Maynman:
wish you can question your Doctrine too.

No where in Genesis 1:1 did it say universe has a beginning

Don't play
It was presented in a simple and logical way
In a lay understanding, what comes to mind from the human standpoint is the heavens and the earth which are components we can see and unique to our environment...
Other parts mentions skies as well

Or other parts of the universe the Bible did not mention means they were not created?
Bible did not mention things like microorganisms and other planets as well
All the same, science agrees the universe has a beginning

LordReed:


Why do all these dumdums keep asking me to produce evidence for claims I didn't make?

If you were debating the earth could not be an effect of a designer? It would come from who? Itself or booom? Earth appeared

Aemmyjah:



Don't play
It was presented in a simple and logical way
In a lay understanding, what comes to mind from the human standpoint is the heavens and the earth which are components we can see and unique to our enevironment...
Other parts mentions skies as well

Or other parts of the universe the Bible did not mention means they were not created?
Bible did not mention things like microorganisms and other planets as well
All the same, science agrees the universe has a beginning

Didn't science agree on Evolution too?

Aemmyjah:


By intelligent mind or by accident?
Intelligent atheist

NATURAL PROCESS

Aemmyjah:


If you were debating the earth could not be an effect of a designer? It would come from who? Itself or booom? Earth appeared

Go read up on planetary and other stellar bodies formation if you wish to know.

Start here: https://www.amnh.org/exhibitions/permanent/the-universe/planets/formation-of-our-solar-system

Maynman:

Didn't science agree on Evolution too?

Based on facts or mere speculation
Why shouldn't we question science as to evolution especially using scientific approach?

Besides, I don't know which part of science agrees with evolution...
Evolution breaks the common concept of reproduction... Parents produce like offspring but they mention how we evolve from one animal or the other and share common ancestral lineage
The human brain cannot be a product of evolution
Scientists don't even agree on its definition and evem the concept of what Darwin said is becoming odd and being revised

LordReed:


Go read up on planetary and other stellar bodies formation if you wish to know.

Start here: https://www.amnh.org/exhibitions/permanent/the-universe/planets/formation-of-our-solar-system

I am not reading any link
Drop screenshot to prove your point

Aemmyjah:


Based on facts or mere speculation
Why shouldn't we question science as to evolution especially using scientific approach?

Besides, I don't know which part of science agrees with evolution...
Evolution breaks the common concept of reproduction... Parents produce like offspring but they , hmi evolve from one animal or the other and s
Andhare common ancestral lineage
The human brain cannot be a product of evolutionscek
Scientists don't even agree on its definition and evem the concept of what Darwin said is becoming odd and being revised

The universe having a beginning is based on what, mind sharing the facts.
And name the scientist that don't agree with Evolution, also what part of science does not agree with Evolution

Maynman:

The universe having a beginning is based on what, mind sharing the facts.
And name the scientist that don't agree with Evolution, also what part of science does not agree with Evolution

All scientists today accept the theory of evolution as to the origin of life and diversity of species. Yes or No?

LordReed:


Go read up on planetary and other stellar bodies formation if you wish to know.

Start here: https://www.amnh.org/exhibitions/permanent/the-universe/planets/formation-of-our-solar-system

Drop screenshot of your point in the link you dropped

Aemmyjah:


All scientists today I accept the theory of evolution as to the origin of life and diversity of species. Yes or No?

Is that the definition of "Evolution", yes or no?

Maynman:

Is that the definition of "Evolution", yes or no?

Define evolution
I mentioned 2 aspects of what evolution says
1. Origin of life
2. Diversity of species

Aemmyjah:



Define evolution
I mentioned 2 aspects of what evolution says
1. Origin of life
2. Diversity of species

Where did Evolution say such,mind sharing whee you got it.

name the scientist that don't agree with Evolution, also what part of science does not agree with Evolution

Aemmyjah:


Drop screenshot of your point in the link you dropped

Aemmyjah:

I am not reading any link
Drop screenshot to prove your point

If you're too lazy to click the link then that's not my problem.

