Interrogate Festus Okoye regarding this document ?

A. I did not

Q. In para 23, you referred to a LGA in Bauchi State.

A. That's correct

Q. Are you aware the PDP won in that LGA in the election?

A. I'm not aware.

This guy is hot and he's giving them hot. He's truly a cyber security expert.

IamV:


[ All the Respondents objected to the admissibility of that documents EXCERPT INEC .
The Petitioners also notes that they will reply to thier objections in due time.]

The Court:
The Copies of the 6 Letters are hereby admitted into evidence and marked as Exhibits PCQ1-6 accordingly.

^{As the court pleases}.

The vast majority of Nigerians who voted Peter Obi are growing impatient for justice to come.
People are not visiting the online stories funded by Tinubu/APC/Mahmood Yakubu trio.

sultanofpigs:
Why are you now abandoning @senatordave1. @Garfield1. It's not fair ooo!
..

my dear, so far I have utilized at least 15% of my brain's capacity. That's why if someone tries to make you feel like you only used 2% then you just have to call their bluffs and give them a dose of their own medicine.

Watch how he will ignore me henceforth, Lol 😅

They always do. When i ask them a simple question their response is always silly, half taught or even an outright insult lol

IfnobeGod20:

This guy is hot and he's giving them hot. He's truly a cyber security expert.

How is that response hot when he didn't even knew who won the election in the LGA he quoted.

Most of these guys will end up in jail. We are all here

IamV:


The Court:
The Copies of the 6 Letters are hereby admitted into evidence and marked as Exhibits PCQ1-6 accordingly.

^{As the court pleases}.

[ Dr. Livy SAN continues with the witness]

Q. In Para 36, you made reference to a Press Release issued by INEC and signed by Festus Okoye

A. Yes

[ He is shown Exhibit PCK2 tendered by The Cyber security witness yesterday and he identifies it.]

Majesty7:


How is that response hot when he didn't even knew who won the election in the LGA he quoted.

Most of these guys will end up in jail. We are all here

I am reading their comments and I just laugh here. Just show people rejoicing over nothing

IamV:


[ Dr. Livy SAN continues with the witness]

Q. In Para 36, you made reference to a Press Release issued by INEC and signed by Festus Okoye

A. Yes

[ He is shown Exhibit PCK2 tendered by The Cyber security witness yesterday and he identifies it.]

Q. In Para 20 of your witness deposition, you said you can identify all Forms (listed in the picture attached) and all INEC electoral documents

A. Yes

[ Respondents remind the court of time and the time keeper notes that he has 5 more minutes.]

IamV:


Q. In Para 20 of your witness deposition, you said you can identify all Forms (listed in the picture attached) and all INEC electoral documents

A. Yes

[ Respondents remind the court of time and the time keeper notes that he has 5 more minutes.]

[ The Witness is now identifying the INEC documents and Forms already tendered to the court. The witness duly identifies them. ]

Q. In Para 61, you mentioned 18,088 blurred copy of the IREV results, can you identify them?

A. Yes

[ He looks at PCE1-4 and Identifies them ]

Majesty7:


How is that response hot when he didn't even knew who won the election in the LGA he quoted.

Most of these guys will end up in jail. We are all here

It's a very smart answer .
Maybe ,going forward,you will understand.

IamV:


[ The Witness is now identifying the INEC documents and Forms already tendered to the court. The witness duly identifies them. ]

Q. In Para 61, you mentioned 18,088 blurred copy of the IREV results, can you identify them?

A. Yes

[ He looks at PCE1-4 and Identifies them ]

Q. Apart from these documents you identified, you also identified other blurred copies duly certified?

A. Yes my Lord.

^{That's all for the witness examination in Chief}.

[ The court stands down the proceedings for Cross-examination till tomorrow since it's 6pm and time is up . ]

obailala:
There's an adage that says "after a robbery operation, if you see anyone celebrating, just know they are the relatives and friends of the robbers". Oga Dave, no need arguing with you cos we already understand this third world political drill. Enjoy your loot!! ...and if God wills it, una go vomit am!

Simple. I don't get it when people argue with paid miscreants. They are here to spread false narratives and not to be convinced. Just ignore them.

Majesty7:


How is that response hot when he didn't even knew who won the election in the LGA he quoted.

Most of these guys will end up in jail. We are all here

Lol. This one has still not gotten what PO is trying to prove through this particular prayer. If you were a witness you would flop. So, he should have known and said PDP won the LG in an election whose process is being interrogated? You obviously don't know what plausible deniability means and how he can affect a witness locus standi

IamV:


It's a very smart answer .
Maybe ,going forward,you will understand.

Nothing smart here. Response noted already by the court. Nothing here, just a confused guy trying to be smart. Till then, we are here

senatordave1:


Obi is trying to use ict to prove irregularities in an election that took place offline and voting and collation manually based.funny.how will you sit in your house and speculate if there was infractions in so so and so unit

Do u play chess...the game is to deduce your opponents next move and either make them feel they know urs while I lead them on to their end...

