gisevak:

The formation of the Earth is a fascinating area of study in planet science and cosmology. Scientists have developed well-supported theories and hypotheses about Earth's formation based on extensive research and evidence. And you can still give your view in a summarized way on how earth is formed.
I[b] don't know[/b], so throw more enlightenment on it.

Go look up scientists that are vast in it for enlightenment.

gisevak:

State second law of thermodynamic. And I would explain how class A extends B from it.

States the law of thermodynamics, let's see his relation to A extends B.
Also show me where you got your definition of "physical laws'
when you were an atheist, wat did you believe]

Maynman:

Go look up scientists that are vast in it for enlightenment.

Tell me about your findings that made you change your views to atheism. Is it the Abrahamic Religion? Is it those Scriptures contradictions or illogical concept of hellfire?? But there are more to this Don't just limit your knowledge to atheism. It is more logical to be agnostic than atheism.

gisevak:

Tell me about your findings that made you change your views to atheism. Is it the Abrahamic Religion? Is it those Scriptures contradictions or illogical concept of hellfire?? But there are more to this Don't just limit yourknoledge to atheism. It is more logical to be agnostic than atheism.

What do you understand by "atheism"?

An agnostics is someone that belives the position of agnosticism.
Agnostic means you lack knowledge, the opposite is Gnostic which is more reasonable.

Maynman:

What do you understand by "atheism"?

An agnostics is someone that belives the position of agnosticism.
Agnostic means you lack knowledge, the opposite is Gnostic which is more reasonable.

Let me put this straight to that:

Agnostics does not have believe in any known gods because those gods does not need our believe; But we do not claim certainty about their nonexistence because we don't have enough facts to rejects its existence.

gisevak:

Let me put this straight to that:
.
Agnostics does not have believe in any known gods because thonose gods does not need our believe; But we do not claim certainty about their becgodause we don't have enough facts to rejects its existence.

How do you know those gods don't need your beliefs, is that not another belief in itself.

Again, an agnostics is someone that belives the position of agnosticism.

gisevak:

Let me put this straight to that:
Agnostics does not have believe in any known gods because those gods does not need our believe; But we do not claim certainty about their nonexistence because we don't have enough facts to rejects its existence.

I call agnostics, theist sympathizers.

"Nowadays, the term “agnostic” is often used (when the issue is God’s existence) to refer to those who follow the recommendation expressed in the conclusion of Huxley’s argument: an agnostic is a person who has entertained the proposition that there is a God but believes neither that it is true nor that it is false.

Maynman:

How do you know those gods don't need your beliefs, is that not another belief in itself.

Again, an agnostics is someone that belives the position of agnosticism.

I have given you one of the points for agnosticism. We don't have enough knowledge to reject gods existence or any related stuffs. It's not a belief system because we are not dogmatic about views. We don't take science as the only authority in our views. We don't know all about our universe. We seek to know more.

gisevak:

I have given you one of the points for agnosticism. We don'tst have enough knowledge to reject gods existence or any related stuffs. It's not a belief system because we are not dog matic about views. We don't take science as the only authority in our views. We don't know all about our universe. We seek to know more.

Agnostics are theist sympathizers, how do you know there is no enough evidence?

Agnostic are dogmatic, you have already accepted the position that Gods exist.

Maynman:
I call agnostics, theist sympathizers.

"Nowadays, the term “agnostic” is often used (when the issue is God’s existence) to refer to those who follow the recommendation expressed in the conclusion of Huxley’s argument: an agnostic is a person who has entertained the proposition that there is a God but believes neither that it is true nor that it is false.

I have given what best described us. Not the one you put up here.

gisevak:

I have given what best described us. Not the one you put up here.

The definition is from the person that coined the word "agnosticism", I don't think you even know him, you are just carrying the title and forming definitions lol.

It is also worth mentioning that, even in Huxley’s time, some apophatic theists embraced the term “agnostic”, claiming that all good Christians worshipped an “unknown God”.

Maynman:

Agnostics are theist sympathizers, how do you know there is no enough evidence?

Agnostic are dogmatic, you have already accepted the position that Gods exist.

What if I tell you we don't have enough facts to rejects or accept But there is more facts to accept than to reject. We don't have enough facts because we lack in capacity to know. Have you been able to give me full evidence about how life started with facts?

gisevak:

What if I tell you we don't have enough facts to rejects or accept But there is more facts to accept than to reject. We don't have enough facts because we lack in capacity to know. Have you been able to give me full evidence about how life started with facts?

prove we don't have enough evidence.
If you lack knowledge on something, keep it to yourself, don't try to extend your ignorance to other people.

Think, if this god created life that means he is lifeless lol
And how can a lifeless thing create that which has life?