Maynman:

Where did Evolution say such,mind sharing whee you got it.

name the scientist that don't agree with Evolution, also what part of science does not agree with Evolution

1. Origin of life: The process by which life first arose from non-living matter. Miller and Oparin

2. Diversity of living forms: The variety of different types of life that exist on Earth. (Darwin and Wallace)

Or I should describe the scientists mentioned above?



As to your second question, I will mention one known example if you answer me first

Do all scientists today (including biologists) accept the theory of evolution?

LordReed:


If you're too lazy to click the link then that's not my problem.

Fine
Personally, I don't drop links
I drop screenshot so that everyone can see the point I'm making
Bear in mind how none of you have addressed the OP
The closest was Jaephoenix but he mentioned 'probably' and said he does not know

Aemmyjah:


1. Origin of life: The process by which life first arose from non-living matter. Miller and Oparin

2. Diversity of living forms: The variety of different types of life that exist on Earth. (Darwin and Wallace)

Or I should describe the scientists mentioned above?



As to your second question, I will mention one known example if you answer me first

Do all scientists today (including biologists) accept the theory of evolution?

Jargons.

Where did Evolution say such,mind sharing whee you got it.

name the scientist that don't agree with Evolution, also what part of science does not agree with Evolution

Maynman:

Where did Evolution say such,mind sharing whee you got it.

Macroevolution refers to evolutionary change that occurs at or above the species level. It involves the formation of new species, the diversification of lineages over long periods of time, and the emergence of novel traits or characteristics. It encompasses significant evolutionary events such as speciation, extinction, and adaptive radiations.

Charles Darwin, in his book "On the Origin of Species," defined evolution as "descent with modification," describing how species arise from a common ancestor and gradually change over time through the process of natural selection. He wrote, "Owing to this struggle for life, any variation, however slight and from whatever cause proceeding, if it be in any degree profitable to an individual of any species, in its infinitely complex relations to other organic beings and to external nature, will tend to the preservation of that individual, and will generally be inherited by its offspring."


Ernst Mayr, defined evolution as "the change in frequency of genes in a population over time." He explained that evolution is driven by mechanisms such as natural selection, genetic drift, and mutation, resulting in changes at both the genetic and phenotypic levels.

Richard Dawkins, a well-known evolutionary biologist and author, wrote, "Evolution is a process that is responsible for the diversity of life on Earth. It is a process [b]without foresight, [/b]and its consequences are determined by a combination of genetic variation, the inheritance of that variability, and the environmental context." Any evidence? Dawkins no give any evidence as to his assumption

Aemmyjah:


Fine
Personally, I don't drop links
I drop screenshot so that everyone can see the point I'm making
Bear in mind how none of you have addressed the OP
The closest was Jaephoenix but he mentioned 'probably' and said he does not know

That's your cup of tea.

I am not interested in addressing the original post. What I was interested in was addressing something the OP said. Too bad if you don't like it.

Aemmyjah:


Macroevolution refers to evolutionary change that occurs at or above the species level. It involves the formation of new species, the diversification of lineages over long periods of time, and the emergence of novel traits or characteristics. It encompasses significant evolutionary events such as speciation, extinction, and adaptive radiations.

Charles Darwin, in his book "On the Origin of Species," defined evolution as "descent with modification," describing how species arise from a common ancestor and gradually change over time through the process of natural selection. He wrote, "Owing to this struggle for life, any variation, however slight and from whatever cause proceeding, if it be in any degree profitable to an individual of any species, in its infinitely complex relations to other organic beings and to external nature, will tend to the preservation of that individual, and will generally be inherited by its offspring."


Ernst Mayr, defined evolution as "the change in frequency of genes in a population over time." He explained that evolution is driven by mechanisms such as natural selection, genetic drift, nd mutation, resulting in changes at both the genetic and phenotypic levels.

With this definition, name the scientists that don't agree with Evolution, also what part of science does not agree with Evolution

Maynman:

Jargons.

Where did Evolution say such,mind sharing whee you got it.

name the scientist that don't agree with Evolution, also what part of science does not agree with Evolution

I will name a very well respected one if you answer my question

All scientists today accept the theory of evolution. Yes or No?