OfoIgbo:


So far, Peter Obi's people have submitted enough evidence to prove that
1. Shettima had another nomination before he was declared Tinubu's running mate
2. Tinubu didn't get 25% of Abuja votes, which is a constitutional requirement
3. Cast doubt on how INEC arrived at the decision that Tinubu won, especially as there were thousands of blurred results, and huge discrepancies in certain states.

The only point Peter Obi now has to prove is that he actually won that election. Even though I know he has submitted EC8A forms for the election, the prosecution still needs to collate the exact results in those forms, as the court may not have time to go through that mountain of evidence.

All I can say at the moment is that Peter Obi has proven enough points for the judges to cancel that election and call for a re-run. He needs to do a bit more for the courts to have enough evidence to declare him the winner.

Let us wait for the defence, and what points they have

So the shettima case that Supreme Court has concluded on and even fined the complainant is what you listed on your number one ? Nawa oooooo .

Hope no be copy and paste you did so or you just fall from the moon for you not to know about the case ?

Don't mind him. They don't know a witness usually passes through grilling from from LP even before standing in court. Such a dull comment.

XY23:


Lol. This one has still not gotten what PO is trying to prove through this particular prayer. If you were a witness you would flop. So, he should have known and said PDP won the LG in an election whose process is being interrogated? You obviously don't know what plausible deniability means and how he can affect a witness locus standi

saintbillion:

Your so call lawyers don't even know the exact numbers of pu's. Lol but the witness corrected him by stating the exact number. Who is in for business? That alone should tell u he means business. If out of 12 units he Carried out his research and saw different pictures in all and discrepancies in the 12 units, what's the needs of wasting time in the remaining faulty 176?

It was a trick. The guy was smart enough to dodge it.

12/176k isn't enough though.

XY23:


Lol. This one has still not gotten what PO is trying to prove through this particular prayer. If you were a witness you would flop. So, he should have known and said PDP won the LG in an election whose process is being interrogated? You obviously don't know what plausible deniability means and how he can affect a witness locus standi

You guys are just slow and daft. He was asked a question. Saying he doesn't know implies that he knew nothing

If he has issues with the announcement, it is better to say "according to INEC"... With that he might prove something but saying blantly that he didn't know shows he never follow the event just a blind supporter believing in his own rubbish. Wait and see. This is a national issue and mind games can send you to jail. Till then

ncoolsome:



Do u play chess...the game is to deduce your opponents next move and either make them feel they know urs while I lead them on to their end...

Unfortunately,it doesn't apply in the court.court is all about facts and law and obi hasn't proven if there was irregularities or if he won and he has just tomorrow

IamV:


Q. Apart from these documents you identified you also identified other blurred copies duly certified?

A. Yes my Lord.

^{That's all for the witness examination in Chief}.

[ The court stands down the proceedings for Cross-examination till tomorrow since it's 6pm and time is up . ]

The court now adjourns till tomorrow, Friday June 23, 2023 at 2pm for continuation of hearing.


-----------
Thank you all for keeping the thread going.
My beautiful & handsome audience, you're all appreciated.

Tomorrow, we go HARDER !

For now,you all take care and do have a great day.

Novarisammy2:


try taking ur drugs judiciously pls

don't skip any dosage

Bush baby .. cry ...
Obituarists.. die..
Obingoe.. bark

It seems you've not been following. Obi has submitted all the facts. It's now left for INEC to prove that those facts are not admissible. What do you think they have been objecting to since last week?

senatordave1:


Unfortunately,it doesn't apply in the court.court is all about facts and law and obi hasn't proven if there was irregularities or if he won and he has just tomorrow

Majesty7:


Nothing smart here. Response noted already by the court. Nothing here, just a confused guy trying to be smart. Till then, we are here

Okay.

IamV:


Q. Have you found out the correct result for that polling unit ?

A. No, I didn't have to.

Q. Does that result exist ?

A. I wouldn't know.

Q. You also did not Interrogate INEC on that result or any one attached to your report .

A.I did not Interrogate INEC but I interrogated INEC manual.

Q. You did not Interrogate any official ?

A. No

Q. Did you ask those who contracted you, LP, for the results ?

A. I didn't

Q. You also did not Interrogate the AWS ?

A. In some ways I did because I interrogated their server and it gave me this, a picture of a book instead of a result.

This is more of a hostile witness than anything. The respondents are hearing it hot like hot iron. Thumb up guy.

ncoolsome:



Do u play chess...the game is to deduce your opponents next move and either make them feel they know urs while I lead them on to their end...

This is no chess. He made a valid point. I can bet you that not one or two of the called witnesses will be sent to jail with extremely HARD labour

Your INEC chair that stole and give it to another thief who knows that the item given to him is certainly stolen one will not end up in prison , right ?


Dey play !

Majesty7:


How is that response hot when he didn't even knew who won the election in the LGA he quoted.

Most of these guys will end up in jail. We are all here