Maynman:

The definition is from the person that coined the word "agnosticism", I don't think you even know him, you are just carrying the title and forming definitions lol.

It is also worth mentioning that, even in Huxley’s time, some apophatic theists embraced the term “agnostic”, claiming that all good Christians worshipped an “unknown God”.

Why should gods want me to worship its/him/her? What facts says we should worship gods outside the Religious Book. The definition doesn't capture majority of agnostic.

gisevak:

Why should gods want me to worship its/him/her? What facts says we should worship gods outside the Religious Book. The definition doesn't capture majority of agnostic.

Theism deals with belief and faith.
Everything about gods is from religious books.

It perfectly captures theist sympathizers calling themselves Agnostic.
The definition is from the person that coined the word.

Maynman:
prove we don't have enough evidence.
If you lack knowledge on something, keep it to yourself, don't try to extend your ignorance to other people.

Think, if this god created life that means he is lifeless lol
And how can a lifeless thing create that which has life?

Does your scientists claim they have evidence to reject existence of gods?

gisevak:

Does your scientists claim they have evidence to reject existence of gods?

Scientists don't deal with beliefs you will know that if you know what "atheism" is.

Do you have enough evidence to reject tom and jerry exist?
Are you Agnostic about it too?

Maynman:

Theism deals with belief and faith.
Everything about gods is from religious books.

It perfectly captures theist sympathizers calling themselves Agnostic.
The definition is from the person that coined the word.

I am describing our views but you're rejecting. His views is not same as mine. Period!!!

gisevak:

I am describing our views but you're rejecting. His views is not same as mine. Period!!!

Then you need to find another phrase to define your beliefs.
Agnosticism was coined by huxley and he has define it.
Period!

Maynman:

Scientists don't deal with beliefs you will know that if you know what "atheism" is.

Do you have enough evidence to reject tom and jerry exist?
Are you Agnostic about it too?

I am saying we don't have proof to reject existence of gods? Or do you have proofs?

gisevak:

I am saying we don't have proof to reject existence of gods? Or do you have proofs?

Prove we don't have proof that Gods don't exist.

If you lack knowledge, don't extend it to others.

Do you have sufficient proof that Tom and Jerry don't exist?
Are you Agnostic to it too?

Maynman:

Then you need to find another phrase to define your beliefs.
Agnosticism was coined by huxley and he has define it.
Period!

Are you part of atheist that says there is no god??

gisevak:

Are you part of atheist that says there is no god??

Define "atheism"

I have asked so many times lol

Maynman:
Prove we don't have proof that Gods exist.

If you lack knowledge, don't extend it to others.

Do you have sufficient proof that Tom and Jerry don't exist?
Are you Agnostic to it too?

On what context are you saying Tom and Jerry does not exist. Is it name Tom and Jerry or cat and rats name Tom and Jerry? They may exists depending on the contexts.

Maynman:

Define "atheism"

I have asked so many times lol

What can you describe about your atheism?

gisevak:

On what context are you saying Tom and Jerry does not exist. Is it name Tom and Jerry or cat and rats name Tom and Jerry? They may exists depending on the contexts.

This is illogical, Names don't exist, what's the shape of the name "bayo"?


Do you have sufficient proof that Tom and Jerry don't exist?
Are you Agnostic to it too?

gisevak:

What can you describe about your atheism?

Define "atheism"

I think that's where your ignorance started and you said you were once an atheist or is it just a lie to promote your supernatural beliefs while hiding under agnosticism.

Maynman:

This is illogical, Names don't exist, what's the shape of the name "bayo"?


Do you have sufficient proof that Tom and Jerry don't exist?
Are you Agnostic to it too?

On what contexts This is fallacy of comparison!!!

gisevak:

On what contexts This is fallacy of comparison!!!

Do you have sufficient proof that Tom and Jerry don't exist?
Are you Agnostic to it too?

Maynman:

Define "atheism"

I think that's where your ignorance started and you said you were once an atheist or is it just a lie to promote your supernatural beliefs while hiding under agnosticism.

Can you provide answers to some of the questions I asked and i would reply you concerning, "definition of atheism".

gisevak:

Can you provide answers to some of the questions I asked and i would reply you concerning, "definition of atheism".

After you provide answers to some of the questions I have been asking you SINCE

You have been dodging it.

Maynman:


Do you have sufficient proof that Tom and Jerry don't exist?
Are you Agnostic to it too?

You're still a students, I presumed. I don't think I would want to talk with you back and forward. Go through my posts and provide answers to those questions. Please don't quote me again until you do so. I don't do half bake knowledge If you can't answer them tell me straight otherwise I might note reply after this. Good night!!! Lecture ends