Maynman:

With this definition, name the scientists that don't agree with Evolution, also what part of science does not agree with Evolution

I am ready na
Answer my simple Yes/No question first na

We all accept that our common ancestors was a man and a woman and that is logical and scientific

Who do atheists adopt as their ancestor? See the image below

Aemmyjah:

I am ready na
Answer my simple Yes/No question first na

You made a claim, defend it, I asked you first.

With this definition, name the scientists that don't agree with Evolution, also what part of science does not agree with Evolution

budaatum:


Because you have not done the research to ask and knock and seek so you may may know, it's likely hard for you to consider that others might have done the research so they may know. And you expect the research they may have done to be given to you instead of you doing your own research.

Believers accept made up ideas without proof or facts. Good thing is you are agnostic, which means you will ask and knock and seek until you do know, or you'd be lazy and just believe.

Did you observe his views? They are not honest. He results in insults because he has no explanations for the questions being asked. He could not provide an explanation of the origin of human existence, nor did he provide explanations on how the creator of the universe is not a mystery. He would have just said he didn't know instead of trying to defend his dishonest stand.
 
Personally, I do not subscribe to believing in something just because we are told, without making an effort to find out if it is true or not. I do not claim I know it all, nor can I prove the mysteries in the world for now.

Maynman:

You made a claim, defend it, I asked you first.

With this definition, name the scientists that don't agree with Evolution, also what part of science does not agree with Evolution

I have defined evolution and cited those that quoted it
If you are really interested in me just mentioning one scientist who does not agree with Evolution and what part, I will gladly mention... I will even add his interview join am but answer me first

gisevak:


Did you observe his views? They are not honest. He results in insults because he has no explanations for the questions being asked. He could not provide an explanation of the origin of human existence, nor did he provide explanations on how the creator of the universe is not a mystery. He would have just said he didn't know instead of trying to defend his dishonest stand.
 
Personally, I do not subscribe to believing in something just because we are told, without making an effort to find out if it is true or not. I do not claim I know it all, nor can I prove the mysteries in the world for now.

We have not seen anything evolved
We have no seen anything created

Life either evolved or was created
Why not do your research sir?

Aemmyjah:


O
I have defined evolution iand cited those that quoted it
If you are really interested in me just mentioning one scientist who does not agree with Evolution and what part, I will gladly mention... I will even add his interview join am but answer me first

Evolution has his own definition, I didn't see non living mater in your citation you quoted, you add that one abi


With this definition, name the scientists that don't agree with Evolution, also what part of science does not agree with Evolution

Maynman:

Evolution has his own definition, I didn't see non living mater in your citation you quoted, you add that one abi


With this definition, name the scientists that don't agree with Evolution, also what part of science does not agree with Evolution

Define evolution then and explain what it says about the origin of life and diversity of living forms

Answer my question first if you want me to answer you

Aemmyjah:


Define evolution then and explain what it says about the origin of v and diversity of living forms



Answer my question first if you want me to answer you

If you are really interested like lordreed said, go look it up and learn.

And remember, all lives come from water, maybe that's why most Religions revere water 😉

With this definition, name the scientists that don't agree with Evolution, also what part of science does not agree with Evolution.

I was the first to ask you to defend your claim since.

Maynman:

If you are really interested like lordreed said, go look it up and learn.

And remember, all lives come from water, maybe that's why most Religions revere water 😉

With this definition, name the scientists that don't agree with Evolution, also what part of science does not agree with Evolution.

I was the first to ask you to defend your claim since.

If you cannot answer my yes/no question then. It means you are are not sincere with your question

There are several thousands of them
The name I wanted to mention is still very much alive today and a lump in the throat for all evolutionists... He wrote a book and they set out to challenge it 🤣🤣🤣

You're not interested in knowing who
Then we call it a day

Aemmyjah:


If you cannot answer my yes/no question then. It means you are are not sincere with your question

There are several thousands of them
The name I wanted to mention is still very much alive today and a lump in the throat for all evolutionists... He wrote a book and they set out to challenge it w 🤣🤣🤣

You're not interested in knowing who
Then we call it a day

With this definition, name the scientists that don't agree with Evolution, also what part of science does not agree with Evolution.

I was on my own when you quoted me, boy bye 😂